The joint venture between Cambodian Angkor Airlines with 51% of contribution of capital and Vietnam Airlines 49% of contribution of capital is just theater.
Theoretically, in order to achieve the profit and loss for an airline, there are three main characteristics of the route for an airlines business:
1) short haul (<500km) 2) medium-haul (> 500km and <2500 km) 3) long haul (> 2500km)
To 1) If one Airline flies only in the catagory 1), i.e. this makes only less profit. Why?. because: - More Fuel Consumption - Maintenance cost is so high because of more landing and launching - Personnel costs so high - a Aircraft always flies under flight conditions - X-Factor .....
To 2) If one Airline flies in the catagory 2), i.e. this makes always medium profit. Why?. because: - Fuel consumption is optimal - Maintenance cost is optimal for landing and launching - Personnel costs optimally - a aircraft always flies in the flight conditions - X-Factor .....
3) If a FG in the Katagory 3) flies, i.e. FG makes this gain or profit max If one Airline flies in the catagory 3), i.e. this makes always gain profit. Why?. because: - Low fuel consumption due to very long-term stays in the flight conduction in 11 or 12 km - Maintenance cost is very low because of rarely landing and launching - Personnel costs low - a Aircraft flies always in the best flying conditions - X-Factor .....
When I look at the joint-venture between Vietnam Airlines and Cambodian Angkor Airlines, may simply speak the final result: 1) Cambodian Angkor Airlines service for taxi Airlines or HUB-Airlines for Vietnam Airlines and flies always in negative profitability. 2) Vietname Airlines has always profit by 2) and 3)
Conclusion - Cambodian Angkor Airlines servers only for their national priority and make minus business. - Vietnam Airlines servers for their national priority and makes pluss business.
You also do evil on khmers wait to die!
ReplyDeleteLet me say?
ReplyDeleteThe joint venture between Cambodian Angkor Airlines with 51% of contribution of capital and Vietnam Airlines 49% of contribution of capital is just theater.
Theoretically, in order to achieve the profit and loss for an airline, there are three main characteristics of the route for an airlines business:
1) short haul (<500km)
2) medium-haul (> 500km and <2500 km)
3) long haul (> 2500km)
To 1)
If one Airline flies only in the catagory 1), i.e. this makes only less profit.
Why?. because:
- More Fuel Consumption
- Maintenance cost is so high because of more landing and launching
- Personnel costs so high
- a Aircraft always flies under flight conditions
- X-Factor .....
To 2)
If one Airline flies in the catagory 2), i.e. this makes always medium profit.
Why?. because:
- Fuel consumption is optimal
- Maintenance cost is optimal for landing and launching
- Personnel costs optimally
- a aircraft always flies in the flight conditions
- X-Factor .....
3)
If a FG in the Katagory 3) flies, i.e. FG makes this gain or profit max
If one Airline flies in the catagory 3), i.e. this makes always gain profit.
Why?. because:
- Low fuel consumption due to very long-term stays in the flight conduction in 11 or 12 km
- Maintenance cost is very low because of rarely landing and launching
- Personnel costs low
- a Aircraft flies always in the best flying conditions
- X-Factor .....
When I look at the joint-venture between Vietnam Airlines and Cambodian Angkor Airlines, may simply speak the final result:
1) Cambodian Angkor Airlines service for taxi Airlines or HUB-Airlines for Vietnam Airlines and flies always in negative profitability.
2) Vietname Airlines has always profit by 2) and 3)
Conclusion
- Cambodian Angkor Airlines servers only for their national priority and make minus business.
- Vietnam Airlines servers for their national priority and makes pluss business.
Question?
How is the Joint-Venture contract?