Sunday, June 01, 2008

Hun Sen eyes extension of long-running rule in Cambodia with opposition divided

Sunday, June 1, 2008
The Associated Press

PHNOM PENH, Cambodia: Although 11 parties are geared to fight it out in Cambodia's upcoming national elections, the contest is all but certain to be a one-horse race.

No one seems to have any doubt that Prime Minister Hun Sen, Asia's longest-serving head of government, will retain his stranglehold over the country's politics. Least of all himself.

"I wish to state it very clearly this way: No one can defeat Hun Sen. Only Hun Sen alone can defeat Hun Sen," he said in a speech earlier this year.

Hun Sen's Cambodian People's Party began almost three decades ago as a communist party that headed a single-party state. But as Cambodia changed into a multiparty democracy, so did the party evolve, and proved itself the master of the field.

Today Hun Sen — once a member of the ultra-leftist Khmer Rouge — is crowing that he will bring the country boundless riches thanks to offshore oil discovered by an ultra-capitalist American oil company, Chevron.

In an hour-long speech at a recent development conference, he unequivocally told the audience he'll remain in power long enough to manage the expected windfall from the black gold, sometime in the next decade.

He spoke as if he had already won a new five-year term in office, though balloting won't be held until July 27. More than 8 million out of Cambodia's 14 million people are eligible to vote, according the elections committee.

An oil bonanza would further bolster Hun Sen's already unchallenged stature at the expense of the country's democratic freedoms, analysts say.

Once oil production starts, Hun Sen will find it easier to ignore the pressures to liberalize from foreign aid donors — on which the country is now still heavily reliant — and will instead curb freedom of expression, assembly and the press, said Lao Mong Hay, a senior researcher at the Hong Kong-based Asian Human Rights Commission.

Elections have become a "veneer of democracy," he said, adding that Hun Sen's expected victory would further empower "the present oligarchy composed of people in power and tycoons."

Through guile and threat, Hun Sen has run Cambodia since 1985, when he became prime minister of a Vietnamese-installed communist government.

A peasant's son, he has intimidated, outsmarted and co-opted his rivals, including those who have spent decades being versed in Western education and democracy.

For years, Cambodia was wracked by civil war between the government and the Khmer Rouge guerrillas, whose 1975-79 "killing fields" regime left some 1.7 million Cambodians dead.

A U.N.-sponsored peace process led to 1993 elections that Hun Sen's party lost — but he managed to muscle his way into the government anyway as co-prime minister.

Less than four years later, he ousted his coalition partner when their rivalry turned violent and his forces emerged victorious after a few days of bloody fighting in and around the capital. His party easily won elections in 1998 over a divided opposition and hasn't lost a poll since. It now holds 73 of the 123 seats in the lower house of parliament.

Hun Sen has also presided over the fast growth of the economy, which remains small by international standards.

Having run the country for three decades, his party has built a firm grass-roots apparatus and can draw on financial wealth unmatched by its opponents. Supporters include some of the country's wealthiest tycoons, who regularly dole out cash to finance rural projects such as schools and roads, often named after Hun Sen.

The party has just three credible rivals, one named after and led by opposition leader Sam Rainsy.

The two other main parties are lead by Kem Sokha, a former human rights activist, and Prince Norodom Ranariddh, whose former party booted him out for alleged incompetence — in part because of some political shenanigans orchestrated by Hun Sen's side.

But because the three parties lack a united strategy and instead pursue their own separate agendas for votes, they are unlikely to loosen the grip of Hun Sen's party, said Kuol Panha, director of Comfrel, an independent Cambodian election monitoring group.

"The imbalance will weigh heavier toward the ruling party. It can prevail at whim with its great strength due to the divided voices among the non-ruling parties," he said.

He said Cambodia's electoral environment is still far from free and fair, with the ruling party enjoying unfettered access to state resources and the tightly controlled broadcast media.

During the past few months, TV and radio stations have flooded the airwaves with coverage of Hun Sen and party colleagues inaugurating rural roads, schools and Buddhist pagodas — financed by cronies — and welcoming deserters from the Sam Rainsy Party.

Sam Rainsy acknowledges that Hun Sen's advantage of controlling the levers of state power make it "very difficult" for opposition parties.

"There's no strong kid on the block," to challenge Hun Sen's grip, said Chea Vannath, an independent analyst and former director of the Center for Social Development, a nonprofit social study group.

"I'm sure the ruling party will stay in power for quite awhile - with or without the oil money," she said.

8 comments:

  1. Anonymous11:54 AM

    What is an idiot (Associated Press)? PM is not the longest-serving head in Asia, not even SE Asia. Lee Kwan Yue have ruled Singapore a lot longer.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous12:14 PM

    Yep, ah khmer yuon will be disappointed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous12:54 PM

    Lop soth! Pourk Ah Khour Kbal Chhke. Ah thorrkkkk!!! :p tongue out! Ah Eng min tov tor Va with AP tov yeee ah nih!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous9:33 PM

    Hn Xen rules Cambodia not by free and fair election; everyone knows that he was installed in power by Yuons. If we can kick the millions of Yuons out of Cambodia, Hun Xen will automatically lose.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous10:00 PM

    "I wish to state it very clearly this way: No one can defeat Hun Sen. Only Hun Sen alone can defeat Hun Sen,"

    I think you mean:

    "I wish to state it very clearly this way: No one can defeat Hun Sen when it comes to stupidity. Only Hun Sen alone can defeat Hun Sen,"

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous10:06 PM

    It's too bad that Hun have lost an eye, he should have lost his mouth.
    That would be a relief to everybody's ears.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous10:19 PM

    Hun Sen, quoted himself " no one can defeat hun sen, only hun sen himself "

    does this mean, hun sen himself gonna kill himself. Like the term used " play with the sword, kill by the sword, because its double eged " ?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous1:28 AM

    Sure but no one killing themselves for nothing though.

    At any rate, it's true that those who live by the sword will died by the sword, and everyone knows this. I mean if you are involve in gangs soon or later it will catch up with you. Therefore, no one is stupid enough to join gangs as accused by Ah desperate Spam Rainxy.

    ReplyDelete