Sunday, April 29, 2007

Khmer Rouge trials a step closer

Saturday, 28 April 2007
By Guy De Launey
BBC News, Pnomh Penh


Trials for the former leaders of the Khmer Rouge have moved a step closer.

Cambodia's Bar Association has dropped a demand that foreign lawyers taking part in the process should pay thousands of dollars in fees.

It was the main sticking point which had prevented local and UN-appointed legal officials agreeing on the ground rules for the trials.

After almost a year of wrangling, the way is nearly clear for the special courts to start work in earnest.

Divisions exposed

More than a million people died under Khmer Rouge rule in Cambodia in the 1970s.

The bar association will now ask for a US$500 (£250) payment from each foreign lawyer hoping to represent clients and the ground rules for the trials may finally be approved.

The international judges had refused to move forward unless the bar association backed down.

They said the fees might deprive defendants or witnesses of the counsel of their choice - and leave the whole process vulnerable to legal challenges.

The international side may have achieved their goal - but the argument exposed the extent of the divisions between local and UN-appointed staff at the courts.

As the row rumbled on, the two sides exchanged strong words in press releases from the courts' public affairs office.

The future of the trials may depend on whether those relationships can be repaired.

The next step is to call a meeting to approve the ground rules. But agreement cannot be taken for granted. A similar meeting last year ended in disarray.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Not Guilty! Mua hahahahaha!!! ....

Anonymous said...

Mothefucking jews are too greedy to pay a few thousand dollars of fees. Damn you - you make that money in a few hours. May the second holocaust will punish you all for crimes against Kmae Krahorm !

Long Live Angka !
Long Live Second Coming of Democratic Kampuchea!

Our Father Pol Pot will bless our new fight ! ! !

Anonymous said...

Okay, but this time can we stick
to the standard calendar year. I
don't think I can hack year "Zero"
twice.