Sok Khemara, VOA Khmer Washington
31 August 2007
An appeal by Cambodia's notorious torture chief is the most public test of a complicated chamber in the Khmer Rouge tribunal. But it likely won't be the only one, a legal expert said Thursday.
The request by Kaing Khek Iev, alias Duch, to be released ahead of an impending trial, is a special case and the pre-trial chamber decisions surrounding it should be open to the public, shedding light on the tribunal chamber, said Hisham Mousar, a legal expert for the rights group Adhoc and a close observer of the tribunal.
The rules say pre-trial chamber hearings are to be held behind closed doors, but in a case like Duch's, there are exceptions, he said.
Many people know he was in charge of the Tuol Sleng torture center, said Mousar, who was a guest Thursday on "Hello VOA."
As many as 16,000 people died at the torture center, their bodies dumped in mass graves on the outskirts of Phnom Penh.
But Duch's appeal is just one case the pre-trial chamber will have to review, as trials of top Khmer Rouge leaders materialize.
The pre-trial chamber is used when investigators and prosecutors have conflict over whether a case should be tried. Victims and lawyers complaints over the outcome of a case go through this chamber, as well. The Khmer Rouge tribunal has no appeals chamber.
The pre-trial chamber of the special tribunal courts is tasked with solving disputes from defendants, victims and other judges. Five jurists—three Cambodian and two international—must come up with a "super majority" of 4 to 1 votes to pass any decision.
If a decision does not reach a super-majority, a case must move forward.
The pre-trial could face other challenges.
Ieng Sary, a top leader of the regime who was granted amnesty by former king Norodom Sihanouk, has long been thought a candidate for the tribunal.
The law stipulates clearly that jurists can review his case, Mousar said.
During the Khmer Rouge era, many instances occurred that could be used to try him, he said.
Mousar said a recent row over whether Sihanouk should lose his immunity in trial proceedings was moot; the constitution prohibits it.
The request by Kaing Khek Iev, alias Duch, to be released ahead of an impending trial, is a special case and the pre-trial chamber decisions surrounding it should be open to the public, shedding light on the tribunal chamber, said Hisham Mousar, a legal expert for the rights group Adhoc and a close observer of the tribunal.
The rules say pre-trial chamber hearings are to be held behind closed doors, but in a case like Duch's, there are exceptions, he said.
Many people know he was in charge of the Tuol Sleng torture center, said Mousar, who was a guest Thursday on "Hello VOA."
As many as 16,000 people died at the torture center, their bodies dumped in mass graves on the outskirts of Phnom Penh.
But Duch's appeal is just one case the pre-trial chamber will have to review, as trials of top Khmer Rouge leaders materialize.
The pre-trial chamber is used when investigators and prosecutors have conflict over whether a case should be tried. Victims and lawyers complaints over the outcome of a case go through this chamber, as well. The Khmer Rouge tribunal has no appeals chamber.
The pre-trial chamber of the special tribunal courts is tasked with solving disputes from defendants, victims and other judges. Five jurists—three Cambodian and two international—must come up with a "super majority" of 4 to 1 votes to pass any decision.
If a decision does not reach a super-majority, a case must move forward.
The pre-trial could face other challenges.
Ieng Sary, a top leader of the regime who was granted amnesty by former king Norodom Sihanouk, has long been thought a candidate for the tribunal.
The law stipulates clearly that jurists can review his case, Mousar said.
During the Khmer Rouge era, many instances occurred that could be used to try him, he said.
Mousar said a recent row over whether Sihanouk should lose his immunity in trial proceedings was moot; the constitution prohibits it.
4 comments:
If khmer rouge trial requires more witness,may be Mr keath chhon who has held positions in ministry for the whole three regime from 1960's until now can be on witness stand.Also the very smart Hor nam hong should be called for witness as well.We should leave the king father alone,at leat we all know for sure he had put tremendous effort for Cambodia prior to 1970.
Kiet Chhon was a personal'advisor of Pol Pot. So how Pol Pot can become a wild animal it was may be impact by his advisor. Look at Heng Sarim 'advisor is a drug trafficking. There Pol pot advisor must be from someone much cleaver than him. Please do not forget that kiet Chhon'wife is a vietnamese. Vietcong has instructed Hun Sen to invite Kiet Chhon to come back and work for Hun sen. He left Pol Pot on the plane with Sihanouk to Beijing. But Vietnam has instructed Hun Sen to invite Kiet Chhon Back so we know who is Kiet Chhon?
Duch - the head of Toul Sleng Prison - was jailed. Why Hor Nam Hong the key leader of Boeung Trabek Prison be free? Because Nam Hong is smart?
Before King Father said if there would be Khmer Rouge trial, he would ask Ho Nam Hong about the reason why he killed a lot of King's relatives in Boeung Trabek Prison.
Now why somebody wants to sue King Father? He's the victim. I think this is Ho Nam Hong's or Keat Chhun's trick.
Small people go to jail but the big guys go free. If I were Cambodian I would keep 60M USD to help the unfortunate people. Because this KRT is a joke. Those superpower countries made the genocide especially China and the US. These tow should pay to build up Cambodia and help her to have a real border. But who am I to say this if many Cambodian people chose to live as a cave man?
Post a Comment