Will Sihanouk Appear at Khmer Rouge Trials?

By Marwaan Macan-Markar

Sep 10, 2007 (IPS)

 Sihanouk locked in embrace with Vietnam's war hero Vo Nguyen Giap.

School of Vice: The historic step taken by Sihanouk to throw in his lot with Cambodian communists led by Pol Pot following the US backed Lon Nol-Sirik Matak coup against him in March 1970 was hardly unexpected in light of prior well-documented clandestine or de facto political and material support generously extended to the North Vietnamese communists by him. Despite his public condemnation of the leaders of the 18th March coup, Sihanouk must have known and anticipated their revolt against him was a strong possibility given his political treachery and the secrecy of his dealings with the North Vietnamese, including approving their use of much of the eastern parts of the country as sanctuaries and vital military supply routes i.e. Ho Chi Minh Trail which then instigated the US's B52 carpet bombing of a country that had hitherto no real quarrel with the Americans. In Henry Kissinger's words, to fight the North Vietnamese communists and defend freedom, it was necessary to subordinate the parts to the whole. More crucially for Sihanouk, the conclusion of the Indochina war in 1975 had not worked out in the manner he would have desired or sought, with the Pol Pot leadership decisively breaking away from the clutches of Hanoi, unbeknown to Sihanouk and even before its final decisive victory on 17th April 1975 - a historic event date deliberately carved up to mark Democratic Kampuchea's independence from Sihanouk's North Vietnamese ‘allies’ who entered Saigon a couple of weeks later. Sihanouk had convinced himself of the inevitability of Communist Vietnamese victory over the Indochina War hence the propensity to risk his stake with the Red camp. However, he had [and has] far too willingly allowed himself - and along with it, his small country - to be used and exploited in pursuit of an end game that neither him nor his compatriots had any realistic chance of determining beside the obligatory sacrifices demanded of his nation in unimaginable human horror and misery as well as in national and territorial integrity. And that, in short, is Norodom Sihanouk's true legacy.

តាំងពីណាមក ខ្ញុំធ្លាប់បានដឹងខ្លះថាសម្ដេច

សីហនុមានទេពកោសល្យខាងផ្នែកនយោ

បាយ ទាំងក្នុងនិងក្រៅប្រទេស ស្ទើរតែគ្មាន

អ្នកដឹកនាំខ្មែរណាប្រដូចបាន ។

ចំវេលាល្អ គួរតែព្រះអង្គប្រមូលសេចក្តីក្លា

ហានយាងចូលសាលាក្ដីខ្មែរក្រហម ដើម្បី

ប្រទានសក្ខីកម្ម តើ​នរណាជាឃាតករពិត

ប្រាកដសម្លាប់ខ្មែរជិត២លាននាក់។

Anonymous 6:23 PM

Dear poster 6:23 PM

It's a myth and artificially constructed aura built to elevate every known autocrat to the status of ruler-genius. Even the Royal fortune-tellers had had to come up with something unique and memorable to give credence and magic to a born-to-rule 'god-king' who is otherwise far more prone to human errors and excesses than the rest of his subjects precisely because of the elevated status and endless privileges accorded to him.

The current god-king is Hun Sen, albeit a ruler who is ultimately bound to the wishes of external/foreign powers, mostly those of Vietnam. Every day, he and his monopolised media outlets drum up the myth of this infallible god-king who is just, rational and sovereign, and this everyday repetition turns the myth and lies into Truth in the minds of millions. That's why it is possible for a clique of manipulative, unrepresentative autocrats to turn white into black and vice versa because the thought process of the masses are conditioned to work in a certain way which sets social events and their causality along predetermined lines so that a given explanation for, say the deaths of "illegal loggers" or Diamond Bridge tragedy would be, in the vast majority of cases, met with acceptance and without qualifications.

This is the unlearned lesson of living in a closed society without transparent, democratic institutions, and the main cause of Cambodia's ills.  Someday, people will be asking the same questions of Hun Sen as we are doing with Sihanouk now.   

School of Vice

.......................................................

Cambodia’s colourful former king Norodom Sihanouk has emerged as the central figure in the latest controversy to plague the special tribunal established to prosecute the surviving members of the genocidal Khmer Rouge regime.

And the 85-year-old royal, who has carved a name for himself as a man who relishes the spotlight, has waded into the dispute in his own inimitable way. He chose to reveal his thoughts on the question that has gripped Phnom Penh: whether Sihanouk should or should not be called to appear before the United Nations-backed war crimes trial.

On Aug. 30 he took his first thrust by issuing an unusual invitation to the U.N. officials associated with the tribunal, including the international spokesman for the tribunal, Peter Foster, to visit the palace for a conversation on ‘’the affairs of the Khmer Rouge and Sihanouk.’’ The means of communicating the invitation was typical Sihanouk: it was posted on the personal web site that he maintains. The rendezvous in the royal court was set for Sep. 8 and expected to last for three hours, from 9 a.m. till 12 noon.

Sihanouk - who stepped down as the monarch in October 2004 in favour of his son, Norodom Sihamoni - took the liberty on that web posting to reveal how he views the Extraordinary Chambers in the Court of Cambodia (ECCC), as the tribunal is officially called. ‘’After this (meeting) it will no longer be necessary for me to present myself before the U.N.’s ECCC,’’ Sihanouk stated in his invitation. And if the U.N. officials failed to show up, he noted that he ‘’will not accept to see, speak or correspond with the U.N.’s ECCC.’’

As was expected, the U.N. officials did not participate in this royal conversation on the tribunal. ‘’I was not authorised to participate in this meeting, nor were other U.N. officials,’’ Foster said during an interview from Phnom Penh. ‘’We responded by saying that only the judges involved in the trial will be able to determine who will be a witness. The judges will do so based on procedural rules.’’

But like a character from a Shakespearian drama, Sihanouk continued to protest too much. In standing up for his cause, the former monarch ‘’complained that the ECCC wanted him to ‘take an oath to tell the truth, nothing but the truth on the subject of arch criminals’,’’ reported the ‘Phnom Penh Post’ English-language newspaper last Friday. ‘’I do not have to swear an oath after (the one I swore) with Buddha, to debase myself to take an oath in front of the ECCC.’’

Those familiar with Sihanouk’s penchant for grand gestures and a life peppered with drama are hardly surprised by this latest offering. Following his being crowned the monarch of his South-east Asian nation in 1941, at the tender age of 18 years, he has abdicated twice, served as king twice, held the post of prime minister twice and served as president once. His record in the world of the arts and entertainment has been as varied, dabbling as a film-maker, song writer, painter, saxophonist and a crooner of ballads.

What is equally well-known is the link Sihanouk maintained with the Khmer Rouge, responsible for an orgy of death during 1975 to 1979 when it took control of Cambodia after a prolonged battle with a pro-American puppet regime in Phnom Penh. The extreme Maoist group killed close to 1.7 million Cambodians, nearly a quarter of the country’s population at the time. The victims were executed, died from forced labour or starvation as the Khmer Rouge tried to turn the country into an agrarian utopia.

Sihanouk himself lost family members to the Khmer Rouge and was kept under house arrest by the genocidal regime between 1976 till 1979. Yet against those details are the roles he played in the four years up to the Khmer Rouge triumph in 1975 - urging the Cambodian people to join the Khmer Rouge, in addition to serving as the head of state for the Khmer Rouge in the first year it held power. And when the Khmer Rouge was driven out of power by the invading Vietnamese troops, Sihanouk fled to the forests with the extreme Maoists and took on a new role as the global defender of the Khmer Rouge regime in exile.

It is this phase of Sihanouk’s life that has been brought into focus and raised the possibility of him going before the ECCC. The latter officially began work in July this year after long delays and hurdles placed in its way, including regular challenges posed by the Cambodian government of Prime Minister Hun Sen.

The push to get Sihanouk appear before the ECCC was triggered by a relatively unknown non-governmental organisation (NGO) based in the United States, the Cambodian Action Committee for Justice and Equity (CACJE). In late August, it made a request to authorities in Phnom Penh to strip Sihanouk of his immunity as a former monarch in order to be called before the tribunal.

The Hun Sen administration rose to Sihanouk’s defence by delivering a harsh rebuke. The premier called the request to strip Sihanouk ‘’very barbaric’’ and one that ‘’could have the result of jeopardising the peace and unity’’ of the country.

But human rights groups questioned the motives of the government, arguing that war-ravaged Cambodia’s quest to create a society governed by the rules of law and justice will be undermined if the former monarch is placed above the law and insulated from the ECCC. ‘’This could set a bad precedence, since the ECCC is expected to set new and high standards of justice for Cambodia,’’ says Lao Mong Hay, senior researcher on Cambodia at the Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC), a regional rights lobby.

‘’The request does not mean he has to face trial as a defendant or as an accused, but it is to remove an unconstitutional clause in the constitution and make the former king available if the judges need him to appear,’’ Lao explained during an interview from Hong Kong, where AHRC is based. ‘’This is very important for the trial, since many Cambodians who lost family want to know about the past; how and why the Khmer Rouge pursued their murderous policies.’’

‘’It is a chance for the former king to clear his name if he did nothing wrong,’’ adds Lao. ‘’And he has been on the record in the past saying that he would be willing to face the trial like the former Khmer Rouge leaders.’’