Wednesday, February 08, 2012

Time Has Past for Khmer Rouge to Deny Facts: Author

Elizabeth Becker, a former foreign correspondent for the Washington Post and New York Times, in Cambodia.

Tuesday, 07 February 2012
Men Kimseng, VOA Khmer | Washington, DC
“She is a court witness, and I also want to ask her about what she knows, but we were also surprised to hear she would testify..."
Elizabeth Becker, a former foreign correspondent for the Washington Post and New York Times, told VOA Khmer that the time has past for former Khmer Rouge leaders to deny historical facts with a trial now under way.

Becker, whose seminal work about the Khmer Rouge, “When the War Was Over,” was published in 1986, said in an interview that no Khmer Rouge leader ever stood up to deny any facts in her reporting.

“What do they have to say for themselves?” she said in a recent interview. “Were they sitting in a closet folding their hands? No. Why have we not heard or read anything from any of them saying, ‘This is what happened.’ And why did they not protest what was written about them before?


None of the three Khmer Rouge leaders now on trial, Nuon Chea, Khieu Samphan or Ieng Sary, has taken any responsibility for the atrocities of the Khmer Rouge, despite the 1.7 million deaths that occurred in just four years of their leadership.

Becker’s book relies in part on her early reporting on the Khmer Rouge and interviews with its leaders, including Pol Pot and Ieng Sary, in 1978, before the fall of the regime. Becker was among a handful of journalists invited to Phnom Penh by the regime’s leaders.

Becker said Ieng Sary, the foreign minister, deflected questions from journalists on alleged human rights abuses by the regime, as he and other cadre sought to show them an idealized version of their polices.

They took us to … a model little village, and they had their highest-ranking cadre dressed as if they were peasants, so everything would be prepared in advance,” she said. “So the only people we saw were the cadres. I didn’t know how exactly they did it, but it was quite clear if you have ever been to a model or anything... Everything was perfect so you knew it was not true.

Documentation from her trip will be used as evidence at the UN-backed tribunal, which is trying three leaders for atrocity crimes, including Ieng Sary. Becker said she is willing to testify before the court when she travels to Cambodia to inaugurate an exhibit of photographs and recordings from that period later this month.

Ang Udom, a defense attorney for Ieng Sary, said he would be preparing questions for her, but he admitted he had not yet read her book.

“Her book is so thick, and I still haven’t had time to read it,” he said. “She is a court witness, and I also want to ask her about what she knows, but we were also surprised to hear she would testify, because her name was not on an earlier list.”

Tribunal spokesman Huy Vannak would not confirm whether Becker will testify at the court, but he said outside experts like her are crucial to proceedings.

“We have heard victims talking about their stories, and the accused have also told stories in their defense,” he said. “Therefore the court needs third parties who are experts to shed more light on the case.”

Research and documentation of the Khmer Rouge have become a central part of the court’s proceedings. On Monday, Chhang Youk, the director of the Documentation Center of Cambodia, appeared before the tribunal Monday to defend the authenticity of hundreds of thousands of documents submitted to the court.

Under questioning from the defense team of Nuon Chea, he told the court that Vietnamese forces had not been the ones to collect the documents in the period after the regime fell, but that they had possession of many of them.

Some 1 million documents were ultimately gathered by the center over more than 15 years, mainly from Khmer Rouge prison facilities, its interior ministry, scholars, national archives and individuals.

Defense lawyer Son Arun’s line of questioning revolved around the possibility of forgery by the Vietnamese forces who took power after the ouster of the Khmer Rouge.

“How can you write a million documents in 10 years?” Chhang Youk said in response.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hey! Whittie..White, you must leave Cambodia alone, either help or leave.

Khmer Man
Former KR

Anonymous said...

AND YOU NEED TO LEAVE U.S TOO

Anonymous said...

Come KI she meant to say:

"The time has 'passed' for former Khmer Rouge leaders to deny historical facts with a trial now under way."

But not:

"The time has 'past' for former Khmer Rouge leaders to deny historical facts with a trial now under way."

Anonymous said...

I heard Khmer Rouge soldiers said
when I was under Khmer Rouge regime in 1976 with my own ears,"we will
keep 1.5 million pure Khmer Rouge,
all the rest we will kill them".

I ignored what they said.Time was
passed,but my memory is still in
my mind.How cruel they were.

What I saw and met those soldiers
were so young,15 to 16 years old.

Anonymous said...

Elizabeth Becker is a very nice woman and a good journalist. We like her. She has been through the Killing Fields where she investigated and interview Pol Pot who was toppled by the secret Viet/Yuon agents and the one of Scottish Journalist had been shot by the secret Viet/Yuon agents (hidden faces among the Khmer Rouges) during the Killing Fields.

Khmer folks and readers, should do the research and find out yourselves and then you know what have been going on there.

Don't think Theary Seng and Youk Chhang have done the homework to research about the situation.

Khmer Yeurng!

Anonymous said...

And when will Henry Kissinger get life in prison for his war crimes affecting many millions of innocent people in various countries, including Cambodia?

And when will George W Bush, Blair & Howard get life in prion for slaughtering over a million innocent Iraqis in their illegal war against Iraq.

And when will Obama the Bomber get life in prison for his illegal war crimes in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya, etc.

Etc., etc.

And when will pigs fly???!!!




There is macabre irony in the US government actually having such a person as "ambassador-at-large for war crimes issues", considering that the US has been one of the worst perpetrators of war crimes around the world, and it still is!

Anything the US government might have to say about war crimes committed by others is pure hypocrisy, until they face up to their own innumerable war crimes, including against Cambodia, and stop their current and future war crimes.



Many powerful interests seek to control the Cambodian War Crimes Tribunal, because they have Cambodian blood on their hands, but they are conveniently omitted from the official story.

The terms of reference for the trials were very specifically limited to 1975-1979, by the UN, although Hun Sen and the Cambodian government wanted a wider time-span.

The UN wanted to protect the other guilty parties who supported Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge crimes, either while they were in power or for decades afterwards - including the US, China, ASEAN countries, Britain, Australia and even the UN itself, all of whom have Cambodian blood on their hands!!!



Obviously, it does not fit the official narrative to give credit, where it is due, to the Vietnamese who drove the genocidal KR from power, responding to a request for help from Cambodians.

Instead, the 'official narrative' only falsely refers to the Vietnamese "invasion", instead of "liberation".

That is the truth.



But to understand the truth you must dig a little deeper than the superficial propaganda of the mainstream narrative.

Anonymous said...

Is Elizabeth Becker pro-Vietnamese?

On February 8, 2012, Elizabeth Becker, a former foreign correspondent for the Washington Post and New York Time revisited Phnom-Penh, Cambodia and gave a lecture at Pannasastra University. She said there had been 30 years of silence on the horrors of the Khmer Rouge Regime and no official acknowledgement that a great crime had been committed. But, with the tribunal, the crime had been acknowledged.

On December 23, 1978, a group of three persons, including two American Journalists, Elizabeth Becker and Richard Dudman, and one British Academic, Malcolm Caldwell were invited to visit Cambodia. Just hours after the interview with Pol Pot, which took place in the French Colonial Head Quarter (La Residence Superieure) in Phnom-Penh, Caldwell was shot to death in the guest house where they all stayed, thus reducing three-person group to two. On 25 December 1978, Vietnam launched a full-scale invasion of Kampuchea (Cambodia).

In Malcolm Caldwell Remembered, Part 5 of the Khmer Rouge Canon 1975-1979,Elizabeth Becker said that Caldwell's death would show that the revolution could not even care for its friends, that it was fraught with chaos, meaning that Vietnam will not allow anyone to survive in Cambodia, be him or her a Cambodian or Foreigner if he or she is not sided with Vietnam’s Indochina Policy. This led to the question why Malcolm Caldwell got killed whereas Elizabeth Becker and Richard Dudman were spared? Was this due to the latter’s two pro-Vietnamese stand?

Malcolm Caldwell was probably slain by someone in the inner party circle opposed to Pol Pot meaning Vietnam’s secret agents, because he might have shown that he was a strong supporter of Pol Pot Regime. Caldwell was an admirer of Pol Pot, because he considered that Pol Pot was the first person to lead the Peasant Revolution. More importantly, Vietnam’s secret agents didn't want their killing fields being revealed to the people in the outside world. If UN knew what was really happening in Cambodia, UN would perhaps send it's peace-keeping forces to oust the Pol Pot's regime. If the UN peace-keeping forces had gone to Cambodia at that time, all the Vietnamese Confederation of Indochina plans could have been derailed. The Vietnamese didn't want their demonic plans to be destroyed by the Western intervention because they have made them since 1930 of Indochinese Communist Party/Federation, by the late Ho Chi Minh. If the UN had started from the West to overthrow the Pol Pot's regime, many of the Vietnamese agents, who secretly had impersonated themselves as the leaders of Khmer Rouge, would have been captured alive for their interrogations.

Based on the above information, All Cambodian Patriots could draw a conclusion whether Elizabeth Becker is a friend of Cambodia or a pro Vietnamese Journalist.

Anonymous said...

Vietnam is invader not liberator! This is absolutely true. If it is liberator, why after removing Pol Pot Regime in 1979, Vietnam occupied Cambodia until 1989 and established a puppet regime under Hanoi's control. Vietnam secrete agents in Cambodia played important role in causing 2millions of cambodians periled.

Vietnam secrete agents working at the inner circle of Pol Pot regime did not harm Elizabeth Becker and Richard Dudman, because they were pro vietnam and blame Pol Pot regime for the killing of 2 millions of Cambodians. Indirectly, they have been helping Vietnam to control Cambodia by installing it's puppets: Hun Sen, Chea Sim and Heng Samrin as suppreme leaders of Cambodia.

In fact, Vietnam is the main culprit that behind the killing field, it should also be held responsible for the life of 2 millions cambodians died during 1975 and 1978.