In light of the HISTORIC (!) start of MOST COMPLEX (sic!) trial hearings beginning on 27 June 2011 and again ANOTHER HISTORIC (!) START of this same MOST COMPLEX (sic!) on 21 Nov. 2011 of Case 002 against the surviving Khmer Rouge senior leaders Nuon Chea, Khieu Samphan, Ieng Sary and Ieng Thirith, KI Media is posting installations of the public document of the Closing Order of Case 002 (or, Indictment). The Closing Order of the Co-Investigating Judges forms the basic document from
which all the parties (co-prosecutors, lead co-lawyers
for all civil parties, defense lawyers) make their
arguments before the Trial Chamber judges (one Cambodian
President, 2 Cambodian Judges, 2 UN judges). Up
until now, the hearings involving these four surviving
senior Khmer Rouge leaders have been in the Pre-Trial
Chamber over issues of pre-trial detention and
jurisdictional issues. Beginning in June November 2011, the Trial Chamber is hearing the substantive (sic!) arguments over the criminal charges (genocide
against Buddhists, genocide against Vietnamese, genocide
against Cham Muslims, crimes against humanity at the 200
prisons, mass crimes in countless killing fields, Eastern Zone
purges, penal code of 1956, etc.) of only the Phase I Movement in April 1975.
Available in Khmer, English and French. Contact the ECCC for a free copy.
CLOSING ORDER (or, INDICTMENT)
of Co-Investigating Judges You Bunleng and Marcel Lemonde
15 September 2010
PART THREE: LEGAL FINDINGS
XIII. CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
A. "CHAPEAU" ELEMENTS
B. UNDERLYING OFFENCES CONSTITUTING CRIMES AGAINST
HUMANITY
Other
Inhumane Acts Through Forced Marriage
1438.
For each of the incidences listed in the
sections "Marriage" and "Factual Findings Crimes", the
Co-Investigating Judges find that the constitutive elements of the crime
against humanity of other inhumane acts through acts of forced marriage have
been established nationwide5273 as well as the worksites 1st January Dam, Tram Kok Cooperatives
and Trapeang Thma Dam, at the Kok Kduoch security centre and in regard to the treatment of the Buddhists.
1439.
With respect to the
actus reus, victims endured serious physical or mental suffering or
injury or a serious attack on human dignity of a degree of gravity comparable
to that of other crimes against humanity. The victims were forced to enter into
conjugal relationships in coercive circumstances.
1440.
As regards the mens
rea, the perpetrators knew of the factual circumstances that established
the gravity of their acts.
1441.
The Co-Investigating Judges find that the
incidences of forced marriage, by their nature or consequences, were part of
the attack against the civilian population; in particular the imposition of
sexual relations aimed at enforced procreation. The perpetrators knew that
there was an attack on the civilian population and that their acts were part of
it.
1442.
The common purpose aimed at or included the
commission of crimes against humanity and other "inhumane acts" by
means of forced marriage. The implementation of the common purpose relating to
forced marriage was facilitated by the imposition of conjugal relations on
victims by the perpetrators of the crimes who were CPK cadres. The
Co-Investigating Judges find that the forced marriages assumed a systematic
character and constituted an integral part of the common project implemented
between April 1975 and 6 January 1976. The widespread character of forced
marriages throughout the country clearly indicates hat they were decided and
coordinated by the highest leadership of the CPK in the common purpose.
Concerning the main modus operandi, witnesses
from different zones report that the representatives of the CPK married people
who had similar profiles. The specificity of this process and the evidence that
it was applied in different locations demonstrates the existence of a common
purpose formulated at the highest level of the CPK regime. Another practice
demonstrating that the marriages took place in the framework of the common
purpose is the fact that multiple marriages were performed at the same time
involving between 20 and 60 couples
1443.
In the majority of cases of forced marriage death
threats were made, violence was used and people were even executed if they
refused to marry. Many witnesses state that they were too afraid to articulate
their objection. Weddings took place devoid of traditional involvement of the
parents. There was no respect of the traditional rituals. In some cases one
party could request authorization to marry a person they determined, but this
does not detract from the element of coercion or force placed on the person so
identified. Some witnesses state that they were forced to consummate their
union, which corroborates the existence of a common purpose established by the
senior leaders of the CPK that marriages were necessary to increase the
population.
No comments:
Post a Comment