In light of the HISTORIC (!) start of MOST COMPLEX (sic!) trial hearings beginning on 27 June 2011 and again ANOTHER HISTORIC (!) START of this same MOST COMPLEX (sic!) on 21 Nov. 2011 of Case 002 against the surviving Khmer Rouge senior leaders Nuon Chea, Khieu Samphan, Ieng Sary and Ieng Thirith, KI Media is posting installations of the public document of the Closing Order of Case 002 (or, Indictment). The Closing Order of the Co-Investigating Judges forms the basic document from
which all the parties (co-prosecutors, lead co-lawyers
for all civil parties, defense lawyers) make their
arguments before the Trial Chamber judges (one Cambodian
President, 2 Cambodian Judges, 2 UN judges). Up
until now, the hearings involving these four surviving
senior Khmer Rouge leaders have been in the Pre-Trial
Chamber over issues of pre-trial detention and
jurisdictional issues. Beginning in June November 2011, the Trial Chamber is hearing the substantive (sic!) arguments over the criminal charges (genocide
against Buddhists, genocide against Vietnamese, genocide
against Cham Muslims, crimes against humanity at the 200
prisons, mass crimes in countless killing fields, Eastern Zone
purges, penal code of 1956, etc.) of only the Phase I Movement in April 1975.
Available in Khmer, English and French. Contact the ECCC for a free copy.
CLOSING ORDER (or, INDICTMENT)
of Co-Investigating Judges You Bunleng and Marcel Lemonde
15 September 2010
PART THREE: LEGAL FINDINGS
I.
GRAVE BREACHES OF THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS 1949
A. "CHAPEAU"ELEMENTS
Awareness of
the Perpetrator
1479.
The perpetrators of the crimes were aware at all
times of both the existence of the international armed conflict5280
as well as the factual circumstances establishing the protected status of the
victims.5281
1480.
At the S-21 security
centre the Vietnamese prisoners had generally been arrested in or near
main conflict zones on the border with Vietnam, at which point they were
transported to S-21 whereupon they would be interrogated on military
intelligence matters related to the armed conflict and for the purpose of
publicly disseminating propaganda in the campaign against Vietnam. Vietnamese
prisoners would be categorised in the records at S-21 as either,
"Vietnamese Soldiers", "Vietnamese Civilians" or as their
perceived status as "Vietnamese Spies".
1481.
At the Au Kanseng
security centre the victims were captured at the Vietnamese border by a
combat Division of the RAK which was engaging in armed hostilities with the
Vietnamese forces in the area. Furthermore, when the Jarai people were captured
they declared themselves to the RAK forces as being both from Vietnam and
civilians.
1482.
Finally, during RAK
incursions into the territory of Vietnam, the perpetrators of attacks on
civilians would have been fully aware that they were in this territory for the
purposes of engaging in military operations against Vietnamese forces further
to the international armed conflict and that the civilians killed would, as
Vietnamese nationals, have been protected persons.
1 comment:
Wow, you changed # 1480 to rescue the Genocide!
Well done.
Do you provide information here or propaganda?
Shame on you. Same same Hun Sen, this is what you do.
Post a Comment