February 24, 2013
By Eang Mengleng and Ben Woods
The Cambodia Daily
The government’s brand-new Airbus A320 jet took off on official state business for the first time on Thursday, when it departed from Phnom Penh International Airport en route to Beijing with King Norodom Sihamoni and Queen Mother Norodom Monineath.
The white aircraft—which bears the words “Kingdom of Cambodia” on the fuselage and features a Cambodian flag on the tail—was purchased late last year for the personal use of government officials and other senior dignitaries, CPP lawmaker Cheam Yeap said.
Though the plane’s inaugural flight took some by surprise, Mr. Yeap emphasized that the Airbus had not been a secret, as its purchase had been announced by State Secretariat for Civil Aviation (SSCA) Secretary of State Mao Havanall during a National Assembly session in November.
“It is the government’s plane and is for use by the King and the government leaders. This is the first time the King has taken a journey using this plane,” Funcinpec secretary-general Nhiek Bun Chhay said.
Mr. Yeap and Mr. Bun Chhay both said they did not know how much the jet had cost, but according to Airbus’ website, a new A320 costs an average of $91.5 million. The 150-seat plane costs roughly $8,000 per hour to operate, in addition to annual maintenance and crew expenses.
This is the first time that Cambodia has owned a plane strictly for use by government officials, said Phay Siphan, spokesman for the Council of Ministers, adding that acquisition of the plane was handled by Council of Ministers Secretary of State Tek Rech Samrath.
Mr. Rech Samrath, who is also the chairman of the national carrier Cambodia Angkor Air, which is a joint venture with Vietnam Airlines, declined to comment. Angkor Air currently has five aircraft in its fleet, two 67-seat ATR 72 turboprops and three 184-seat Airbus A321 jets, the newest of which arrived in late December and early January.
Other government officials, including those in the political opposition and aviation industry, said the unveiling of the government’s personal-use Airbus came as a surprise.
“It’s not involved with us,” said SSCA Undersecretary of State Chea Aun, adding that the government body had merely been responsible for ensuring that the plane arrived safely in the country “a few weeks ago.”
SRP lawmaker Yim Sovann said the opposition was not aware that the state had purchased a plane for use by government officials.
“This is a very new one. Nobody knows that the government bought this plane,” Mr. Sovann claimed.
Khek Norinda, communications manager at Cambodia Airports, which operates the country’s international airports in Phnom Penh, Siem Reap and Sihanoukville, said the plane landed for the first time in Cambodia sometime between January 24 and 26.
7 comments:
Chinese knows that this election coming is not good and so, they told this king to go now before it is too late. The Chinese know that VC behind this CPP gov't and would continue to use Hun Sen to kill his own people and told Hun Sen not to let SR to return home. Hun should be smarter by now, that is, telling VC to leave him and his people alone.
I think the claim that this airbus cost $8000 an hour to operate and is not included the maintenance and crews expenses is over exaggerated and is out of a proportion.If this claim is true It means that,If American Air line is to operate this type of aircraft from California to Boston which will take roughly 8 hours and all 150 seats are filled at $559 round trip per seat average,then you will see what would be the net benefit to AA before maintenance & crews expenses if we look at the math below.$559x150=$83,850 deduct the operation cost of $8,000 phr x 16 hrs=$128,000.Base on this math It show that AA will lose $44,150 per flight.The question is,how this carrier stay in business?? would anyone have this type of business???...
យន្តហោះនេះនឹងធ្លាក់នៅពេលពួកផ្តាច់ការនិិងពួកឈ្លើងជញ្ជក់ឈាមខ្មែរជិះ។
In response to comment made at 3:05 AM, please refer to this link as reference of variable cost of operation of A320. This cost is at $8,350 per hours. Thus, Phnom Penh Post figure is correct. http://www.comluxaviation.com/library/media/other/A320%20BJT%200612.pdf
For your information, the example of American Airline given by commentator 3:05am is incorrect and misleading.
First, the round trip East coast/West coast is merely 11 hours, not 16 hours. In his example, if the airline fills all the passenger seats, it will be profitable. Plus, Airline gets revenue from goods transportation as well.
Second, commentator 3:05am seems to imply that AA is profitable. In factm American Airline has not been profitable. Due to competition in the American, only South West is fairly profitable about US major airline.
In response to 3:43 AM,I used to travel to east coast twice a year,but I am not going to argue with you.Assuming that you are corrected on the 11 hrs round trip from east to west coast,AA will have to spend $91850 plus maintenance and crews cost while It will only gross at only $83,850 if all 150 seat are filled,this still show a -$8,000 plus maintenance and crews cost.And this is per flight.How in the world AA can effort to stay in business.I don't know how you do your math to make a profit out of these numbers.I have been in business for over 20 yrs and I can't really make this sale & expense to be profitable,I must go back to school to learn how to cheat the number I guess to make these numbers to be profitable.
3:43am,
Does it really costs $8,350 to operate A320 in Cambodia?
How about a PhD degree from America, can Cambodia match the way America pay too? I don't think so. Maybe just a fraction of what America pay for a PhD. Probably this is the problems which got reaction from blogger @3:05am and I agree with blogger @3:05am too.
As follow up, American Airline has not been profitable. It filed for Chapter 11 since early last year. It revenue is not exactly $600*150 per trip. It's more complicated than that.
The bottom line is not about how much the cost of operating an A320, it’s about how rich Cambodian government or how reckless the government spends money. After all, every country has official airplane. We should just be happy to seem a nice and reliable airplane bearing Cambodian color.
Post a Comment