Showing posts with label Greed. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Greed. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Senseless Kratie killing reflects a bitter truth

14-yr-old Heng Chantha killed during forced eviction in Kratie (Photo: The Phnom Penh Post)

Wednesday, 23 May 2012
By Mu Sochua
Letter to the Phnom Penh Post

Dear Editor,

The savage killing in Kratie seven days ago of Heng Chantha, a 14-year-old girl, by soldiers and police comes three weeks after the murder of Chut Wutty, Cambodia’s most respected environmentalist.

Her killing comes less than two weeks after Prime Minister Hun Sen ordered an immediate suspension of economic land concessions.

More than two million hectares of Cambodia’s arable land and one million hectares of our national forests and parks are part of these concessions, signed by the hand of the Prime Minister.

The military-style operation in Kratie was aided by a helicopter.

The authorities’ version of the operation was justified by deputy prime minister Sar Kheng as necessary to crack down on an association for a democratic movement and for the arrest of its ringleaders.

The order from the top is clear: aim to kill.

The real reason for this military-style operation was the protection of economic concessions against villagers who had organised to defend their land, which the company had encroached on.

Saturday, October 13, 2007

Hun Sen Said Disliking Supreme Commander Ke Kim Yan for Having Too Much Land

Ke Kim Yan (Bottom right) (Photo: AFP)

01 Oct 07
By Srei Ka
Moneakseka Khmer

Translated from Khmer and Posted online

According to a senior officer of the Cambodian People's Party [CPP], Hun Sen is angry with Ke Kimyan because he sees that Ke Kimyan owns too much land. It is not known whether Ke Kimyan bought the land from the people or he just grabbed it. However, it is a fact that vast tracts of land in the regions controlled by the armed forces have become Ke Kimyan's personal property, such as in Kampong Spoe province. The same officer said that in the Pong Peay area where a Korean company is investing without laying out any capital in the CamKo City project, Ke Kimyan also owns quite a huge tract of land there. And we are not talking about a number of other provinces.

Therefore, because he sees that Ke Kimyan owns so much real estate, which partly affects some development projects and crop plantations of the people, Hun Sen is not very pleased with Ke Kiyan. However, in reality Ke Kimyan's land is not located in industrial zones but is mostly agricultural land for fruit tree growing. As such, he cannot easily sell these plots of land and is therefore obliged to keep them, thus making him look so rich in land everywhere because the land he owns is not very sought-after.

As for the other CPP officials, they are wilier as they seek only to own land in industrial zones, which can be easily traded for great profits that they immediately deposit in banks. Hence, these officials are not seen as owning much land. For instance, Cham Prasith, minister of trade, and Sok An, minister of Council of Ministers Cabinet, apparently do not own hundreds of hectares of land like Ke Kimyan but each plot of land they own can fetch millions of dollars on the market.

This officer said that some CPP army chiefs, police officers, and high-ranking officials make a lot of money and are busy sending it to overseas banks. Sending and packing money to be deposited in foreign banks is not very obvious. No one knows how much money flows out because in Cambodia there is no anti-corruption law. When an official takes office, or leaves it, he does not have to declare his assets at all. Therefore, no one knows how many hundreds of millions of dollars these officials have.

According to this CPP officer, Ke Kimnyan's possessions cannot be compared with those of the civilian officials around Hun Sen like Cham Prasith, Sok An, Keat Chhon, Pen Simorn, Chea Chanto, or Chan Sarun. Let alone these civilian officials, Ke Kimyan's cannot be compared even with the assets of fellow army chiefs and police officers, such as Moeng Samphan, Kun Kim, Pol Saroeun, Meas Sophea, and Hok Langdi.

This CPP official said that between Hok Langdi and Ke Kimyan, the former being National Police Director General and the latter Armed Forces Supreme Commander, Hok Langdi is by far the richer. He did not know from where Hok Langdi has accumulated his fortune, but his son who is training as a pilot in Australia can afford to pay $100,000 a month for renting an airstrip. If Hok Langdi is not loaded, how can he do such a thing? However, comparing the land ownership between Hok Langdi's and Ke Kimyan's, the latter beats the former by a mile. Hok Langdi does not own much land but he has a lot of money, which is not very obvious to most observers. As for Ke Kimyan, he does not have a lot of money but he has a lot of land albeit not easily sellable but very visible. For this reason, Hun Sen is said to dislike Ke Kiyan, who owns so much land but does not make huge contributions to the CPP coffers like other police chiefs and army commanders. In fact, besides owning land, Ke Kimyan is not as rich as other CPP police officers, army chiefs, and senior officials.

An economic expert said that any country would do well if corrupt officials use the proceeds from their national-asset stripping acts to build factories and enterprises or to invest in various fields in the country, making the country prosper and helping bring jobs for the people so they can make money and live a better life. This is called poverty reduction because the looters of the national assets use the national money to invest in their own nation.

According to past observation, Cambodian officials known to own millions of dollars usually divert their money overseas and seek investors to come invest in Cambodia from abroad instead, thus keeping their own money fallow. It is frequently seen that some mainland Chinese having only $100-200.000 do not hesitate to sink their small capital in Cambodia and, enjoying the complicity of some corrupt government officials, they usually become rich in the end, making millions in profit, which they take back to their own country. Because Cambodian officials tend to send their money abroad, it is normal that a country with a great outflow of capital like Cambodia sees its domestic economy slump.

At the same time, this economic expert said, however, that it is probably because the Cambodian officials are afraid they might be accused of having a lot of money from stripping the national assets that they dare not make investment in their own country, preferring to pack up and send their loots abroad while continuing to suck up money from inside the country. This is why some diplomats have said that the Cambodian elite are never satiated.

Friday, July 06, 2007

Angkor Temples Inspire Awe, Burger Joints

Tourists Flock to Ancient Cambodia Shrines, Bringing Opportunity and Danger

July 5, 2007
By MARK LITKE
ABC News (USA)


Magnificent. Miraculous. Mystical. Words that only begin to convey the majesty of the temples at Angkor, Cambodia. And today, you can add another word: mobbed!

Day after day, this wonder of the world is being assaulted by hordes of tourists, an estimated 2 million visitors this year. A number almost certain to double in the next few years.

They crawl like colorful lines of ants across the steep stairs and towering spires of the 12th century temple, the most recognized of the Hindu and Buddhist shrines sprawling over 300 square kilometers.

They scamper across ancient stones to pose in front of the hundreds of massive enigmatic stone faces of the 13th century Bayon Temple.

At the end of each day, one can barely make out the shape of the 9th century temple, Phnom Bakheng, literally buried under an onslaught of four to five thousand visitors who have scaled its ancient sandstone walls to witness a once-in-a-lifetime sunset.

Must See Tourism

In the tourist industry, Angkor has rapidly become one those "must-see destinations." It's a UNESCO World Heritage Site, and largely unspoiled in a still remote and exotic corner of Cambodia.

But tourism, according to John Stubbs, vice president of the U.S.-based World Monuments Fund, "has become a double-edged sword."

On the one hand, tourism can bring an enormous amount of revenue to countries and organizations trying to preserve the great cultural treasures of the world.

Stubbs and his WMF teams have worked for 15 years helping preserve two of the most seriously threatened temples at Angkor. He's watched tourism grow from a trickle to a flood. "The tourists are blessing," he said. They bring money and curiosity and respect for the temples. And tourist dollars help pay for restoration work that runs into the millions of dollars.

"Most tourists want to be responsible," Stubbs said. "They understand the importance of behaving properly and cleaning up after themselves. It's our responsibility to keep encouraging that."

Siem Reap, Boom Town

On the other hand, the rapid growth in visitors to Angkor and the nearby town of Siem Reap now threaten to overwhelm the region's limited resources. Noise, traffic and pollution have become serious threats to the temples and the culture they symbolize.

Angkor is now experiencing the same stress and threats as the other Heritage Sites, including the Great Wall of China and the Pyramids of Giza.

Ten years ago, Siem Reap, the gateway to Angkor, had one hotel. Today there are over 100 and more are being opened at a rate of one a month. Ox carts and bicycles have given way to horrendous traffic jams. Entertainment districts have sprung up, offering nightspots for every taste, massage parlors, pizza and burger joints. And the constant drone of jet aircraft landing at the new international airport has some wondering whether vibrations will damage the fragile temple walls.

Invasion or Salvation?

However, for many Cambodians, impoverished survivors of the brutal Khmer Rouge regime of the 1970s, the growth of tourism has meant salvation. At least for the time being. Som Vannak, who hawks souvenir photographs for the tourists, said he hopes to start his own photography business with the money he makes in tips. "Tourism," he said, "of course it's good, good for Cambodia, and very good for me." That sentiment is echoed by hundreds of small merchants selling guidebooks, souvenir hats and T-shirts to the tourists.

But some of the more well traveled, well-heeled tourists from Western countries have mixed feelings. Mick Moore recently visited from Australia. "I don't know if it's a good thing or a bad thing, to be honest. I know the tourist crowds bring money here. But it's not as peaceful as it used to be."

Asked about the crowds perched atop Phnom Bashing at sunset, American Toni Duffy said, "I think the crowds take away from the experience." But her companion Saul Unter disagreed. "I don't feel that. The importance of this place deserves people to watch it, to see it, to witness it."

Managing Change

John Stubbs said that "at the end of the day, it comes down to managing change, managing the visitors who come to the site. And there is hope. There is a lot of work underway to do just that."

For the first time, top Cambodian officials are expressing concern that more planning and care will be needed if Cambodia is to protect one of its most important cultural assets.

Many Cambodians have been upset with how the temples have been used so far. In one case, the temples were rented out for the production of the Angelina Jolie film "Lara Croft: Tomb Raider."

Son Soubert, a member of Cambodia's Constitutional Council, believes that using Angkor for movies and unrestricted tourism has disrupted the Hindu and Buddhist spiritual atmosphere of the temples.

He is especially concerned with the greed of his own countrymen, looking to get rich at Angkor's expense. "They are not caring for the cultural side of this temple," he said. "They are more interested with the economic side, making money, and getting it into their pockets."

But others, like Stubbs, are hopeful. "Angkor in its day," Stubbs said, "was one of the all-time great civilizations on Earth." And, in fact, it could have been destroyed many times over.

It was all but lost to the jungles a century ago, before it was painstakingly uncovered by early European explorers.

It was lost to the world again during the years of isolation under the murderous Khmer Rouge, who sometimes used the temple grounds for shooting practice.

Following the Khmer Rouge, a small army of grave and cultural artifact robbers descended on the deserted temples. Cambodia was too weak and traumatized to defend itself.

But eventually nations and nongovernmental agencies, art communities, and ordinary individuals came to Angkor's defense. The fact that we can now can fly or drive in reasonable comfort right to the gates of this long-lost magnificent relic of an ancient civilization is a testament to those efforts.

As Stubbs reminded us, "We just need to stay ahead of the curve, so to speak. There's not a minute to waste in looking after this precious place, because it could, without a doubt, be ruined by some wrong decisions, or by lack of control of visitors."