Showing posts with label Him Huy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Him Huy. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Tuol Sleng daughters reconcile the past

Huy Senghul (left) and Norng Chen Kimty stand in front of a photo of Norng Chen Kimty’s father Norng Chanphal, seen on the left in the background photo. Photo by: John Anthony
Wednesday, 14 September 2011
John Anthony
The Phnom Penh Post

Huy Senghul and Norng Chen Kimty’s fathers were tormentor and victim, respectively, at the Khmer Rouge’s infamous Tuol Sleng interrogation facility, but the two now work together, at times sharing a desk, to document the crimes of the genocidal regime.

Their fathers, former Tuol Sleng executioner Him Huy and child survivor Norng Chanphal, have since quite remarkably reconciled, and the children now work as researchers at the Documentation Centre of Cambodia, a key source of written evidence for the Khmer Rouge Tribunal.

Both daughters share a common goal: to search for the truth about those slain during the three years, eight months and 20 days that the Khmer Rouge ruled Cambodia.

Monday, March 30, 2009

Confession expected as Duch trial resumes

A child looks at skulls inside a stupa at the popular tourist site Phnom Sampov near Samlot in Battambang province, some 291 kilometres northwest of Phnom Penh this month. The resumption of Duch's trial today may bring new light to bear on generations-old moral questions for the Kingdom. (Photo by: AFP)

Monday, 30 March 2009
Written by Thet Sambath and Georgia Wilkins
The Phnom Penh Post
Samlot


Tuol Sleng chief's admission of guilt would come amid questions of whether the perpetrators of Khmer Rouge atrocities can also be victims.

HIM Huy, one of the only surviving guards from Tuol Sleng prison, knows that he stands in the middle of one of Cambodia's greatest moral dilemmas: Can the perpetrators of the worst Khmer Rouge atrocities also claim to be victims of the regime?

The 53-year-old's stint at the Khmer Rouge's torture centre may have helped keep the wheels of the paranoid regime well-oiled, but Him Huy now says he was a prisoner of ideology and a slave to the orders of his higher-ups.

"I am also a victim of the Khmer Rouge. If I did not respect and practice Angkar's orders, I would have been executed like the other prisoners," he says.

This emotional moral quandary will begin to be publicly debated today, when the trial of Him Huy's former boss, prison chief Kaing Guek Eav, resumes and both victims and perpetrators take the stand to testify about the regime's most notorious detention centre.

"Right now, there isn't anything that exists that pulls the entire story together," says Alex Hinton, author of Why Did They Kill? Cambodia in the Shadow of Genocide.

"By the end of this, we will have a much more complete picture of how S-21 ran, with links all the way up to the central committee," he adds.

Although the trial opened formally last month, Monday marks the beginning of the substantive hearings, in which survivors, prison guards and family members of the more than 12,000 men, women and children who were tortured at Tuol Sleng and sent to their deaths will be called upon to tell their stories.

A born-again Christian and former maths teacher, Kaing Guek Eav, better known by his revolutionary name Duch, has been described as both a meticulous, calculated killer, and a passive, subservient actor who slavishly passed on orders from the top.

Of the five former leaders detained at the Khmer Rouge tribunal, he is the only one to admit his role in killings that occurred during the 1975-79 regime - a confession that is likely to be repeated at his trial.

"The things that will emerge most clearly are how the entire S-21 apparatus worked, going all the way from arresting people to taking them to Choeung Ek or the grounds just outside S-21 and killing them," Hinton said.

But in every trial dealing with war crimes, Hinton said, the biggest ethical question is: how do you distinguish between good and evil in an ideology so extreme that it was kill or be killed?

Duch (back row, second from right) photographed with other S-21 guards at Tuol Sleng during the regime.

"My brother had no power to decide who was killed. What he did was on the order of senior leaders," said Hong Kim Hong, Duch's sister who now works at Samlot district's health centre, told the Post last week.

"Ieng Thirith told the court it was Nuon Chea who ordered Duch to do it," she said, referring to an unprompted outburst by the former social affairs minister for the regime during her pretrial hearing.

"So it means that my brother is not guilty because he just did what the senior leaders told him to," she said.

Duch cannot plead guilty, as in civil law jurisdictions there is generally no such legal concept. In the court's hybrid system, a confession by the defendant will be treated like any other piece of evidence, and a full confession - which Duch is widely expected to give - does not prevent a full trial from occurring or relieve the plaintiff from its duty of presenting a case to the trial chambers.

For many who knew Duch when he found God, such as San Thy Matathe, a pastor who witnessed Duch's mid-1990s baptism in a western Cambodia river, the 66-year-old's decision to cooperate with the court was motivated by his new religion.

"If he had not believed in God, he would not have confessed his crimes," San Thy Matathe told AFP last week.

Although Him Huy has not found God like his former boss, he, too, says that telling the court in detail the ways in which he carried out orders to brutalise will give him closure.

"When I know clearly why there was an order to torture and to kill people, my conscience will be cleared," he said. "History pages will be closed by the ECCC. We will know who gave the orders and who was behind these massacres."

Fears of confessing

Him Huy is a public face on the thousands of cadres who made up an intricate hierarchy of regime officials, some defiant and others regretful about their roles as small pieces of the regime's machinery.

"[Testimonies at the court are] a very important step for the healing of a nation because reconciliation is not only about the victims or the winners of war, but the perpetrators and former enemies as well," says genocide researcher Youk Chhang, director of the Documentation Center of Cambodia.

But with the first trial at the court finally starting, many former perpetrators are afraid to come forward, even as witnesses, for fear of being imprisoned.

"My wife and I can't sleep well since court was formed. We are worried about security and we always think any day the court will summon me," says one former cadre who now lives under an assumed name.

Another high-ranking Khmer Rouge cadre, who was in charge of the northwest zone after the previous chief, Ros Nhim, was arrested in 1978, agreed.
"IF MORE KHMER ROUGE ... ARE ACCUSED AND DETAINED, THERE WILL BE PROBLEMS."
"I am living in a quiet place, away from my village since the court was formed. I am worried the court will arrest me," he said, speaking on condition of anonymity. "It is not only me, my former comrades who were senior officials are also hiding and trying to hide their background since the court was set up," he added.

A former cadre who wanted to be referred to only as Roeun, also questioned the value of the trials.

"Why is Duch being tried if he was a very low-ranking Khmer Rouge member? We are afraid we'll be the next to be arrested and tried because we are higher [ranking] than him," he said.

Expand the trials?

For many overseas observers, the trial must broaden its net regardless of the fears for national reconciliation and stability.

"Many more [former leaders] need to face the court to really deliver justice to the millions of victims of these horrific crimes," Amnesty International said Saturday in a statement, quoting Brittis Edman, Amnesty's Cambodia researcher.

Robert Petit, the court's foreign co-prosecutor, has said that he wants more former regime members investigated. However, his Cambodian counterpart, Chea Leang, disagrees on the basis of national security. The impasse has been made formal and sent to the pretrial chamber for a decision.

Many ex-Khmer Rouge agree with Chea Leang.

Meas Muth, a former military commander and widely considered to be on Petit's second list of suspects, said indicting more people would spark unrest.

"If more Khmer Rouge cadres are accused and detained, there will be problems and disorder in the former Khmer Rouge areas," Meas Muth said.

Regardless of whether more cadre are rounded up, for Youk Chhang the first trial is a huge step towards understanding - for everyone.

"There may be no single answer to what really happened. However, we all have the obligation to participate in the search for truth," he says.

Francois Roux, Duch's international co-lawyer, says that Duch will uphold a promise made last month to ask forgiveness for his role in the regime.

"I would like to repeat Duch's words: ‘I will apologise to the victims, but I won't ask the victims to pardon me yet."

ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY NETH PHEAKTRA

Monday, March 02, 2009

"Yes, I did kill people ... But Duch ordered me to do all of that": Him Huy

Him Huy, a former guard at the Khmer Rouge prison Tuol Sleng, in Anlong San, Cambodia, on Tuesday, participated in thousands of executions from 1975 to 1979. (Seth Mydans/International Herald Tribune)

For Khmer Rouge guard, it was kill or be killed

Sunday, March 1, 2009
By SETH MYDANS
International Herald Tribune


ANLONG SAN, Cambodia:

"We were victims, too," said Him Huy, the head of the guard detail at the Tuol Sleng torture house, who took part in the executions of thousands of people at a Khmer Rouge killing field.

As the prisoners knelt at the edges of mass graves, with their hands tied behind them, executioners swung iron bars at the backs of their heads - two times, if necessary - before they toppled forward into the pits.

"I had no choice," said Him Huy, 53. "If I hadn't killed them, I would have been killed myself."

In the severe and paranoid world of the Khmer Rouge prison, guards and torturers themselves worked under threat of death, and Him Huy saw a number of his colleagues kneel at the edges of their graves for that blow to the back of the neck.

"I used an iron bar about that long," he said, spreading his hands wide as he sat in a dry rice field to tell his story late last month, "and about as thick as my big toe."

Him Huy, guard and executioner at the most prominent Cambodian torture house, personifies the horror of the Khmer Rouge years, from 1975 to 1979, when at least 1.7 million people died of starvation and overwork as well as torture and execution.

As the trials of five senior Khmer Rouge figures get under way in Phnom Penh, they raise questions about the guilt - or victimhood - of lower-ranking cadre, the people who carried out the arrests, killings and torture, and who are unlikely to face trial.

Late at night, sometimes two or three times a week, Him Huy said, he drove trucks full of prisoners to the Choeung Ek killing field, where he logged them in - 20 or 30 or 80 at a time - and then confirmed that they had been killed.

He asserted that he had personally killed only five people, as demonstrations of loyalty to his superiors.

At least 14,000 people were arrested and interrogated at Tuol Sleng prison, which was known officially as S-21 and is now maintained as a museum. Only a handful survived.

Him Huy is back home now in this village 80 kilometers, or 50 miles, south of Phnom Penh - a farmer and father of nine, optimistic, hard-working and quick to smile, seemingly comfortable to be who he is and at ease with his memories. His neighbors seem to like him.

"Even the young people, when they have a party they always invite him," said his wife, Put Peng Aun. "If there's a party, he's got to be there."

Asked to describe himself, Him Huy said, "I'm not a bad person. I'm a good man. I never argue with anyone. I never fight with anyone. I have good intentions as a human being."

But some of those who knew him at the prison remember him harshly. One survivor, Bou Meng, says Him Huy beat and tortured him, poking at his wounds with a stick. "His face was so mean," he told interviewers at the Documentation Center of Cambodia, a private research center. "Today he looks gentle."

Two of Him Huy's co-workers at Tuol Sleng, quoted by the historian David Chandler in his book on the prison, "Voices from S-21," remembered him as "a seasoned killer, an important figure at the prison and a key participant in the execution process."

One prison document that bears his signature, from July 23, 1977, reports the execution of 18 prisoners. Scribbled at the bottom is a note reading: "Also killed 160 children today for a total of 178 enemies killed."

Him Huy is evasive about the extent of his duties at the prison. But whatever he did there, he said, he performed on pain of death.

"I am a victim of the Khmer Rouge," he said without hesitation.

"I did not volunteer to work at S-21." "We were all prisoners, those who killed and those who were killed," he said. "And in fact, for a lot of the staff there, the day came when they were killed, too. In the daytime we'd be eating together, and in the evening some were arrested and killed."

In a book about the prison staff called "Victims and Perpetrators?" the Documentation Center calculates that at least 563 members of the staff of Tuol Sleng - about one-third of the total - were executed while working there.

In a distilled and horrific way, Tuol Sleng was a microcosm of the nation, where half-starved and overworked people lived in constant fear of being arrested and killed, often for reasons they never learned.

The first defendant in the United Nations-backed tribunal is Him Huy's former boss, the commandant of Tuol Sleng prison, a tough, sharp-eyed man named Kaing Guek Eav and generally known as Duch. His trial began two weeks ago.

It was Duch who signed execution orders for both prisoners and errant staff. Indeed, Him Huy rose to become fifth or sixth in the chain of command after his superiors were pulled from their jobs and killed.

"Yes, I did kill people," Him Huy said. "I did transport people to Choeung Ek. I did verify lists of people at Choeung Ek. But Duch ordered me to do all of that."

Many Cambodians appear to accept this common defense among former Khmer Rouge cadre: that they had no choice but to be cruel, fearing for their own lives. It is a defense Duch himself has made in the past.

Visiting the prison recently, Chum Mey, another survivor of Tuol Sleng, described 12 days and nights of torture and terror, but without bitterness toward his abusers.

"My thought is not to put the blame on Him Huy because I don't know what I would have done in his place," he said. "I don't think I would have been able to disobey."

Thirty years have passed since the Khmer Rouge were ousted by a Vietnamese invasion. Him Huy is no different from his neighbors, raising a big family and tending to his beans and corn and rice.

At the end of a long interview, he headed back to his bean field, filling a cannister with pesticide and marching down the rows of long yellow beans, swinging a hose from left to right.

He made sure, he said, to walk with the wind behind him so that none of the pesticide would blow back in his face.

Khmer Rouge guards say they were victims

ANLONG SAN, Cambodia, Mar 1, 2009 (UPI) -- As trials of senior Khmer Rouge leaders begin in Cambodia, guards who worked under them allege they had to kill or be killed.

"We were victims, too," said Him Huy, the head guard at Tuol Sleng, a house of torture where nearly 14,000 people died from 1975 to 1979.

The prisoners knelt at the edge of mass graves while guards bashed their heads and toppled them into the pits, Him Huy, 53, told The International Herald Tribune in a story published Sunday.

Today Him Huy is a farmer with nine children and is well-liked in his village. A handful of the people who survived Tuol Sleng, however, allege he was a seasoned killer, the Tribune reported.

A prison document bearing his signature from July 23, 1977, reports the killing of 18 prisoners. A note scribbled at the bottom reads: "Also killed 160 children today for a total of 178 enemies killed."

Five senior Khmer Rouge figures go on trial this week in Phnom Penh for the deaths of at least 1.7 million people who died of starvation, overwork, torture and execution. Thousands of lesser leaders, including Him Huy, are unlikely to face trial, the Tribune reported.

Monday, February 16, 2009

Special Report: Khmer Rouge's S-21 torture prison

Around 1.7 million people, or a fifth of the population, died in Cambodia during just over three years of Khmer Rouge rule (Photo: EPA)

Cambodia is to relive the horrors of the Khmer Rouge's S-21 torture prison when its jailer goes on trial.

15 Feb 2009
By Thomas Bell, South East Asia Correspondent
The Telegraph (UK)

Like many village homes in Cambodia, his simple house is on stilts and entered by a ladder - stripes of daylight show through the slatted bamboo floor. There is a television, wedding photographs and a small Buddhist shrine. Many believe that the man who lives here personally killed thousands of people with an iron bar.

Him Houy, 53, was the deputy head of security at the Khmer Rouge's S-21 torture centre where victims were forced to confess to imaginary crimes before being taken to the killing fields and murdered.

On Tuesday his former boss, the prison's commandant Kaing Guek Eav, better known as Duch, 66, will become the first Khmer Rouge leader to face trial for crimes against humanity.

"In 1977 I went to have a meeting at Duch's house and he said 'we must kill everyone'," Him Huoy claims. "He even killed his own relatives.

He never shouted, he was always very quiet, but if he gave the order to arrest someone they would be arrested. There was a motto hanging on the wall that said 'The secret enemy belongs to the CIA and KGB. We must arrest and kill them all'."

The old prison is a museum now, lined with the haunting black and white portraits of its inmates. Each one of them was grotesquely tortured with the tools still on display until they confessed to crimes they never committed. Many victims implicated everyone they ever met in fantastical conspiracies in their desperation to satisfy the inquisitors. John Dawson Dewhirst, the only British victim, eventually claimed he joined the CIA when he was 12 years old.

Finally they were driven to the killing fields outside Phnom Penh at Choeung Ek to be killed and dumped in pits. The site is a tourist attraction now, with a monument of skulls and the clothes of victims emerging from the bumpy ground. Surviving prisoner lists show that at least 12,380 people passed through S-21, although the true number may be higher. Only around a dozen are believed to have survived.

Four other Khmer Rouge leaders are in custody awaiting trial and prosecutors at the court, jointly run by the United Nations and the Cambodian government, are preparing cases against six more people. The court will only pursue senior figures – Him Huoy is not important enough to be prosecuted, although he will be a witness in Duch's trial.

It is three decades since the fall of the Khmer Rouge's lunatic regime, and the special court has been blighted by delays, financial scandal and political rancour. The hope is that at the end of it all Cambodians will have heard their painful history carefully examined and – perhaps – laid to rest. If the process is a success the wounded country might move a step closer to reconciliation and "closure".

For Van Nath, 62, one of S-21's tiny band of surviving victims, justice delayed is still important. When I met him a year ago he was bright eyed with a full head of white hair but he complained that his health was beginning to fail. As part of a unique experiment he will be a "civil party" in Duch's trial, represented by a lawyer with the right to question witnesses and influence proceedings.

"I'm not looking for torture like he did to me, or for him to be killed like he killed other people," Van Nath said. "He should apologise to his victims so they can rest in peace. Of course, if he regrets what he did that means something."

But glib notions of "closure" may be beyond reach for survivors of Cambodia's hell. Between 1975-79 an estimated 1.7million people, or 20 percent of the population, were executed or died of starvation and overwork. Half the populations is under 30 and too young to remember those days – for the older ones it is doubtful whether anything can lay the past to rest. Nevertheless, surveys show that around 80 percent of Cambodians support the court process.

Thousands of relatively low level Khmer Rouge cadres, many with the blood of hundreds or thousands of people on their hands, live in villages across the country. A few occupy high positions in government and the army.

Duch, now a born-again Christian, is in fact almost unique among Khmer Rouge figures in that he has acknowledged his crimes and asked forgiveness. Nevertheless, he is expected to argue at his trial that he was following orders from more senior leaders and he would have been killed if he had not obeyed.

"They always say they did nothing wrong, they only followed orders and it's not their fault," Van Nath said angrily. "I don't want to hear them say they followed orders and did their job."

Him Huoy makes just that argument to explain his own actions. "Duch said whoever went against his orders, he would kill him," he said.

In 2002 Van Nath and Him Huoy, the victim and the perpetrator, were reunited at the prison to make a documentary, S-21: The Khmer Rouge Killing Machine. In the film the old guards and their prisoners confronted each other, recalled and even re-enacted life at the prison.

"It was not easy for me, it was hard to handle the situation, but we had a plan to ask questions and I had to ask them," Van Nath said of coming face to face with Him Huoy. "It was hard for me because I hate this man. He killed a lot of people. It has been thirty years now and I have never heard him apologise."

When the court was set up it was decided that in the interests of national reconciliation junior figures such as Him Huoy should not be prosecuted – there are simply too many of them. But as far as Van Nath is concerned, "Absolutely this man should be prosecuted."

"I am trying to find a way to compare this man to something," he said.

"I can describe him, while he worked with Duch, this man was like a computer button. Him Huoy was the most trusted person of the regime."

Today Him Huoy is a gentle seeming, quietly spoken man. As he talked to me in his village home children played in the sunlight outside and older relatives lounged in hammocks strung beneath the house. He fled S-21 with the other prison staff on the day the regime crumbled in 1979. Four years later he was arrested by the new government and accused of being the prison director.

"At that time they asked me how many people I killed. I said 'a thousand'," he told me. "They said 'could it be more?' and I said 'you can say more', because in those days I was so depressed I couldn't do anything. I didn't want to be alive anymore. I wanted them to kill me right away."

"My brain is getting better now. The bone is getting harder. There is no depression now," he added with a weak smile, his eyes dampening.

As Him Houoy tells it, the prisoners would be blindfolded and driven by truck from the prison to the killing fields at night. He said he knew that many of them were innocent – some were his former colleagues.

Him Huoy has given differing accounts of his actions to different interviewers.

It was his job, he claimed, to record the prisoners' names as they were unloaded from the trucks. "We told them 'we will take you to a new house'. We never told them anything that would frighten them," he said. Then they were led away and killed at the edge of the pits with knives and iron bars to save bullets - it would take about four hours to kill 100 people.

Him Huoy, who insisted he killed only five people, described killing a man.

"Duch was sitting there under a tree and there was one prisoner left," he said. "Duch said to me, 'are you honest with the government? If you are honest with the government then you have to kill this prisoner' and he took an iron bar from the ground and gave it to me."

"I beat him once on the back of the neck and I threw the iron bar down and I walked away," he claimed.

Him Huoy likened himself in those days to a pig in cage. "It can't move," he said. "If they want to kill the pig they can. We wanted to escape but we couldn't."

For him dealing with the past is not about examining it in court but obout forgetting. "If you didn't ask me about it I would try to forget. I just try to earn a living and not remember these things," he said flatly.

And what about apologising? "I think the guards should apologise to the prisoners, it is polite to do so," he allowed. "But I am also a victim of the regime, Duch is the right one to punish."

Saturday, February 14, 2009

Tuol Sleng Guard Wants To See Duch Tried

Him Huy (Photo: DC-Cam)

By Kong Sothanarith, VOA Khmer
Original report from Kandal province
13 February 2009

In the village Anlong San, in Kandal province, 80 kilometers from Phnom Penh, Him Huy, passes house after house, walking indiscriminately and with total liberty.

Thirty years after the fall of the Khmer Rouge, the former guard supervisor at Tuol Sleng prison has hung up his black uniform, put away his cap, given up his arms, and become a simple farmer in this village close to the Vietnam border.

Now Him Huy is one of the witnesses against Kaing Kek Iev, his former boss, the Khmer Rouge prison chief known as Duch who will go on trial soon.

“I will oppose Duch,” Him Huy said in an interview this week, “because he is one of the Khmer Rouge leaders who hurt very much the Cambodian people and caused the deaths of Cambodian citizens nearly all over the country.”

Under the Khmer Rouge, Him Huy received prisoners as they were brought to Tuol Sleng, and he was ordered to arrest “enemies of the Angkar,” the Organization, in Phnom Penh and in the provinces.

Each day, he said, Tuol Sleng received between 10 to 60 detainees, and, during the same day, as many as 30 to 70 people were tortured and killed.

“The order to make arrests came from Duch,” he said. “If Duch wanted someone destroyed, he would be destroyed. And he said that after one of the prisoners was interrogated, he must be destroyed. Even prison staff. He said if they cannot follow [orders] they would be destroyed also.”

Duch is charged with war crimes, crimes against humanity, torture and murder for his role as chief of Tuol Sleng, where at least 12,000 Cambodians were tortured before they were executed. His initial trial hearing is set for Feb. 17, with a trial to begin in earnest shortly thereafter.

Duch’s trial will be a signal of justice for Cambodian victims and will inform the international community that Khmer Rouge leaders must be tried for their mistakes, Him Huy said.

In Anlong San, Him Huy’s neighbors say they are waiting for Duch’s trial as well, are following the progress of the courts by radio and plan to follow the hearing on television.

Meanwhile, as Duch’s approaching trial has increased interest in the long-awaited tribunal, the courts remain dogged by allegations of corruption.

The Open Society Justice Initiative, a tribunal monitoring group, issued a statement Friday warning of “grave flaws” in the courts and warning that recent reports “suggest the Cambodian government is attempting to block further indictments.”

The court must demonstrate that it is not a tool of the Cambodian government and ensure a fair and transparent judicial process,” OSJI Executive Director James Goldston said in the statement. “The court must show it is relying on law and facts, not politics, in deciding how many suspects will be investigated.”

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Khmer Rouge trials set to begin

"I will testify with my heart. I will give the money they offer me as a witness to beggars in need because offering money like this is to look at witnesses like dogs" - Nhem En angry response to ECCC stipend offer for witnesses
Phnom Penh (dpa) - One of a handful of survivors from Pol Pot's secret prison is expected to stand shoulder to shoulder with his former guard and the photographer who documented it all to testify against their former master, the men and their families said Tuesday.

The long-awaited $56-million joint UN-Cambodian court to try top former Khmer Rouge leaders has begun calling witnesses, and although their feelings are mixed, all have agreed to be heard.

Relatives of a former senior guard at S-21, or Toul Sleng Torture Centre, Him Huy, said he had been called to the stand to testify against the prison's former commandant, Kang Keng Iev, alias Duch.

Duch has been charged with crimes against humanity for his alleged crimes at one of the most infamous prisons in history.

The photographer who took many of the infamous portraits of the accused both pre- and post-mortem, Nhem En, said he has also been called to give testimony from November 1.

Experts have estimated that around 14,000 people died at the prison, which was designed to torture suspected spies before the survivors were shipped to the Killing Fields to be murdered.

Witnesses will be given food and accommodation as well as a 5 dollar a day stipend - a courtesy Nhem En angrily rejected.

"I will testify with my heart. I will give the money they offer me as a witness to beggars in need because offering money like this is to look at witnesses like dogs," Nhem En said by telephone.

En, who was recruited from a remote village aged just 16 and trained to document the brutality of the regime, said he believed the museum of his work he is setting up near his home in Anlong Veng, 500 kilometres north of the capital, will do more to help people understand the Khmer Rouge regime than the trial.

"But I will go and tell my story. I will go without documents. I will carry the pictures in my mind," he said, adding that he felt violated and patronised by the price being put on his life story.

One of just a handful of survivors who is expected to also testify, Vann Nath, said he didn't care about stipends. "Money is not important. I just want justice," Nath said.

Up to 2 million Cambodians died under the Khmer Rouge regime's 1975-79 Democratic Kampuchea regime in the ultra-Maoists failed attempt to turn the country into an agrarian utopia.

A spokesman for the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Reach Sambath, said the court was simply grateful to witnesses who were happy to testify.

"We embrace principal and willingness. This tribunal is not about money," Sambath said.