Showing posts with label Land property ownership. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Land property ownership. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 05, 2012

PM will hand-deliver titles [... if he does not change his mind again - Remember the ELC ban?]

Wednesday, 05 September 2012
Chhay Channyda
The Phnom Penh Post

Prime Minister Hun Sen will personally deliver land titles to residents in Kratie province’s Snuol district on September 21 following the completion of the land measuring mission by volunteer youth there.

“I will go to Kratie’s Snuol district to distribute land titles for these residents for the first time. They are not provisional but complete land titles for ownership,” Hun Sen said during a graduation ceremony held at Koh Pich yesterday.

“Today all granted land titles following the measurement are declared complete, so the people in all those areas don’t need to face a transitional period,” the premier continued.

Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Property tax: a courtesy of the CPP

Cambodia to launch new property tax by end this year

PHNOM PENH, Jun. 29, 2010 (Xinhua News Agency) -- Cambodian government is set to launch a new property tax by the end of this year, local media reported on Tuesday, citing officials at the Ministry of Economy and Finance.

Under the Finance for Management Law, passed in November, purchasers of constructions worth more than 100 million riels ( around 25,000 U.S. dollars) will be required to pay an annual tax worth 0.1 percent of property value.

"We are preparing a prakas to establish a committee to evaluate property and we will start implementing tax collection in the end of this year, as the National Assembly requires," Norng Piseth, chief of the Real Estate Division at the Ministry of Economy and Finance was quoted by the Phnom Penh Post as saying.

"It is very important for increasing national income," he added.

Although the new levy is not expected to raise large amounts of additional funds, as Minister of Finance Keat Chhon has estimated tax revenue would be between 3 million U.S. dollars and 9 million U.S. dollars, the government has voiced its ambition to improve tax administration.

About 180,000 houses that are under municipal and provincial administration would be covered under the new property tax, according to Hang Chuon Naron, secretary of state of the Finance Ministry.

Thursday, May 06, 2010

UCLA doctoral student John Scott-Railton uses mapping technology to help villagers in Cambodia and Senegal

May 6, 2010
By Shoshee Jau
Daily Bruin (UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA)

John Scott-Railton first stepped into Cambodia in 2006 carrying three global positioning systems receivers, determined to revolutionize the country’s water and sanitation systems.

“What if you take cheap, hand-held global position systems receivers, make points and make an objective ... map, and combine it with public health measures?,” Scott-Railton had asked himself. “I just wanted to see if this crazy idea would even work.”

Yet shortly after his arrival to Cambodia, he realized that water and sanitation were the least of his worries. After seeing the government bulldozing and claiming villagers’ land by force, Scott-Railton, currently a doctoral student at UCLA, said he redirected the goal of his project and decided to use his receivers’ mapping technique to salvage the property rights of thousands of Phnom Penh villagers.

“All the people from the village came to me and told me to please help them,” he said. “It was the worst feeling in the world because I felt so useless and they had false hope in me.”

Teaming up with various Cambodian nonprofit organizations, Scott-Railton developed a map of about 5,000 households in a central community of 25,000 to 50,000 people in Phnom Penh. With the help of interns from Cambodian universities, he conducted a census of the entire community.

Because the Cambodian government often took away villagers’ land without properly compensating them, Scott-Railton worked to provide documentation and proof of their property.

“The idea was to do all this work in support of legal cases, and the lawyers would use the maps and numbers to set up a case,” he said.

Scott-Railton came to UCLA to pursue his doctorate degree in 2008. In addition to his studies and work as a teaching assistant, he also began field work in Dakar, Senegal, using his devices’ mapping technique to analyze flood control methods in the city.

UCLA’s Center for Community Partnerships recently recognized Scott-Railton for his work in Senegal through the Rishwain Social Justice Entrepreneurship Award. He will also be presenting his project in Belgium this coming fall.

Because the monsoon season periodically brings chronic flooding to 800,000 Dakar villagers each year, families built a complex network of small dams and pathways around the city to keep the waters out. However, these networks only aggravated the problem, Scott-Railton said. After learning that citizens expected the government to aid them in flood control, he spoke with political leaders and advised them to take action.

Scott-Railton said he likens the situation in Dakar to the international problem of global warming because the lack of government regulation has allowed citizens to do as they like, exacerbating the initial problem.

In order to tackle the global warming issue, Scott-Railton said that people must partner with their communities and their governments in a global effort.

In spite of his accomplishments, Scott-Railton holds deep respect for his students and always tries to provide them with as much help and as many resources as possible, said Kennan Cronen, a third-year political science student.

“He’s always excited about his students’ ideas and ready to give his expertise,” Cronen said. “When I got funding for a solar panel project, John said that if we wrote a paragraph on the project, he would get an L.A. Times article written about it.”

Still in his 20s, Scott-Railton embodies what people can achieve through hard work, dedication and passion, said Gary Lee, a friend from Scott-Railton’s undergraduate years who helped him launch his project in Cambodia.

“John is a very easy person to work with,” Lee said. “He tries to understand other parties’ interests, and he’s never thought he was better than others.”

Friday, April 16, 2010

Understanding the law: Property ownership without title

The occupation of a real estate without title

02 April 2010
By Seng Dina
Radio France Internationale
Translated from Khmer by Komping Puoy


Land disputes are quagmires in Cambodia. The old ownership rule prior to 1979 was canceled. The number of those who occupy lands after 1979 without having a land tile is still high. Therefore, the “Understanding the law” program will touch upon the land dispute issue first, and on this Thursday, we will first start with the occupation of land without having property title. The clarifications will be provided by Dr. Hel Chamroeun.

1- I occupied a piece of land since 1979. I was a legal occupation, but I did not have the property title. What is my right on this piece of land?

Those who occupy lands or any other real estate since 1979, even if they do not have a property title issued by the authorities, then they are not the owner of that real estate, they are only considered as “legal occupant.”

2- As the “legal occupant”, what are my rights on this piece of land?

The “legal occupant” has similar rights to the title owner as well, i.e. he has the rights to use, to live, to plant, to rent, to pawn, to sell, to transfer the rights to their children, etc…

In the case of transfer of right, the recipient of the real estate also retains the right of “legal occupancy”, he is not turning into the title owner.

The “legal occupancy” and the ownership have the same amount of rights, what differs between the two is that the ownership is a final right and he can receive full protection from the law. As for the right of the “legal occupant”, it is only a temporary right that could lead to dispute in the future.

3- Can the “legal occupant” become the owner or not?

Yes! If the occupation was done legally according to 5 conditions:
  • It’s a true occupation, i.e. it’s not an occupation by someone who is just a land keeper, a housekeeper, or a farm keeper for somebody else.
  • It was not an occupation that took place with violence, i.e. there was no forced entry to occupy.
  • The occupation is publicly known, i.e., it was not a surreptitious occupation without anybody’s knowledge.
  • It was a continuous occupation, i.e. there was no abandon of this real estate during a long period of time.
  • The occupation was done honestly, i.e., when the “legal occupant” came to occupy, he does not know that the real estate had a prior owner already.
The “legal occupant” who fulfills these 5 conditions above will become the property owner after he occupies that real estate continuously for 5 years without any interruption.

4- After occupying according to the conditions (above) for a period prescribed by the law, can I automatically become the property owner?

The property ownership is not automatic. The “legal occupant” can become the final property owner only if the authority issues a title for him, following a registration of the property.

5- During the waiting period to receive the final land title, can the “legal occupant” receive a document to recognize the occupation of this real estate or not?

Yes! The authority must issue a document certifying the occupation of the real estate to the “legal occupant” who legally occupies. However, this document is a proof of the right to occupy only, it is not a title that nobody can protest about.

6- If I see an empty real estate without an owner, can I enter into its occupation as a “legal occupant” at any time or not?

The occupation of a real estate as a “legal occupant” that the law recognizes is only for an occupation that took place prior the adoption of the land law, i.e. before 2001. All real estate occupation after the adoption of the land law is illegal and is a crime punishable by the law.

Poor people who want land, they must send a petition to the authority through the social land concession program.
---------
Note: The following article in entirely in Khmer Unicode

ការកាន់កាប់​អចលនវត្ថុ​ដោយ​គ្មាន​ប័ណ្ណ​កម្មសិទ្ធិ

04/02/2010
ដោយ សេង ឌីណា
Radio France Internationale


បញ្ហា​ដីធ្លី នៅ​តែ​ជា​រឿង​ចម្រូងចម្រាស់​មួយ នៅ​ប្រទេស​កម្ពុជា។ របបកម្មសិទ្ធិ​ចាស់ មុន​ឆ្នាំ​១៩៧៩ ត្រូវ​បាន​លុបចោល។ អ្នក​ដែល​​កាន់កាប់​​​ដីធ្លី ក្រោយ​ឆ្នាំ​១៩៧៩ នៅ​តែ​មាន​ច្រើន ដែល​កាន់កាប់​ដោយ​គ្មាន​ប័ណ្ណ​សម្គាល់​កម្មសិទ្ធិ។ វិវាទ​បាន​កើត​ឡើង​ជា​ញឹកញាប់ ជុំវិញ​បញ្ហា​ដីធ្លីនេះ។ ហេតុ​ដូច្នេះ​ហើយបាន​ជា នៅ​ក្នុង​នាទី​យល់​ដឹង​អំពី​ច្បាប់​នេះ វិទ្យុយើង​​​នឹង​លើក​យក​បញ្ហា​ដីធ្លី មក​និយាយ​មុនគេ ដោយ​ចាប់​ផ្តើម​ដំបូង នៅ​ថ្ងៃ​ព្រហស្បតិ៍​នេះ អំពី​​​ការ​កាន់កាប់​ដី ដោយ​មិនមាន​ប័ណ្ណ ដោយ​មាន​​ការ​ឆ្លើយ​បំភ្លឺ​ពី​បណ្ឌិត ហ៊ែល ចំរើន។​

សូម​ចុចខាងក្រោម ដើម្បីស្តាប់ ការ​ឆ្លើយ​បំភ្លឺ​របស់​បណ្ឌិត ហ៊ែល ចំរើន
Click here to listen to the audio program in Khmer

១-ខ្ញុំកាន់កាប់​ដី​មួយ​កន្លែង​តាំងពី​ឆ្នាំ​១៩៧៩​មក។ ជា​ការ​កាន់កាប់​ដោយ​ស្របច្បាប់ ក៏ប៉ុន្តែ មិនមាន​ប័ណ្ណ​កម្មសិទ្ធិ។ តើ​ខ្ញុំ​មាន​សិទ្ធិ​ជា​អ្វី​ លើ​ដីនេះ?

អ្នក​ដែល​បាន​កាន់កាប់​ដី ឬ​អចលន​វត្ថុ​ផ្សេងទៀត ពី​ឆ្នាំ​១៩៧៩​មក បើ​សិន​ជា​មិនទាន់​មាន​ប័ណ្ណកម្មសិទ្ធិ​ចេញ​ដោយ​អាជ្ញាធរ​មាន​សមត្ថកិច្ចទេ អ្នក​នោះ​មិនមែន​ជា​ម្ចាស់​កម្មសិទ្ធិ​លើ​អចលនវត្ថុ​នេះ​ទេ គឺ​មាន​សិទ្ធិ​ត្រឹម​តែ​ជា​ភោគី (អ្នក​កាន់កាប់​ស្របច្បាប់) ប៉ុណ្ណោះ។

២-​ក្នុង​ឋានៈជា​ភោគី តើ​ខ្ញុំ​មាន​សិទ្ធិ​​អ្វី​ខ្លះ​លើ​ដីនេះ?

ភោគី​​មាន​សិទ្ធិ​ប្រហាក់​ប្រហែល​នឹង​ម្ចាស់​កម្មសិទ្ធិ​ដែរ ពោល​គឺ​មាន​សិទ្ធិ​ប្រើប្រាស់ អាស្រ័យ​នៅ ដាំដុះ ប្រវាស់ ជួល បញ្ចាំ លក់ ឬ​ផ្ទេរ​ទៅ​ឲ្យ​កូនចៅ ។ល។

នៅ​ក្នុង​ករណី​មាន​ការ​ផ្ទេរ​កម្មសិទ្ធិ​នេះ អ្នក​ទទួល​អចលនវត្ថុ​ពី​ភោគី គឺ​ទទួល​បាន​ត្រឹម​តែ​សិទ្ធិ​​ជា​ភោគី​ដដែល មិនមែន​ជា​ម្ចាស់​កម្មសិទ្ធិ​នោះទេ។

ភោគី និង​កម្មសិទ្ធិករ​ មាន​ទំហំ​សិទ្ធិ​ដូចគ្នា។ អ្វី​ដែល​ខុសគ្នា គឺ​នៅត្រង់ថា សិទ្ធិ​ជា​កម្មសិទ្ធិករ​គឺ​ជា​សិទ្ធិ​ស្ថាពរ​ ហើយ​អាច​ទទួល​បាន​ការ​គាំពារ​ពីច្បាប់ ដោយ​ពេញលេញ។ ចំណែក​សិទ្ធិ​ជា​ភោគី​វិញ គឺ​ជា​សិទ្ធិ ដែល​មាន​លក្ខណៈ​បណ្ដោះអាសន្ន ដែល​អាច​មាន​ការ​ជំទាស់​តវ៉ា​បាន ទៅ​ថ្ងៃ​ក្រោយ។

៣-តើ​ភោគី​​អាច​ក្លាយ​ជា​​កម្មសិទ្ធិករ​​បាន​ដែរ​ឬទេ?

បាន! ប្រសិន​បើ​​ការ​កាន់កាប់​នេះ ធ្វើ​ឡើង​ដោយ​ស្របច្បាប់ ដោយ​គោរព​តាម​ល័ក្ខខ័ណ្ឌ ៥៖

-កាន់កាប់​ដោយ​ពិតប្រាកដ ពោលគឺ​ មិនមែន​ជា​ការ​កាន់កាប់ ក្នុង​ឋានៈ​ជា​អ្នក​ចាំដី ចាំ​ផ្ទះ ឬ​ចាំ​ចម្ការ​ឲ្យ​គេ។

-កាន់កាប់​ដោយ​គ្មានហិង្សា ពោលគឺ មិន​ប្រើ​កម្លាំង​ចូល​ទៅ​ដណ្តើម​កាន់កាប់។

-​កាន់កាប់​ដោយ​មាន​ការ​ដឹងឮ​ជាសាធារណៈ ពោល​គឺ​ មិនមែន​​ចូល​កាន់កាប់​ដោយ​លួចលាក់ មិន​ឲ្យ​គេ​ដឹង។

-​កាន់កាប់​ដោយ​គ្មាន​ការអាក់ខាន ពោលគឺ​ មិនបាន​បោះបង់​អចលនវត្ថុ​នេះ​ចោល ក្នុង​គម្លាត​មួយ​ធំ។

-កាន់កាប់​ដោយ​សុចរិត ពោល​គឺ ​ពេលចូលកាន់កាប់ ភោគី​មិនបាន​ដឹង​​ថា អចលនវត្ថុ​នេះ​មាន​ម្ចាស់​រួចទៅហើយ​នោះទេ។

ភោគី ដែល​បំពេញ​តាម​ល័ក្ខខ័ណ្ឌ​ទាំង ៥ ខាង​លើ​នេះ អាច​ក្លាយ​ជា​ម្ចាស់​កម្មសិទ្ធិ​បាន ក្រោយ​ពីបាន​កាន់កាប់​អចលនវត្ថុ រយៈពេល ៥ឆ្នាំ ជាប់ៗ​គ្នា​ឥតដាច់។

៤- ក្រោយ​ពី​បាន​កាន់កាប់​តាម​ល័ក្ខខ័ណ្ឌ និង​គ្រប់​រយៈពេល ដែល​កំណត់​ដោយ​ច្បាប់​ហើយ​ តើ​ខ្ញុំ​អាច​ក្លាយ​ជា​ម្ចាស់​កម្មសិទ្ធិ​ដោយ​ស្វ័យប្រវត្តិ​ឬទេ?

សិទ្ធិ​ជា​កម្មសិទ្ធិករ មិន​អាច​ទទួល​បាន​ដោយ​ស្វ័យប្រវត្តិ​នោះទេ។ ភោគី អាច​ក្លាយ​ជា​ម្ចាស់​កម្មសិទ្ធិ​ស្ថាពរ លុះត្រា​តែ​​អាជ្ញាធរ​មាន​សមត្ថកិច្ច​​ចេញ​ប័ណ្ណ​សម្គាល់​កម្មសិទ្ធិ​ឲ្យ ក្រោយ​មាន​ការ​ចុះ​បញ្ជីដីធ្លី​មានលក្ខណៈ​ជា​ប្រព័ន្ធ។

៥-ក្នុងពេលរង់ចាំ​ការទទួល​បាន​ប័ណ្ណកម្មសិទ្ធិ​ស្ថាពរ តើ​ភោគី​អាច​ទទួល​បាន​​ប័ណ្ណ​អ្វី ដែល​សម្គាល់​ការកាន់កាប់​អចលនវត្ថុ​​នេះ​ដែរឬទេ?

បាន! អាជ្ញាធរ​មាន​សមត្ថកិច្ច​ត្រូវ​ចេញ​ប័ណ្ណ​សម្គាល់​សិទ្ធិ​កាន់កាប់​អចលនវត្ថុ​ ទៅ​ឲ្យ​ភោគី ដែល​កាន់កាប់​ស្រប់ច្បាប់។ ក៏ប៉ុន្តែ ប័ណ្ណនេះ​ គ្រាន់តែ​ជា​ភស្តុតាង​បញ្ជាក់​អំពី​សិទ្ធិ​កាន់កាប់​ប៉ុណ្ណោះ មិនមែន​ជា​ប័ណ្ណ​កម្មសិទ្ធិ ដែល​តវ៉ា​មិនបាន​នោះទេ។

៦-ប្រសិន​បើ​ខ្ញុំ​ឃើញ​មាន​អចលនវត្ថុ​ទំនេរ​គ្មាន​ម្ចាស់ តើ​ខ្ញុំ​អាច​ចូល​កាន់កាប់​ធ្វើ​ជា​ភោគី​បាន​គ្រប់ពេលឬ?

ការកាន់កាប់​អចលនវត្ថុ ក្នុង​នាម​ជា​ភោគី ដែល​ច្បាប់​ទទួល​ស្គាល់ គឺ​មាន​តែ​ការកាន់កាប់ មុន​​ពេល​ច្បាប់​ភូមិបាល​​ចូល​ជា​ធរមាន​ប៉ុណ្ណោះ ពោល​គឺ​ មុន​ឆ្នាំ​២០០១។ រាល់​ការ​​ចូល​កាន់កាប់​អចលនវត្ថុ នៅ​ក្រោយ​​ច្បាប់​ភូមិបាល​ចូលជាធរមាន គឺ​ជា​ការ​កាន់កាប់​ខុសច្បាប់ ដែល​អាច​ទទួល​ទោស​ព្រហ្មទ័ណ្ឌ។

ប្រជាជន​ក្រីក្រ ដែល​ចង់​បាន​ដី ត្រូវ​តែ​ធ្វើ​ពាក្យ​សុំ​ទៅ​អាជ្ញាធរ តាម​រយៈ​យន្តការ “​សម្បទាន​ដី​សង្គមកិច្ច”។

Saturday, March 20, 2010

World Bank Failed Lake Residents: Complaint

Homes being dismantled on Boeung Kak Lake (Photo: Nicolas Axelrod, The Phnom Penh Post)

By Men Kimseng, VOA Khmer
Original report from Washington
19 March 2010



A multi-million-dollar World Bank land project failed to help residents in an impoverished community in Phnom Penh establish legal land titles, allowing their ouster and leaving them in limbo, a US rights group says in an official complaint.

The World Bank’s Land Management and Administrative project failed to protect the people of Beoung Kak lake in northern Phnom Penh, who were pushed out to make way for a lucrative real estate development, the Center on Housing Rights and Evictions says in a Sept. 4, 2009, complaint.

“As Boeung Kak residents were unable to transfer their customary rights into formalized land titles under LMAP, the project not only failed to formalize their tenure but in effect also degraded their pre-existing tenure status,” the Minnesota-based COHRE said in the complaint, a copy of which was obtained by VOA Khmer.

The $28.83 million land management project was initiated in June 2002 and implemented by the Ministry of Land Management but was terminated by the government in September 2009, just a few months before its final date, for having too many conditions.

Local residents said that in 2006, Sras Chak commune, which includes the Boeung Kak community, was declared an adjudication zone, but when they asked to register their land, they were denied and told they lived in a development zone.

“They don’t have a land title, but they have purchasing documents that some of the new residents bought from older ones, and authorities have recognized them,” said Eang Vuthy, a legal education officer of the Bridges Across Borders Southeast Asia, which operates in alliance with COHRE.

“The reason why they don’t have a legalized land title was that in 2006 or 2007 the LMAP declared that Sras Chak commune would be an adjudication zone, but the Phnom Penh municipality stopped the registration process,” he said. “They don’t have a land title, only customary rights.”

Vuthy said that according to the Cambodian land law those who live more than five years on uncontested land are the rightful owners.

There are more than 4,000 families of Boeung Kak residents, some of which have been living there for almost 20 years. Most of them are poor people, while some have guesthouse businesses. Many were evicted after the government decided in 2007 to lease the land to Shukaku, Inc., a developer.

According to the Development Credit Agreement for the LMAP, in order to mitigate the potential harm of evictions from state property, an application of the Environment and Social Guidelines, including the Resettlement Policy Framework is required, COHRE said.

However, the framework was not applied in the case of Boeung Kak. Therefore, in addition to the “weakening of the customary land rights of Boeung Kak residents, the protections that the DCA required have not been implemented by the government,” COHRE said.

More than 900 families have so far been evicted from the Boeung Kak area. Some have been relocated to Damnak Troyeung, some 20 kilometers outside of Phnom Penh, while others received a lump sum of $8,500 in compensation.

“We, the Boeung Kak residents, don’t know where else to seek intervention because three countries have announced registration of our land, but now the government says the land is still in dispute and cannot be registered,” said Thai Nary, a local resident who claimed to have settled in Village 22 since 1993. “I am so hopeless hearing that. I cannot even fix my leaking roof. I almost cry every day and cannot stand up anymore. If I raise my roof a bit higher, I am scared that the company will besiege and stop me.”

Thai Nary and other residents have asked for onsite development.

The residents have asked COHRE for assistance, and the case has so far been brought to the attention of the World Bank’s Inspection Panel, according to COHRE documents.

Officials at the World Bank in Washington declined to comment, referring VOA Khmer to see documents posted on its Web site.

An Inspection Panel’s report dated Dec. 2, 2009, posted on the bank’s site, concludes that in order to make an independent assessment for management compliance, “Bank policies and procedures and related issues of harm in the context of the project, the Panel would need to conduct an appropriate review of all relevant facts and applicable policies and procedure.”

The Panel, however, asked the World Bank’s Board of Executive Directors to refrain from issuing any recommendation pending a management meeting with the government.

“The Panel, as it has done in similar situations in the past with Board approval, will not take a position at this time on whether the issues of non-compliance and harm raised in the Requester merit an investigation,” the Panel concluded.

After COHRE’s request for an investigation, on Dec. 17, 2009, the World Bank’s Cambodia manager, Annette Dixon, issued a statement saying the bank was ready to support Cambodia to improve living conditions of people who have been resettled or are facing settlement from land facing development.

An initiative for negotiations between the government and the Bank is underway, sources told VOA Khmer.

Monday, January 21, 2008

Opposition concerned about law allowing foreigners to buy and own land properties

Monday, January 21, 2008
Everyday.com.kh
Translated from Khmer by Socheata

SRP MPs expressed their concerns about the National Assembly plan to amend the law to allow foreigners to buy lands in Cambodia, and privately own them. Ngo Sovann, Svay Rieng SRP MP, told RFA on Saturday that he and the SRP do not support any amendment to the law governing land ownership because he said that this law could be a serious danger to the Nation. “If we allow foreigners to buy lands in Cambodia, we are concerned about foreigners, such as Vietnamese businessmen coming to buy lands in Cambodia. If they (Vietnamese businessmen) could buy a lot of lands along the border, after a while, this lands become theirs,” Ngo Sovann said. However, Nuth Narang, the secretary of state of the minister of Land Management, Urban Planning & Construction told The Phnom Penh Post newspaper that this amendment to the law will be made with the intention of attracting foreign investors, and it will not make Cambodia lose anything at all, it will serve the Cambodian economy also.