Showing posts with label Sarit Thanarat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sarit Thanarat. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Preah Vihear Temple, A Khmer Cultural Legacy

(Photo: EPA)

PREAH VIHEAR TEMPLE, A KHMER CULTURAL LEGACY

2.14.10
By Khmer Surin
ชาวแขมร์จังหวัดสุรินทร์

What is a Thai Unilateral Map? Is Preah Vihear Temple a Hindu Temple or a Khmer Temple? Who Built Preah Vihear Temple? Let's observe some facts...
Sarit Thanarat

The Thai unilateral map was a map produced by Field Marshal Sarit Thanarat government of Thailand to counter the verdict of the International Court of Justice on June 15, 1962, which granted Cambodia full ownership of the Khmer temple and the 4.6 km2 adjacent land. The map showed a new Thai boundary line abutting against the Preah Vihear temple, which did not coincide with UN recognized map of the two countries. The ICJ verdict sent a rippling shock for the rest of Thailand as if it were struck by 9.0 earthquake with the Khmer Preah Vihear Temple as being the epicenter. Many Thais were asked to contribute at least one Baht per person to help contribute to the World Court case at The Hague in the Netherlands under the Thai legal team of Seni Pramoj. The Thai defense team at the time argued that the mixed French-Siamese border commission did not follow the watershed line which was to be used for the delineation of the boundary between Cambodia and Thailand. The French understood the importance of the Preah Vihear temple to the people of Cambodia; and in recognizing the historical significance, France felt that the temple belonged to Cambodia and therefore indicated as so on the Annex I map that it was located inside the territory of Cambodia. King Chulalongkorn (Rama V) of Siam acknowledged the map at the signing of the Franco-Siamese Treaties of 1904-07.

To understand why Preah Vihear is so important to the people of Cambodia, we must look into its history. Preah Vihear was one the earliest Khmer temples built on an unusual breathtaking site on top of 525 m high cliff. Construction began in the 9th century and into the 10th century A.D. and it was dedicated to Hindu god Shiva and his manifestations as the mountain gods Sikharesvara and Bhadresvara. An interesting note to this is that a small Khmer Buddhist temple of 'Wat Kaew Sikha Kiri Svarak' on adjacent land was named after the mountain god. Construction of the temple began under the reigns of the Khmer kings Suryavarman I (1002-1050) and Suryvarman II (1113 -1150). An inscription found at the temple provides a detailed account of King Suryavarman II studying sacred rituals, celebrating religious festivals and making gifts, including white parasols, golden bowls and elephants, to his spiritual advisor, the aged Brahman Divakarapandita. In the wake of the decline of Hinduism in the region the site was converted to use by Buddhists.

Many Cambodians today feel that the Preah Vihear Temple is a Khmer heritage left behind by their great god-kings and ancestors. It bears no legacy or cultural heritage whatsoever to Thailand except the fact that the Siamese had conquered the area in the 15th century and placed under direct Siamese rule in the 18th century. The Khmer Empire was a great empire that ruled most of Southeast Asia between the 9th and 15th century as witnessed by the grandeur of the ruins at Angkor. Power struggle within the Khmer ruling class and foreign invasions led to its decline. The first recorded Thai kingdom of Sukhothai (1238 till 1438) was established under the rebellious yoke of two Siamese chieftains Khun Po Bangklanghao and Khun Po Phameung on Khmer territory. The Siamese were newcomers migrated from Nanchao, Southern China, during the wake of the Mongol invasion. They migrated South toward the Chao Phraya and Mekong regions of the Khmer kingdom. Through years of slave labor and breeding with Khmers. The once Tai 'sino-phenotype' had transformed into a better and stronger Siamese society, adopting almost everything from their Khmer masters. This explained as to why the Thai culture and language bear alot of Khmer influences over the years. And Subsequently, as the Khmer power declined in the region, the Siamese felt embarrassed and want nothing to associate with the Khmers. In doing so, they rewrote history as they see fit to glorify themselves. Many Thai historians rejected the idea that 'Khom' (a Thai term for ancient Khmers) bear no relationship to present-day Cambodians. However, this view was not shared by Professor Charnvit Kasetsiri, a highly distinguished Thai historian at Bangkok Thammasat University. The Thais admired 'Khom' culture but hated Khmers.

As Thailand progress since the 1950's, many Thai nationalists began to eradicate and distance themselves from the heavy Khmer influences in all aspects of Thai society. It was started with Plaek Pibulsonggram by his enforcement of a new Thai social culture based on the west, and then later with Field Marshal Sarit Thanarat at the height of Khmer-Thai conflict of Preah Vihear in the 1950's and 1960's. Many Thais were preeched to hate Khmers as inferior, not intelligent, lazy and ugly with dark skin. To the contrary, these racist ideas are not true at all. Thai school children were taught with a one-sided history based on incorrect informations. Western scholars believed the 'Tai' people migrated down from Yunnan province in southern China. However, some Thai history books suggested that they were native to Southeast Asia long before Khmer people at Ban Chiang. Even though 40% of the Thai language contained Khmer words, Khmer (or 'Khom' in Thai) writings were eradicated from Buddhist scriptures all over the country. Former King Norodom Sihanouk was often mocked in ridicules. Students were asked what color (si in Thai) that the Thai people hate---and their reply was 'Si-hanouk'. Thais admired the Khmers and their culture when they were a power in the region. When the Khmer empire diminished, everything changed over night and they hated Khmers and wanted to own everything that belonged to the Khmer people, including temples. There are currently about 45 Khmer temples in Thailand, and now they so desire to own other Khmer temples of Preah Vihear, Ta Moan Touch, Ta Moan Thom, adjacent land, etc.

Mon-Khmer people were one of the earliest inhabitants of Southeast Asia. Today, Khmer people call their homeland 'Suvarnabhumi' (a Sanskrit term for Golden Land). Many scholars believed that 'Kambuja' was a name given by the Kambojas a group of people who originally lived in the Pamir mountains of Afghanistan. They migrated to Gujarat (northwestern India), made their way to Sri Lanka and finally came to the Indochina peninsula and established the Khmer kingdom of 'Funan' between (4th century B.C.E-1th century A.D.). A Kambuja Kshatriya named Kambhu Svayambhuva married the local Naga tribe's daughter named Mera, together they established the 'Nokor Phnom' kingdom or 'Funan' (in Chinese: 扶南) as recorded by Chou Ta-kuan, a Chinese envoy to Cambodia. Many Indian customs, culture, religion and language were introduced and mingled with the native Naga tribe via this union period. Following the decline of 'Nokor Phnom', another Khmer kingdom of 'Chandra' emerged. 'Chandra' kingdom or 'Chenla' (in Chinese: 真腊) (550-802 A.D.), was a successor kingdom to 'Funan' or 'Nokor Phnom' kingdom. The Khmer Empire (802– 1431AD) was the second greatest recorded empire in Southeast Asia in terms of land mass after Srivijaya, present-day Indonesia. It covered all of present-day Cambodia, Thailand, Laos, parts of South-Vietnam and Burma). The term 'Khmer' (adjective for the people of Cambodia) was created a result of the conjugation of the two names in recorded Khmer history 'Kambhu + Mera'. A Khmer proverb stated that "If Khmers unite, Khmers survive, if Khmers divide, Khmers will perish." The Khmers have always been a proud and enduring race with great ancient history, echoing in the Khmer national anthem 'Nokor Reach' by the supreme Buddhist patriarch, Samdech Chuon Nath. They so desire to exist peacefully with all its surrounding neighbors. 'Suvarnabhumi' will always be golden as Khmer people come together in the defense of what it is rightfully hers.

---Khmer Surin
---ชาวแขมร์จังหวัดสุรินทร์
2.14.10

Friday, October 02, 2009

Opinion: Bangkok Post needs reality check

Tuo Jia Sarit Dhanarajata-the Siam royal narcissistic stooge and dictator

2 October 2009
Opinion by Kok Sap
Originally posted at http://khamerlogue.wordpress.com


In view of Siam quarrel over Cambodia rights to speak for and defend its property, apparently Bangkok Post misspoke and mischaracterized Khmer nation. Two wrongs can’t be right.

I agree with Bangkok Post and find Hun Sen words are intolerable and unnecessary in dealing with so called modern Siam country. As human endowed with rights to express true feeling, Hun Sen appears to speak his mind in full graphic. But Hun Sen wasn’t highly educated and rooted out from noble clans.

But if we look at the episode from the cause and effect law, Hun Sen isn’t too far from being proper in giving fair warning to those who wanted to harm his home country. Bangkok Post should put itself in Hun Sen shoes to understand how he felt.

Siam royal stooges started border row with premeditated intent to cause burden and anguish for Cambodia. Make it worst, with no authorization Royal Siam Air Force had capriciously and repeatedly flown its aircrafts over Cambodia air space. All say in volume how intense and contemptuous of Siam toward Cambodia. So somebody in Cambodia has to openly give the benefits of the doubt of Siam belligerences and war calling.

Probably it’s a good idea for the ASEAN Summit next month to initiate discussion on Siam violations of neighbors to prevent war. Obviously Siam is the instigator for the whole thing. Thus it would be advantageous for ASEAN 2015 aim to solidify market under singular vision, singular identity in one community under Siam thumb. If not careful, Preah Vihear could be a spark of new Indochina war.

Before it’s broken it must be fixed, so ASEAN can’t sit on hands longer. In due to inadvertent effect, then it should bring in UN Permanent Security Council to help.

The world knows by now that Cambodia has had enough of war. Contrary Siam would not want to enter Cambodia to its imperialist war. Definitely it can’t afford two wars while its southern provinces inhabitants are fighting for independence and home rule. That has not escaped human rights observers and sympathizers attention. Plus the Communist China will not stand idle to watch its investments in Cambodia, its old and loyal ally, gone to waste in Siam unrealistic conquest. So the matter will be taken straight away to UN Permanent Security Council by China anyway.

From records, Siam has been the bully and trespasser toward Cambodia for the past 771 years. Much Cambodia territory and people were annexed to Siam control via manipulation, holding Khmer royal families hostage, or plainly wars. Recently PM Abhisit Avijjajiva wasn’t helpful in the process in launching his private website “I love Thailand” to erroneously insinuate Cambodia had taken Siam land several instances. That’s typical of most foreigner descents born into Siam confused mentality and twisted history. After much criticism and uproars, the website was off.

Subsequently Cambodia was not well received in world view because its Viet Cong trained Khmer Rouge killing fields’ atrocity in 1975-1979. In reality Cambodia has been in defensive and the receiving end throughout history.

The irony of Hun Sen harsh words should not blind Bangkok Post from knowing that Siam started the plots when UNESCO admitted Khmer Preah Vihear into world heritage site in 2008. Cambodia effort to register Preah Vihear with UNESCO was made known to Siam all along.

The real problem is not just UNESCO acceptance of Preah Vihear without listing Siam in partnership but the unilateral Siam drawn map post 1904-1907 Siam–French drawn map. Siam knew then that the colonized Khmer demanding the return all of its provinces along north and west of Dangrek –Cardamom range. But both colonialists french and siam ignored and forced new map down Cambodia throat until to date.

After the narcissistic Sarit Dhanarajata and Thanom Kattikachorn invaded and illegally took control of Preah Vihear, in 1962 the not so modern Cambodia took matter to the International Court of Justice in Hague. The ICJ had ruled that Preah Vihear temple located on and the surrounded site per 1904-1907 map belongs to Cambodia rightly. Also the Court ordered Siam to return all stolen artifacts from Preah Vihear to the proper rightful owner. None was complied and respected.

In retaliation dictator Sarit banned Khmer inhabitants, living under Siam control, from carrying on their tradition and heritage. Khmer language was outlawed and forbidden from teaching to children. Countless old Khmer scriptures and books found in pagodas were confiscated and burned down as an ultimate warning.

Again, in October 1991, Siam has signed Paris Accord to recognize and respect Cambodia territorial integrity and sovereignty. But when Cambodia is ready to demarcate its boundary line, Siam threw fits and tantrum over Preah Vihear admittance to world heritage registry.

It’s ludicrous of Bangkok Post to paint Siam as innocent virgin and victim in matter. The former colonists like France and England knew Siam history and its active intent to conquer Cambodia.

Now under royal backing, Siam current government seems to suffer memory lapse. As long as Siam royal stooge, PAD, will continue to twist politics to pressure the 2006 Royal Junta accomplice, Democrats Party and Abhisit government, the inevitable is expected.

The long range plan is Siam wanting Cambodia land with its concerted diplomacy in ASEAN circle and using US back door to enter UN permanent Security Council.

Cambodia is well aware of Siam twisted history and ill will toward Cambodia dating back to Phlek, Khuong and Sarit eras. Also during the refugee era 1975-1993, many international witnesses have learned first hand how Siam mistreated Khmers from both sides of its present border with Cambodia.

In 1979, Thai Task Force Unit 80 dumped 45,000-49,000 Khmers off Preah Vihear steep cliff to die from landmines, shots, dehydration and starvation. Those who ran back into Siam controlled territory were shot to death at point blank. The number of casualty was unreported and hidden from world press to date. The notorious Siam Task Force Unit 80 terrorized, robbed, raped, murdered and tortured countless refugees in camps. The sad part is many Thai Task Force members are Khmer descents.

Since 1907, in reality Cambodia avoided war with Siam at all costs even it had to lose provinces along Dangrek – Cardamom range. Now Cambodia wants Siam to respect 1904-1907 map and 1991 Paris Peace Accord. Ridiculously Bangkok Post exaggerated the 2003 incident led to destruction of Siam embassy and businesses because of the confused subject of Siam kingdom belittled Cambodia and Angkor Wat.

Nonetheless, Cambodia had not held public protest against Siam on going violations yet. Also note all the Siam property and business damages during 2003 protest were compensated in full. As Kasit Pyromya, current Foreign Minister and active PAD instigator, has called Hun Sen, the thug, who saw to fix problems to sooth Siam investors feeling.

For the so claimed modern Siam, yet it had not compensated Khmer property damages and live losses which caused by the Royal thugs, PAD. Days ago, Siam black clad soldiers arrested, shot and burned one of the 16 Khmer trespassers alive to death.

Other word, if Bangkok Post speaks of Hun Sen retaliation in harsh words that were just words. Yet his reaction was merely a reflection of the Bangkok ruling house hypocrisy. Shamefully Bangkok Post failed to print out Siam hypocritical ruler behavior. One can ask if the ruler lives the hypocrisy how could the subjects not to follow.

Borderline between Siam and Cambodia will never be resolved without the international commission step in to monitor the entire episode. The ASEAN will face the impasse of its 2015 aim unless Siam is fully reformed its present regime to restore 1932 democracy and world confidence. All 16 manipulative military coups to subjugate people into worshipping same hypocrite and inhumane ruler are quite enough. After all, is it Siam modern in broad definition?

Cambodia knows Siam too well and its words from the past or present government can not be trusted. Siam will always try to blame others for its own responsibilities. So the best bet for Bangkok Post to do is to call out the singular vision guy who divides and destroys Siam and its neighbor harmony. Then its condemnation of Hun Sen belligerence shall be heard and lauded. But as long as Bangkok Post dares not to condemn the sole culprit of Siam on going turmoil, then Hun Sen will not do otherwise.

Apparently Bangkok Post journalistic candor and modern civility seems missing from its conscience. Other than that Siam must stop playing victim over its spilled milk.

Saturday, August 04, 2007

Preah Vihear: How Thailand accepted the verdict

An anecdote in Cambodia's history
Collected by LAO Mong Hay, UK


PREAH VIHEAR
How Thailand accepted the verdict
according to Dr. Han Li-wu, Ambassador of the Republic of China to Thailand, 1956-64


'My friendly relations with Marshal Sarit [Thanarat], Thanom [Kittikachorn] and Praphart [Charusathien] grew so close, especially with Sarit, that I became, so to speak, his personal consultant in international relations. Let me tell you an anecdote. Thailand and Cambodia had a dispute over the sovereignty of a hill, called Kao Phra Vihan, on their border. They submitted the case to the Word Court for adjudication, and I was warned by the Chinese judge in the court that Thailand might lose. I warned the Thai government, but they did not show much interest. They were overconfident. After they had lost the case, the Cabinet was split over the question of accepting the verdict. The Cabinet was meeting practically every day, Marshal Sarit having, at the time, taken over the prime ministership after a successful operation.

'One morning, Sarit went to the airport to see off a state guest, and I, as Dean of the Diplomatic Corps, was there as well. After the guest had left, I shook Sarit's hand and asked why he looked so sombre. He said, "Kao Prah Vihan, Kao Prah Vihan, every day! Headaches!" At once I said, "Marshal, why should you worry?" He looked at me with astonishment. "Accept the verdict.". I continued, "and close the road to Prah Viharn. How are the Cambodians to go up the hill from their side, which has no road and is the steep side of the hill? "At once he got the point and repeated the question, "How could they go up the hill?" with a broad smile. He summoned a Cabinet meeting, announced his decision to accept the verdict and closed the only road to the hill on the Thai side.'

Source: P. Van de Meerssche, A Life to Treasure: The Authorized Biography of Han Li-wu (London: The Sherwood Press, 1987), p. 106