Kem Sokha, Cambodian Center for Human Rights President, has been under criticisms from SRP for his increasing attacks on SRP for working with prime minister Hun Sen - most of these involving social problems affecting people - even though SRP is still an opposition party. Alex Sutton, IRI resident country director, warned that IRI financial support to CCHR could be affected should Kem Sokha reenters the political fray. Up to now, CCHR had accomplished the important task of educating Cambodian people on democracy and human rights, however, Kem Sokha had recently been plagued by rumors of his impending return to the Cambodian political life. So far, Kem Sokha had not personally put these rumors to rest. (Photo RFA)
Monday, March 27, 2006
By Yun Samean and Whitney Kvasager
THE CAMBODIA DAILY
Marking an unprecedented strike against an organization once considered an ideological and political ally, the Sam Rainsy Party announced on Sunday that it will boycott all forums organized by the Cambodian Center for Human Rights.
In a scathing letter dated March 22 and received Sunday, SRP Acting Secretary-General Meng Rita accused CCHR Director Kem Sokha of hoarding funds in order to launch a political party, and of using the organization's public forums to create a personality cult.
"Kem Sokha ... has used public forum at the grassroots level for his own benefit more than for freedom of expression, knowledge dissemination and for the benefit of real people," Meng Rita wrote.
Meng Rita also said that the majority of CCHR's volunteers are unpaid SRP activists and that the organization had stifled SRP participation during the forums by limiting party members' speaking time to 10 minutes per participant.
Kem Sokha could not be contacted for comment.
CCHR spokesman Ou Virak said the SRP claims were groundless, reiterating that Kem Sokha had no plans to start his own political party.
"We have tried to put that rumor to rest," Ou Virak said.
"There is always the rumor that Kem Sokha will form a political party. Only time will tell that we have no intention of such," he said.
SRP speakers were allotted the same time as everyone else at forums, he added. "The public forum has a time limit. We give 10 minutes each round, and we give two or three rounds. Even Kem Sokha himself we put on a time constraint" he said.
Alex Sutton, resident country director for the US-based International Republican Institute, said the SRP boycott of the public forums deviated from what was once a symbiotic relationship between the two groups.
Sutton urged the two groups to find a quick solution. "CCHR and SRP are like-minded organizations. They should be working together," he said. "It would be a shame to waste too much time focusing on this issue."
He said the IRI, which annually donates about $800,000 to CCHR and also provides political training to the SRP, would reconsider its relationship with the human rights organization should Kem Sokha start his own party. "If Kem Sokha reenters the world of politics, certainly it would have an effect on how IRI could support CCHR," he said.
SRP leader Sam Rainsy refused to comment.
SRP members contacted on Sunday denied that the boycott indicated fears that Kem Sokha was usurping the SRPs popularity, which some said would suffer as a result of Sam Rainsy's growing coziness with Prime Minister Hun Sen and his ruling CPP.
SRP lawmaker Son Chhay said that CCHR must stay out of the nation's politics. "The center must be neutral," he said. "So we encourage them not to be too publicly active."
Committee for Free Elections Director Koul Panha warned that the boycott showed inconsistencies in SRPs political message.
"They want to introduce a culture of dialogue, but dialogue is not just with the government. Dialogue is dialogue with everybody," he said.
Koul Panha added that the SRP was still a strong opposition and that he did not believe Kem Sokha would attempt to push them out of the political arena. "They are softer than before, but they are still the opposition," he said.
In a scathing letter dated March 22 and received Sunday, SRP Acting Secretary-General Meng Rita accused CCHR Director Kem Sokha of hoarding funds in order to launch a political party, and of using the organization's public forums to create a personality cult.
"Kem Sokha ... has used public forum at the grassroots level for his own benefit more than for freedom of expression, knowledge dissemination and for the benefit of real people," Meng Rita wrote.
Meng Rita also said that the majority of CCHR's volunteers are unpaid SRP activists and that the organization had stifled SRP participation during the forums by limiting party members' speaking time to 10 minutes per participant.
Kem Sokha could not be contacted for comment.
CCHR spokesman Ou Virak said the SRP claims were groundless, reiterating that Kem Sokha had no plans to start his own political party.
"We have tried to put that rumor to rest," Ou Virak said.
"There is always the rumor that Kem Sokha will form a political party. Only time will tell that we have no intention of such," he said.
SRP speakers were allotted the same time as everyone else at forums, he added. "The public forum has a time limit. We give 10 minutes each round, and we give two or three rounds. Even Kem Sokha himself we put on a time constraint" he said.
Alex Sutton, resident country director for the US-based International Republican Institute, said the SRP boycott of the public forums deviated from what was once a symbiotic relationship between the two groups.
Sutton urged the two groups to find a quick solution. "CCHR and SRP are like-minded organizations. They should be working together," he said. "It would be a shame to waste too much time focusing on this issue."
He said the IRI, which annually donates about $800,000 to CCHR and also provides political training to the SRP, would reconsider its relationship with the human rights organization should Kem Sokha start his own party. "If Kem Sokha reenters the world of politics, certainly it would have an effect on how IRI could support CCHR," he said.
SRP leader Sam Rainsy refused to comment.
SRP members contacted on Sunday denied that the boycott indicated fears that Kem Sokha was usurping the SRPs popularity, which some said would suffer as a result of Sam Rainsy's growing coziness with Prime Minister Hun Sen and his ruling CPP.
SRP lawmaker Son Chhay said that CCHR must stay out of the nation's politics. "The center must be neutral," he said. "So we encourage them not to be too publicly active."
Committee for Free Elections Director Koul Panha warned that the boycott showed inconsistencies in SRPs political message.
"They want to introduce a culture of dialogue, but dialogue is not just with the government. Dialogue is dialogue with everybody," he said.
Koul Panha added that the SRP was still a strong opposition and that he did not believe Kem Sokha would attempt to push them out of the political arena. "They are softer than before, but they are still the opposition," he said.
1 comment:
Disappointing,after all he was not a real man.Insecurity will mock him. Raingsy Three mottos:
1-Destruction of Sihanoukist-monarchist right wing,
2-Self elevvation as only democratic voice with dictatorial new culture,
3-Self prophecized as Savior of Monarchy,
He is sucking up to Sihanouk and undermining US support.Dangerous game,Somdach Keh Samdech Raingsy wanna -be!
True color is out now.
Post a Comment