Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Arrest warrant for General Kieng Savoun

Click on the warrant to zoom in.

The warrant states that the cause of the arrest is: "Kieng Savoun ... is accused of [being] a group of armed men, [action] perpetrated in Battambang in 2006 and up to January 2007".

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

How can he be one of the armed men if he's unable to stand alone because of his longtime sickness ?
The communists always proceed that way to arrest people.Same case was done with Cheam Channy.

Anonymous said...

First of all, Psycho, Cambodia
is not a communist. If you keep
this shit up, you will never hear
the end of it, you got that,
stupid?

Anonymous said...

Based on facts, the regime in Cambodia is not clear, but it is more toward Communist and Autocracy, and the Monarchy is only a decoration. It is very confusing.

The Regime CPP was created by the Vietnamese, the leftist (political party of Communist). At the same time, the Vietnamese still controls both Laos and Cambodia, except that Laos is purely Communist and Cambodia has King, but is under an autocracy rule.

Based on facts, Cambodia is Communist under the Vietnamese control, an autocracy ruled by an autocrat, because one man (Hun Sen) has unlimited authority, along with a Monarchy but a fake monarchy. Monarchy in Cambodia is governed by the autocrat and Communist. Since Hun Sen was a Communist it is hard for the public around the world to figure out, besides seeing him is a still Communist.

If you disagree please share.

Anonymous said...

What is the difference between
one dominating party in Cambodia
and in Singapore, Japan, ...

Need all parties be balance.

Again: Winner use skill and losers
use noise. Do you understand what
that mean?

Moreover, two parties like in
the US ain't heaven either. They
aren't what I called "people
choice," but Corporates' puppets sent so control American. So what
is the big deal?

Anonymous said...

I totally disagree with you 8:32 PM.
In Cambodia or Burma the losers got power and well armed and noise not using skills. Yes skill to kill.

You don't need skill to win in those countries. You are wrong about that.

Anonymous said...

Nope, skill is skill no matter
what it may be. There were a
bunch of idiots from the US who
called themself freedom fighter
who came to coup us, but they
lost because we have the skill.
And when we coup the cheaters in
93 and win because of our skill
also. Thus, we can beat all our
oppostions at any game because
our skill are simply better.