Saturday, April 21, 2007

Kem Sokha in Long Beach seeking for US support

Cambodian civil rights activist comes to L.B.

Kem Sokha says he is returning to the political fold.

04/20/2007
By Greg Mellen, Staff writer
Long Beach Press Telegram (Calif., USA)

"... critics say, at best, Kem will dilute the power of opposition parties and help Hun Sen and the CCP further consolidate their power."

LONG BEACH - Cambodian human rights activist Kem Sokha is back in the political game.

After spending five years as the ultimate political outsider, watch dog and critic of Prime Minister Hun Sen and the ruling Cambodian People's Party in his role as president of the Cambodia Center for Human Rights, Kem announced he is stepping down from the nongovernmental organization to launch a new political party.

The Human Rights Party has applied for status from the Cambodian Ministry of the Interior and could be officially recognized by next week.

In an effort to drum up international support, Kem has been touring the North American continent, with recent stops in Canada, Seattle and Northern California.

On Sunday, he will speak in Long Beach at the Holiday Inn, 1133 Atlantic Ave., at 3 p.m. Admission is free. With the largest concentration of Cambodians in the United States, Long Beach is a vital stop for native Cambodians seeking U.S. support. This is Kem's second visit to Long Beach in just over a year.

With national elections slated in 2008, Kem hopes to provide a legitimate opposition party to the ruling CPP, which has been consolidating power in Cambodia.

After walking away from the often unseemly world of Cambodian politics in 2002, Kem earned tremendous popularity in his country, particularly in rural areas, as an advocate for human rights.

Across the countryside, Kem's group organized forums in which residents aired grievances and discussed the issues of the day. The forums, which were often highly critical of the government, were broadcast on the "Voice of Democracy" radio program.

"For almost five years, I educated people about human rights and democracy," Kem said. "Now the people ask me to go into politics."

Asked to run

According to Kem, more than 200,000 Cambodians signed petitions recruiting him to create a party.

"I tell them, I don't want to establish a party. I want them to establish a party, and I will help them," Kem says.

Kem is no stranger to Cambodian politics. He was a member of the parliament established after the United Nations sanctioned elections in 1993 and served until 2002 as a representative and senator. He was also chairman of the National Assembly Human Rights Commission.

However, throughout his career, he has been a lightning rod, in part because of his liberal views about democracy.

In January 2006, he was jailed for 17 days on criminal defamation charges, which were later dropped. When news of Kem's jailing was released, there was immediate condemnation from the international community, which likely hastened his release.

Kem also fled the country in 1997 after a government coup, and in 1998, he sought protection in the U.S. Embassy in Phnom Penh.

Critics of Kem have questioned his motives since he created his human rights group, claiming it barely disguised his true goals of returning to politics.

A year ago, when Kem was declaring he was uninterested in politics, the Sam Rainsy Party said Kem had "aims at conquering the SRP electorate for his future political party."

Other critics say, at best, Kem will dilute the power of opposition parties and help Hun Sen and the CCP further consolidate their power.

"(Those) people don't understand what I do," Kem said. "My objective is real democracy in Cambodia. There are many parties in Cambodia, but no real democracy."

To underscore his claim that he is not seeking personal power, Kem says one of the main platforms in his party is a two-term term limit.

The effect

Michael Hayes, publisher and editor in chief of the English-language Phnom Penh Post, says it's too early to gauge Kem's electoral clout.

"It depends on how much money he can raise for his campaign. Obviously, the more `opposition parties' there are, the less likely the chance any one of them will gain a significant number of seats in Parliament. So this will be a problem for the Sam Rainsy Party (SRP), which is currently the strongest opposition party," Hayes said in an e-mailed response to questions.

The relationship between Kem and Sam Rainsy has been prickly in the past, which may make for rough going in attempts at coalition.

For now, the Sam Rainsy Party is taking a neutral stance.

"For SRP, we welcome all political parties which abide by democratic principles like us," Chrea Sochenda of Sam Rainsy Party told Radio Free Asia, "but in general, SRP has no concern about anybody forming a political party, or about any personality forming his party."

Hayes sees a wrinkle in the upcoming vote.

"The elections will be interesting, mostly because around 1 million Cambodians will have turned 18 since the 2003 elections and will thus be eligible to vote," Hayes wrote in an e-mail. "These young people have different aspirations and world views than their parents and no memories of the Khmer Rouge years. The opposition is hoping they will vote for change; the CPP is working on ways to get them to support the ruling party."

Kem says the recent commune-level elections in his country showed a lot of disaffection and apathy among voters. He is after the estimated 2.5 million voters who didn't exercise their rights to vote.

"I want to integrate those 2.5 million," Kem said. "If you give people hope and choice, that's real democracy."

Greg Mellen can be reached at greg.mellen@presstelegram.com or (562) 499-1291.

18 comments:

Anonymous said...

A coalition of Kem Sokha and Sam Rainsy?

It can happen on two simple conditions:

1. Everyone sticks to the principles not personalities. At this moment the principle is true democracy and human rights. In order for this to happen, both parties must have the same platform and in particular internal structure and party constitutions that allow internal democracy. As an observer, I do not see any (i mean any) existing party with a democratic internal structure and constitution. Instead, it is the rule of man (usually one man). To sum up, 1, you need same principle

2. You need good characters. People must be trustworthy and show good leadership (decisive, courage, and take responsibility)

I think the second is easier for the both men. It is the first that is difficult. For ex. the srp has a steering committee--everyone knows it's a joke. Steering committee is a parking space for people who have some money for the srp and wants title to come along with the sacrifice. They have no real power. The power of the SRP stays with Sam Rainsy himself and a few people who made up the "permanent committee". In fact members of the permanent committee made up of SR and his wife, Eng Chhay Eang, Yim Savan and the wives and in law.

If SRP is truly interested in creating a "coalition of the democrats" they must be willing to be dramatic. It needs to start from the inside!!!

Anonymous said...

Charek Khmer: when are we going to learn about our stupidity behavior? Khmer have been exploited with Charek Khmer, so do we still not have a clue yet?

Khmer practice and used RULE 1 but RULE 2 forget RULE 1, that is Khmer problems and that is why Ah Yuon like it a lot.

Anonymous said...

Charek Khmer, I really like your idea a lot. Kem Sokha now is being bought by CPP. It is really, If you don't beleive me, you will see in the near future.

Recently, Kem Sokha went to CTN to meet with Mr. Soy Sopheap. Can you what will happen?

Please learn about Kem Sokha more from his political time during Soen San party and Vigelent NGO and then CCHR.

Anonymous said...

Kem Sokha use NGO as a cover up to create CCHR and then use CCHR as a cover up to create HUMAN RIGHT PARTY!!!!! If you are talking about being stealthy and nobody is more stealthy than Kem Sokha himself!

If Kem Sokha claimed that he is the real man that he is then he doesn't need to cover up anything or hide anything since the begining! This is not the first time that Kem Sokha had tasted Cambodian politic!!!!I am hoping that his political taste of Cambodian politic this time will not turn out to be bittersweet!!!

Anonymous said...

To all khmers LONG BEACH...
Please don't support a LOSER kem sokha.Creating MORE PARTY is a receipe for diaster. You can either join SRP or cpp .It's your choice.Don't donate your dollars to the loser.This idiot want nothing but to be in the spotlight that all.

Anonymous said...

ROFLMAO!!!

Anonymous said...

Is Kem Sokha Yuan?
If not then he needs to not support Yuan (CPP).

Anonymous said...

Khem Sokha will use his nonsense rhethoric words to sprlit votes from SRP and explicitly support CPP.

So, the question is "what trend of Khem Sokha Freedom Party will serve?"

Anonymous said...

For the Cambodian younger generation, like I am, I really want to have a model from the elder generation.

The youngers, as I observed, have suffered alot from the act of those elderly.

Why could`t they work together, if everyone claims to be real democracy? Why don`t you,Soka, Rainsy,Rith and others work to getter to, at least, to create a culture of solidarity for the younger genearation?

I guess, when you die, the younger generation will curse all of you, at least I will do.

Khemara P.Penh

Anonymous said...

Let me analyse :
Kem Sokha was Hun Sen's trusted man even before 1993. He spied from Son San by becoming Son San's spy before 1993. Then he and CPP destroyed Son San party...It goes on.
Now please stop hoping that Kem Sokha will join Sam Rainsy one day. It will never happen. Kem Sokha must do what his boss said.

From Canada.

Anonymous said...

I believe some of us will be attending the meeting. I would like to ask the public if anyone out there has specific ?'s and would want us to ask Mr. Kem Sokha, please post your post ?'s.

For the interest of our Khmer people and Cambodia, please no bogus ???'s.

Anonymous said...

Dr. Tith Kiri will be Mr. Kem Sokha's number one cheerleader.

Anonymous said...

I will give an easy example: let say out of 100% votes in 1 county, if 40% go to CPP and 39% to SRP and 20% to Kem Sokha. CPP will win 1 seat. But if Kem Sokha is not running, SRP would have got at least 2% more to win with 41%. So do you see the danger ? Kem Sokha came to separate the vote because Hun Sen told him to do so. And he will neeeeeever join SRP.

Anonymous said...

First, SRP should not have the right to monopolize Cambodian "democrats". In the past, because of the fact that's there are no party of real democracy, SRP was seen as the hope. But then SRP consolidate his power in his party, installed a whole bunch of cronies and families (wives of a few and in-laws).

The recent commune election shows quite well that over 2.5 million registered voters did not voted. You can blame the NEC but the major side to the coin is the fact that SRP failed to mobilize many, particularly people in the rural.

SRP's arrogance has alienate many intellectual inside Cambodia as well as people abroad. Also the fact of SRP elite style failed to capture the grassroots.

If SRP is intending to stay as a good opposition party, be the way they are. But if they want to win and rule, then they must be inclusive.

To be inclusive, they must set a more democratic structure and internal rules. Many people want to help Cambodia but not many want to go into a party to support individual's ambition for absolute power. If SRP claimed to be democratic, then start with its own party.

Anonymous said...

for those refusing to meet Kem Sokha, go and see and then make decision. That's democratic!

Anonymous said...

Dear Khmers abroad.
What kem Sokha is doing is of a good help to the CPP to cling to the power. Kem Sokha has made a big mistake when he believes he could win some seats after preaching democracy and human right in the whole Country. Don't pretend you are a charismatic politician. Popularity is different from Capability.

Anonymous said...

Here is my true democratic world fuck the voting and screw the politicians. No vote no power and fuck all.

Anonymous said...

I second that!