Friday, May 11, 2007

After 10 years, Blair says enough ... after almost 30 years, Hun Sen says maybe another 30 more years

Thu May 10, 2007
Blair bows out after 10 years

By Katherine Baldwin

TRIMDON (Reuters) - Tony Blair announced on Thursday he would step down on June 27 after a decade as prime minister and told Britons disillusioned by the war in Iraq that he had always done what he believed was right.

Blair's popularity has suffered since he sent British forces to join the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq and a Labour Party rebellion in September forced him to say he would quit within a year, opening the door for Gordon Brown to take over.

"Hand on heart, I did what I thought was right," Blair told Labour Party members in his constituency in northern England. "I may have been wrong, that's your call. But believe one thing, if nothing else, I did what I thought was right for our country."

U.S. President George W. Bush developed a remarkably close relationship with Blair and the White House hailed him as an "extraordinary leader" and a strong friend and ally.

"The prime minister has demonstrated the ability to work with presidents of both parties and maintain a long tradition of an alliance that is of extraordinary strategic importance," said White House spokesman Tony Snow.

Blair's resignation triggers a contest to lead the Labour Party which finance minister Brown is favorite to win. Labour said its new leader and deputy would be announced on June 24.

Brown would become prime minister after the departure of Blair, the only person in a century besides Margaret Thatcher to have held the post for 10 years.

"I think that's long enough, not only for me, but also for the country and sometimes the only way you conquer the pull of power is to set it down," Blair said.

NORTHERN IRELAND PEACE

Blair will be remembered for helping bring peace to Northern Ireland after decades of violence, winning three straight elections for Labour for the first time and dragging it from its left-wing roots to the centre of British politics.

"There is no doubt, however, that the prime minister's concerted efforts helped in ultimately securing devolution in Northern Ireland," said Protestant cleric Ian Paisley, who long resisted the power-sharing government launched this week.

An opinion poll published by the Guardian newspaper on Thursday showed 60 percent of voters believed Blair would be remembered as a force for change, though not always good. The ICM poll said 44 percent believed he had been good for Britain.

"I came into office with high hopes for Britain's future and you know I leave it with even higher hopes for Britain's future," he said. "This is a country that can today be excited by the opportunities, not constantly fretful of the dangers."

Blair had long been expected to hand over power to let another Labour leader guide the party into the next national election due in May 2010, at the latest.

Brown, whose official residence is next door to Blair's in London's Downing Street, has waited with increasing impatience for the departure of his neighbor. Critics say their rivalry, often bitter, has diluted the government's effectiveness.

Blair has been tainted by a party funding corruption scandal in which he became the first serving prime minister to be quizzed by police, as a witness, in a criminal probe.

Blair and Brown were the twin architects of Labour's rise to power in 1997 after 18 years in the political wilderness.

Under Blair, Britain's economy has enjoyed a strong era of growth, high employment and low interest rates. But Brown will take over as interest rates hit a six-year high on Thursday and are set to rise again.

Brown's chief challenge will be to revive support for Labour and overtake the opposition Conservatives in the opinion polls.

Conservative leader David Cameron, 40, has revitalized the party of Margaret Thatcher -- the only prime minister to hold power longer than Blair in the past century -- since he became leader in 2005. Polls suggest he could win a slim majority in parliament in a national election.

17 comments:

Anonymous said...

I think the leader of Cambodia should be learn from Prime Minister Tony Blair, Bill Clinton and Other..Comment by Bross Lob Sa Ti..Live in Lynn Mass.USA.

Anonymous said...

They will never learn anything. Are you kidding? They're all think, they wrap in gold. That is our leaders' mentality. #1 and never have to leave the chair and it's bad! bad!. Very selfish & embarassing to be Khmer.

Anonymous said...

We don't need to look at western world who have changed their leaders in every two or three terms. Look at Vietnam and China, these two countries have changed thousand of leaders from the top to the bottom since 1989. They have changed their President, their Prime Minister, Their National Assembly leader etc.. and etc... That why their country has developped. Cambodia is now worst than North Korea in term of keeping rotten woods to stay in power. They are nothing but National Robbers. Areak Prey

Anonymous said...

Well, China, Vietnam, ..., and EU,
has good qualified candidates for
replacement, but what do we have?
Nothing but a bunch of Power Hungry
Morons, and you know that fair
well, 6:26. Don't tell me that you
don't.

Anyhow this is all irrelevant,
Singapore has been ruled by Lee
Kwan Yew and his family since the
late 50's and they are doing very
well. Thus, changing ruler is not
a big factor for anything here.
So stop bickering.

Anonymous said...

Same leader will never give anything new, but just the same corrupted and cheated tactics and mentality. If we change to other new one, and the old good leader can come again to show that he is good, so that we know he is real smart and good.

But when he is firmly holding the power, how can you measure that other has no competence like him? This is a rotten compitition.

Your old fashing of thinking and ruling (9:11AM) is not different from Khmer Rouge or other dictators who have been dead uselessly and embarrassing...

KY

Anonymous said...

Wrong, our old thinking relieves
many people from poverty. It is
your space-aged thinking that is
like Pol Pot's with a little twist.
You will caused the country more
suffering and failure for sure
just as Pol Pot and Lon Nol did.
Who are you trying to fool, 9:55?
Where is the evidences of your
successfull space-aged thinking,
huh?

Anonymous said...

10:29 AM your asking for evidence from 9:55. And where is yours? Both side is right about other leaders and how progressive their countries are. But if a leader does not care about the people, how do you expect the government to flourish. That is the difference between our Dumbo Jumbo leader(s). People can`t rise up to challenge the government while other countries either with set term limits or just ruled by the same Family can. That is what make a government responsible to it`s people, for it`s people. All in all it is how the governement respects the will of their own people. Then the country will see a bright light. Just my 2cent

Anonymous said...

I told you my evidences. Just looks
at Singapore, Taiwan, China,
and Japan. The same parties have
have ruled it for decades and they
are doing fine. Now, let us see
some of yours, shall we?

Anonymous said...

That's the khmer leader's mentality.From SIHANOUK down to HUN SEN.
Sihanouk got kick out by Marshall LON NOL.pol pot was dethroned by YUONS.HUN SEN , wELL , i don't think anybody capable to topple him yet at this moment.

Anonymous said...

And 30 years has lapsed and still
counting. I wouldn't hold my breath
if I were you. PM is just the best
of all times in history, period.

Anonymous said...

MANY WELL KNOWN ASIAN LEADERS ARE SELFISH AND DEADLY.

That is all we have to say. Thing will never change and just like the wheather, Summer and Rain almost all year long and that is all in Asia.

In Europe or America, there is spring, summer, fall and winter. All has the beauty of it own for people to live, do things and enjoy their lives in whatever way, they want.

Every season, there is a way to grow, prosper, cherish and enjoy or invent new thing for better tomorrow.

Like for their leaders, people want something new or better way to handle crisis, perhaps more powerful and they keep searching until they find it or satify about it and there are other people or leaders who can do that. Every new person that is born, came with a brand new brain and sure is new idea. Who invent computer? A 23 years old college kid in America! for crying out loud! That is how, he got Bill Gate's attention and that is how Bill Gate gets to own 40 billions dollars in his bank account. Any one of us or leader has 40 billions bucks in the bank? We didn't think so. Not even what ever his name is that runs China. He gets to own nothing or able to do anything with it. Fool! all belongs to the state.

In the winter when it is so cold and freezing, the West invented heat. They invented air conditioning when it's 100 degree hot temperature out there!. They show cases flowers on this earth when it's spring and invented fine resorts and Spas all over the world for people to enjoy and be happy about in the summer.

What did we or Asian have done invented? Nothing and nothing is word. Please name one thing that is standing out and good or great for the humanity.??????????

We see a lot of nasty bastards and killers. That is all we see. Shame on us Asain and all of you who resist change!!!!!!

Good for you Mr. Blair. You didn't do anything wrong or be shameful about. You just like to give other people a chance to do better thing. We love you and mighty proud of your courage! God save Mr. Blair!

Anonymous said...

What did we or Asian have done
invented, you motherfucker? Well,
I bet you are eating it (noodle)
twice a week, and write on it
(paper), and printing it (printer),
and play with it (firework),...
Need I go on, you space-aged
retard?

Anonymous said...

Here's an interesting story about
Tony Blair:

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/blair_protection.html

Anonymous said...

Jump! you asshole noodle heads.Hahahahah!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

What a pity monkey!heee.heee...

Anonymous said...

hehe!

Anonymous said...

Iraq has a lot of oils, much much
more than Cambodia. It would be
a shame if their citizens will
not be benefited from any of it as
people in Brunei has. I believe
Iraq will have to spend a good part
of their oil on weapon to defense
themself year after year until
their oil wells will ultimately
dry up.