Thang D. Nguyen, Jakarta
The Jakarta Post (Indonesia)
As the crisis in Myanmar worsens, protesters in neighboring Malaysia and elsewhere in Asia are increasing their calls for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) to play a more proactive role in overcoming the situation.
But really, what else can ASEAN do about Myanmar?
ASEAN - whose members are Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam - has tried to work with Myanmar in a constructive way to bring democracy into the country.
In 2003, foreign ministers from ASEAN issued a statement urging Myanmar's military rulers to free Nobel Laureate and democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi, whose National League for Democracy secured a landslide, but unrecognized, victory in a 1990 election.
Last year, an ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Myanmar Caucus was established, with the primary aims of pushing democracy in Myanmar and helping free Ms. Suu Kyi.
Let's not forget that ASEAN has only recently moved away from its founding principle of non-interference - i.e. members will not get involved in issues considered to be the internal affairs of other members.
To ASEAN's credit, the pressure it exerted in the past led to Myanmar giving up its scheduled turn as the chair of the association last year (the Philippines took the position, as it was next in line).
After consulting other members, Singapore, which assumed the chairmanship of ASEAN in July, called on the organization to make a statement on the crisis in Myanmar.
Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said ASEAN cannot "credibly remain silent or uninvolved in this matter".
But, let's face it, a statement from ASEAN may be helpful, but it won't be a critical force. In other words, the Myanmarese junta is really beyond the reach of ASEAN at this point.
Do not forget, this is the same government that defied calls from the U.S., the European Union, ASEAN itself and the entire international community to free Aung San Suu Kyi and allow democracy to take place.
The proof is that despite U.S. sanctions that President George W. Bush announced in New York during the United Nations (UN) General Assembly last week, the Myanmarese junta went ahead with its crackdown on Buddhist monks and civilian protesters, arresting more than 100 and killing at least 17.
India and China - two neighboring countries outside ASEAN that have influence on Myanmar - have reacted disappointingly to the situation. While they both expressed concern about the crisis, they clearly said it falls into the category of Myanmar's internal affairs.
As a close trading partner and corridor to the Indian Ocean, Myanmar must be stable in China's eyes.
However, a Beijing-backed crackdown on the monks over their protests would hurt China's image, especially as it prepares to host the Olympics next year.
As for India, Myanmar is its source of oil, so it will remain diplomatic.
With news from Myanmar overwhelming the mood at the General Assembly, the UN Security Council held an urgent meeting and agreed to send the UN Secretary-General's special envoy, Ibraham Gambari, to Myanmar to deal with the junta.
However, Gambari's presence is not strong enough for the junta.
He handed over a message from the UN urging the junta to stop its crackdown on the monks and civilian protesters.
But this regime has shown, and continues to show, defiance of instructions, no matter how strong they are or who they are from.
After all, the junta has been living with warnings, sanctions and other forms of pressure from the international community for the past 19 years.
So as sad as it may be, another visit from another envoy with another message from the UN is nothing new for the junta.
Therefore, if the crisis in Myanmar is to be resolved, the UN needs to gather its will, consensus and resources to send an ultimatum to the junta.
The ultimatum is simply this: If the junta does not stop its crackdown, the UN will move its troops into Myanmar!
The junta is smart enough to know that its military resources do not outnumber those of the UN, should it decide to take this path.
And if this scenario materializes, the people of Myanmar will side with - you guessed it - the UN troops, adding more force to this democratic revolution.
This is an opportunity for the international community to bring peace and democracy to Myanmar once and for all. And if the world misses this opportunity, Burma - as Myanmar it is affectionately known - will never be free.
The writer is a Jakarta-based columnist. More of his articles can be found at
www.thangthecolumnist.blogspot.com
But really, what else can ASEAN do about Myanmar?
ASEAN - whose members are Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam - has tried to work with Myanmar in a constructive way to bring democracy into the country.
In 2003, foreign ministers from ASEAN issued a statement urging Myanmar's military rulers to free Nobel Laureate and democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi, whose National League for Democracy secured a landslide, but unrecognized, victory in a 1990 election.
Last year, an ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Myanmar Caucus was established, with the primary aims of pushing democracy in Myanmar and helping free Ms. Suu Kyi.
Let's not forget that ASEAN has only recently moved away from its founding principle of non-interference - i.e. members will not get involved in issues considered to be the internal affairs of other members.
To ASEAN's credit, the pressure it exerted in the past led to Myanmar giving up its scheduled turn as the chair of the association last year (the Philippines took the position, as it was next in line).
After consulting other members, Singapore, which assumed the chairmanship of ASEAN in July, called on the organization to make a statement on the crisis in Myanmar.
Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said ASEAN cannot "credibly remain silent or uninvolved in this matter".
But, let's face it, a statement from ASEAN may be helpful, but it won't be a critical force. In other words, the Myanmarese junta is really beyond the reach of ASEAN at this point.
Do not forget, this is the same government that defied calls from the U.S., the European Union, ASEAN itself and the entire international community to free Aung San Suu Kyi and allow democracy to take place.
The proof is that despite U.S. sanctions that President George W. Bush announced in New York during the United Nations (UN) General Assembly last week, the Myanmarese junta went ahead with its crackdown on Buddhist monks and civilian protesters, arresting more than 100 and killing at least 17.
India and China - two neighboring countries outside ASEAN that have influence on Myanmar - have reacted disappointingly to the situation. While they both expressed concern about the crisis, they clearly said it falls into the category of Myanmar's internal affairs.
As a close trading partner and corridor to the Indian Ocean, Myanmar must be stable in China's eyes.
However, a Beijing-backed crackdown on the monks over their protests would hurt China's image, especially as it prepares to host the Olympics next year.
As for India, Myanmar is its source of oil, so it will remain diplomatic.
With news from Myanmar overwhelming the mood at the General Assembly, the UN Security Council held an urgent meeting and agreed to send the UN Secretary-General's special envoy, Ibraham Gambari, to Myanmar to deal with the junta.
However, Gambari's presence is not strong enough for the junta.
He handed over a message from the UN urging the junta to stop its crackdown on the monks and civilian protesters.
But this regime has shown, and continues to show, defiance of instructions, no matter how strong they are or who they are from.
After all, the junta has been living with warnings, sanctions and other forms of pressure from the international community for the past 19 years.
So as sad as it may be, another visit from another envoy with another message from the UN is nothing new for the junta.
Therefore, if the crisis in Myanmar is to be resolved, the UN needs to gather its will, consensus and resources to send an ultimatum to the junta.
The ultimatum is simply this: If the junta does not stop its crackdown, the UN will move its troops into Myanmar!
The junta is smart enough to know that its military resources do not outnumber those of the UN, should it decide to take this path.
And if this scenario materializes, the people of Myanmar will side with - you guessed it - the UN troops, adding more force to this democratic revolution.
This is an opportunity for the international community to bring peace and democracy to Myanmar once and for all. And if the world misses this opportunity, Burma - as Myanmar it is affectionately known - will never be free.
The writer is a Jakarta-based columnist. More of his articles can be found at
www.thangthecolumnist.blogspot.com
5 comments:
The UN troop needs to move in to solve this situation. The UN needs to capture the generals and stop them from contact with china for its support to take back the government. Otherwise, it will be like Cambodia, where as hun sen sought help from vietnam after he lost the election and take control over the government ever since. If hun sen and youn puppets were captured Cambodia would have been better of than it is right now.
Oh yeah ... Go ahead ... Make my day!
UN Troops? Yeah go ahead make the Junta day.
Some of these people still believe in the UN troops. Do they know who created the UN Organization?
It is not bad to have the UN to be neutral but it is so disgusting when some of their members are too corrupted.
Also the UN cannot do a damn thing to even a small Hun Sen not to go far to a big army like Junta. Don't these people know who are behind Junta? They are China (1.2 billion) and India (nearly 1 billion). These 2 big nations with more than 2 billion people supoort and do the business with Junta that's how happens.
Don't forgot not long ago Hun Sen went to Indai but then he turned down by the leader of India, he returned home and gave a fake reason why the leader of India couldn't see him.
Why did Hun Sen go to India? He followed Junta? or else?
Good point 11:15PM,India knew that hun sen and cpp groups are just puppets,puppet can changes mind very quick,if hun sen standing on his feet to his own nation India might has a considering.
Well, india is poorer than China by a factor of two and changes; thus, I don't expect much help from them. Plus, they are not growing as fast as they should. At that pace, Vietnam will passed them by in about 6-8 years or so.
Post a Comment