Thursday, April 03, 2008

At Trial, Cambodian-American Coup Plotter Portrayed as Reckless


April 3, 2008
BY JOSH GERSTEIN
Staff Reporter
New York Sun


LOS ANGELES — A Cambodian-American tax preparer and self-described freedom fighter, Yasith Chhun, recklessly endangered the lives of civilians and his own followers when he launched a coup attempt in his homeland in 2000, a prosecutor told jurors during opening arguments yesterday at Mr. Chhun's trial in federal court here.

Mr. Chhun's defense replied that he was engaged in a noble, if naïve, attempt to free his countrymen from a despotic regime and that he had no desire to see anyone killed in the process.

"This accountant from the city of Long Beach decided he was going to take over a country," the prosecutor, Lamar Baker, said. "And he was willing to take lives in order to do so."

Mr. Chhun's attorney, Richard Callahan Jr., said the group, which called itself the Cambodian Freedom Fighters, had the laudable goal of removing what he called the "tyrannical regime" of Prime Minister Hun Sen.

"They attempted what they believed was a gallant effort to save Cambodia from the regime of Prime Minister Hun Sen," Mr. Callahan said. "These men put their lives on the line for the cause. ... The effort was misguided and naïve in its execution to be sure, but it was not misguided in its intent."

Mr. Callahan told jurors about the "killing fields" in which an estimated 1.7 million people died in the 1970s during the murderous regime of Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge. "Hun Sen had been a brigade commander under Pol Pot and unfortunately many of the same abuses continued under his reign," the defense attorney said. Mr. Callahan noted that in 1998, as the plans for the coup were being crafted, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a resolution calling for Mr. Hun Sen to be indicted under international law for a variety of human rights abuses, including attacks on political rallies and the killing of Cambodian opposition figures.

The defense lawyer said Mr. Chhun's contacts with American political leaders in Washington led him to believe America would back the putsch. "His CFF members also believed the U.S. would be there," Mr. Callahan said.

At the outset of his 35-minute argument, Mr. Baker showed jurors a photograph of a bloodied man sprawled on a sidewalk clutching what appeared to be a weapon. The prosecutor said the man was a private security guard at a gas station who was fired on with an AK-47 during the coup attempt and later had a grenade tossed at him by a member of Mr. Chhun's group.

Mr. Chhun, 52, faces charges of conspiracy to kill overseas, conspiracy to damage or destroy property in a foreign country, and conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction outside America. He also is charged with violating the Neutrality Act, a law that dates to 1797 and bars private military expeditions against countries with which America is at peace. Each of the conspiracy counts carries a possible life sentence. Violation of the Neutrality Act carries a possible sentence of 25 years in prison.

In court filings, the prosecution argued that federal law prohibits privately launched military efforts in most circumstances because of the deleterious effects such missions can have on America's relations with other governments. However, Mr. Baker did not make such an argument to jurors yesterday, leaving it to them to speculate about the possible impact of Mr. Chhun's amateur war-making on America.

Mr. Baker did stress that much of the planning for the attack was done on American soil. "It was, as sometimes the labels or the commercials say, 'Made in the U.S.A.,'" he said.

During his 15-minute opening, Mr. Callahan disagreed. "There was actually very little connection to the United States," he told jurors.

Mr. Baker glossed over the manner in which Mr. Hun Sen "came to power." However, the prosecutor acknowledged, albeit briefly, that Cambodia suffers from poverty, corruption, and human rights violations.

"The defendant and his Cambodian Freedom Fighters thought they could solve all of Cambodia's problems if they could just take over the country," Mr. Baker said. The prosecutor also suggested twice that Mr. Chhun was a coward because he stayed behind when the attempted takeover was carried out. "The defendant's encouragement stopped at the Cambodia border. When it was time for Operation Volcano, he remained in Thailand," Mr. Baker said.

Mr. Callahan said military advisers told Mr. Chhun that he could jeopardize the security of the operation by going along.

Press reports from the scene in Phnom Penh said about six people were killed when the coup attempt was easily put down by Cambodian government forces on the morning of November 24, 2000. However, Mr. Baker told jurors yesterday that only three men died and that all of them were insurgents.

The prosecution's opening contained a contradiction of sorts. While the prosecution is contending that any attempt by an American to overthrow Cambodia's government by force is unlawful, Mr. Baker at times seemed to fault Mr. Chhun for failing to use enough force.

Ultimately, Mr. Chhun's guilt or innocence could hinge not on the coup attempt itself but on the smaller-scale "popcorn" attacks that the insurgent group allegedly carried out in the months leading up to the coup attempt. Mr. Baker said Mr. Chhun was willing to cause "injuries and death to others" in order to get publicity for the group.

While jurors may be reluctant to convict Mr. Chhun for leading an assault on the Cambodian government, they may be less willing to forgive the smaller attacks, which prosecutors said involved throwing grenades into coffee shops and karaoke bars where mostly civilians would be present.

The prosecution's first witness was an FBI agent who suggested that Mr. Chhun, who worked out of a small office in a strip mall, suffered from delusions of grandeur. "He said he would become the interim president of Cambodia until new elections could be held," the agent, Donald Shannon Jr., said. Mr. Shannon said Mr. Chhun made the statement in an interview several months after the November 2000 coup attempt.

While Mr. Chhun's openness at that time would seem to suggest he thought he had done nothing illegal, Mr. Shannon said the accountant sometimes switched words to make the attack sound less violent. The agent said Mr. Chhun talked of "attacks" on government officials in Cambodia, but would then say, "I mean 'arrest.'"

25 comments:

Anonymous said...

Mr. Lamar Baker never been through hell and back and what does he know about Mr.Chunn Yasith?

Mr. Lamar Baker would never dream of eating something that people wouldn't dare touch but this is how Cambodian people have to eat just to survive and he would never dream of going to sleep thinking he could be next and he would never dream of working like an animals just to buy time to see the family member for the last time!

You know sometime dream do come true and if you don’t believe me just go check Toul Sleng where the Cambodian dream are made of!

I can understand how Mr. Chunn Yasith who see himself as one of the lucky one and he felt that he has the responsibility and the obligation to help other! I frankly don’t care what the world color Mr. Chunn Yasith because only Chunn Yasith can understand Chunn Yasith!

Anonymous said...

Whoever try to save Cambodia from hell did not do anything illegal. They are the heroes in my opinion. They have the courage and the sacrifice unlike some of us.

Anonymous said...

All problems because of Sihanouk,and never end,

"Il faut mieux hasarder de sauver un coupable que de condamner un innocent"

Peace,Independence,Real justice

Anonymous said...

The Federal Bureau Investigation (FBI)are being pay by the CPP to acheive a guilty verdict on Bang Yasith trial. The FBI should help investigate the killing of 1997 killing by Hun Sen's gang. also, the grenade attack of March 30, 1997. oh, what about the killing of Piseth Pillika murder(s)?

Anonymous said...

are being paid by Mao+Ho

Anonymous said...

Well, life is full of disappointments. What else can I tell you?

Anonymous said...

They said American never corrupted or loyal to law. But when these Americans people such as FBI, CIA or other agents went to Cambodia they know how to corrupt as well or even worst than Cambodian. Come on, if FBI really respect the rule of law they should pursue the investigation with or without problem. You are right! The Americans are/were taken bribe as well when they are in Cambodia. Money talk!

Anonymous said...

Well, you ask for it, and you got it. So, stop whining, will ya? You look like a bunch of poor babies.

Pathetic!

Anonymous said...

To 8:02 pm. Americans can only enforced laws in their own country. Being an FBI does not mean that that individual can carry a badge and arrest criminals in Cambodia or other countries.

Accusing FBI, CIA of taking bride without proof shows that the accuser is immatured and that individual, if he reveal his name, can be arrested and booked for defamation and label.

People have freedom of expression but it does not mean people can defame anyone with the intend to harm reputation of that person, unless you can prove what you accused in the court of law.

Anonymous said...

5:30, it seems like you know for real that the CPP paid the FBI to get Yasith. Do you know who Yasith is? Did he form the CFF and throw a non-sense coup for the sake of saving Cambodia, or it was for a different purpose? How much do you know Mr. Chun? If a person wants to be a leader, I mean a real leader, he/she needs to a personality that people would respect, good integrity, wisdom, good vision, sacrify, etc. Cheating on tax, falsifying records, just to name a few, are not part of good leader's role model.

Anonymous said...

Damn, you got great potential, 10:01.

If you ever run for office, look me up, will ya?

Anonymous said...

yeah give me your # you freaking Viet pimp @11:01PM?

Anonymous said...

Just go on the net, dude. I'll find you, alright?

Anonymous said...

I think Mr Chhun just like Mose in the bible,that would free cambodian walk away from Satin Hun Sen.
God will judge .Yasith also known Jesus already why don"t you ask God to be with you. But Yasith wife she a bitch, talk like sith.Yasith he is a good man.
bye.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Chhun does not have the right to conduct a war against another country, even if the ruler of that country is a dictator.


While he may have a legitimate cause, Mr. Chhun, as a citizen of the United States of America, does not have the right to organize an arm insurgent against the government that is not at war with the United States.

Anonymous said...

check out this quote from paragraph 9 :

"""He also is charged with violating the Neutrality Act, a law that dates to 1797 and bars private military expeditions against countries with which America is at peace. """

What about when the US bombed cambodia in the early 70's lead by henry kissenger ?

That was never used, or he was never trial or charged.

WHAT A DOUBLE STANDARD WORLD.

Anonymous said...

This man is a goner for real. He had fun and a good life-style though. I heard he helped traffic many young Cambodian women out of Cambodia as well in the 90's. Is that true. This man is just a waste. This is a lesson to be learned in America. Yes, America provides you the opportunity to realize your greatest human potential, but you can also be rendered useless any time when you deviate from the law.

Anonymous said...

I know this man when I was living in the United Nations refugee camps in Thailame and in the Philippine in 1980. I must say that he is a very dedicated man to his study...

This man has so much passion for life and work and to see in this situation is such a waste!

Anonymous said...

Well, nobody is perfect.

Anonymous said...

RESPECT LIFE AND LAW NOT DO AS YOU CAN WITH MONEY AND POWER!

HE IS NOT DIFFERENCE FROM HUN SEN'S FAMILY, THEY DESERVE CONFINEMENT! FOR SAFTY SAKE OF SOCIETY!

Anonymous said...

HE'S MAY BE CRAZY?

Anonymous said...

I saw Yashit and group in front of the UN once they was act like kid! Yes they are crazy and cand be dangerouse for stability of society!

Anonymous said...

Never judge a book by its cover!

Anonymous said...

To the clown of 9:39PM, this is how you and your brain of seeing arrest people for just talking. This is just talking not harming anyone with physically. So where is the freedom of speech you are preaching? Come dude, freedom of speech!

Anonymous said...

yes, reckless is the correct political term for this person. people, you just can't use force to get something you wanted. use diplomacy and negotiation. remember what gandhi said. violence begot violence. and please don't try to recruit because being reckless won't get you anything, not to mention recruits!