Click here to read The Cambodia Daily article published in 2000 where eyewitnesses discussed about
Hor Nam Hong's role at the Boeung Trabek jail
Hor Nam Hong's role at the Boeung Trabek jail
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
Everyday.com.kh
Translated from Khmer by Socheata
While vice-prime minister Hor Nam Hong is suing Sam Rainsy for accusing him of being the Boeng Trabek jail chief, Dr. Pung Chiv Kek, President of the Licadho human rights organization, expressed her regret, saying that she does not want to see lawsuits between politicians just before the election period. She said that lawsuits near the election will greatly affect the voters. Dr. Pung Chiv Kek added that politicians should reply to each other’s accusation through information broadcast in the newspapers or over the radio instead, that would be much better than bringing their cases to court. Regarding this lawsuit issue, Hor Nam Hong said that if Sam Rainsy apologizes to him for misspeaking, then he would withdraw his lawsuit. However, on Tuesday Sam Rainsy still maintained his strong standing of not apologizing to Hor Nam Hong.
21 comments:
Hor Nam Hong is not usual old man.
This old man does not regret what he did to his people. And suing is all he can live.
lettre ouverte à SE HOR NAM HONG vous qui etes instruit et ministre des affaires étrangeres , vous devrez connaitres des lois des us des coutumes (universalite des droits de l'homme) pourquoi excitez et portez plainte il faut vous défendre devant le tribunal Si c'était non coupable OK ainsi les gens ne vont pas taxé vos descendants comme << HOR NAM HONG? ouf c'est un bourreau qui a massacré des millions de khmers (je dis khmers) allez Excellence il faut vous défendre (hor monirath)
We let you work with UN since 1993.You still don't understand what is the suffering Dr!
Now that is so fair! Since Cambodia has KR Tribunal already and why not take on AH HOR NAM HONG lawsuit because after all it is dealing with the KR issue!
More twist and turn to come!
It's not Sam Raingsy alone who talk about KILLER ,but also BAN-KI-Moon
http://ki-media.blogspot.com/2008/04/un-chief-calls-for-speedy-cambodia.html
I wouldn't worry so much about those lawsuits as our courts' lack of independence, impartiality and competence as most judges and prosecutors are members of the CPP.
LAO Mong Hay, Hong Kong
You are wrong, Dr Lao, our court are not lacking independence. If they don't follow rule of law, they will will be removed, and that had happened in the past already.
Khmerrrrrr!il faut bouger,il faut réagir .
"La plupart des hommes célèbre meurent dans un véritable état de prostitution" comme Sihanouk!
Khmerrrrrr!
http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=xIMlO0ytGfQ
One must stop the Vietcong Suicidal Commando such as the one @3:15 PM before he blows himself up to pieces!!!
Dr. Lao,
It's a worry because the courts are not independent. If they are independent then we don't worry because everything will be judged according to the laws. But because the Cambodian courts are biased and not independent, they will judge this case according to what Hor Namhong wants, which is a conviction for Rainsy, and that's a worry.
Mr.3:15PM
Reports upon reports since 1993and my own field study have not confirmed your claim of judicial independence in Cambodia.
LAO Mong Hay, Hong Kong
True, Cambodian judiciary has never been independent, biased, corrupt and judge according to what the executive branch, Hun Sen and CPP I mean, wants.
Why do you say that, Dr Lao? Do you mind elaborate? Also, keep in mind, there is no such thing as perfect or 100% independence judicial system, unless it has its own independent election.
as long as hunsen is still in the power,the justice will never be reached by the people.kmeng watt
Dr. Lao
The ECCC was instituted to try people who committed crimes against humanity during the Pol Pot era. If Hor Nam Hong and Keat Chhun were guilty of those crimes then the ECCC would have jurisdiction. At this time those two people have not been named in any indictment nor has the ECCC indicated that both men will be called before the ECCC.
Since Sam Rainsy saw fit to repeat Sihanouk's words he subjected himself to the same repercussions that Sihanouk faced, namely a lawsuit. Since this is Cambodia only a Cambodian court has jurisdiction to apply Cambodian law if a plaintiff files a complaint in that venue, no matter whether they are believed to be partial. An argument that Sihanouk might have won the appeal is worth nothing, as it is purely hypothetical. That report in the Cambodia Daily is full of innuendo and very short of legally substantive evidence. Sam Rainsy is in hot waters again because he can't keep his mouth shut when he knows full well that some things need to be treated very carefully. But he has a tendency to run off his mouth without presenting any evidence. He is treading on thin ice.
អាហោ ណាំហុង ថា ឈឺចាប់ណាស់ ដែលថា អាហោ ណាំហុង ជាមេគុកបឹងត្របែក ក្នុងសម័យខ្មែរក្រហម ប៉ុន្តែសូមជំរាប អាហោ ណាំហុងថា អ្នកដែលឈឺចាប់ជាងអាហោណាំហុង ទៅទៀតនោះ គឺប្រជាពលរដ្ឋខ្មែរដែលមានបងប្អូន ត្រូវអាហោ ណាំហុង បញ្ជាយកទៅសំលាប់ នៅគុកត្របែក រាប់មិនអស់។ អាហោ ណាំហុង សមចូលគុក ដោយតុលាការខ្មែរក្រហមហើយ។
ah Hor Nam Hong must be in jail in KR tribunal because ah Hor Nam Hong is the chief of Boeng Tra Baek prison.
Mr. Sam Rangsy chose to have hot potatoes on hands while Cambodians are preparing to go to the polls. Getting caught tangled with Phom Penh Tribunal is what he is choosing. Otherwise, he would just leave the matters to Khmer Rouge Tribunal as he is convinced of the crimes committed by Keats Chon and Hour Nam Hong during DK era. Personal attacks are not the high road that honest politicians should borrow. Why don't you attacking the government policies instead as you always know how to do very well? People poverty, corruptions, foreign policy, Vietnamese colonization ... etc? We expect you to win the election at the up coming polls, not getting troubles with defamation law suite!
Suis completement en accord avec ce que vous avez dit ici M/Mme francophone! Merci.
One Cambodian Kid
It's difficult to claim the CPP court independent when it is always politically biased. Well, they have pay for the reputation they have built upon. They can't blame people but themselves.
The CPP court is just as independent as the US, UK,..., or AU court. It can't be any better.
Post a Comment