Friday, May 02, 2008

As world grasps for rice, Cambodia's success story


The rice-exporting country has seen a dramatic rebound thanks to years of agricultural research.

May 1, 2008
By David Montero
Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor


Phnom Penh, Cambodia - For 30 years the rice fields at a commune on the outskirts of Phnom Penh lay mostly barren and unused, a legacy of the Khmer Rouge, the Communist regime that led almost 2 million Cambodians to their death, many from starvation.

But today Cambodia has a rice surplus. And these fields are incubating some of the most advanced rice technology in Cambodia, under the tutelage of the Cambodian Agricultural Research Institute (CARDI), which is at the center of Cambodia's largely unheralded "green" revolution.

As the global food crisis continues to spark riots and rationing, Cambodia's turnaround showcases the power – and the limits – of rice research, experts say. Few countries in modern history have engineered as dramatic an agricultural rebound as Cambodia.

In 10 years, beginning in 1987, by applying the tool suite of the Green Revolution – new rice varieties, improved irrigation, and better fertilizer – the country has risen to a peak of rice output, producing enough rice to be self-sufficient for the first time in 25 years.

"It has been a big achievement for [Cambodia]," says Men Sarom, CARDI's director. "And I think research contributed a lot to that."

The kernel of that research was first planted in the 1960s, when scientists at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), a pioneering agricultural institute based in the Philippines, developed higher-yield varieties of grain and introduced new systems of irrigation and fertilizer. Thus was born the Rice Revolution.

Of particular importance was IR8, a rice variety that had a yield double that of normal rice, was less susceptible to disease and more responsive to fertilizer. Dubbed the "miracle rice," it has been credited with averting massive famine in India, Africa, and throughout the developing world in the 1970s.

Cambodia is home to one of the Green Revolution's greatest successes. In 1969, Cambodia's annual rice production was 4 million tons a year, a healthy output. But by 1980, the 6 million people who had survived the Communist Khmer Rouge era, from 1975 to 1978, were on the brink of starvation. By 1997, however, Cambodia had been virtually reborn: its rice fields were producing nearly as much rice as they had in 1969, but on half the land, making the country rice self-sufficient once again.

The rebound was the result of a collaboration between the Cambodian government, the IRRI, and the Australia government, which together invested millions of dollars in irrigation, infrastructure, and fertilizer beginning in 1987. They also trained 1,300 scientists and support staff to revitalize the country's agricultural system. And the new high-yielding rice varieties allowed farmers to produce more on less land.

Today, experts say, Cambodia's yields have risen from 1.35 tons per hectare to 2.5 tons per hectare. It produces enough to export – more than a million tons this year – but recently imposed export controls to ensure it has enough for its own people.

Still, as Cambodia also illustrates, scientific advances will only take rice production so far. Although Cambodia's yields have doubled in the last 30 years, they are only almost half that of Thailand and Laos (where better soil conditions, seed varieties, climate and management make for higher outputs). Meanwhile, weeds here still cause rice yield losses of up to 30 percent, and poor seed quality in some areas means that 160,000 tons of rice rot every year, according to a report by the IRRI.

"There are still many problems that need to be addressed – problems from climate change and market changes," say Mr. Sarom.

Scientists also warn that the amount of land being farmed – especially in the developing world – has not increased substantially in the last two decades. Urban sprawl and industrial development continue to compete for farmland.

"Even here in Thailand [the world's largest exporter of rice], even if they wanted to, they can't produce more rice. There isn't much more farmland, and the production level is also already pretty high," says Paul Risley, a spokesman for the World Food Program in Thailand.

The recent global food crisis has sharply underlined that, despite the Green Revolution's benefits, many countries are simply not able to produce enough food for their exploding populations.

But even if the biggest production advances have already been achieved, that doesn't mean scientists are giving up.

CARDI, continues to develop new varieties that can produce better quality rice and withstand inclement weather. Sarom says research is already pointing the way to higher rice yields. "In America and Australia, you have yields of six to eight tons of rice per hectare. Why not here? We still have the potential to increase productivity," he says.

That enthusiasm was echoed by the country's agriculture minister, Chan Sarun, Tuesday when he said he expects Cambodia to produce enough rice to export some 8 million tons a year by 2015. That would make it one of the world's top rice exporters.

And around the world, research still offers the promise of better yields. For example, hybrid rice, a blend of three kinds of rice, grows faster, is more disease resistant, and produces 20 percent higher yields. Hybrids are only just starting to catch on: 800,000 hectares were planted in Asia outside of China between 2001-02, but only 1,000 in Indonesia, for example, and only 20,000 in Bangladesh, according to the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO). The expanded use of hybrids has particular promise for food security, the FAO adds.

The current food crisis may be creating an investment environment for a second Green Revolution, some analysts say. By averting massive famine, the first Green Revolution helped create an impression among world leaders that investments in agriculture were no longer as vital. Many countries stopped spending on agricultural development. That may be starting to change as Malaysia, the Philippines, and China have in recent weeks announced plans to boost investment in agriculture.

30 comments:

Anonymous said...

Tehn why Khmetr kids are still being fed by FAO ? Please explain

Anonymous said...

There are several reasons for this, but the most important is lack of jobs. Those surplus are only those who created it, not for those who does nothing. Furthermore, as long Ah Sam Rainsy keep deterring jobs from poor people, they will continue to require aids.

Anonymous said...

Dear Sir:

I am a middle school student and am doing a research on Cambodian language and find this place through Google. I have noticed that people is being addressed as Ah Sam Rainsy, Ah Hun Sen, Ah Rannarid. Is Ah the same thing as Mr.? I asked a Cambodian boy classmate and he said that it is more respectable than Mr. Then I saw the word Ah Pol Pot and I know that Pol Pot was a bad person. I asked my friend and he laughed. Do Cambodians respect each other that much even Pol Pot?

Anonymous said...

"Ah" grammatically is an article as "a", "an", "the" in English. When using it in front of a name, it lower the person to an object like a chair, box, ..., or a stick. But it's commonly used among people of the same peer.

Anonymous said...

The word Ah when use to call politicians or leader, it intend to mock, to disrespect that person. I think in this case it the opposite of Mr. So the word Ah put that person to the level of animal. So don't ever use this word to call older people or people higher rank than you. It is a sign if disrespect.

Anonymous said...

True for Asian, but it's okay to use "Ah" with westerner and associate because they have no moral value.

Anonymous said...

Hey you very same Viet pimp/parasite @8:46AM and 11:14 AM,

You Viet-born pimp/parasite ought to quit pretending to be Cambodian and speaking out for Cambodian.

You Viet-born pimp/parasite hurts you Viet-plunderer long enough.

You Viet-born pimp/parasite must know that the Cambodian people knows your true color and the world too sees and knows you Viet's true color, very well if I may add!

So take your boat, and head on home down the Mekong river...and don't ever look back.

Nothing in Cambodia (for you Viet-born pimp/parasite) is worth dying for!!!

Aren't you Viet pimp/parasite kissing the West's arse every minute of you Viet freaking life??? Look around, ask around...

Anonymous said...

Hey you very same Youn pimp/parasite @8:46AM and 11:14 AM,

You Youn-born pimp/parasite ought to quit pretending to be Cambodian and speaking out for Cambodian.

You Youn-born pimp/parasite hurts you Youn-plunderer long enough.

You Youn-born pimp/parasite must know that the Cambodian people knows your true color and the world too sees and knows you Youn's true color, very well if I may add!

So take your boat, and head on home down the Mekong river...and don't ever look back.

Nothing in Cambodia (for you Youn-born pimp/parasite) is worth dying for, okay???

Anonymous said...

Aren't you youn pimp/parasite kissing the West's arse every minute of you youn freaking life??? Look around, ask around...

Anonymous said...

Dear Student:
As you can see this site is not without controversy. For one you must know that KI-Media supports the opposition Sam Rainsy Party with Sam Rainsy as chairman. Sam Rainsy is a very controversial person himself, although most overseas Khmer support him, and this site is mostly for and by overseas Khmer. You have the occasional original homeland-Khmer here too.

Second, the word Ah is usually meant in a derogatory manner even when addressing a peer. So don't even ever use.

So you can easily see who supports whom. If they write Ah-Hun Sen then they are Sam Rainsy supporters, if they write Ah-Sam Rainsy the opposite is the case.

The polite form of addressing a person of higher standing is 'Look' or 'Look-srey (female)'. Then you have a lot of prefixes depending on your relationship, e. g. Oum, oun, bong, ming, etc. You need to look that up - it would lead too far to list all this here. Persons of equal standing, like friends, are usually referred to by their name with the suffix aeng, e. g. Sophal-aeng, and this is used instead of the personal pronoun 'you', also depending on whether you use direct or indirect speech. There is plenty of material available on the internet. The best to-date, however, is "Modern Spoken Cambodian" by Huffmann.
I am a Westerner who speaks Khmer, lives in Cambodia and has a Cambodian family.

KJE said...

It is clear that Cambodia has made great progress in rice cultivation to become an exporting nation. If price soar in Cambodia despite its self-sufficiency it only follows economic laws. There is a stronger demand from importing nations which leads to price increases overall, and as a consequence domestic prices rise too. The only measure to counter this is to implement price controls for rice and basic food staples, e. g. pork, etc. Don't anybody forget, Cambodia is enjoying a free market economy, which is more than two thirds of the road to full democratic freedom. The rest will follow automatically in due course.

Anonymous said...

Go down and out! ah psychopath chhkout jrook Hun Sen !

Anonymous said...

I agreed with 10:03.

Anonymous said...

Don't be fooled by this self-proclaimed Pro-Yuon free-thinker SOB attention seeker, the owner of the so-called about-Cambodia blog. Beware!

How many hit counts on his blog, does this con-artist want? Tell me and I will make it hit every minute of his freaking life!

អានោះវាជា ខ្ញុំយូន ដូចអា ហ៊ុនសែន អញ្ជឹង!

Anonymous said...

No blog will get more counts then the number of maggots you ate in the Vietcong shit pit, Ah stupid Khmer-Yuon (8:55).

Anonymous said...

Wrong, you imbecile Viet parasite! Dead wrong! You Viet parasite is kissing the West'arse every freaking minute of your freaking life and you Viet parasite claim that you Viet parasite is the best?
Best in what? Prostitution? Look around, ask around you Viet plunderer/Parasite!!!

Anonymous said...

To: free-thinker!

There is no such thing as free market economy! Ahahhahhah

If you have taken economic 101 and you would know that! Now to prove my point! Since Cambodia hit by high inflation and the cost of everything go up and AH HUN SEN government step in pretending to help dirt poor Cambodian people such as banning the export of rice to outside the country to stabilize the price. So by this action of AH HUN SEN to take such economic measure show that Cambodian economy is not a free market economy! Ahhahahha

Here are one more things that you need to know! Since Cambodian favor more American dollar to run their economy and now that the American dollar go down in value and of course the good and service will go up too because now it take more American dollar to buy it! By the way, it is not that Cambodia doesn’t enough rice to feed the population because now it would take more American dollar to buy a bag of rice!

Some economic experts believe that it would take another 4 years for American dollar to turn around!

From: Feel good thinker!

Anonymous said...

That is the dumbest comment I ever heard off. Just because the government step in to keep scamers from ripping off people doesn't mean the economy is not free.

Anonymous said...

11:09 AM, Have you been drinking Nuoc Mam while surfing?

Anonymous said...

Nope, I had it with jai yor just a few days ago.

Anonymous said...

I told ya not to gulp Nuoc Mam down your throat like that...See, now your brain got all messed up, see?

KJE said...

Who is this 8:55? What does he get off on? Seems like he needs a little rest. He is all screwed up.

Price controls are a measure in every economy if speculation gets out of hand. New York City has rent control for some districts, for instance. Is anybody saying the U. S. economy is not a free market? Guys you must think a little before you post your comments.

Hey, and I am not out for hits. I just want to show a different view to some. Since this site is so pro-SRP, and they are anything but a democratic party, some things need to be pointed out to people who can't do that on their own. I have some inside knowledge that most of you don't have. So I know what I am writing about. And I am not asking for you to agree. Just read it. If you have comments, fine. But don't dump that drivel on me like what can be read here most of the time.

Anonymous said...

To free-thinker!

Well, I will say it again that U.S economy is not totally a free market! The U.S has a mix economy!


Here is a little education for you!
http://economics.informbank.com/articles/economic-theory/kinds-of-economic-system.htm

KJE said...

10:10
As I am always willing to learn something new I checked out that website, although I am fairly knowledgeable in economics holding a business degree.
Those statements about the different kinds are rather narrow in scope. Correct, there is no 100% free economy as that would lead to chaos. Man's greed is insatiable.
Generally, a free market economy is defined when the private sector contributes more than 80 - 85% to the GDP. Certain services like defense, the administration of the nation, preferably part of the health sector need to be provided by the public sector. A government is bound to intervene in certain instances where the national interest is concerned or even threatened. The U. S. economy is a free market economy while most of the Western and Southern European economies are free social market economies. But the U. S. economy comes closest to what is generally called capitalism.

Anonymous said...

Well...KJE, do you need hit count on your blog or not? It's free you know? You want free publicity don't you? I think a pretender like you, does.

You can do the math KJE: every minute of the hour, 24/7...it's got to be lots and lots of hits on ytour page..and you won't appear to be isolated anymore after that...what da ya say, Mr. pretender? Just let me know, okay?

KJE said...

11:24
Can't you read? You don't get it, do you? Besides, if you knew how these things work you would know that stat counter distinguishes between page loads and unique and returning visitors. By the way, KJE is not the blogger, it's several persons.
The qualified persons reading the op-eds are enough already as we don't need morons like you as an audience. You are a lost cause anyway. People like you populate such blogs as KI-Media letting loose with their vacuous posts, double and triple posting them. That's how KI-Media gets 1000 hits a day. I sure don't want those. But I guess every word is wasted on you anyway. So have a good day.

Anonymous said...

Well, you're one pretender alright ...KJE, Free-thinker..etc...or whatever your clan is. Just one suggestion to all of you pretender there: change your blog name to anything but "about-Cambodia"...because you have been giving Cambodia a bad name long enough already..agreed,
you jack arse?

Anonymous said...

One more thing Mr. Smart arse Free-thinker...You seem to have been a bit too bitter towards KI-Media huh? Why is that? Can you entertain us a bit on that?
Or is it just the nature of you grumpy-grouchy old fart clan of yours there? Well, good luck in your dump (blog) there, okay?
And all you clan is welcome here on KI-Media anytime, we mean it!

Anonymous said...

lol! hey Free-thinker old man, log on to you blog yourself and keep clicking the refresh button, watch your stat count...and tell us what you see...Damn free-thinker!

KJE said...

Hey 5:00, nice job, but sorry only an imbecile would do such a thing. I normally don't engage in this kind of petty and childish squibbling, but you must have an IQ well below 100 to find pleasure in this.
Well, I must correct myself you are not an LB ghetto kid but a Washington, DC, ghetto kid with access to a computer. Your IP is
12.150.188.2 and your ISP is Sheraton Four Points, so probably wireless. Just cut it out. You won't achieve anything with this silly behavior. But then you are probably an under-achiever with very low self-esteem anyway.

2.45
New South Wales, right? Well stay in the boondocks and watch your sheep.

Unfortunately, it is just the likes of these two that give young Khmer people a bad name.