Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Thai PM faces critics in no-confidence debate

Thai Prime Minister Samak Sundaravej

BANGKOK (AFP) — Thailand's prime minister faces his critics in a no-confidence debate beginning Tuesday, as he defends his four-month-old government from claims of mismanagement and cronyism.

Samak Sundaravej took office after his People Power Party (PPP) comfortably won elections in December, ending more than a year of rule by royalist generals who overthrew premier Thaksin Shinawatra in 2006.

Samak had openly campaigned as an ally of Thaksin who would replicate his policies in rural areas, but his intimacy with the self-made tycoon despised by the elite and middle classes helped ignite the recent crisis.

The opposition Democrat Party claims Samak is running Thailand on behalf of Thaksin, who is banned from politics, while protesters camped outside Government House say he is suppressing corruption cases against his predecessor.

Democrat MPs also intend to grill Samak and seven cabinet ministers over their handling of the economy, a deal with Cambodia over a disputed temple, the transparency of procurement of buses for the capital, and other issues.

"We want only to do our job of investigating the government," Democrat Party spokesman Ong-art Klampaiboon told AFP.

"The investigation of a government's performance does not depend on how long they have been in office for. Once they show signs of corruption and inefficient work it's enough to lodge a no-confidence motion."

PPP spokesman Kudeb Saikrajang said Samak was confident going into the debate.

"He can answer any question because the government has done nothing wrong," Kudeb said. "This debate is an effort to link him with former premier Thaksin to destroy his reputation."

The debate will end with a no-confidence vote on Thursday, and Samak has vowed to step down if he loses.

This is a slim prospect, with Samak's six-party coalition dominating two-thirds of the 480-seat lower house, analysts say.

"The opposition doesn't have a large enough number of seats to make any difference, which reflects the fact they don't have the popular vote," said Giles Ji Ungpakorn, a politics professor at Chulalongkorn University.

Samak's toughest week yet began Monday with a debate before senators, nearly half of whom were appointed under the army-backed constitution.

The prime minister refuted charges that he was Thaksin's puppet, telling the Senate: "The members of our political parties may come from the same groups, but it's normal in Thai politics for people to change parties."

He also faces pressure from street protesters led by the so-called People's Alliance for Democracy (PAD), which brought 25,000 people to the gates of Samak's offices on Friday.

The PAD had led protests against Thaksin in the months before the coup, and its latest demonstrations have raised fears of a new coup, which has sent investors fleeing the Thai stock market.

Its rallies exert a strong influence because the leadership is seen as a reflection of the traditional power centres in the palace and the military.

Thaksin had antagonised Bangkok's elite with policies such as free healthcare that endeared him to Thailand's populous rural heartland.

Analysts say that even if Samak were somehow forced out of office, tensions would remain between the traditional elite and voters.

"Even if there is a house dissolution and a new election, the politics will resume the same road because the PPP will come back, a shadow of the Thaksin system, and the PAD will resume its action," said Somjai Phagaphasvivat, a political analyst at Thammasat University.

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Siam's policy made crazy poeple...laallaa, PM is not power like khmen.....hhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaa

Anonymous said...

Senators blemed strongly to Siam's PM,...but khmen Senator never did like this only signed and meeting to approve is enought.

Anonymous said...

What are these 2 Thai bloggers try to say?. It appears that they say the Khmer government under Hun Xhen is more stable and democratic?. They must be out of their mind.

Anonymous said...

Does anybody know the meaning of SIAM?
Here is the correct answer:
S: Stupidness
I: Immorality
A: Abjectness
M: Madness

Anonymous said...

That's what happened when you betrayed your country and pleased your golf buddy.

Anonymous said...

SIAM = Khmer-Thai's protectorate.

Anonymous said...

I heard the rumor this SIAM PM (Samak Sundaravej) is probably Khmer. I am glad at least Khmer in SIAM is still acknowledge that Preah Vihear Temple is Khmer. Like he said, Khmer has been raising its flag on Prasat Preah Vihear for over 40 years and the SIAM lost the petition already back in over 40 years ago "Quote by Samak". Other party as PAD stop instigate people to do any more protest or demonstration.

Anonymous said...

Cheer to PM Samak for understanding and realizing that the Thai are stupid. Thank you!!!!!May god bless those Khmer like you in SIAM to rise up!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Yes, only Khmer in srok Siem is interested in the temple. The real siem is not into that type of temple.

Anonymous said...

So what the fuck with all Siam demonstrating in Bangcock?????

Please be patient with the Siam blogger you have to wait until the end of the thread, put together all the Siam comments and then you get some shadowy idea that they try to convey. The Siam country are still migrating from the ape to the cave man.

Anonymous said...

Patient? FYI, the Khmer-Thai have not seen their temple for about 50 years now.

Anonymous said...

There are photos of Preah Vihear all over the internet, and they have waited for 50 years?????

Yea if I were a Siam I would run out of patience also, I would run to the nearest internet cafe and quick!!!

Anonymous said...

Yeah, but the Khmer-Thai want both. They want to work and live near the temple, and they want to see it on the net when they a away on business.