Tuesday, September 30, 2008

King Sisowath's 1906 protest letter to the French colonial Governor regarding the illegal occupation of Khmer territories by Siam

King Sisowath

Translated from French by Luc Sâr
Our sincere thanks to Bora Touch, Esq. for pointing out this important historic letter



Letter from the King of Cambodia, H.M. Sisowath,
to the French Colonial Governor in Cambodia
(5 November 1906)

Kingdom of Cambodia
No. 205

Office of the King
H.M. Preah Bat Samdech Preah SISOWATH Cham-Chakrapong Hakrireach Barminthor Phuvanay Kraykeofa Soulalay Preah Chao Krong Kampuchea Thippadey, King of Cambodia

To the Governor of the French Republic in Cambodia,
Phnom Penh

Mr. Governor,

At a time when France, our benefactor, is busy with the delimitation of the border of Cambodia with the former Cambodian provinces abducted by Siam, I believe that it is my duty to send you the following observations and reservations, and I am also asking you to please let these be known, at an opportune time, to the delimitation Commission which will start its works and submit them to the Government of the (French) Republic. My delegates within this Commission are also in charge of supporting the same demands in front of the Commission.

1- In reality and incontestably, the cession to Siam by France of the former Khmer provinces which have just been re-attached to Cambodia – such as Stung Treng, Tonle Ropov, M’lou Prey, Krat and Koh Kong – cannot provide legitimate satisfaction to Cambodians given the circumstances in which the Siamese occupied these territories by force and by hypocrisy during the time when Cambodia was at the mercy of Annam (Vietnam) and Siam. By returning back these provinces (to Cambodia), the Siamese are only divesting what they took and detained against all rights of the people [of Cambodia], and that they do not want to keep them much longer because the lack of importance of these districts cannot compensate their costs of their exploitation, administration and maintenance.

2- We insist on the former natural limits of the Khmer Kingdom which, prior to the Siamese invasion, included on Siam’s side the provinces of Battambang, Siem Reap, Stung Treng, Tonle Ropov, M’lou Prey, Kuckhan [currently known as Sisaket], Prey Sar, Soren [Surin], Sankeac [Sangka], Neang Rong, Nokoreach Seima (Korat), beyond the Phnom Dangrek Mountain, Koh Kong, Krat and Chantabor (Chantaboun [Chantaburi]) touching upon Bacnam and the Kingdom of Champassac (Passac).

All these provinces are still populated by Cambodians and they preserve their absolute Khmer patriotism.

3- The richest provinces of Cambodia are precisely Battambang and Siem Reap; in the latter province, (temple) ruins of our Kingdom old powerful capital still subsist, they are shining proof of the magnificence of our ancestors. These two provinces, just like the others, were never given to Siam by any of my predecessors, and our claims in view of their return back to Cambodia have never ceased and will never cease as long as we do not receive satisfaction in this regard. Our past numerous claims are testimonials to this effect.

Independently to all historical justifications which confirm our rights on these two provinces, the 15 July 1867 Treaty concluded between France and Siam mentioned that the December 1863 Treaty, allegedly concluded between the Kingdoms of Cambodia and Siam, was annulled and that Siam renounces forever all vassalage from the part of Cambodia. Therefore, this clause completely disengaged Siam from the Khmer Kingdom, which, by this treaty, should recover all her territorial integrity, and if the then-French diplomats – through Article 4 of this same 15 July 1867 treaty – consented, without consulting the Cambodian Government or the Cochinchina Governor, that the provinces of Battambang and Siem Reap remained with Siam, they were absolutely being cheated by the Siamese in their persuasion of the existence of an alleged treaty unknown to the Cambodians, and within Siam’s rights and value of these territories. I am adding, that to my knowledge, this alleged treaty concluded on December 1863 between Cambodia and Siam never regularly existed and that it is only fair to provide us with satisfaction. In fact, in spite of our profound and sincere gratitude towards the protectorate Government, we cannot prevent ourselves from wondering whether such diplomatic action to get rid of our assets, behind our back and without our consent, could last.

In all cases and irrespective of the results of the works [accomplished] by the current Commission, and the ulterior diplomatic actions regarding our borders with Siam, not including the cession by Cambodia of her valuable provinces of Battambang and Siem Reap – along with all its dependences –, we are asking to reserve forever, for us and all our successors, the right to prevail our demands until full justice and satisfaction are given to us.

These are, Mr. Governor, the observations and the reservations that I make it as my duty to send to you, while assuring you that they perfectly represent the unanimous feelings of my Government and those of my people. Beyond our strong attachment to these provinces – the irregular detention of which is a real heartache for all the Cambodian people – you are aware of all the difficulties resulting from this detention that our neighbors are continuously creating through the encroachments of our territory, the robberies, the plundering actions and the daily crimes committed in our country by perpetrators who can easily find refuge on their side where they remained unpunished. These acts are actually taking place as they have been proven by the reports from your [French provincial] Governors and our provincial Governors. I believe that this situation which is absolutely prejudicial to all public security principle will become worst as long as the provinces of Battambang and Siem Reap, the most contiguous ones to Cambodia, are not returned to us.

Please accept, Mr. Governor, the assurance of my highest regards.

Done in our Royal Palace in Phnom Penh on Monday, the 4th day of the waning moon of the 2nd month of the Cholasakrach 1268, of the year of the Momi (Horse) Atthasak, the third of the reign, i.e. the 5th of November 1906 of the Christian calendar.

(Signed): Sisowath
Copy: The Cabinet Chief
(Signed) Unreadable

24 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thank you your Majesty!!!

Anonymous said...

King Ang Duang or king Norodom did write a similar letter to Napoleon III? asking him to return all Khmer provinces in Kampuchea Krom to Cambodia, once France leaves Indochina. Napoleon promised to return all those provinces to Cambodia. But Napoleon did not live until 1949, when France decided the fate of Kampuchea Krom. So the French parliament, deliberately disregarded Napoleon's promises to the Cambodian king, voted to cede all Khmer provinces in Kampuchea Krom to Vietnam. Sad really.

Anonymous said...

8:35 AM
Are you talking about Napoleon Bonaparte... The corse's man
He's the man.
Hun Sen want to be like him.

Khmer Canadian

Anonymous said...

9:32 AM, Yes, but I wasn't sure if he was the first, the second or the third. I think it was Napoleon the third who promised to return all Khmer territories, once France leaves Indochina.

Anonymous said...

To 8:35, it was Napoleon III, a nephew of Napoleon Bonapart. King Ang Doung tried to contact him through a French jesuit.

But that jesuit was arrested by the Siam when he tried to travel through Siam to philippine to convey Norodom Message to French General Governor in the Filippine.

It was later that another message has arrived in the hand of Napoleon III and he promised sent a troop to support Ang Doung to fight the VN, if he agreed to french colonial over Cambodia. Ang Doung agreed but only if the French can capture Kampuchea Krom. After that at one point, French-Khmer troop reached Preah Trapang, but unlucky that King Ang Doung died, so the troop returned..

Since after that, Cambodia never tried to take Kampuchea Krom by force. Norodom and Sisowat, and Sisowat Monivong, including Norodom Sihanouk has tried to appeal to French to return Kampuchea Krom to Khmer by based on historical fact. But it was useless.

However, without the French Intervention, Cambodia would be teared into two parts by Siam and Youn, and my passport would be Kingdom of Thailand, or Socialist republic of VN..hehehe..Voila!!!

Anonymous said...

All French Nazi treaties must be abolished and everything must be returned to Thailand as it was before the arrival of the Evil Colonial.

Anonymous said...

King Sisowath is a true Khmer leader! In the face of adversity from the French, the Thai, and the Vietnamese, he is asking for the return of the Khmer territory!

Khmer leaders of today have no patriotism and nationalism!

Anonymous said...

Yeah, but he's a fagot because he can't do the job himself.

Anonymous said...

Hun Sen is the only true Khmer King in Cambodia. No one dare to mess with him.

Anonymous said...

The Vietcong mess with King Hun Xen since day one when they handpicked him and make him signed away Khmer Koh Tral for saving his arse from the Khmer Rouge and for putting him in power! I have to wonder why all the Khmer border treaties with Vietnam still remain in secrecy to this day!

Anonymous said...

Bullshit, just because Viet is our Best Pal, it doesn't mean they mess around with us.

Anonymous said...

Members of Indochinese Federation doesn't mess around with each other. Ah Khmer-Oversea is sick. This is like saying members of NATO messing around with each other. Isn't that stupid?

Anonymous said...

Vietcong racist policy toward the Khmer Krom people will be dismantled!

Anonymous said...

Nope, Vietcong's policy toward Ah Khmer-Yuon Criminals is highly appropriate and just.

Anonymous said...

Interesting to read your comments, folks. Because of the cold war and American horrific policy in the 60s and weakness of our stands, the production of that was a genocide in Cambodia and ever since it is an opportunity again for the eastern neighbor... . Because of French colonialism converted from protectorate, khmers lost the khmer krom / Leu land. I am so sad to see we never learned the lesson from the past.
And now what, we have to protect what we currently have.

Anonymous said...

Indeed, and Cambodia couldn't be in better hand than PM Hun Sen the greatest leader of all Khmer history.

Anonymous said...

King Sisowat is a fake.

The only true Khmer King is PM Hun Sen.

Anonymous said...

My beloved Khmers!

Ya all above are absolutely right!
When da kings wants to be a farmer, and da farmer becomes a Mighty King of all the Khmer kings, then the shrinking nation is stable, indeed, but evidently and generally the miserable and poor Khmer people's living condition also contionuously, and perhaps eternally suffocates to death!

Anonymous said...

You're right. We don't want that to happen. Thus, he have to make PM Hun Sen King. He's the only one who can stop all that.

Anonymous said...

There is no where in the world where the enemy can pick a dirt poor farmer from their jail as enemy combatant and turn him into a King of Cambodia!

This is a fucken fairy tale come true but so do the nightmare!

May God bless Khmer Kingdom!

Anonymous said...

yes, thailand and vietnam still hold a lot of khmer provinces although they have given some back with the help of france of that time. cambodia will always remember our lost provinces in both thailand and vietnam and even in laos as well. maybe one day we can get them back.

Anonymous said...

Dream on.

SpicyGroup said...

Thank Khmer leaders for protecting Khmer lands.

Unfortunately, the royalists, the right wing, and left wing had been killing each other for power that lead to total destruction and the great dishonor to the current Cambodians.

Many Cambodians lost Khmer national pride as the result of Khmer Rouge legacy and poverty, which lost to billions dollars.

Now, Khmer prefer to buy $9 of Vietnamese made underwear than the $2.5 shirt.

They prefer to buy $20 of 20 cm shorts than the colorful silk traditional Khmer clothes.

They prefer to buy $19 oilly disgusting pizza than $3 Ansorm sticky cake.

They prefer to pay $3 for chemical soya source rather than natural fresh made by our own Khmer.

They prefer to spend $20,000 a year to study in such as small country and narrow minded as Singapore than $500 Cambodian university.

How can we create more jobs to 300,000 new young Cambodians per year if we only import and do not give value to local made?

SpicyGroup said...

Thank Khmer leaders for protecting Khmer lands.

Unfortunately, the royalists, the right wing, and left wing had been killing each other for power that lead to total destruction and the great dishonor to the current Cambodians.

Many Cambodians lost Khmer national pride as the result of Khmer Rouge legacy and poverty, which lost to billions dollars.

Now, Khmer prefer to buy $9 of Vietnamese made underwear than the $2.5 shirt Cambodian made.

They prefer to buy $20 of 20 cm shorts than the colorful silk traditional Khmer clothes.

They prefer to buy $19 oilly disgusting pizza than $3 Ansorm sticky cake.

They prefer to pay $3 for chemical soya milk cans rather than natural fresh made by our own Khmer.

They prefer to spend $20,000 a year to study in such a small country and narrow minded as Singapore than $500 Cambodian university.

How can we create more jobs to 300,000 new young Cambodians per year if we only import and do not give value to local made?