Jacques Verges at press conferenceClaire Duffett
Special to Law.com
At the press conference, Khmer Rouge victims bemoaned the slow and disjointed progress of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, the tribunal's official name. "We don't want a trial by media," complained Australian prosecutor William Smith, from underneath a canopy of sound booms. Chaos, however, is exactly what Jacques Vergès appears to want.
The French lawyer, nicknamed "devil's advocate," gained notoriety for representing a slew of infamous clients, including Nazi leader Klaus Barbie and terrorist Ramirez "Carlos the Jackal" Sanchez. In his one-man play currently at the Theatre de Madeleine in Paris, Vergès describes his strategy as "defense de rupture," characterized by interrupting trials by any means necessary.
At last Thursday's hearing, Vergès employed this approach by demanding that his client, Khieu, be released because most of the documents are not translated into French. In addition to English and Cambodia's mother tongue, Khmer, French is one of the court's three working languages.
Vergès filed his complaint in July and, last week, he and his Cambodian co-counsel Sa Sovan came before a panel of pre-trial judges inside the glassed-in courtroom outside Phnom Penh. Cambodia and the U.N. created this hybrid court, composed of domestic and international lawyers and judges, in 2001 to try Khmer Rouge leaders for international war crimes and crimes against humanity. During its reign from 1975 through 1979, the regime emptied cities and forced citizens to toil in fields. In an attempt to produce huge sums of rice and create an agricultural peasant Utopia, the party executed tens of thousands of people deemed disloyal, educated or simply lazy. Hundreds of thousands more died from overwork or starvation.
In addition to Khieu, detainees include the Khmer Rouge's former prison chief, its social action minister, its foreign minister and the second-in-command to party leader Pol Pot, who died 10 years ago.
Vergès says his client didn't know about the group's murderous tactics. During his presentation last Thursday, Vergès pounded his fists, pointed his finger and spoke at a pace that left his translator breathless.
Little of the French lawyer's discourse resembled traditional legal arguments. He quoted French King Louis XIV, recited his career highlights and suggested the court appeal to the U.N. to replace its former secretary-general, Kofi Annan, who supposedly agreed with Vergès that all documents should be translated. Hundreds of Cambodians, Westerners and saffron-robed monks listened in on headsets from behind the glass partition. Some sat silently, while others chuckled when Vergès made statements such as, "I laugh in the face of your threats." Still others moaned in disapproval.
When deputy international prosecutor William Smith presented oral arguments, he preemptively apologized for his performance's comparative lack of flair. Smith, who spent 11 years as a prosecutor at The Hague before joining the ECCC, then explained that international tribunal precedent requires that all court documents be in the mother tongue and one other language, not two. The ECCC printed all documents in Khmer and either English or French. Translating the pages into all three languages is unnecessary, he argued. He criticized Vergès and Sa for prolonging their clients' detention with a "meritless action." The judges said they would decide on the issue at an unspecified later date.
At a press conference after the hearing, Vergès and Sa appeared to revel in the press attention, ratcheting up their indignation over the untranslated documents and challenging Smith to an impromptu debate rather than cede the floor to him. Suth Ny, a petite, 51-year-old Cambodian woman in the crowd, shouted at the men to step down. Sa yelled back and rushed toward the woman, pointing his finger at her and telling her that he, too, lost family under the Khmer Rouge. Defense coordinator Richard Rogers blocked Sa's advance and tribunal employees then escorted the attorneys from the room. A small smile could be seen on the corners of Vergès' mouth amidst the chaos.
Organizers then gave victims a chance to speak, aided by an English translator. "You are performing a circus," scolded a middle-aged man named Ly Monysak. He and several other victims implored the court to replace Khieu Samphan's attorneys.
The next day, a quieter proceeding in the same courtroom determined a far more significant issue. The court denied prosecutors' request to use a legal theory, called Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE), against torture prison chief Kaing Guek Eav, alias "Duch," but agreed to add domestic murder and torture charges to his indictment. JCE could have made Duch liable for all 15,000 deaths at his prison, simply for having participated in its operation. Instead, prosecutors must prove his direct involvement with every murder. If allowed to proceed, JCE would also have helped link evidence against Duch to the other defendants.
The court's case is strongest against Duch, who left behind a trail of execution orders. The born-again Christian is also the only defendant to admit guilt. Duch, indicted in August, might now go to trial by March 2009.
After the back-to-back hearings, the court grappled with several more hurdles early this week. On Sunday, a U.N. delegation, led by Assistant Secretary General for legal affairs Peter Taksoe-Jensen, arrived in Cambodia to help the court address corruption allegations filed against lawyers and judges by several administrative staff. On Tuesday, prosecutors issued a "statement of disagreement" over whether the court should seek to try additional defendants. Lead Cambodian prosecutor Chea Leang opposes further investigations while lead international prosecutor, Canadian Robert Petit who has worked for U.N.-backed tribunals in Rwanda and Sierra Leone, supports them.
Before indictments against the remaining four detainees -- and possibly others -- can proceed, the court must investigate the corruption charges, mediate the co-prosecutors' dispute, and sort through hundreds of remaining pre-trial legal questions and appeals. Reining in Jacques Vergès is another big hurdle.
"I am not leaving this position," Vergès shouted during last Thursday's hearing. "I will come at it again and again."
Claire Duffett, a former assistant editor at The American Lawyer, is a freelance journalist based in Cambodia.
The French lawyer, nicknamed "devil's advocate," gained notoriety for representing a slew of infamous clients, including Nazi leader Klaus Barbie and terrorist Ramirez "Carlos the Jackal" Sanchez. In his one-man play currently at the Theatre de Madeleine in Paris, Vergès describes his strategy as "defense de rupture," characterized by interrupting trials by any means necessary.
At last Thursday's hearing, Vergès employed this approach by demanding that his client, Khieu, be released because most of the documents are not translated into French. In addition to English and Cambodia's mother tongue, Khmer, French is one of the court's three working languages.
Vergès filed his complaint in July and, last week, he and his Cambodian co-counsel Sa Sovan came before a panel of pre-trial judges inside the glassed-in courtroom outside Phnom Penh. Cambodia and the U.N. created this hybrid court, composed of domestic and international lawyers and judges, in 2001 to try Khmer Rouge leaders for international war crimes and crimes against humanity. During its reign from 1975 through 1979, the regime emptied cities and forced citizens to toil in fields. In an attempt to produce huge sums of rice and create an agricultural peasant Utopia, the party executed tens of thousands of people deemed disloyal, educated or simply lazy. Hundreds of thousands more died from overwork or starvation.
In addition to Khieu, detainees include the Khmer Rouge's former prison chief, its social action minister, its foreign minister and the second-in-command to party leader Pol Pot, who died 10 years ago.
Vergès says his client didn't know about the group's murderous tactics. During his presentation last Thursday, Vergès pounded his fists, pointed his finger and spoke at a pace that left his translator breathless.
Little of the French lawyer's discourse resembled traditional legal arguments. He quoted French King Louis XIV, recited his career highlights and suggested the court appeal to the U.N. to replace its former secretary-general, Kofi Annan, who supposedly agreed with Vergès that all documents should be translated. Hundreds of Cambodians, Westerners and saffron-robed monks listened in on headsets from behind the glass partition. Some sat silently, while others chuckled when Vergès made statements such as, "I laugh in the face of your threats." Still others moaned in disapproval.
When deputy international prosecutor William Smith presented oral arguments, he preemptively apologized for his performance's comparative lack of flair. Smith, who spent 11 years as a prosecutor at The Hague before joining the ECCC, then explained that international tribunal precedent requires that all court documents be in the mother tongue and one other language, not two. The ECCC printed all documents in Khmer and either English or French. Translating the pages into all three languages is unnecessary, he argued. He criticized Vergès and Sa for prolonging their clients' detention with a "meritless action." The judges said they would decide on the issue at an unspecified later date.
At a press conference after the hearing, Vergès and Sa appeared to revel in the press attention, ratcheting up their indignation over the untranslated documents and challenging Smith to an impromptu debate rather than cede the floor to him. Suth Ny, a petite, 51-year-old Cambodian woman in the crowd, shouted at the men to step down. Sa yelled back and rushed toward the woman, pointing his finger at her and telling her that he, too, lost family under the Khmer Rouge. Defense coordinator Richard Rogers blocked Sa's advance and tribunal employees then escorted the attorneys from the room. A small smile could be seen on the corners of Vergès' mouth amidst the chaos.
Organizers then gave victims a chance to speak, aided by an English translator. "You are performing a circus," scolded a middle-aged man named Ly Monysak. He and several other victims implored the court to replace Khieu Samphan's attorneys.
The next day, a quieter proceeding in the same courtroom determined a far more significant issue. The court denied prosecutors' request to use a legal theory, called Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE), against torture prison chief Kaing Guek Eav, alias "Duch," but agreed to add domestic murder and torture charges to his indictment. JCE could have made Duch liable for all 15,000 deaths at his prison, simply for having participated in its operation. Instead, prosecutors must prove his direct involvement with every murder. If allowed to proceed, JCE would also have helped link evidence against Duch to the other defendants.
The court's case is strongest against Duch, who left behind a trail of execution orders. The born-again Christian is also the only defendant to admit guilt. Duch, indicted in August, might now go to trial by March 2009.
After the back-to-back hearings, the court grappled with several more hurdles early this week. On Sunday, a U.N. delegation, led by Assistant Secretary General for legal affairs Peter Taksoe-Jensen, arrived in Cambodia to help the court address corruption allegations filed against lawyers and judges by several administrative staff. On Tuesday, prosecutors issued a "statement of disagreement" over whether the court should seek to try additional defendants. Lead Cambodian prosecutor Chea Leang opposes further investigations while lead international prosecutor, Canadian Robert Petit who has worked for U.N.-backed tribunals in Rwanda and Sierra Leone, supports them.
Before indictments against the remaining four detainees -- and possibly others -- can proceed, the court must investigate the corruption charges, mediate the co-prosecutors' dispute, and sort through hundreds of remaining pre-trial legal questions and appeals. Reining in Jacques Vergès is another big hurdle.
"I am not leaving this position," Vergès shouted during last Thursday's hearing. "I will come at it again and again."
Claire Duffett, a former assistant editor at The American Lawyer, is a freelance journalist based in Cambodia.
6 comments:
Put this French asshole, the evil defender, in jail.
Force him to eat khmer shit. French is no good anywhere and they're going down like crazy.
Cambodian people should unite together to send letter to Khmer Tribunal to expel this idiot french lawyer out from Cambodia. If he cannot understand Cambodian, he cannot represented his criminal client in the court. All criminal acts was done in Cambodia and against Cambodian people. Therefore for those without Cambodian knowledge cannot represente criminals in Cambodia at all. Areak Prey
Each defendant charged is selects a Khmer lawyer and a foreign lawyer. So the Khmer lawyer can explain to verges what each document says. Also if verges is fluent in English so he can read the documents
First you might want to expel youns first....
Hello All readers!
I am happy to read all your commends, for me, I’ve got some new ideas which I found from a lot of documents of history of Cambodia throughout regimes. I quoted 6 points from those documents to add as commends here;
1. Who’ve live in Phnom Penh and other provincial town nowadays? The answer is Vietnamese, why they are there? Who are owner of the houses in Phnom Penh and other town(Khmer),Where are they now?(died), who killed them in order to dispute over Khmer houses, to get good jobs, to make better and high education for their children, and to get into leading position in the country, like Loa today.
2. When Khmer were killed? Very early period of Khmer Rouge won, this meant that all KR leaders were not coming to the position. The process of killing is that Khmer people were cheated to go by trucks to welcome Samdach Orv (King, Sihanouk) returning to Cambodia, or go to study at this and that places, and then they were fired crowdedly. Those were killed, people in the capital and provincial town during a very short period of 19 to 23 April 1975.
3. 1979 coming, the Khmer people were replaced by Vietnamese. Those Vietnamese have been living in Cambodia for long time, some of them came to Cambodia during Sangkom Reas Niyoum, some of them came during Lorn Norl regime, they learnt and spoke Khmer very well. 1975 those Vietnamese were sent back to Vietnam by testing who can speak Vietnamese were allowed to go. 1979 while returning to Cambodia, those Vietnamese were allowed to inter Cambodia for whose can speak Khmer by shifting different places of living from capital to province and province to capital. Khmer people knew nothing about this and thought that those who are living in the capital and town are Khmer, but actually those are Vietnamese. It is a reason why people were not allowed to go into Phnom Penh because only Vietnamese were allowed to go in first.
4. In 1975, plan of killing government official and soldiers who live in the capital and town to get their houses until 1979, the next plan is to kill Khmer at rural because at capital are almost Vietnamese. That’s why there was a plan of K5 that all soldiers at the rural were killed.
5. Early 1979, a lot of Khmer people were killed as well, day time, Vietnam acted as good actors, but night time Vietnam acted as killers to kill Khmer more and more in order to eliminate Khmer from the nation. Phnom Penh is just a nest of birds when they grew up, they will fly different places. Vietnam is the same, Phnom Penh is a very central place of their living, Chhbar Ampoav, Oreusey, Olumpic, Neak Loeung, and Chroy Chang Va, all are Vietnamese. They will go to other province while they can speak Khmer. Every Khmer people can see and consider if you really love Khmer.
6. All killings above accused “Ang Kar”, where Ang Kar were from? Unfortunately, the history can not be hidden, South Vietnam were same Cambodia situation, North Vietnam did their politic the same Khmer politic, government officials and soldiers were collected but they were not killed, only jailed. The question was made, Ang Kar in Khmer and in South Vietnam were the same, who learnt from who? Or both Ang Kar was in one. Khmer People can think of the Khmer Rouge Regime, how can KR leaders kill Khmer people? because a period of killing, those KR leaders were not coming to the position, so how can they do to kill Khmer? Thus, all KR leaders said “they didn’t know the killing was true”. Actually, Ang Kar from Vietnam were the killers (North Vietnam). This is not our trend to Khmer Rouge Leaders but it’s just what I found from the documents. As for, the witness for the tribunal Khmer Rouge Leaders, those are Vietnamese women. Thus, it means that all witnesses are arranged by Vietnam (Vietnam – Khmer).
Post a Comment