27/12/2008
Bangkok Post
Former foreign minister Noppadon Pattama has urged Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva to keep his promise to get the ancient Hindu ruins of Preah Vihear back from Cambodia.
Mr Noppadon said he was concerned about the prime minister's stance on the issue. He raised the Preah Vihear issue before the Democrat-led government is due to deliver its policy statement to parliament, where it is expected to face a tough grilling by opposition MPs led by the Puea Thai party on Monday and Tuesday.
Foreign Minister Kasit Piromya will be one of the targets of the grilling.
Mr Noppadon said he had supplied information about the issue to opposition MP Chalerm Yubamrung to debate in parliament.
He said when he was foreign minister he made it clear that the Preah Vihear case was closed.
But Mr Abhisit, who was then opposition leader, insisted he would reserve the right to press for the return of the border temple to Thailand.
Mr Noppadon said Mr Abhisit said in a House debate that Thailand only acceded to Cambodia's demands for the temple, but the land where the temple is located is still owned by Thailand, although the Foreign Ministry disagreed with Mr Abhisit on the issue.
If Mr Abhisit can prove his claim, his government must talk with Cambodia and demand the return of the land surrounding the temple or demand Cambodia pay rent for the land.
Preah Vihear belongs to Cambodia, but both countries claim ownership of a 4.6-square-kilometre overlapping area surrounding the temple.
If the government fails to proceed with the matter, this will show that what the Democrats said during the debate was meaningless.
"Mr Abhisit and his government should be given the chance to work. But be warned that the efforts to encourage reconciliation will never materialise if the prime minister is something of a hypocrite," Mr Noppadon said.
Mr Noppadon resigned as foreign minister under duress over debates surrounding the Preah Vihear temple joint communique which was found to be unconstitutional by the Constitution Court.
The court ruled that the Thai-Cambodian joint communique backing Cambodia's unilateral bid to list the temple as a World Heritage Site, signed by Mr Noppadon and Cambodian Deputy Prime Minister Sok An, was a treaty and required parliamentary scrutiny and endorsement.
Mr Noppadon said he was unhappy about Mr Kasit's remarks about Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen.
He claimed Mr Kasit made offensive remarks against Mr Hun Sen that could affect relations between Thailand and Cambodia.
Mr Noppadon said he was concerned about the prime minister's stance on the issue. He raised the Preah Vihear issue before the Democrat-led government is due to deliver its policy statement to parliament, where it is expected to face a tough grilling by opposition MPs led by the Puea Thai party on Monday and Tuesday.
Foreign Minister Kasit Piromya will be one of the targets of the grilling.
Mr Noppadon said he had supplied information about the issue to opposition MP Chalerm Yubamrung to debate in parliament.
He said when he was foreign minister he made it clear that the Preah Vihear case was closed.
But Mr Abhisit, who was then opposition leader, insisted he would reserve the right to press for the return of the border temple to Thailand.
Mr Noppadon said Mr Abhisit said in a House debate that Thailand only acceded to Cambodia's demands for the temple, but the land where the temple is located is still owned by Thailand, although the Foreign Ministry disagreed with Mr Abhisit on the issue.
If Mr Abhisit can prove his claim, his government must talk with Cambodia and demand the return of the land surrounding the temple or demand Cambodia pay rent for the land.
Preah Vihear belongs to Cambodia, but both countries claim ownership of a 4.6-square-kilometre overlapping area surrounding the temple.
If the government fails to proceed with the matter, this will show that what the Democrats said during the debate was meaningless.
"Mr Abhisit and his government should be given the chance to work. But be warned that the efforts to encourage reconciliation will never materialise if the prime minister is something of a hypocrite," Mr Noppadon said.
Mr Noppadon resigned as foreign minister under duress over debates surrounding the Preah Vihear temple joint communique which was found to be unconstitutional by the Constitution Court.
The court ruled that the Thai-Cambodian joint communique backing Cambodia's unilateral bid to list the temple as a World Heritage Site, signed by Mr Noppadon and Cambodian Deputy Prime Minister Sok An, was a treaty and required parliamentary scrutiny and endorsement.
Mr Noppadon said he was unhappy about Mr Kasit's remarks about Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen.
He claimed Mr Kasit made offensive remarks against Mr Hun Sen that could affect relations between Thailand and Cambodia.
45 comments:
Stop Dreaming Thai theives...
Case closed in 1972, 10 years after the ICJ verdict of 1962!
Preah Vihear is a Khmer temple through eternity and will never be Thais...
It was built by a Khmer king for the Khmer people...NOT THAIS THEIVES...get it???
Cambodia has the right to go the ICJ again for the return of all Thai land back to Cambodia.
I suggest that your stupid dying king and his fat bitch start negotiating with China for the returns of Thais back to their ancestral homeland in Yunnan province!
Stay out of it, Ah Monkey (2:46). This dispute is strictly between the owner of the temple (Khmer on the mountain) and the Thai. No one is asking you for help, comprende?
Stay out of it, Ah Monkey (3:10 PM). This dispute is strictly between the owner of the temple (THE KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA) and the Thai. No one is asking you for help, comprende?
Guys,3:10pm is mental and is a Khmer traitor working for foreigners, so don't talk to him. He always repeat the same thing about "Khmer on the mountain" and refer to Khmers in Cambodia as "ah monkey". Dude, you have shamed your family and your ancestors for betraying your people and nation. Shame!
Anyway, Thai politicians are playing politics on Preah Vihear. Noppadon just want to get back on Abhisit for kicking him out of his FM job and for putting him into trouble. Abhisit wanted to get back P.Vihear when he was opposition leader because he wants to label Noppadon and Samak as traitors. People will see, now that Abhisit is in power he will act like Noppadon when Noppadon was in power. And Noppadon, as a dissident, will act like when Abhisit was opposition leader. They all the same, playing politics with the life of Cambodians and P.Vihear has become the victim and the casualty of their stupidity.
Bullshit, Ah Pleu (3:46), Kingdom don't own shit, but people and community does.
ไอ้พวกสัตว์เดรัจฉานชาวไทยทั้งปวงเหล่านี้ เกิดขึ้นมาเป็นโจรปล้นทรัพย์ที่ดินของผู้อื่นตายไปมันจะพินาศตกนรกทั้งหมด!
รวมทั้งไอ้หมาใหญ่ 3ตัวข้างล่างนี้:
ไอ้หมา อภิสิทธิ์ เวชชาชีวะ
ไอ้หมา นพดล ปัทมะ
ไอ้หมา กษิต ภิรมย์
ah fake siam has been suffering from split personality disorder. once minute a cpp supprter, one minute a siam wanabe. need to get his ass fucked by a siam ktoey
To stupid mother fucker Thais:
The ICJ ruled in 1962 that the Preah Vihear and the surrounding land belonged to Cambodia.
Stop pretending and fooling others...no one is as dumb as you are!
I 'm very sorry that Communism has destroyed Khmer since 1970.
"yaksi yantri year ni samathaing katani aksya yakcha sarak thina sutoanta pahinak meanaksyak ana savasyak tévear pitasayak pihayoati tatinor"
"HE WHOSE SENSES ARE MASTERED LIKE HORSES WELLE UNDER THEIR DRIVERS`CONTROL,WHO IS PURGED OF PRIDE,FREE FROM PASSIONS-SUCH A STEADFAST ONE EVEN DEVAS HOLDER."
May Buddha Srey Aar Metrey save all people in this planet
http://fr.youtube.com/user/maitreyaproject
http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=axCSr7U3tBE&NR=1
http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=KHb_K_tOS6k&feature=related
You idiot (4:47), ICJ is not the owner of the temple, but the Khmer on the mountain is.
Kasit insulted Hun Sen when he was the PAD member. See if Hun Sen can put up with Kasit's insults. I think Hun Sen will just shut up. He is only strong with Khmer, but scared of foreigners.
5.18PM,
Samdach Shit. Go sucking that samdach dick, if you are so confused about cilvilised language and barbarian language. You tries too hard to get an image of education man yourself but don't know how to address a jungle boy.
อีนางแม่มดแก่สิริกิต ไอ้เฒ่าเจ้าเล่ห์ภูมิพลรับใช้ไอ้ฉิบหายอภิสิทธิ์ เวชชาชีวะ และพวกสมุนโจรยึดสนามบิน มึงแก่จนหีเหม็นควยเน่าจะตายอยู่วันสองวันแล้วยังไปรังแกคนดี ไอ้จักรีจัญไรตายทุกปียิ่งดี ชาติเขมรจะได้เจริญสักที
I think KI-Media's resident "intellectual" Lao Mong Hay advocates land concessions to Thailand to align himself with the Westerners. Westerners support the Siams and even supply them with modern weapons to carry out their aggressions against the Khmer people.
Cambodia must forge closer ties with China as a deterrence against threats to our sovereignty by the Yuons and Siams.
Meanwhile, Lao Mong Hay and the KI-Media team must explain their positions on Preah Vihear and reconcile their support for the white imperialists with the Khmer people's desire for sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Furthermore, I challenge "Dr." Lao Mong Hay to a series of debates on various issues pertinent to Cambodia.
A real intellectual should not be afraid to participate in a scholarly debate based on facts, reasoning and sound logic.
Only fake Ph.D.'s should be worried about being exposed for the frauds that they are.
As for my other critics, I urge you to respect my stature as an intellectual and not to attempt to draw me into puerile verbal exchanges like "Ah joi ma-rai, ah koncheas yuon" and things of that nature. I will not stoop to your level.
I eagerly await their responses.
- Khmer Patriot, Ph.D.
Just so that people will not be confused by...
Viet troller and Thai (Siem) troller here on KI-Media are not intellectuals and/or scholars. They are just that - troller.
The readers know quite well who or what KI-Media is. No one reader in the right mind thinks that KI-Media should further justify its position or stance with regards to anything especially to self-proclaimed Ph.D, pretenders, phony and multiple personalities and characters. Trying to provoke or engage KI-Media in such a game is rather assenite...
KIMR 1
ហេ អាដុកទ័រ វិកលចារឹក មកពី ហាណូយ
អាឯងមឹនបាច់និយាយ ប្រឆឹតប្រឆៀងទេ អាងាប់!
អាឯងកុំសង្ឃឹមថា លោក បណ្ឌឹត ឡៅម៉ុងហៃ នឹង ទៅសរសេរចចារឆ្លងឆ្ចើយជាមួយអាងាប់ខ្ញុំកញ្ជះ បាតជើងយួនកន្តបឯងនោះអោយសោះ។ ជម្ងឺ AIDS របស់ អាឯងវានឹងយកព្រលឹងអាឯង ទៅថាននរក ក្នុងពេលឆាប់ៗនេះហើយ។ យល់ហើយឬនៅ អាងាប់តៃហោង???
Re: "...my other critics,....
Khmer Patriot, Ph.D."
I ain't no Ph.D from Hanoi or from nowhere on this planet earth. But I can tell a "phony, fake, pretender" from a sincere or "real" one. I opt to not interact with a phony like you. Furthermore IMHO, you're just a troller, a Viet slave and Viet arse kisser, no more no less! Is it clear enough for you fake Ph.D from Hanoi?
Have a good life!
p.s. please note double negative in the first part of my comment. Do not do that in real life cuz fake Ph.D from Hanoi may call that "ignorant". Thanks.
[ca roule trou duc', non?]
[ស្ដាប់បាននៅ អាងាប់ខ្ញុំយួន?]
Khmer intellectuals, listen to me and listen well:
(1) From your post you show part of your intellect particularly in English writing. Whereas the other part of your same post is pure garbage such as cursing. But why? Genuine intelligent persons are normally strong, very strong intellectually. They hardly get upset and shaken by the insults. They have real strength in the mind.
(2) Khmer intellectuals, there are real, I mean real enemies that we are facing in our survival. There is NO need for anyone of us to turn around and attact any member in "our Khmer family". Because it is extremely foolish and dangerous to our unity and our survival. There are plenty of good methods to argue "constructively" among ourselves in a "very appropriate place". These good methods can be found by our so called intellect or intelligence quotient.
Khmer intellectuals, there is no need to degrade yourself with foul language. Respect is "earned" and it cannot be asked for. R-kun jroeurn, bat. Sok sabbaii.
Remember who are the real enemies.
Qm.
...
Qm, (12:13 AM),
Below is the real enemy.
According to some sources,
Thailand is in deep trouble with internal affairs and looking to politicize anything to seek the world attention. Preah Vihear is something the THAI can prey on Cambodia for now...
Viet puppet Hun Sen, on the other hand has been instructed also to politicize the matter to divert and distract the world's attention from the Vietnamization of Cambodia and the final push for the completion of the federation of Indochina.
The Preah Vihear case has been closed for decades by the Hague. There is no way that Thailand can reverse that. The Viet experts and lobbyists all know full well and ready to go to court to help secure the future of the Federation in cooperation with and/or on behalf of Cambodia.
Either way Cambodia under Viet puppet HUN SEN stands to lose on this again: there is nothing to win on the case whereby Thailand has already lost decades ago. What Cambodia lost is her being gotten closer and closer to her demise while contributing in her entirety to the birth of the Viet Feferation of Indochina.
It's so sad...This is Viet-Cambodia under HUN SEN and Sihanouk families!!!
The Siem/Thai pushes on, the Yuon/Viet swallows KHmer/Cambodia up!!!
Hun Sen and his cronies will make more secret concessions to the Viet Federation of Indochina to thank the Viet for the Preah Vihear matter!!!
Yes dear Khmer patriots Ah Siamese has been playing Pilitics with us all along, I do not worry about it, we simply watching them how they are moving as well as thier motivations. As we always well aware of their tricky Politics, we just simply prepare our selves to trap Abhi-shit and Kas-shit then remove their skins (Yellow Shirts) for Cambodian (HRP)if they need, or otherwise just to cover Abhi-Shit and his Soldiers graves.
Cambodia owned more than Preah Vihear Temple for thousands years Abhi-Shit and his Ministers must aware of, we will turn their weapons and Jets Fighters on theirown population, these Pathaya young men will have a big surprise if they chose to invading more deeper in Khmerland. Here is a song for you young men. PATHAYA! PATHAYA! BRAIN ABHI-SHIT NHA IS COCONUT HUSK. PATHAYA! PATHAYA! ABHI-SHIT NHA WAS BEACH BOY! PATHAYA! PATHAYA! ABHI-SHIT NHA IS A KHAMOY!=(THIEF) THESE BOYS PATHAYA BEACH WANTED BACK.!you should go TO EXPOSE youself to the westerner rather than destroy Siam and Thai's Land. Take my advice young man Preah Vihear issue is OVER!!!!! OVER!!!! OVER!!!
Down Ah SIamese!
PL.K
Dear Khmer Phd,
Your comment sound so good to be true,all your words are exactly copied or well trained from khmer rouge please do not feel offensive if I do not make any mistakes you are the Viet troll all you want to do you want to slit khmer number one . And secondly you want to keep us in the jail with out wall like you did in khmer rouge era by disconnect us from out site world no westerners to help and eyes witness then when we are in your trap you kill us.
Cambodian people please watch this commenter khmer Phd closely,this guy is the Viet troll pretend to be khmer.
2:27 correction split not slit
Look boys, if you recall the history Khmers and Thais are close friends and relatives compared to Veitnam. If you keep biting each others to death, who would lose? First, Cambodia or Laos, and later on, would be Thais. There are always traitors in each country. Maybe, because of the mis-treatments of one another. Vietnam would be happy to help burn your houses.
Summary of the Summary of the Judgment of 15 June 1962
CASE CONCERNING THE TEMPLE OF PREAH VIHEAR
(MERITS)
Judgment of 15 June 1962
Proceedings in the case concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear, between Cambodia and Thailand, were instituted on 6 October 1959 by an Application of the Government of Cambodia; the Government of Thailand having raised two preliminary objections, the Court, by its Judgment of 26 May 1961, found that it had jurisdiction.
In its Judgment on the merits the Court, by nine votes to three, found that the Temple of Preah Vihear was situated in territory under the sovereignty of Cambodia and, in consequence, that Thailand was under an obligation to withdraw any military or police forces, or other guards or keepers, stationed by her at the Temple, or in its vicinity on Cambodian territory.
By seven votes to five, the Court found that Thailand was under an obligation to restore to Cambodia any sculptures, stelae, fragments of monuments, sandstone model and ancient pottery which might, since the date of the occupation of the Temple by Thailand in 1954, have been removed from the Temple or the Temple area by the Thai authorities.
Judge Tanaka and Judge Morelli appended to the Judgment a Joint Declaration. Vice-President Alfaro and Judge Sir Gerald Fitzmaurice appended Separate Opinions; Judges Moreno Quintana, Wellington Koo and Sir Percy Spender appended Dissenting Opinions.
*
* *
In its Judgment, the Court found that the subject of the dispute was sovereignty over the region of the Temple of Preah Vihear. This ancient sanctuary, partially in ruins, stood on a promontory of the Dangrek range of mountains which constituted the boundary between Cambodia and Thailand. The dispute had its fons et origo in the boundary settlements made in the period 1904-1908 between France, then conducting the foreign relations of Indo-China, and Siam. The application of the Treaty of 13 February 1904 was, in particular, involved. That Treaty established the general character of the frontier the exact boundary of which was to be delimited by a Franco-Siamese Mixed Commission
In the eastern sector of the Dangrek range, in which Preah Vihear was situated, the frontier was to follow the watershed line. For the purpose of delimiting that frontier, it was agreed, at a meeting held on 2 December 1906, that the Mixed Commission should travel along the Dangrek range carrying out all the necessary reconnaissance, and that a survey officer of the French section of the Commission should survey the whole of the eastern part of the range. It had not been contested that the Presidents of the French and Siamese sections duly made this journey, in the course of which they visited the Temple of Preah Vihear. In January-February 1907, the President of the French section had reported to his Government that the frontier-line had been definitely established. It therefore seemed clear that a frontier had been surveyed and fixed, although there was no record of any decision and no reference to the Dangrek region in any minutes of the meetings of the Commission after 2 December 1906. Moreover, at the time when the Commission might have met for the purpose of winding up its work, attention was directed towards the conclusion of a further Franco-Siamese boundary treaty, the Treaty of 23 March 1907.
The final stage of the delimitation was the preparation of maps. The Siamese Government, which did not dispose of adequate technical means, had requested that French officers should map the frontier region. These maps were completed in the autumn of 1907 by a team of French officers, some of whom had been members of the Mixed Commission, and they were communicated to the Siamese Government in 1908. Amongst them was a map of the Dangrek range showing Preah Vihear on the Cambodian side. It was on that map (filed as Annex I to its Memorial) that Cambodia had principally relied in support of her claim to sovereignty over the Temple. Thailand, on the other hand, had contended that the map, not being the work of the Mixed Commission, had no binding character; that the frontier indicated on it was not the true watershed line and that the true watershed line would place the Temple in Thailand, that the map had never been accepted by Thailand or, alternatively, that if Thailand had accepted it she had done so only because of a mistaken belief that the frontier indicated corresponded with the watershed line.
The Annex I map was never formally approved by the Mixed Commission, which had ceased to function some months before its production. While there could be no reasonable doubt that it was based on the work of the surveying officers in the Dangrek sector, the Court nevertheless concluded that, in its inception, it had no binding character. It was clear from the record, however, that the maps were communicated to the Siamese Government as purporting to represent the outcome of the work of delimitation; since there was no reaction on the part of the Siamese authorities, either then or for many years, they must be held to have acquiesced. The maps were moreover communicated to the Siamese members of the Mixed Commission, who said nothing. to the Siamese Minister of the Interior, Prince Damrong, who thanked the French Minister in Bangkok for them, and to the Siamese provincial governors, some of whom knew of Preah Vihear. If the Siamese authorities accepted the Annex I map without investigation, they could not now plead any error vitiating the reality of their consent.
The Siamese Government and later the Thai Government had raised no query about the Annex I map prior to its negotiations with Cambodia in Bangkok in 1958. But in 1934-1935 a survey had established a divergence between the map line and the true line of the watershed, and other maps had been produced showing the Temple as being in Thailand: Thailand had nevertheless continued also to use and indeed to publish maps showing Preah Vihear as lying in Cambodia. Moreover, in the course of the negotiations for the 1925 and 1937 Franco-Siamese Treaties, which confirmed the existing frontiers, and in 1947 in Washington before the Franco-Siamese Conciliation Commission, it would have been natural for Thailand to raise the matter: she did not do so. The natural inference was that she had accepted the frontier at Preah Vihear as it was drawn on the map, irrespective of its correspondence with the watershed line. Thailand had stated that having been, at all material times, in possession of Preah Vihear, she had had no need to raise the matter; she had indeed instanced the acts of her administrative authorities on the ground as evidence that she had never accepted the Annex I line at Preah Vihear. But the Court found it difficult to regard such local acts as negativing the consistent attitude of the central authorities. Moreover, when in 1930 Prince Damrong, on a visit to the Temple, was officially received there by the French Resident for the adjoining Cambodian province, Siam failed to react.
From these facts, the court concluded that Thailand had accepted the Annex I map. Even if there were any doubt in this connection, Thailand was not precluded from asserting that she had not accepted it since France and Cambodia had relied upon her acceptance and she had for fifty years enjoyed such benefits as the Treaty of 1904 has conferred on her. Furthermore, the acceptance of the Annex I map caused it to enter the treaty settlement; the Parties had at that time adopted an interpretation of that settlement which caused the map line to prevail over the provisions of the Treaty and, as there was no reason to think that the Parties had attached any special importance to the line of the watershed as such, as compared with the overriding importance of a final regulation of their own frontiers, the Court considered that the interpretation to be given now would be the same.
The Court therefore felt bound to pronounce in favour of the frontier indicated on the Annex I map in the disputed area and it became unnecessary to consider whether the line as mapped did in fact correspond to the true watershed line.
For these reasons, the Court upheld the submissions of Cambodia concerning sovereignty over Preah Vihear.
Don't listen to dumb donut makers. It is not the kingdom who own the temple but the people in the community. Kingdom can't own anything.
Take the Empire State building in the US for example, how can the US owns it? Only the New Yorker cans own it. They can decide to get rid of it or keep it, ... . See the difference?
3:47 am a Thai wanna be boi...go kiss my Arse! Go and rot in hell...fool!
Please do not undermine your own country leaders, such as Mr. Hun. It’s not easy to deal with the border conflict as it can affect a lot of innocent lives along the border areas. I’m sure Mr. Hun doesn’t want to lose any more Khmer territory to Thai since he already well aware that Thai has long been the enemy to Khmer and always want to take more land from Khmer. He also well prepared to confront Thai’s invasion with modern weapons recently acquired from his supporter countries. We'll see SAMs, STINGERS and ANTI-TANKS missiles flying in the jungle if Thai choose to invade Cambodia. Be patient and see how the gov’t would handle the issue.
Yo Yo Yo 3:47 AM,
You are funny as shit...Man...ROFL!
Now that's what we called your "Head in your ass" talking...Man.... See, you've learned something good when you come to KI-Media just like that Ph.D from Hanoi....Damn worthless nutcase!!!
Wrong 4:24 AM...wrong wrong wrong!!! What Hun Sen Viet puppet will do is to kowtow and kiss his Viet MASTER ARSE for help then HUN SEN will make more secret territory concessions to thank the Viet for ultimately LET KHMER become part of the Viet federation of Indochina....You'll see...The freaking Thai is just a pusher, thusly:
THE THAI PUSHES ON, THE VIET MOVES IN AND SWALLOWS KHMER UP.
3:47 AM,
There's a difference between Preah Vihear and the Empire State Building in New York. Preah Vihear is a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Before it became a World Heritage Site, Preah Vihear was given the category of Protected Landscape (IUCN category V )which requires national authority and governmental supervision over the monuments by the government of that sovereign nation.
For your information, the Empire State building is recognized as a National Historic Landmark by the US government although the building is owned and managed by W&H Properties. This means that its status is recognized as a national symbol but ownership doesn't belong to the US government.
In the case of Preah Vihear, its status is more like the equivalent of a National Park in the United States. In the US, national parks are a reserve of land, declared and owned by a national government, protected from most human development and pollution. National parks are protected areas of IUCN category II.
The Thais are simply bullies that love to show intimidation and push Cambodia around. Nothing more.
The Viets (ah yuon) are parasites that pentrates through Cambodia, infects inside Cambodia, and reproduces inside Cambodia...feeding off Cambodia and reducing the fitness and capability of Cambodia. As it prolongs itself, Cambodia eventually dies.
Don't be silly, 4:40, only the owner (Khmer on the Mountain) of the temple can decide what to do with their temple. You can't steal it from them and turn it to a stupid national park without permission.
5:03 AM,
Too late you idiot. No Cambodian ever protested. Seems like you're the only one barking. Who the fuck are you? Get off the computer, find something productive to do, and get a life.
Hey, 3:10 PM, could you explain what the difference between "Khmer on the mountain" and "Khmer People" (the whole country that called Cambodia)???
Please shows the proof and details!! Mr. Wis-damn.
From: Intell-idiot.
Khmer on the mountain is different from Khmer in Phnom Penh, which is different from Khmer in Kampot, which is different from Khmer in Svay Rieng, ... . Furthermore, Khmer on the mountain is independent from Cambodia. They don't pay tax to Cambodia; they don't follow Cambodia law; they have different dialect; ... ; and their closest friends are the Thai, Lao, and Viet.
What else would you like to know?
Sure, just one more simple question, 6:20 AM: have you played with yourself yet this morning?
Stop changing the subject, you greedy evil doer.
Keep up with your evil doing. Soon, you will join those who stabbed your King in back in the 70's because of their greed.
You're really dumB, are you? So sad that you are a self-denial.
"A man WITHOUY A COUNTRY"
12:36 AM I would not think that is possible. If there is such thing as "the birth of the Viet Feferation of Indochina" that birth can die long before its due date. The reason would be, in this era of 21st century, the world is completely covered with modern knowledge. So, please rest assured that such birth does not exist in the real world but "the evil's dream" that can be burnt and destroyed by the rays of sunlight.
... and besides, Vietnam is tiny and can barely survive on its own stance. Please abandon that senseless nightmare. Sank you.
Qm
...
Dead wrong 12:06 PM.
A sad monkey on the mountain.
Khmer on the mountain =
"A MAN WITHOUT A COUNTRY"
Sad,sad,sad,sad Ape.
Samdech Hun Sen must cut off this idiot mad dog Kashit Piromya's head and wash Samdech's feet with his blood!
สมเด็จอัครมหาเสนาบดี เดโช ฮุนเซน ต้องตัดหัวไอ้หมาบ้า กษิต ภิรมย์แล้วเอาเลือดของมันมาล้างส้นตีนของท่าน!
Post a Comment