Sunday, March 08, 2009

Cambodia's Scale of Justice

7th March, 2009
Opinion by Khmerization

“In Cambodia of today, people win court cases not because they deserve to win. People win court cases based on how much money they can bribe the judges, regardless of whether they are on the right or the wrong side of the laws.”

Cambodia’s justice has been suffering image problems since the formal inception of the Cambodian judiciary. From one regime to the next, Cambodia’s justice system, and its tarnished image, remained virtually unchanged. And after the 1970 coup d’etat that toppled Sihanouk’s royalist regime and the installation of the Khmer Republican regime of Marshall Lon Nol, Cambodian judicial and justice system has suffered incessant political interferences. But the level of political interferences in the judiciary has never been on a scale seen today.

Political and legal pundits are dumbstruck about the level of injustice that has been practising in the Cambodian courts today. The high level of injustice comes about in large part due to the economic factor of the judges because of very low pay which lead them to practise corruption. But the main factor leading to rampant corruption and injustice is mainly due to the condonation of corruption and impunity tolerated by the government. As a result, justice has become too expensive for many ordinary Cambodians.

The scale of justice in today's Cambodia is tilting toward the rich and the powerful at the expense of the poor. In Cambodia of today, people win court cases not because they deserve to win. People win court cases based on how much money they can bribe the judges, regardless of whether they are on the right or the wrong side of the laws. The more people are willing to bribe the judges, the more chances they will be assured of winning. This is why nowadays, the poor people have lost confidence in the justice system and resort to take matter into their own hands. Regardless of what purpose it was originally designed for, the Cambodian justice system has effectively become the tool for the rich and the powerful to oppress the poor.

Corruption has made justice in Cambodia unreachable by the have-nots, but it served the rich and the powerful well because of the money and the political powers they wield. But the political interferences in the judicial system have made it virtually impossible for those who are on the opposite side of politics to the government to obtain justice. Crimes perpetrated against opposition figures by government agents have never been resolved. On the contrary, crimes perpetrated against supporters of government, whether the perpetrators are from the opposition or elsewhere, have always resulted in the wrong convictions of opposition supporters.

Case in point: The recent lifting of Mr. Sam Rainsy’s parliamentary is a gross injustice and a blatant proof of high level of political interferences in the judiciary. The Cambodian People’s Party-controlled judiciary failed to take action on Mr. Sam Rainsy’s lawsuit against the National Election Committee (NEC) for electoral frauds. On the contrary, the court took action against Mr. Sam Rainsy, following lawsuit lodged by the NEC for failing to pay fines, which resulted in his parliamentary immunity being lifted.

The lifting of Mr. Sam Rainsy’s parliamentary immunity is illegal for many reasons. First, Mr. Sam Rainsy has not been allowed to exhaust all avenues of appeals. He was still appealing to the High Court when the Permanent Committee of the Parliament hurriedly lifted his immunity in contravention of the constitution. The Cambodian constitution stipulates that only the full session of the parliament can decide on such a matter. Secondly, Mr. Sam Rainsy had paid the fines on the same day as when his parliamentary immunity has been lifted. And immediately after the payment of the fines, the NEC, the plaintiff against Mr. Sam Rainsy, withdrew the lawsuit against Mr. Sam Rainsy. Mr. Sam Rainsy immediately wrote to the president of the National Assembly requesting for his immunity to be re-instated. As a matter of fact, without political interferences, the matter is considered finished. But due to political interferences, up until today, nearly two weeks after the fines have been paid, Mr. Sam Rainsy is still without his parliamentary immunity.

Mr. Sam Rainsy’s case, if not for any political motivation, can be resolved in split seconds. Cambodia has more urgent and pressing issues for the government, especially Prime Minister Hun Sen, to deal with. Political pundits and observers put the blames squarely on the government, Prime Minister Hun Sen in particular, for artificially creating a lot of trivial issues for itself to be occupied within a deliberate attempt to divert public attention from the more pressing issues of unemployment, global financial crisis, crimes and border issues.

For the sake of Cambodia and her suffering people, Cambodian political leaders, Prime Minister Hun Sen and Mr. Sam Rainsy in particular, should set aside their political differences and unite in one force to work together in helping to tackle urgent issues facing the Cambodian nation today. Border issues, political, economic and social ills should be on top of their agenda. Internal infighting, as is always the case, has brought havoc and destruction. Internal infighting against one’s own fellow countrymen, even against those who are from the opposite side of politics, is effectively a national suicide.

To sum up, in order to make Cambodian justice system a clean and just system, the judges have to be paid well and severe punishments of judges who are involved in corruption must be applied. But more importantly, political entities must stop interfering with the courts’ works and the courts and judges must be made to be neutral and truly independent of politics.

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

Real justice in Cambodia is hard to obtain because all the judges are political appointees and are corrupt and never get punished. For real justice to happen in Cambodia, judges, courts must be neutral and non-political. Corrupt judges must be severely punished.

Anonymous said...

The poeple of Cambofia have only one way,all Khmer people have remove the Hun Sen regime by voiting in 2013. that is the best way, the solution are give empower to Khmer people. Neverless, the Khmer poeple ont in one core you known, all Khmer have to consider about that, is the pointout.

Anonymous said...

People in the west win court cases not because they deserve to win. People over there win court cases based on how much money they have for lawyers. What difference does it make?

Don't be fool by Ah Khmer-Yuon (KY) who got nothing better to do but to try to deceive Khmer people.

Anonymous said...

JUSTICE? CATCHING AND RELEASE!! THERE'S NO JUSTICE...NOPE!

Anonymous said...

1:14am, In the West, for difficult and complicated cases people have to have good lawyers to have a high chances of winning and they are a bit expensive. They don't need to bribe the judge to win. But, for those who have no money, unemployed people etc, the government will provide the lawyers free of charge and some of them are very good lawyers.

People win the cases because they deserve to win, no one can bribe the judges like in Cambodia under Hun Sen. This is the difference.

Anonymous said...

Hahaha! Pouk Ah judges in cambodia crooked and addicted bribe!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Cambodian judges, police dept, genearls, rich tycoon..all of these people are the most corrupted people, they'r rich from lands grabbing/stealing from the poors! illegal logging....

Anonymous said...

You must be out of your mind, 4:13, if you see any difference between increasing you chance to win your case by giving money to judge or to lawyer. The truth of the matter is you didn't win because you deserved it but because you paid for it.

The problem with you, mate, is you are drowned with your forefather's (G. Washington's) rhetorics.

Anonymous said...

12:16pm, the difference between paying a lawyer and a judge is, you pay the lawyer for their service, but if you pay a judge you are bribing him to buy justice. some cases are very complicated that you need a very expert lawyer to represent you to increase your chance of winning or to secure a lesser sentence. if the case is a simple and straight forward one, the accused will be convicted for sure, but if he has a good lawyer, the lawyer can navigate through legal loopholes or something to get him a lesser sentence, may be due to a legal technicality.

Through your writing and the way you speak, it seems that you are living and educated in a Western country. If you live in the West and educated in the West, you must be out of mind for advocating bribing the judge to get out of your crimes. Unbelievable.

Anonymous said...

Come on, dude (6:01), most of super rich guy can get away with murder because they have lot of cashes. You can do it two ways: Paying the judge directly or paying a tip-top lawyer. Either way, the victim will still be in the grave and no justice served. Do you get the picture?

At any rate, I am not advocate for either method. I just don't want people to think there is a perfect justice anywhere. Everything got flaw dude if you care to take the trouble to find it.

Anonymous said...

8:37pm, then what are you advocating, lawlessness where people can take matters into their own hands? where did you get that information that the super-rich can get away with murders? There might be some cases where, due to insufficient evidence or legal technicality, someone might get away with murders, anyone, not just the super-rich and the powerful like in Cambodia. In Cambodia, all the rich and powerful will get away with murders and the poor will always be wrongly convicted, sometimes just to cover up the crimes of the super-rich and the powerful, just like Bornn Samnang and Sok Sam-oeun. Anyway, Pisith Pilika's murderer or murderers (Bun Rany, Hun Sen and the hitmen)are still roaming around freely.

Anonymous said...

7;02, you are trying to make make choose between Westerner's shit and Asian's shit. They're both stink. Why can we leave it as is.

Like I said, in the west whoever got the best lawyer will mostly win the case, and it has nothing to do with right, wrong, or justice.

Here's what people are saying in the west:

http://www.blurtit.com/forandagainst/Is_it_ok_for_people_with_lots_of_money_to_get_away_with_murder

Anonymous said...

Here's a good story:

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/93111

When a Khmer people kill someone while driving drunk, he got into big trouble and got deported back to Cambodia ...

But when some rich guy did the same thing, he got 15 days. How's that for westerner's justice system?

Anonymous said...

Can The Rich And Famous Get Away With Anything? It Certainly Seems That Way
by Greg Morago

http://www.commondreams.org/views03/1130-09.htm