By A. Gaffar Peang-Meth
Pacific Daily News (Guam)
"Sen's abuses of state institutions are actions detrimental to his country's dignity and his people's economic and social well-being, and are violations of his own peoples' norms and values.We learn so we can improve ourselves and the world in which we live. We dialogue so we can learn more.
...Hun Sen's greed and lust for power are detrimental to Cambodia's reputation on the world stage"
Last June, the Hong Kong-based Asian Human Rights Commission's senior researcher, Lao Mong Hay, called for the empowerment of Cambodia's institutions so the people's constitutional rights can be secured. He quoted the architect of European Unity, French economist and diplomat Jean Monnet: "Nothing is possible without men; nothing is lasting without institutions."
Monnet also observed: "People only accept change when they are faced with necessity, and only recognize necessity when a crisis is upon them."
There is a continuing discussion between two officers of the U.S. armed forces in Iraq, a Buddhist and a Muslim, both of Cambodian descent, following a series of my columns in the Pacific Daily News on Cambodia. The view of one holds that government is "responsible" to educate and empower the people to build a better Cambodia; another asserts that government can "set conditions" for people to progress, but individuals must walk the talk and own some consequences.
It's a healthy dialogue. As thoughts are provoked, the door to a horizon of options and perspectives is opened. That's how we grow and progress.
Indeed, man is the impetus to achieve the possible. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights sets as "the highest aspiration of the common people" a world of freedom of expression and belief, and freedom from hunger and from fear. It's an ideal world but nations agreed the declaration must be "a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations."
In practice, man everywhere aspires generally to a life of relative contentment, in an acceptable condition of self-sufficiency and general good health.
The American forefathers believed in the equality of man with unalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and in instituting a government among men who give it power to attain these goals.
A country's political system refers to its institutional or structural arrangements -- interest groups, political parties, the three branches of government, the bureaucracy -- to formulate and pursue society's collective goals.
Each institution or structure must perform its specific roles and carry out its functions in order for the political system to make and implement decisions and policies that affect society, economy, and culture. That's how politics functions.
As an organizing force, every government in the world aspires to fulfill its general ultimate goals to keep the nation independent and free from foreign occupation, maintain order and security, and provide for the economic and social well-being of all citizens.
Budapest-born American Professor Emeritus of Psychiatry at the State University of New York, Thomas Stephen Szasz, posits, "The system isn't stupid, but the people in it are."
It is humans, from among men in society, who populate the system, be it monarchical, democratic, or communist. On behalf of institutions, which interact with one another in a democratic system, men make decisions and policies, and implement them. This is governance.
Good governance includes participation, the rule of law, transparency, responsiveness, consensus, equity and inclusiveness, effectiveness and efficiency, and accountability, according to the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific,. Bad governance is increasingly seen as "one of the root causes of all evil in our societies."
Good governance is an ideal, says ESCAP, but to ensure sustainable human development, there must be actions to transform this ideal into a reality.
The "people" in the system make "good" or "bad" governance.
To guide them, a constitution -- a collection of principles, norms, customs, standards and a set of rules -- is the supreme law of the land. It contains statements of national values, ideas and goals; describes who does what in government; defines each branch's powers and limitations, the division of powers; and legitimizes a government's rule.
Cambodia does have necessary modern institutions and people with expertise to run them. Yet the organizing force under Cambodian Premier Hun Sen has failed to achieve ESCAP's characteristics of good governance. It is riddled with corruption, abuses citizens' rights and tramples its own laws, while still being pledged a billion dollars of aid from the international community in 2009.
Cambodia's 1993-instituted constitutional direct democracy, the National Congress, is supposed to be held once a year by the premier and chaired by the king, to allow citizens to meet the country's leaders "to be directly informed of various matters of national interest" and "to raise issues and make proposals for the state authorities to address." It has never been held. On March 4, the premier said since his People's Party holds a majority in Parliament, it could amend the constitution "to remove it from the constitution altogether."
An individual's action or inaction is determined principally by his or her values (Khmer values include integrity, honesty, hard work, meritocracy), beliefs (in Buddha's precepts and Khmer codes of conduct), interests (in serving the people), and experiences (personal and national).
Sen's abuses of state institutions are actions detrimental to his country's dignity and his people's economic and social well-being, and are violations of his own peoples' norms and values.
Cambodia's political system is not antiquated, but Hun Sen's greed and lust for power are detrimental to Cambodia's reputation on the world stage.
A. Gaffar Peang-Meth, Ph.D., is retired from the University of Guam, where he taught political science for 13 years. Write him at peangmeth@yahoo.com.
8 comments:
This is very critical, very intellectual and very affectionate analysis
Thanks Peang-Meth
Talk is cheap. How can you suggest an enpowerment to local Cambodians. Since there are no concenses of decision making especially in the direction and policies of the country. Cambodians are so divided, not only in Cambodia, even in the US, how many partitions it has. There will be not unity if we empower people to make there own dicisions without respect of others.
Empowerment can only apply when the majority of people in the country have sufficient level of knowledge mainly through education. But how many etellectual people were left after the Khmer Rough. Please read the book of "Cambodia after the Khmer Rough" The author is an American. So many hardhsip for the inherit government to rebuild this war torn country.
However, criticism is still good if it is in a constructive and presented in a polite way which is acceptable upon the local culture. But before making those critics, we should able to understand all the situations and look deep into the real issues rather than obstensibly.
I believe due to his personal view and past experience and background, Mr Peang Meth, has never returned to Cambodia after he left the country during the Lon Nol regime.
It's so sad to have Hun Sen represent us as our leader. He is so lack-luster, backwards thinking and doesn't care about the welfare of the Cambodian people nor does he care about Cambodia's image on the international scene. Hun Sen has detrimentally given Cambodia a bad reputation as a greedy and money-begging nation.
Hun Sen could have done quite a lot for Cambodia in terms of alleviating people out of poverty, providing up to date social services and further developing Cambodia's infrastructures. But no, he decides it is better to consider only himself, his family and the few elites.
something ought to change for the better. if something is not working right, why continue to tinker with it, why not ask for something better?
True but there is nothing wrong here. What need to be change is in the US. Millions and millions of people lost their jobs and homes everyday. It's a violation of Human Right.
Don't listen to Ah Jrook (Gaffar).
Like someone above said, "talk is cheap". We need to stop this blame game and pointing finger at one person for Khmer suffering. By no mean I am pro Hun Sen and his regime, but being Khmer, we are obligated to take responsibility to help our people. We have to stop depending on foreigners to solve our issues, rather it is up to us individually to make a differences. Yes, the professor write very elegantly, but what have he done for Khmer people. Therefore, we all need to play parts in helping rebuilding our country to regain our pride as an Ankor builder.
Srolanh Khmer
Srolanh Khmer,
I am not siding with Gaffar but he has also helped Cambodia. In your idea, what do you mean by helping Cambodian people? Give them money, rice, sarong? or what? Or living in Cambodia to exploit them through business, power and court..etc?
Or giving them education advise? Gaffar is giving Cambodians the advise...why he is denied of helping Cambodia.
If you voted for CPP (Cambodian People's Party):
Also known as:
Communist Party of Kampuchea
Khmer Revolution Party
Khmer Rouge Party
Khmer Krorhorm Party - គណបក្សខ្មែរក្រហម
You're support the killing of 1.7 million innocent Khmer peoples from 1975 to 1979 in Cambodia.
You're support the killing at least twelve innocent men, women and children on March 30, 1997 Grenade Attack in Cambodia.
You're support assassination of journalists in Cambodia.
You're support political assassination and killing in Cambodia.
You're support attempted assassination and murder of leader of the free trade union in Cambodia.
You're support corruptions in Cambodia.
You're support murder of Piseth Pilika (Hun Sen's affaire).
You're support Hun Sen Regime burn poor people's house down to the ground and leave them homeless.
Hun Sen, Chea Sim and Heng Samrin was a former Khmer Rouge commanders.
Now, Hun Sen, Chea Sim and Heng Samrin are Khmer Rouge leaders, since their leader (Pol Pot) is dead.
From 1975 to 1979, these Khmer Rouge commanders responsible for killing 1.7 million innocent Khmer peoples in Cambodia.
From 1980 to present, these Khmer Rouge leaders responsible for killing innocent men, women and children on March 30, 1997, assassinated journalists, political assassination and killing, murder of Piseth Pilika (Hun Sen's affaire) and attempted assassinate and murder of leader of the free trade union in Cambodia.
When is the ECCC going to bring these three criminals to U.N. Khmer Rouge Tribunal?
Khmer Rouge Regime is a genocide organization.
Hun Sen Regime is a terrorist organization.
Hun Sen Bodyguards is a terrorist organization.
Hun Sen Death Squad is a terrorist organization.
Cambodian People's Party is a terrorist organization.
I have declare the current Cambodian government which is lead by the Cambodian People's Party as a terrorist organization.
Whoever associate with the current Cambodian government are associate with a terrorist organization.
Khmer Rouge Regime had committed:
Torture
Execution
Massacre
Atrocities
War Crimes
Crimes Against Humanity
Starvations
Overwork to Death
Slavery
Rapes
Abuses
Assault and Battery
Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Regime had committed:
Assassination
Murder
Killing
Terrorism
Drive by Shooting
Intimidation
Death Threat
Threatening
Human Rights Abuses
Human Trafficking
Drugs Trafficking
Under Age Child Sex
Mass Evictions
Land Grabbing
Corruptions
Illegal Firearms
Illegal Logging
Acid Attacks
Injustice
Steal Votes
Violate the Constitution
These are the Trade Marks of Hun Sen's Khmer Rouge Regime.
Under Hun Sen Regime, no criminals that has been committed murder and all other crimes within Hun Sen's government ever been brought to justice.
Information change without notice as it become available.
Post a Comment