Monday, May 25, 2009

Chevron should consider reputational risk

Monday, 25 May 2009
Written by Gavin Hayman, Global Witness
Letter to The Phnom Penh Post


Dear Editor,

Your article "Chevron deal still unresolved as crisis impacts exploration" (May 20, 2009) cites the economic crisis as the reason for delays in renewing Chevron's oil exploration agreement with Cambodia. Chevron should consider other factors in negotiations with the government - not least of which is reputational risk.

Earlier this year, Global Witness exposed major governance failings in Cambodia's emerging oil sector. Our report, "Country for Sale", revealed that the institution in charge of Cambodia's oil industry - the Cambodian National Petroleum Authority (CNPA) - is a constitutionally dubious body under the direct control of Prime Minister Hun Sen and his deputy Sok An.

Centralisation and politicisation of power within the CNPA has created a dysfunctional organisation over which the Cambodian parliament has no oversight. A setup like this leaves the industry wide open to corruption and exploitation.

Companies such as Chevron have a role to play in improving the governance of the country's extractive industries to help reduce poverty. As a key member of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, Chevron should lead by example. To start, it should disclose any payments it makes to the Cambodian government.

Given recent events in Ecuador, reputational risk should be at the core of Chevron's approach to Cambodia.

Gavin Hayman, Global Witness
London

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

everyone had made mistakes once in their existence. let's hope we all can learn from that mistake and become better when dealing internationally, etc... god bless cambodia.

Anonymous said...

Americans want money not reputation. Do you not remember the 1 million civilians killed in Iraq? This is not for the benefits of others but for those oil conglomerates, of course this include Bush's involvement prior to his tenure as the president.