KI-Media loves to hear from you, and we're giving you a bullhorn. We just ask that you keep things civil. Please leave out personal attacks, do not use profanity, ethnic or racial slurs, or take shots at anyone's sexual orientation or religion. We thank you for your cooperation!
Stupid question: The whole world know, Prasat Preah Vihear belongs the Khmer Descents. In this case Kingdom of Cambodia is the Country of the Khmers descents, means Prasat Preah Vihear belongs to Cambodia
Preah Vihear temple is Khmer prides and joy. The world communities knew it well. It belonged to Khmer. Sacrava is not Khmer that's why Sacrava post this unthinkable title. Whats an idoits.
The author made the title like this because he wanted to draw attention from the readers due to the Preah Vihear Temple and its surrounding land become the hot issues between Cambodia and Thailand.
In reality, the temple and land around it are clearly belong to Cambodia only as you know.
Please, don't draw conclusion before getting know in detail.
The Kindom of Cambodia own Angkor Wat, but why Sok Kong own Ankor Wat too, and he took $-million profit for his pocket,to Vietnam, and provide less than 1% to the Kingdom of Cambodia. Who own Angkor-Wat?
Now the question who own Preah Vihea Temple? Think it again and again, if noone cannot answer, do a research.
If it was in fact that Cambodia Kingdom get a profit only 1% from Angkor Wat Site, so the rest of monies belonged to Sok Kong, Vietnam, they were the ownership.
I agree! The top two bloggers doesn't understand what Sacrava trying to portray. Yet, so quick to comment on this issues that they have no clue about. Please read, read and read.... before commenting.
9 comments:
Stupid question:
The whole world know, Prasat Preah Vihear belongs the Khmer Descents.
In this case Kingdom of Cambodia is the Country of the Khmers descents, means Prasat Preah Vihear belongs to Cambodia
Preah Vihear temple is Khmer prides and joy. The world communities knew it well. It belonged to Khmer. Sacrava is not Khmer that's why Sacrava post this unthinkable title. Whats an idoits.
Dear the above two readers,
The author made the title like this because he wanted to draw attention from the readers due to the Preah Vihear Temple and its surrounding land become the hot issues between Cambodia and Thailand.
In reality, the temple and land around it are clearly belong to Cambodia only as you know.
Please, don't draw conclusion before getting know in detail.
However, thank you for your nationalism
Let's Think this way Deeply,
The Kindom of Cambodia own Angkor Wat, but why Sok Kong own Ankor Wat too, and he took $-million profit for his pocket,to Vietnam, and provide less than 1% to the Kingdom of Cambodia. Who own Angkor-Wat?
Now the question who own Preah Vihea Temple? Think it again and again, if noone cannot answer, do a research.
Red-Ant.
To 3:13AM,
Yes, you maybe right, who own it?
UNESCO, Kindom of Cambodia, or a private Business man like Sok Kong?
3:02 WHAT DO YOU THANK FOR NATIONALIST FOR? ARE YOU A SON OF GUN?
Cambodia Town
Long Beach,Ca
To: 3:13 AM
If it was in fact that Cambodia Kingdom get a profit only 1% from Angkor Wat Site, so the rest of monies belonged to Sok Kong, Vietnam, they were the ownership.
New Phally
អា ភីភីយូ (PPU) មកបៀម ក្ដ ឪអាឯងលេងភ្លាម
មក អាកូនមីសំផឹងយួនអស់សាច់!
ឪអាភីភីយូ(PPU)
I agree!
The top two bloggers doesn't understand what Sacrava trying to portray. Yet, so quick to comment on this issues that they have no clue about.
Please read, read and read.... before commenting.
Post a Comment