7th January, 2010
Op-Ed by Khmerization
“7th January, 1979 is both a combination of a liberation and an invasion. Miss Theary Seng, former executive director of Centre for Social Development, called it a liberation through invasion, while Dr. A. Gaffar Peang-Meth, former professor of the University of Guam, called it a day of infamy and deliverance.”
The controversy surrounding the glorification or the celebration of January 7, 1979 has been hotly debated between the proponents of the Vietnamese intervention and its opponents since day one. Today marks the 31st anniversary of the invasion of Cambodia by the Vietnamese forces and debates are again raging, as happened every year, as to whether this date should be celebrated as a liberation day or an invasion day.
Proponents of the Vietnamese intervention in 1979 celebrate 7th January as a liberation day. They believe that without the Vietnamese intervention of 1979, the whole population of Cambodia would have been wiped out by the Khmer Rouge genocide, while opponents of the Vietnamese intervention believe that it should be remembered as an invasion day.
Opponents of the Vietnamese intervention have instead called for the celebration of the Paris Peace Accords of 23rd of October 1991 instead of 7th January, 1979. On the eve of the 30th anniversary of the Vietnamese intervention of last year, Mr. Khieu Kanharith, Minister of Information and government spokesman, was adamant that 7th January was a more important date than the Paris Peace Accords. He said and I quote: “if there were no 07 January 1979, there wouldn’t be 23 October 1991 either.” By saying this, he seems to believe that 7th January, 1979 is the cornerstone that has laid a foundation for the Paris Peace Accords of 23rd October, 1991.
Mr. Kanharith statement seems to resonate an admission of 7th January as an invasion day. By saying that without 7th January, the day of the Vietnamese invasion, and that there wouldn’t be 23 October 1991, the day that Cambodia achieved peace, Mr. Kanharith is unconsciously admitting that 7th January, 1979 is an invasion day because if there wasn’t any invasion, there wouldn’t be a need for any peace accords.
Opponents of the Vietnamese intervention, on the other hand, are adamantly and vehemently insisting that 7th January is an invasion day. They have accused Vietnam of abetting the Khmer Rouge to take powers in Cambodia on 17th April, 1975 and aiding the massacres of 1.7 million Cambodians. They believe that Vietnam did not voluntarily invade Cambodia solely for the purpose of liberating the Cambodian people from the Khmer Rouge genocide, but rather Vietnam invaded Cambodia because the Khmer Rouge has turned down its overtures of subordination to Vietnam and because of border clashes due to Vietnamese border encroachments. They also accused that, after the 1979 invasion, the killings of the Cambodian people continued unabated through the so-called “K-5 Plan” and that the Vietnamese army had plundered the Cambodian wealth and resources by transporting them back to their country.
Opposition parties also insisted that 7th January is an invasion day. They consider that it is a product of the 17th April, 1975, the date of the Khmer Rouge takeover and the beginning of the Cambodian genocide, aided and abetted by the present leaders of the Cambodian People's Party (CPP), because the majority of them, like PM Hun Sen, Senate President Chea Sim and National Assembly Chairman Heng Samrin, are important ex-leaders of the Khmer Rouge.
Mr. Sam Rainsy, an arch-opponent of the 7th January, in a letter to The Cambodia Daily in January 2009, said and I quote: “But it is worth realizing that without April 17, 1975, there would be no need for January 7, 1979.” Mr. Sam Rainsy’s statement seem to concur the above statements which consider that both dates (7th January, 1979 and 17th April, 1975) as the by-products of the Vietnamese creations, aided and abetted by the present CPP leaders who were important ex-leaders of the Khmer Rouge regime.
In conclusion, for me personally, 7th January, 1979 is both a combination of a liberation and an invasion. Miss Theary Seng, former executive director of Centre for Social Development, called it a liberation through invasion, while Dr. A. Gaffar Peang-Meth, former professor of the University of Guam, called it a day of infamy and deliverance.
I believe it is a liberation day in the sense that, whether it was an intention of Vietnam or not, millions of Cambodian lives have been saved from the Khmer Rouge regime. I also consider it as an invasion day because it was an invasion: pure and simple, because I believe that Vietnam had helped the Khmer Rouge to take powers in 1975 and aided and abetted in the subsequent massacres of 1.7 million Cambodian lives. I also believe that the Vietnamese intervention in 1979 was not born out of any sympathy for the Cambodian people, but rather Vietnam had taken that course of actions because of a breakdown of relations with the Khmer Rouge and because of border clashes resulting from border encroachments by Vietnam.
So, is 7th of January, 1979 a liberation day or is it an invasion day? The answer is both, depending on who we are talking to. Or, as Miss Theary Seng puts it, it is a liberation through invasion.
Op-Ed by Khmerization
“7th January, 1979 is both a combination of a liberation and an invasion. Miss Theary Seng, former executive director of Centre for Social Development, called it a liberation through invasion, while Dr. A. Gaffar Peang-Meth, former professor of the University of Guam, called it a day of infamy and deliverance.”
The controversy surrounding the glorification or the celebration of January 7, 1979 has been hotly debated between the proponents of the Vietnamese intervention and its opponents since day one. Today marks the 31st anniversary of the invasion of Cambodia by the Vietnamese forces and debates are again raging, as happened every year, as to whether this date should be celebrated as a liberation day or an invasion day.
Proponents of the Vietnamese intervention in 1979 celebrate 7th January as a liberation day. They believe that without the Vietnamese intervention of 1979, the whole population of Cambodia would have been wiped out by the Khmer Rouge genocide, while opponents of the Vietnamese intervention believe that it should be remembered as an invasion day.
Opponents of the Vietnamese intervention have instead called for the celebration of the Paris Peace Accords of 23rd of October 1991 instead of 7th January, 1979. On the eve of the 30th anniversary of the Vietnamese intervention of last year, Mr. Khieu Kanharith, Minister of Information and government spokesman, was adamant that 7th January was a more important date than the Paris Peace Accords. He said and I quote: “if there were no 07 January 1979, there wouldn’t be 23 October 1991 either.” By saying this, he seems to believe that 7th January, 1979 is the cornerstone that has laid a foundation for the Paris Peace Accords of 23rd October, 1991.
Mr. Kanharith statement seems to resonate an admission of 7th January as an invasion day. By saying that without 7th January, the day of the Vietnamese invasion, and that there wouldn’t be 23 October 1991, the day that Cambodia achieved peace, Mr. Kanharith is unconsciously admitting that 7th January, 1979 is an invasion day because if there wasn’t any invasion, there wouldn’t be a need for any peace accords.
Opponents of the Vietnamese intervention, on the other hand, are adamantly and vehemently insisting that 7th January is an invasion day. They have accused Vietnam of abetting the Khmer Rouge to take powers in Cambodia on 17th April, 1975 and aiding the massacres of 1.7 million Cambodians. They believe that Vietnam did not voluntarily invade Cambodia solely for the purpose of liberating the Cambodian people from the Khmer Rouge genocide, but rather Vietnam invaded Cambodia because the Khmer Rouge has turned down its overtures of subordination to Vietnam and because of border clashes due to Vietnamese border encroachments. They also accused that, after the 1979 invasion, the killings of the Cambodian people continued unabated through the so-called “K-5 Plan” and that the Vietnamese army had plundered the Cambodian wealth and resources by transporting them back to their country.
Opposition parties also insisted that 7th January is an invasion day. They consider that it is a product of the 17th April, 1975, the date of the Khmer Rouge takeover and the beginning of the Cambodian genocide, aided and abetted by the present leaders of the Cambodian People's Party (CPP), because the majority of them, like PM Hun Sen, Senate President Chea Sim and National Assembly Chairman Heng Samrin, are important ex-leaders of the Khmer Rouge.
Mr. Sam Rainsy, an arch-opponent of the 7th January, in a letter to The Cambodia Daily in January 2009, said and I quote: “But it is worth realizing that without April 17, 1975, there would be no need for January 7, 1979.” Mr. Sam Rainsy’s statement seem to concur the above statements which consider that both dates (7th January, 1979 and 17th April, 1975) as the by-products of the Vietnamese creations, aided and abetted by the present CPP leaders who were important ex-leaders of the Khmer Rouge regime.
In conclusion, for me personally, 7th January, 1979 is both a combination of a liberation and an invasion. Miss Theary Seng, former executive director of Centre for Social Development, called it a liberation through invasion, while Dr. A. Gaffar Peang-Meth, former professor of the University of Guam, called it a day of infamy and deliverance.
I believe it is a liberation day in the sense that, whether it was an intention of Vietnam or not, millions of Cambodian lives have been saved from the Khmer Rouge regime. I also consider it as an invasion day because it was an invasion: pure and simple, because I believe that Vietnam had helped the Khmer Rouge to take powers in 1975 and aided and abetted in the subsequent massacres of 1.7 million Cambodian lives. I also believe that the Vietnamese intervention in 1979 was not born out of any sympathy for the Cambodian people, but rather Vietnam had taken that course of actions because of a breakdown of relations with the Khmer Rouge and because of border clashes resulting from border encroachments by Vietnam.
So, is 7th of January, 1979 a liberation day or is it an invasion day? The answer is both, depending on who we are talking to. Or, as Miss Theary Seng puts it, it is a liberation through invasion.
21 comments:
Give me a break! As my father (his is chinese who left China in 1926 and come to Cambodia) said the Vietnamese got us out from Khmer Rouge Pol Pot. We all Cambodians must thank Vietnamese for what they did. But he said I hate Communism. When he arrived and joined us in the USA in 1980, and here what he said to all of us " In America, even if you have to pay 50% of what you earn to the government to fight against Communist, you are still ahead of the game. Look at me, everything I earned in Cambodia, Khmer Rouge took it all". Let's face it, either we like Vietnamese or not, this is politic! It's all up to our Khmer leaders to manage their political game for Cambodians. My Dad died in 2005 but his personal dream is still "fuck the communist!".
I appreciate your hard challenge for our people. Wish for luck
Siemreap
D Day Invasion, it was called as such because the liberators invaded France to kick the German out. But the yuons invaded Cambodia to steal, not to liberate.
Since when did the yuon ever have kindness and compassion to help Khmer from the bottom oftheir heart ?
I wonder what The Khmer Rouge who had been fighting against Hun Sen andthe yuon after the invasion date from 7/1/79 to when they joined up with the fromer reconcile their conscience ?
well written, K
I totally agree with Dr. Peang wrote "a day of infamy and deliverance.” The word "infamy" covers all such as bastad communist Yuon liar, bastard communist Yuon killed million Khmers and made us Khmers killed Khmers. DEATH to Communist Yuon all of them.
Thanks Dr. Peang-Meth, you are the best Khmer scholar and you used the best term to label the bastard Communist Yuon.
I suspect Vietnam set up a scene and create role players and the end of the story is 7 January. Loot at Pol Pot is communist and the current CPP come from the same source.
Well written article! January 7, 1979 was indeed "Invasion"
Your message was loud and clear and all Cambodians need to remember this paragraph...
"Vietnam had helped the Khmer Rouge to take powers in 1975 and aided and abetted in the subsequent massacres of 1.7 million Cambodian lives. I also believe that the Vietnamese intervention in 1979 was not born out of any sympathy for the Cambodian people, but rather Vietnam had taken that course of actions because of a breakdown of relations with the Khmer Rouge and because of border clashes resulting from border encroachments by Vietnam."
Complete Invasion...Without opposition party and the intervention of the 1991 Paris Peace Accord, and if it were left entirely up to Vietnam, Hun Sen, Chea Sim, Heng Samrin and CPP party, all of Cambodia would become Kampuchea Krom already!
10:40 AM
What would you call the ruling party in Cambodia? It is definitely not Democratic. Why are thanking the Vietnamese, remember they strongly backed Pol Pot's Regime and brought him into power in 1975. Not only did the Vietnamese aided and abetted, they orchestrated in the killing of over 1.7 million Cambodians.
So sad, you can't even comprehend who the murderer in disguise is...hint, it's the people that you believed saved you! You have been fooled and mislead to think that that the Vietcongs are the savior...when indeed they are the perpetrators of the Killing Fields. PLease do more research and study on what Communism is, because you obviously don't understand it. Please also know who is friend and who comes as foe!
To those who CPP/yuon supporters,
Was there a genocide in Laos too ? Why did the yuon troops stay there ? These days, Laos almost exists in map and name only. In some provinces, the Lao people are banned from going near.
The yuon invasion/occupation was unavoidable. Indochina was one battlefield, one country, in the yuons' eyes.
Wake up Khmer ! It is not too late, we can reclaim our country, our idendity.
Some Cambodian people always find way to give the Vietcong credit even though they don't deserve it! The worst part of it all is that these Cambodian are dying to speak for the Vietcong as if the Vietcong want to listen to them! ahhahah
This is my take on the Vietcong true intention! Now I don't need to speak for the Vietcong leaders and I am going to listen to what the Vietcong leaders have to say regarding their occupation of Cambodia!
This is what the Vietcong leaders said of Cambodia after the invasion in 1978 and I quoted directly from the author name Jitendra Mohan:
"The situation in Kampuchea is irreversible": such is the common refrain of every pronouncement from Vietnam on the subject, whether by Truong Chinh, Pham Van Dong or Nguyen Co Thach, and whether it is made in Hanoi, Moscow or in New York. Over and over again, Vietnamese spokesmen emphasise that the 'unity, friendship, and co-operation' of the three Indochinese countries and peoples is a permanent reality beyond all question; no political solution will be allowed to alter that basic fact. The only solution that Vietnam wants and will accept is the one which recognises this as a fait accompli, which is 'not negotiable'. The views, to say nothing of the right of the Kampuchean (and Laotian) people do not come into the picture. One must see that the quest for a political solution, conceived in terms of Vietnam's needs and interests, runs counter to the independence and, ultimately the very survival, of Kampuchea."
http://www.jstor.org/pss/4369465
= Now by studying the following passages were written by Jitendra Mohan and tell me that this is liberation?
The Vietcong leaders had spoken and you Cambodian people must accept the fact! If you Cambodian people refuse to accept what the Vietcong leaders have to say then you will never see the big picture in the world of politic and you will always be one step behind your enemy!.
" what the yuons couldn't get through military means, they get it through laws and treaties", said Sok Chhong, 1954 Khmer delegate to the Geneva Conference.
What Sok Chhong said turned to be so true 25 years later.
Sok Chhong died in Paris a few years ago.
You should know that khmers were the victims of political clash between Yourn Communist and Khmer Communist. Yourn did not come to save us volunteerily. That was their plan. We were not the victim of choice. Khmer don't like Pol Pot nor Vietnamese invaders.
Democratic Kampuchea Pol Pot Khmer Rouge Regime
Members:
Pol Pot
Nuon Chea
Ieng Sary
Ta Mok
Khieu Samphan
Son Sen
Ieng Thearith
Kaing Kek Iev
Hun Sen
Chea Sim
Heng Samrin
Hor Namhong
Keat Chhon
Ouk Bunchhoeun
Sim Ka...
Committed:
Tortures
Brutality
Executions
Massacres
Mass Murder
Genocide
Atrocities
Crimes Against Humanity
Starvations
Slavery
Force Labour
Overwork to Death
Human Abuses
Persecution
Unlawful Detention
Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime
Members:
Hun Sen
Chea Sim
Heng Samrin
Hor Namhong
Keat Chhon
Ouk Bunchhoeun
Sim Ka...
Committed:
Attempted Murders
Attempted Murder on Chea Vichea
Attempted Assassinations
Attempted Assassination on Sam Rainsy
Assassinations
Assassinated Journalists
Assassinated Political Opponents
Assassinated Leaders of the Free Trade Union
Assassinated over 80 members of Sam Rainsy Party.
"But as of today, over eighty members of my party have been assassinated. Countless others have been injured, arrested, jailed, or forced to go into hiding or into exile."
Sam Rainsy LIC 31 October 2009 - Cairo, Egypt
Executions
Executed over 100 members of FUNCINPEC Party
Murders
Murdered 3 Leaders of the Free Trade Union
Murdered Chea Vichea
Murdered Ros Sovannareth
Murdered Hy Vuthy
Murdered journalists
Murdered Khim Sambo
Murdered Khim Sambo's son
Murdered members of Sam Rainsy Party.
Murdered activists of Sam Rainsy Party
Murdered Innocent Men
Murdered Innocent Women
Murdered Innocent Children
Killed Innocent Khmer Peoples.
Extrajudicial Execution
Grenade Attack
Terrorism
Drive by Shooting
Brutalities
Police Brutality Against Monks
Police Brutality Against Evictees
Tortures
Intimidations
Death Threats
Threatening
Human Abductions
Human Abuses
Human Rights Abuses
Human Trafficking
Drugs Trafficking
Under Age Child Sex
Corruptions
Bribery
Illegal Arrest
Illegal Mass Evictions
Illegal Land Grabbing
Illegal Firearms
Illegal Logging
Illegal Deforestation
Illegally use of remote detonation on Sokha Helicopter, while Hok Lundy and other military officials were on board.
Illegally Sold State Properties
Illegally Removed Parliamentary Immunity of Parliament Members
Plunder National Resources
Acid Attacks
Turn Cambodia into a Lawless Country.
Oppression
Injustice
Steal Votes
Bring Foreigners from Veitnam to vote in Cambodia for Cambodian People's Party.
Use Dead people's names to vote for Cambodian People's Party.
Disqualified potential Sam Rainsy Party's voters.
Abuse the Court as a tools for CPP to send political opponents and journalists to jail.
Abuse of Power
Abuse the Laws
Abuse the National Election Committee
Abuse the National Assembly
Violate the Laws
Violate the Constitution
Violate the Paris Accords
Impunity
Persecution
Unlawful Detention
Death in custody.
Under the Cambodian People's Party Hun Sen Khmer Rouge Regime, no criminals that has been committed crimes against journalists, political opponents, leaders of the Free Trade Union, innocent men, women and children have ever been brought to justice.
JAN 07, 1979 WAS NO DOUBT IS BOTH LIBERATION THROUGH INVASION. AND WITHOUT APRIL 17 1975 THERE WOULD NOT BE JAN 07, 1979. WHEN KING SIHANOUK SUPPORT VIETCONG DRING VIETNAME WAR DID VIETCONG EVER THANK SIHANOUK FOR SUPPORT OR CALL SIHANOUK A SAVIOR TOO, NO INSTEAD CURSE BACK AT SIHANOUK. AFTER ALL IT WAS VIETNAME WAR BUT CAMBODIA HAS SUFFER EVEN LONGER AFTER VIETNAM WAR HAS ENDED.
I CAN THINK THAT REASON THAT HUN SEN,CHEA SIM, HENG SARIN WANTED ALL KHMER CITIZENS AND THEIR SUPPORTERS TO RECOGNIZED IT BECAUSE IT WILL KEEP THEM IN POWER WHICH WILL SATIFY THEIR THEIR GREED. BUT WITH HUMAN RIGHT EXPENSE.
When there is a debate such as this one we must reflect on the history. For example, a leader of gang recruited a member and this member become notoriuosly savage, and he was confronted and only allowed to practice less savage crimes. One must wonder whether this is good or it is still considered bad but not the worst ones. Vietnamese strategies to colonize drafted many years ago. It had to make some adjustments to some of the changes but eventually Vietnamese accoplished the same goals. I said if you want to help me teach me do not just take over and run me life. Vietnamese is an invader.
You are a man.
You adopt a 14 years old girl because she was dying.
You have sex with her after.
She owe you nothing because you don't really help her.
The man is Vietnameses and the girl is Khmers.
In civilize world, 8:01 PM comment had just committed very serious crime. Morally and ethically, ones should not take advantage the weak and innocent children( 14 year old is under age.) Have some respect for yourself if not others to point out such example.
Invasion through Liberation!
Liberation was an excuse to the invasion!
11:58 AM, I concur your opinion. In this sense, Vietnam is no liberator but invader. Vietnam was the one who created the monster KR to kill off Khmer people, aided and abetted by Vietnam.
From the continuation of history can we see this thing this way:
Viet have crouched into South East Asia for centeries and never sease to stop (It swallow whole of CHAM) and big chunk of Cambodia! already)
Just in mordern history after the end of Frech era the vietnamese had kidnap Cambodia Kids for future traine to controled Cambodia (Exemple: Pen Sovan)
This show that the Vietnamese Communist has a long long time plane to take over Cambodia!
In 1975 the Vietnamese Communist create Pol Pot and help Pol Pot take over Cambodia ( Vietnamese motherfucker is the creator of the killer monster Pol Pot)
After helped and doctrinated Pol Pot to Kill millions of Cambodia, motherfucker Vietnamese creat and invasion so they can get credit as a good guy and save the live of its spies (Hor NamHong, Kiet Chorn, and the liked)
Can any body see the fucking evil of the Vietnamese motherfucker!
May lightning strike the traitors of the nations and religion!
And motherfuckers go to hell!!!!!!
5:22 AM
5:26 AM
The fucking CPP leaders are no better than the Khmer Rouge. They have killed people just like the Khmer Rouge except in smaller scales. They are presntly pillaging Cambodia's natural resources for their own gain. Those top CPP leaders are greedy son of bitches and they bribe and use poor people in their favor. They should realize the laws of karma. These bastards will one day face justice just like Ferdenand Marco and Surharto of Indonesia.
Post a Comment