January 20, 2010Confucius said: "To put the world in order, we must first put the nation in order; To put the nation in order, we must put the family in order; To put the family in order, we must cultivate our personal life; And to cultivate our personal life we must first set our hearts right."
By A. Gaffar Peang-Meth
Pacific Daily News (Guam)
Despite the highs and the lows in 2009, the old year has come to an end and left us at the starting gate for a new one, from which we can build our new future using our productive, creative talents. Or we can choose to walk a familiar path of worn-out patterns and fossilized thoughts and actions.
The new opportunity should boost our spirits.
Some pleasant things did happen last year. Members of a group of Cambodian expatriates in America's northwest, none of whom I have ever met, read my column in the Pacific Daily News and wrote to discuss the failure of the United Nations-supported Khmer Rouge tribunal to bring justice to the Khmer people.
Thus began a long-distance relationship. It was heartening to read the group's online discussion of old Khmer traditions and sayings, how and why they are, or aren't, useful in the 21st century. I saw critical thinking take root.
I was captivated by their discussion on an old Khmer saying, "Ngeuy skawk, Aown dak Kroab," or, "Vertical rice plants bear nothing. Leaning rice-plants bear grain." I contributed my ideas. And when the group's forum brought interested expatriates together to discuss another old saying, "Don't emulate a teacher's behavior; follow his teaching," I was asked for input and was pleased to respond.
Our relationship flourished. I have quietly enjoyed and softly encouraged their continued activities, which helped develop productive and creative thinking and keeps them connected with the Khmer culture.
The topics brought memories of my mother, who barely finished elementary school but taught me that it was not weakness to rely on others, even upon those who see the world differently than I do; and of my father, who endlessly preached "humility" in long after-dinner conversations, as if I didn't have anything else I would rather do. Roll my tongue seven times before speaking, eat a sappy green banana or pull weeds when I "itched" to argue or to fight, and to thank God and pray to God.
Only later did I learn of the thesis-antithesis concept, of the Chinese "yin yang," and understand the Buddhist concept of things in pairs, like day and night, happiness and suffering, war and peace.
Yes, opinions differ; thoughts differ. Disagreement is natural, but gentlemen can disagree without being disagreeable. A saying goes, "Empty vessels make the most noise."
A recent blog comparing "the lively" exchange on Internet to a welcome developing step in democracy has its antithesis: Those "anonymouses," inclined to cut others down, establish exclusiveness and hurl insults are engrossed in licentiousness, lacking in legal and moral restraints, and feed and strengthen authoritarian rule. The growth of democracy needs fair play, equilibrium, inclusiveness and a responsible dialogue.
Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights asserts "the right" of man to "hold opinions" and values "freedom of expression," but its exercise "carries with it special duties and responsibilities" and may "be subject to certain restrictions ... provided by law and are necessary (a) For respect of the rights or reputations of others; (b) For the protection of national security or public order (ordre publique), or of public health or morals."
Come to mind are Eleanor Roosevelt's words: "Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people."
Specialist Tim Hurson describes a person with a "monkey mind," who jumps from one thought to another like a monkey that cannot stay on one branch. He's natural at "aimless thinking"; he "roams aimlessly through half-formed images" or "wanders into an endless stream of unanalyzed associations from (his) unanalyzed past."
Hurson urges us to learn "how to think," to develop "quality thinking," for it helps prepare us for a better future and survival in the 21st century. Focused thinking is hard, as it requires us to observe, remember, wonder, imagine, inquire, interpret, evaluate, judge, identify, suppose, compose, compare, analyze, calculate and to think about thinking (metacognition).
Carl Rogers, a psychologist in education, said, "The only person who is educated is the one who has learned how to learn." British Dr. Alec Bourne said: "It is possible to store the mind with a million facts and still be entirely uneducated." And German playwright Johann von Goethe said: "Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do."
Roosevelt's example of "ideas" discussed by "great minds" takes me to President Obama's Dec. 10 Oslo speech: "We can acknowledge that oppression will always be with us, and still strive for justice. We can admit the intractability of depravation, and still strive for dignity. We can understand that there will be war, and still strive for peace. We can do that -- for that is the story of human progress; that is the hope of all the world; and at this moment of challenge, that must be our work here on Earth."
This "work here on Earth" belongs to every man and woman, old and young, and to you and me. The first place to begin is to improve ourselves.
Confucius said: "To put the world in order, we must first put the nation in order; To put the nation in order, we must put the family in order; To put the family in order, we must cultivate our personal life; And to cultivate our personal life we must first set our hearts right."
A. Gaffar Peang-Meth, Ph.D., is retired from the University of Guam, where he taught political science for 13 years. Write him at peangmeth@yahoo.com.
The new opportunity should boost our spirits.
Some pleasant things did happen last year. Members of a group of Cambodian expatriates in America's northwest, none of whom I have ever met, read my column in the Pacific Daily News and wrote to discuss the failure of the United Nations-supported Khmer Rouge tribunal to bring justice to the Khmer people.
Thus began a long-distance relationship. It was heartening to read the group's online discussion of old Khmer traditions and sayings, how and why they are, or aren't, useful in the 21st century. I saw critical thinking take root.
I was captivated by their discussion on an old Khmer saying, "Ngeuy skawk, Aown dak Kroab," or, "Vertical rice plants bear nothing. Leaning rice-plants bear grain." I contributed my ideas. And when the group's forum brought interested expatriates together to discuss another old saying, "Don't emulate a teacher's behavior; follow his teaching," I was asked for input and was pleased to respond.
Our relationship flourished. I have quietly enjoyed and softly encouraged their continued activities, which helped develop productive and creative thinking and keeps them connected with the Khmer culture.
The topics brought memories of my mother, who barely finished elementary school but taught me that it was not weakness to rely on others, even upon those who see the world differently than I do; and of my father, who endlessly preached "humility" in long after-dinner conversations, as if I didn't have anything else I would rather do. Roll my tongue seven times before speaking, eat a sappy green banana or pull weeds when I "itched" to argue or to fight, and to thank God and pray to God.
Only later did I learn of the thesis-antithesis concept, of the Chinese "yin yang," and understand the Buddhist concept of things in pairs, like day and night, happiness and suffering, war and peace.
Yes, opinions differ; thoughts differ. Disagreement is natural, but gentlemen can disagree without being disagreeable. A saying goes, "Empty vessels make the most noise."
A recent blog comparing "the lively" exchange on Internet to a welcome developing step in democracy has its antithesis: Those "anonymouses," inclined to cut others down, establish exclusiveness and hurl insults are engrossed in licentiousness, lacking in legal and moral restraints, and feed and strengthen authoritarian rule. The growth of democracy needs fair play, equilibrium, inclusiveness and a responsible dialogue.
Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights asserts "the right" of man to "hold opinions" and values "freedom of expression," but its exercise "carries with it special duties and responsibilities" and may "be subject to certain restrictions ... provided by law and are necessary (a) For respect of the rights or reputations of others; (b) For the protection of national security or public order (ordre publique), or of public health or morals."
Come to mind are Eleanor Roosevelt's words: "Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people."
Specialist Tim Hurson describes a person with a "monkey mind," who jumps from one thought to another like a monkey that cannot stay on one branch. He's natural at "aimless thinking"; he "roams aimlessly through half-formed images" or "wanders into an endless stream of unanalyzed associations from (his) unanalyzed past."
Hurson urges us to learn "how to think," to develop "quality thinking," for it helps prepare us for a better future and survival in the 21st century. Focused thinking is hard, as it requires us to observe, remember, wonder, imagine, inquire, interpret, evaluate, judge, identify, suppose, compose, compare, analyze, calculate and to think about thinking (metacognition).
Carl Rogers, a psychologist in education, said, "The only person who is educated is the one who has learned how to learn." British Dr. Alec Bourne said: "It is possible to store the mind with a million facts and still be entirely uneducated." And German playwright Johann von Goethe said: "Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do."
Roosevelt's example of "ideas" discussed by "great minds" takes me to President Obama's Dec. 10 Oslo speech: "We can acknowledge that oppression will always be with us, and still strive for justice. We can admit the intractability of depravation, and still strive for dignity. We can understand that there will be war, and still strive for peace. We can do that -- for that is the story of human progress; that is the hope of all the world; and at this moment of challenge, that must be our work here on Earth."
This "work here on Earth" belongs to every man and woman, old and young, and to you and me. The first place to begin is to improve ourselves.
Confucius said: "To put the world in order, we must first put the nation in order; To put the nation in order, we must put the family in order; To put the family in order, we must cultivate our personal life; And to cultivate our personal life we must first set our hearts right."
A. Gaffar Peang-Meth, Ph.D., is retired from the University of Guam, where he taught political science for 13 years. Write him at peangmeth@yahoo.com.
19 comments:
"Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights asserts "the right" of man to "hold opinions" and values "freedom of expression," but its exercise "carries with it special duties and responsibilities" and may "be subject to certain restrictions ... provided by law and are necessary (a) For respect of the rights or reputations of others; (b) For the protection of national security or public order (ordre publique), or of public health or morals."
How many people in this particular forum do understand that "The right is "carries with it special duties and responsibilities" and may "be subject to certain restrictions ... provided by law and are necessary"
"Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.
For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil."
Confucius is right, except just what I have quoted. So the order should be: God-man-family-nation. Without God being the foundation, the house will likely deteriate and crumble into a heap of mess.
A little more details to help you understand better.
God is the head of man:He has power over him. Man is the head of woman: He has authority over her.
Children are under the authority of the their parents. They should submit to them.
Man, you are responsible to know what is require of you to be a good husband if you are married. By listening to God who has instructed you to know what his will is for you as a man. This is the channel from which your spirituality should come from.
The Bible has the instructions for you. This has been God's order for society from the very beginning.
If you want to be bless, take your responsibility and lead the way for your family.
Where are people? Why not much comment lately?
To me there are two reasons:
1-They are starting to act after talking
2-They are getting bored of talking the same old things.
I wish they are busy taking the right actions. Good luck!
KI fan
First we must improve ourselves!! Exactly right Dr. Peang-Meth... you better stop exposing your photo anymore with your article, because it irritate your audiences so much and now this is year 2010 and it is also new gate for you to change your old behavior..
Khmer
contents vs. appearances, form vs function. I'd rather a person say to me directly how she or he think of me than having a so-called intellect insulting me from his thought and belief under his smooth civilize speeches.
although I agree that for productive dialogue, an acceptable protocol should be upheld by the participants. However, in a free, highly-charged political, forum like KI blog or Tawainese parliamentary sessions, the flowery language should be taken for what it really is - a normal human behavior when they are free from the restriction of civility and moderation.
Anonymous must go!
that's right, cambodia should learn from everybody from all over the world. we must not be biased in our learning. knowledge is shared all over the world; it is unwise not to learn from all the world's great religious philosophers, etc. it's about time cambodia and khmer people wake up, really!
Guys, in case any of you missed this interesting article about the "Khmer Riche" please follow this link:
http://www.expat-advisory.com/forum/asia/cambodia/-phnom-penh-pub-expats-expats-cambodia/sydney-morning-herald-article-khmer-riche
Best regards,
RD-FB
The developments of making intelligent society can occur when specific assessments determined that the end benefits will provide for all people. No hand should left on deck..everyone must get busy, and all thoughtfull opinions should be listened to. Even success is at hand, society should anticipate devines and sharpe them accordingly. Confront the aggressors early and align them in usefull formations.No quick fix fora society as our but if we see where we are and what we need to do we are a step closer to recover ourselves..No short cut.
9:38AM,
I see the same thing as you see: less comment posters now it was before. I am one of them. Before, I posted some, but now I found it useless oe even nonsense, as sometimes we fight among ourselves the comment posters, and it produces nothing good but insulting one another; therefore I hold back from posting comments; I just read the articles.
I had just had lengthy conversation with a friend and found that a lot of us think that wise discussion bring about constructive changes. Comments should be articulated and intelligents. If ones has gone through the trouble of finding this site..he or she should appreciate the amount of work people have to maintain it...this site does not just happenned it self. KI good job.
(that's right, cambodia should learn from everybody from all over the world. we must not be biased in our learning. knowledge is shared all over the world; it is unwise not to learn from all the world's great religious philosophers, etc. it's about time cambodia and khmer people wake up, really!
11:28 AM)
It called history, fool 11:28Am, any good school do that! Except you get your PhD with no schooling and readind, OOHHHH Education?
""I see the same thing as you see: less comment posters now it was before. I am one of them. Before, I posted some, but now I found it useless oe even nonsense, as sometimes we fight among ourselves the comment posters, and it produces nothing good but insulting one another; therefore I hold back from posting comments; I just read the articles.
10:31 PM""
10:31PM! You just miss understanding about "Anonymous Comments"! They are not to produce any thing substance like when your farther banked your mother too hard and it produce a stupit head like you!
From thr commets you not need to know the ideas but people feeling as well!
Open your eyes and your ear don't be a jurk like ah Kwack Hun Xen!
"Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights asserts "the right" of man to "hold opinions" and values "freedom of expression," but its exercise "carries with it special duties and responsibilities" and may "be subject to certain restrictions ... provided by law and are necessary (a) For respect of the rights or reputations of others; (b) For the protection of national security or public order (ordre publique), or of public health or morals."
How many people in this particular forum do understand that "The right is "carries with it special duties and responsibilities" and may "be subject to certain restrictions ... provided by law and are necessary"
6:38 AM
But law make by ah kwack Hun Xen and other monkeys are fool laws! stupid!
And you ever hurd of how stupid ah Kwack talked in public and comment about other people Kmer and foreigners alike?
My lightning strike trhe evils, soon!
The ways of ah Hun Xen and CPP are doing to Khmer now! there is no logic to deal with motherfuckers!
May lightning strike them just it did to ah Hok Landy!!!!!!
interesting approach, thanks a millions Dr Peang
Fth
1:01AM,
Do you know you are a little fucking too chhleuy to me? The reason why you are too fucking chhleuy is because your father screw your mother too often. Am I right when I said some comments prove that their posters are chhleuy from birth? If I don't fuck you forst, you'd better not fuck me.
"Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights asserts "the right" of man to "hold opinions" and values "freedom of expression," but its exercise "carries with it special duties and responsibilities" and may "be subject to certain restrictions ... provided by law and are necessary (a) For respect of the rights or reputations of others; (b) For the protection of national security or public order (ordre publique), or of public health or morals."
How many people in this particular forum do understand that "The right is "carries with it special duties and responsibilities" and may "be subject to certain restrictions ... provided by law and are necessary"
6:38 AM
But law make by ah kwack Hun Xen and other monkeys are fool laws! stupid!
And you ever hurd of how stupid ah Kwack talked in public and comment about other people Kmer and foreigners alike?
My lightning strike trhe evils, soon!
1:11 AM
Just do yourself a favour by looking at the numbers of political parties seat in parliament and senate. You may have to beg the political party you support to careful read any potential or futre draft bills and to debate or oppose it so many innocent Cambodians would not suffering.
yes, 6:42am, some people seem to take freedom and rights for granted. i mean it's ok to take it for granted in the public, however, if you belong to an organization like the military, work place, etc, you must obey rules and regulations or policy or law, etc. so, do know where, when and what before they bitch and whine all the time,really! that's the confusion in cambodia that people don't understand when they cry wolf all of the times. i mean, if it's to do with the public property,etc, than it should be ok, but try to do on a job interview and complain or whine or bitch about company's policy, etc, and see if you are hired! right! that should teach some people to think twice, really!
Post a Comment