Tuesday, April 06, 2010

Cambodia: Campaign Against Wearing of Short Skirts

(Photo: Reuters)

Sunday, April 4th, 2010
By Sopheap Chak
Global Voices Online


A group of teachers and students held a rally in Cambodia to protest the wearing of short skirts which they claim violate Khmer culture. Several government officials are supporting the rallyists.

Around 100 people including teachers and students held a rally on Sunday March 28 in an effort to stop female students from wearing short skirts. The campaign was expected to have more participants if its original plan to march through the streets of Phnom Penh was approved by the City Hall. Still, the campaign organizer, Seang Bunheang, Director of Khmer Teachers' Association reportedly applauded this gathering as a success in sending the message of urging the Ministry of Education, academic institutions, teachers, female students and their parents to stop female students from wearing short skirts. This appeal is hoped to preserve Khmer Culture and discourage female students from vigorously adapting western culture:
“I had the idea to organise the campaign because I want to improve Khmer culture [and retain the culture] that we had many years ago – some Khmer women change their manner by copying other cultures and do things such as wearing short skirts or sexy clothes in schools and public places. That can destroy our culture,” says Seang Bunheang as quoted from Phnom Penh Post.

Acknowledging the the move could be seen as an undue pressure on women, the organizer repeatedly claimed it is justified for promoting Khmer culture.
I don’t force [women] from wearing short skirts, but I want to take care and improve our Khmer culture, “We have to take care in order for other countries not to look down on us.”
Seemingly, this campaign has been welcomed by major ministries, Cambodian Independent Teachers' Association, and some students. For example, there is support from Pov Sam An, deputy director of the Ministry's Informal Education System Department who reportedly agrees that female students should not wear short skirts. He also cited the existing mandatory rule instructing female students to wear only long skirts.
“All female students have to wear their skirts under the knees in school, and it is good that the Khmer Teachers’ Association campaign will remind people of this, I cannot accept that some female students in private or state schools wear such short skirts to school,” said Pov Sam An.
Even the Secretary of State of the Ministry of Women's Affairs, San Arun, also welcomed the rally by sharing a similar opinion about the need to preserve Khmer culture. She allegedly claimed that “the trend towards shorter skirts was part of an ill-advised attempt to copy other cultures – a move she suggested could destroy Khmer culture if left unchecked.” Interestingly, she linked the short skirt as motivation for men to rape:
“Wearing short skirts and sexy clothes is a reason to cause rape cases to occur because all men, when they see white skin, they feel like having sex with them.”
This provocative statement has caught the attention of a prominent blogher Kounila Keo who posted this on her facebook page, which later sparked several comments. Here is an interesting remark by a commentator:
“This is like saying women in the Middle East who walk outside of the places they're allowed to, are asking to be raped. I think the Secretary is perpetuating a negative cultural attitude between genders. I'm sorry but women and short skirts are NOT the problem…I find that the leaders in Cambodia are part of the problem. If they want to positively change attitudes of the people, they need to start providing an avenue to discuss about these gender issues–not condemn those who are ultimately in ‘ownership' of their bodies.”
This idea is shared by Sim Socheata who sent a letter to Phnom Penh Post's editor, “Don't blame women for men's lack of self control”:
“We are witnessing that women and girls are blamed for being raped and sexually harassed for the kind of place they decide to go, the kind of dresses they decide to wear and the length of those dresses. Instead of calling for women to stop wearing short skirts, the Khmer Teachers Association could have marched against male perpetrators who rape women and girls, men who commit violence in the family, male teachers who sexually harass their students.”
While majority of those who commented on Kounila's facebook page believe that wearing short skirts is not the problem, Chanroeun Pa who also joined this debate wrote about the link between cultural integration and safety of women:
I don't completely agree with the secretary of the MoWA, and I don't really support the school girls to wear short skirt either. It is obvious that wearing short skirt is a Western style. In fact, there is nothing wrong with wearing the short skirt for the school girls in general. Instead it is an art or beauty of dressing for girl. But wearing short skirt which is too short in an inappropriate way and in wrong place is a great danger for the person herself. And therefore, this requires a consideration about the different cultural values between Cambodian culture and the West. We have to accept that new culture which emerges from the interaction with other culture is sometimes overwhelming. And the ground somehow is suitable for the seed to grow well. We will, should not ignore the sensitivity of sexual taboo in Cambodian society either. There is a saying about choice of cultural adoption, “You can either adjust your head to fit your hat, or adjust your hat to fit your head.”
Meanwhile, another blogger, Mean Lux is not in favor of the anti-short skirt campaign and issues this warning:
For protesters against wearing short skirt, facebook maybe next in their list to be banned to preserve the in-their-view Khmer tradition.
As expected, this campaign has received much attention. The debate is still ongoing with another social activist Chhay Sophal, writer for Open Institute, wrote “ទស្សនៈ​ពី​ការ​ស្លៀកពាក់​បញ្ចេញ​សាច់”, “View on Skimpy Dresses.” He randomly interviewed young females in the capital and two other provinces to survey their opinion on the campaign. Though many respondents agreed that the ban on wearing short skirts is viable for academic institutions, they think it should not be applied in public spaces. Strikingly, the belief that wearing short skirts induces rape cases surprises the respondents:
“កាល​ពី​មិន​ទាន់​មាន​ការ​ស្លៀក​ពាក់​ខ្លី​បែប​នេះ​កាល​ពី​បណ្ដា​ឆ្នាំ​មុនៗ និង​ជំនាន់​មុនៗ តើ​មិន​មាន​​ករណី​ការ​ចាប់​រំលោភ​សេពសន្ថវៈ​មែន​ទេ​ឬ​អី ហើយ​តើ​បុរស​ៗ​ពិត​ជា​មិន​មាន​អារម្មណ៍​ចង់​រួម​ភេទ​មែន​ដែរ​ឬ​អត់ បើ​ពួកគេ​មិន​បាន​ឃើញ​សាច់​ស​ខ្ចី​របស់​នារីៗ​នោះ? នារី​វ័យ​ក្មេងៗ​ទាំង​នោះ​បាន​សំណូមពរ​ថា មនុស្ស​ជំនាន់​មុន​មិន​ត្រូវ​បន្ទោស​មនុស្ស​ជំនាន់​ក្រោយ​ឡើយ ព្រោះ​សម័យ​កាល និង​ការ​វិវត្ត​វា​ពិតជា​ខុស​គ្នា​ពី​ជំនាន់​មួយ​ទៅ​ជំនាន់​មួយ។”
“Were rape cases avoided in the past when there were no skimpy outfits? Will men have no sex feelings if the girls would not wear short skirts? The girls request the elders to accept the reality of social evolutions instead of blaming their acts”
Sophal highlighted that the respondents also reflected on the basic rights and freedom of individuals as guaranteed by the Constitution and international rights conventions. Further, the respondents appealed to the government to improve the rule of law and take serious intervention for social security rather than focusing on the short skirt matter:
សេចក្ដី​ថ្លៃថ្នូរ​របស់​ជាតិ​មួយ​គឺ​ត្រូវតែ​ទប់ស្កាត់​ការ​ជួញ​ដូរ​មនុស្ស និង​ការ​ជួញដូរ​គ្រឿងញៀន ការ​លុបបំបាត់​ទេសចរណ៍​ផ្លូវ​ភេទ ការ​លុបបំបាត់​ការ​កេង​ប្រវ័ញ្ច​លើ​ស្ត្រី និង​ត្រូវ​តែ​គោរព​សិទ្ធិ​ស្ត្រី ហើយ​ផ្ដល់​តួនាទី​ស្ត្រី​នៅ​ក្នុង​សង្គម​ប្រកប​ដោយ​សមភាព​យេនឌ័រ ការ​ផ្ដល់​សេវា​សាធារណៈ​ និង​ហេដ្ឋារចនាសម្ព័ន្ធ​សង្គម​ឲ្យបាន​គ្រប់គ្រាន់​ដល់​ពលរដ្ឋ ការ​បង្កើន​ការងារ​ឲ្យ​មនុស្ស​ធ្វើ ត្រូវ​មាន​ការ​អភិវឌ្ឍ​ទាំង​នៅ​ទីក្រុង​និង​នៅ​ជនបទ មិន​មាន​អំពើ​ពុក​រលួយ​ជា​ប្រព័ន្ធ ត្រូវ​មាន​តម្លាភាព និង​មាន​យុត្តិធម៌​សង្គម​ជាដើម។
In order to maintain the dignity of the state, there must be measures to prevent human trafficking, drug, sex tourism, and exploitation on women; importantly, there must be respect on women's rights together with gender mainstreaming in order that gender equity is feasible. Also, there must be sufficient social services and infrastructure to all in addition to the increase of employment and balanced development in the urban and rural area where there is no systematic corruption or simply transparency and justice must be ensured.

Regardless of the mixed views on this campaign, the trend is observably and likely to target girls rather than the main violators. Earlier there was also an attempt by the state to impose a girl curfew - which was justified by claiming that it would promote safety of women against being harmed at nightclubs or other entertainment areas. Groups asserted that it is better to strengthen the rule of law and restrictive policies on the nightclub itself.

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

The culture of wearing short skirt, if it exists, is not as dangerous as the cultures of violence, cruelty, oppression, immunity, corruption or lawlessness in Cambodia. I agree that there should be dress code in schools or temples. However, it is not the worst thread to our Khmer culture.It is about appropriateness versus inappropriateness.


Those officials are afraid of western cultures. But look at the way they live. They buy foreign cars, wear foreign clothes, drink foreign wines, eat food producded in foreign countries, listen to foreign musicand so on. Can we say that they are influenced by foreign cultures?

Anonymous said...

They should outlaw those old Cambodian fat cats from drinking those Black Label Johnny Walker, Henessy, or Chivas becuase that would be bad for the culture and health. The same with the addiction to big SUVs like Lexuses.


And what about those "choumteavs" who are wearing big diamonds and carrying Coach, Chanel, or Gucci hand bags??? Why are they promoting the "foreign" concepts and cultures of materialism???


It is not about short skirts, but it is about people whether the peverts/rapists who would commit the criminal acts, or if for the women/girls themselves, how they would control the access to get under these skirts, short or long ones.

I support freedom of choice and personal responsibility and decency, not government control or policing of fashions.

Anonymous said...

What are we the middle east now, where women have to cover their faces and their entire body because some men can't control their desires and urges? This is not even an issue, it is just another excuse to suppress women's freedom of choice, under the justification of culture preservation! Please worry about real issues like the fact that students have to pay a bride to teachers everyday so they can attend classes, land-grabbing by powerful and politicians and business men, corruption, impunity, Cambodian territorial integrity, poverty and the flawed anti-corruption border!

Anonymous said...

all schools have rules and regulations. students should abide these rules and regulations, really! if you are in unversity or college, i don't think they care how you (an adult person) dresses, but in high school level and below, you have to follow school's rules and regulation. no exception, ok! wait until you are over 18 to dress whatever you feel like! that's all!

Anonymous said...

Where did you all come up with the stupid idea teachers and students ? You better care about your job , your place to stay , your family and food for tomorrow. No need to worry about what other people wear as long as its not against the law or public decency . If you don't like it don't do it , its people's choice .
Some people in Cambodia are very stupid just like CPP by trying to control other people's lives.

Anonymous said...

2:08 PM
Wearing short skirts is against some people's idea , its not against the rule of the school. If its against the rule of the school , those teachers and students dont have to protest . They can enforce the rule by witdrawing those rule breakers out of school.

Anonymous said...

skirts too short and too tight bras should be banned because they give the desires of sex for men.

Anonymous said...

Go to school or university meaning they are on a learning process. If they still go to schools or visit the universities, they have to respect the rule.
It is more about self-responsibility and self discipline.
All educational institutions in Cambodia (private and state) have the full responsibility for the future of the young generation of Khmer. They have to think of the humanity education and not just academic level.

Anonymous said...

They are destroying our society and culture. It's lawless country that's why and nobody care about them. The rumor they heard about themselves proved of more attractive to men out there.

Anonymous said...

simply look around the world, ok. if schoold around allowed their students to go to school half naked, in bikini, understand, short skirts, tank top, bra, or what have you, then cambodia can do the same, if not, then don't expect khmer school to do the same, ok! common sense, no pervert in school, school is place of learning, not dating, ok! wake up people! leave your lingerie at home or something,ok!

Anonymous said...

What is wrong with wearing short skirts? This is 21th century, even Queen Elizabeth her outfits like suits are short skirts go with the top blazers or long sleeve blouse or suits. In the past women wore almost topless; just look at European monarchy showed their chests while their robes were long mopping the floor.

Short skirts don't destroy the country, but the Jumpeav Jumteut with all phamoung jungkbeun and gold diamond and golden watches and big villas are the people who are destroying the country.

Anonymous said...

now are they talking about short skirts to school or short skirts in general? you have to keep in mind at schools have rules and regulation regards the rights to study of others, ok! nobody cares what adult people wear in the street, at home, at party, or whatever, but at school, especially in high school and below, the school authority have the right to enforce the law, you know!

Anonymous said...

European and Japanese schools wearing uniform: short skirts with white blouse and covered with blazers. Why doesn't Cambodia do the same?

Anonymous said...

" don’t force [women] from wearing short skirts, but I want to take care and improve our Khmer culture, “We have to take care in order for other countries not to look down on us.” "
Seang Bunheang, Director of Khmer Teachers' Association "

Mr Seang, if you brush you teeth and talk with thinking 7 times before open your mouth other countries may not look down on you!

If you talklike that only the Vietnamese will give you PhD!!!! You will equal with Hun Xen by the way! keep up, fool!!!