Employees at Hon Hai's Foxconn plant peer out from the back of a company sign in Shenzhen. Foxconn, which makes iPhones and iPads for Apple at its factory in the southern Chinese city, increased labor rates by 70 percent recently after a spate of suicides among workers. Qilai Shen / China Foto Press2010-07-19
By Andrew Moody
China Daily
Analysts question future of nation's manufacturing as labor costs rise
BEIJING - How long will companies be able to afford to manufacture in China? That such a question can be asked would have seemed absurd until very recently.
For the past decade and more, China has been the manufacturing workshop of the world.
Last year, according to IHS Global Insight, the leading financial research company, China exported some $1.7 trillion of goods, 80 percent of which were manufactured in factories, and is set to end the United States 110-year reign as the world's leading manufacturer some time next year.
All has not been well in China's manufacturing heartlands in recent months, however. Foxconn, which makes iPhones and iPads for Apple at its factory in Shenzhen, increased labor rates by 70 percent recently after a spate of suicides among workers.
Strikes at Honda have also aroused concerns among foreign investors about labor unrest in China.
Manufacturing wages across China have increased by 14 per cent over the past year (see inside cover story), making the prospect of producing goods in nearby Southeast Asian countries such as Vietnam or in Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and even Africa seem a viable alternative.
Two large US companies, Ann Taylor Stores, the women's clothing retailer, and Coach, the luxury handbag maker, are poised to relocate production to countries, where labor rates are cheaper.
Mike Devine, chief financial officer of New York-headquartered Coach, which makes luxury hand bags, said at a conference recently a move was in the pipeline.
"We are looking to move production into lower-cost geographies, most notably Vietnam and India," he said.
Michael Nicholson, chief financial officer of Anne Taylor Stores, also told the Wall Street Journal recently the company was assessing the quality of production sites in other countries.
A recent survey by EEF, Britain's leading manufacturing association, said one in seven of its members were looking at shifting production back to the UK, fed up with problems in countries such as China.
"Getting goods of the right quality, issues such as time to market and rising fuel costs have been driving this trend," said Lee Hopley, EEF's chief economist.
Dr Eric Thun, lecturer in Chinese Business Studies at the University of Oxford China Center, said too much can be read into recent labor unrest.
"Strikes happen all the time. The current generation of workers have higher aspirations than perhaps their parents had," he said.
Thun also believes current labor cost pressures could be a catalyst for change in China.
"One of the problems that China historically has faced is that it has never been pushed into innovation-based activities because of this excess supply of labor," he said.
"Pushing manufacturing into high value-added activity is very much what the government wants. This kind of cost pressure stimulates upgrading."
Alistair Thornton, an analyst with IHS Global Insight, said it was difficult to interpret what was happening to China's manufacturing sector.
He said one likely explanation was that China had reached the so-called "Lewis Turning Point" (named after the British economist Arthur Lewis) at which an economy reaches a point in its development when it exhausts its supply of rural migrant workers, thus putting pressure on wages.
"Another explanation is that we are seeing the effects of the stimulus package which has created jobs in infrastructure development in western and central China, reducing the pool of labor for manufacturing. It is not likely to be one or the other but a combination of both," he said.
What the Chinese government would like to happen over the medium term would be for the coastal regions to become centers of manufacturing excellence while low-tech manufacturing moves inland.
If some Chinese or foreign companies decide to switch manufacturing to Southeast Asian countries, the economic damage need not be that great.
During this process, however, China still needs to retain a sizeable labor-intensive manufacturing sector because its unusually large population is always hungry for jobs.
Thun added China could not get into a game of chasing ever lower labor costs because this would be ultimately self-defeating.
"The only way labor costs are going to be kept low is if development doesn't succeed. Development inevitably is going to raise your costs," he added.
"It is nonetheless a dilemma for the government. From an employment perspective they still need low-end manufacturing but, on the other hand, the fact that labor costs are rising is to some extent a sign of success."
Jim Pinto, an expert in automation based in San Diego, California, who predicts future trends in manufacturing, said China's manufacturing sector was likely to prove more resilient than many realize.
"Labor is not the big element to manufacturing costs many people think. A lot of manufacturing is relatively automated. What distinguishes China is the low margins its companies can survive on," he said.
"China can make an iPhone for $200 and sell it to Apple for $220, whereas a European maker, for example, would sell it for $360. The availability of cheap loans and tax holidays means it can survive on these lower margins."
Dr Stephen Dyer, principal in management consultants AT Kearney's Shanghai office, said it was too easy to see manufacturing being about labor rates.
He pointed to a project his firm undertook for a US furniture maker. It showed wage rates in China were 17 times less than at its factory in America. When higher US labor productivity was taken into account, the difference in labor cost was just five times. The labor content of any finished item of furniture was between 5 to 10 per cent.
"An increase in labor rates in this case would only have a small impact on margins," he said.
"You cannot disregard it, however. The automotive industry survives on 2.5 per cent margins and any increase in cost could make a sizeable dent on these."
Dr Stefan Halper, a senior research fellow at Magdalene College, Cambridge, and author of the recent book 'Beijing Consensus' about China's future economic outlook, said recent events put China's manufacturers at some form of crossroads.
"China is desperately trying to hang on to its export market. It really doesn't want to give up its advantages which it has carved out of granite," he said.
He said attempts to cling on to its manufacturing prowess by making some of its goods offshore in Southeast Asia and then re-exporting them from China carried risks.
"They are going to find themselves in the same situation as American manufacturers, which will add a new interesting dimension to the globalization process. They will not win friends in the countries they site their new factories if they also export the worst conditions of China factories," he added.
Dr Dyer at A T Kearney said this constant seeking of some form of labor arbitrage would not work for China or any other country in the long term.
"This idea that Vietnam is the next Shangri-La and that we can keep on moving production to the lowest cost place is not really the future of manufacturing. In theory there will be eventually nowhere lower cost to move and costs will be equal everywhere, although I doubt that will be the case in reality," he said.
He predicts manufacturing would take place in future in the markets where the goods were intended to be sold.
"In the automotive industry product development is the most important part of the process. All the components can be manufactured and assembled in the relevant markets. There would be differences in the way this was done between India and China, for example, and cost differences, but it wouldn't be about chasing labor rates," he added.
That is for the future. Thun at the University of Oxford said it was not inconceivable in the medium term that low-cost manufacturing in China would continue to move further inland.
"It is said that by doing this you are moving further away from transport links and supply networks. It happened in the 1980s in Shanghai as a lot of development quickly pushed out to Zhejiang. It will be an incremental process. It may not go as far as the deepest western provinces but it inevitably pushes back from the coastal areas," he said.
It is in these coastal areas such as Guangdong where Chinese manufacturing is facing its biggest test, perhaps since reform and opening up began in the late 1970s.
Pinto, the manufacturing futurologist, said China was not about to lose its crown as the world's workshop overnight.
"China has really learnt how to ramp up manufacturing. It can provide quantity and quality at speed and this gives it real advantages over many other countries. It is not going to lose that any time soon," he said.
BEIJING - How long will companies be able to afford to manufacture in China? That such a question can be asked would have seemed absurd until very recently.
For the past decade and more, China has been the manufacturing workshop of the world.
Last year, according to IHS Global Insight, the leading financial research company, China exported some $1.7 trillion of goods, 80 percent of which were manufactured in factories, and is set to end the United States 110-year reign as the world's leading manufacturer some time next year.
All has not been well in China's manufacturing heartlands in recent months, however. Foxconn, which makes iPhones and iPads for Apple at its factory in Shenzhen, increased labor rates by 70 percent recently after a spate of suicides among workers.
Strikes at Honda have also aroused concerns among foreign investors about labor unrest in China.
Manufacturing wages across China have increased by 14 per cent over the past year (see inside cover story), making the prospect of producing goods in nearby Southeast Asian countries such as Vietnam or in Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and even Africa seem a viable alternative.
Two large US companies, Ann Taylor Stores, the women's clothing retailer, and Coach, the luxury handbag maker, are poised to relocate production to countries, where labor rates are cheaper.
Mike Devine, chief financial officer of New York-headquartered Coach, which makes luxury hand bags, said at a conference recently a move was in the pipeline.
"We are looking to move production into lower-cost geographies, most notably Vietnam and India," he said.
Michael Nicholson, chief financial officer of Anne Taylor Stores, also told the Wall Street Journal recently the company was assessing the quality of production sites in other countries.
A recent survey by EEF, Britain's leading manufacturing association, said one in seven of its members were looking at shifting production back to the UK, fed up with problems in countries such as China.
"Getting goods of the right quality, issues such as time to market and rising fuel costs have been driving this trend," said Lee Hopley, EEF's chief economist.
Dr Eric Thun, lecturer in Chinese Business Studies at the University of Oxford China Center, said too much can be read into recent labor unrest.
"Strikes happen all the time. The current generation of workers have higher aspirations than perhaps their parents had," he said.
Thun also believes current labor cost pressures could be a catalyst for change in China.
"One of the problems that China historically has faced is that it has never been pushed into innovation-based activities because of this excess supply of labor," he said.
"Pushing manufacturing into high value-added activity is very much what the government wants. This kind of cost pressure stimulates upgrading."
Alistair Thornton, an analyst with IHS Global Insight, said it was difficult to interpret what was happening to China's manufacturing sector.
He said one likely explanation was that China had reached the so-called "Lewis Turning Point" (named after the British economist Arthur Lewis) at which an economy reaches a point in its development when it exhausts its supply of rural migrant workers, thus putting pressure on wages.
"Another explanation is that we are seeing the effects of the stimulus package which has created jobs in infrastructure development in western and central China, reducing the pool of labor for manufacturing. It is not likely to be one or the other but a combination of both," he said.
What the Chinese government would like to happen over the medium term would be for the coastal regions to become centers of manufacturing excellence while low-tech manufacturing moves inland.
If some Chinese or foreign companies decide to switch manufacturing to Southeast Asian countries, the economic damage need not be that great.
During this process, however, China still needs to retain a sizeable labor-intensive manufacturing sector because its unusually large population is always hungry for jobs.
Thun added China could not get into a game of chasing ever lower labor costs because this would be ultimately self-defeating.
"The only way labor costs are going to be kept low is if development doesn't succeed. Development inevitably is going to raise your costs," he added.
"It is nonetheless a dilemma for the government. From an employment perspective they still need low-end manufacturing but, on the other hand, the fact that labor costs are rising is to some extent a sign of success."
Jim Pinto, an expert in automation based in San Diego, California, who predicts future trends in manufacturing, said China's manufacturing sector was likely to prove more resilient than many realize.
"Labor is not the big element to manufacturing costs many people think. A lot of manufacturing is relatively automated. What distinguishes China is the low margins its companies can survive on," he said.
"China can make an iPhone for $200 and sell it to Apple for $220, whereas a European maker, for example, would sell it for $360. The availability of cheap loans and tax holidays means it can survive on these lower margins."
Dr Stephen Dyer, principal in management consultants AT Kearney's Shanghai office, said it was too easy to see manufacturing being about labor rates.
He pointed to a project his firm undertook for a US furniture maker. It showed wage rates in China were 17 times less than at its factory in America. When higher US labor productivity was taken into account, the difference in labor cost was just five times. The labor content of any finished item of furniture was between 5 to 10 per cent.
"An increase in labor rates in this case would only have a small impact on margins," he said.
"You cannot disregard it, however. The automotive industry survives on 2.5 per cent margins and any increase in cost could make a sizeable dent on these."
Dr Stefan Halper, a senior research fellow at Magdalene College, Cambridge, and author of the recent book 'Beijing Consensus' about China's future economic outlook, said recent events put China's manufacturers at some form of crossroads.
"China is desperately trying to hang on to its export market. It really doesn't want to give up its advantages which it has carved out of granite," he said.
He said attempts to cling on to its manufacturing prowess by making some of its goods offshore in Southeast Asia and then re-exporting them from China carried risks.
"They are going to find themselves in the same situation as American manufacturers, which will add a new interesting dimension to the globalization process. They will not win friends in the countries they site their new factories if they also export the worst conditions of China factories," he added.
Dr Dyer at A T Kearney said this constant seeking of some form of labor arbitrage would not work for China or any other country in the long term.
"This idea that Vietnam is the next Shangri-La and that we can keep on moving production to the lowest cost place is not really the future of manufacturing. In theory there will be eventually nowhere lower cost to move and costs will be equal everywhere, although I doubt that will be the case in reality," he said.
He predicts manufacturing would take place in future in the markets where the goods were intended to be sold.
"In the automotive industry product development is the most important part of the process. All the components can be manufactured and assembled in the relevant markets. There would be differences in the way this was done between India and China, for example, and cost differences, but it wouldn't be about chasing labor rates," he added.
That is for the future. Thun at the University of Oxford said it was not inconceivable in the medium term that low-cost manufacturing in China would continue to move further inland.
"It is said that by doing this you are moving further away from transport links and supply networks. It happened in the 1980s in Shanghai as a lot of development quickly pushed out to Zhejiang. It will be an incremental process. It may not go as far as the deepest western provinces but it inevitably pushes back from the coastal areas," he said.
It is in these coastal areas such as Guangdong where Chinese manufacturing is facing its biggest test, perhaps since reform and opening up began in the late 1970s.
Pinto, the manufacturing futurologist, said China was not about to lose its crown as the world's workshop overnight.
"China has really learnt how to ramp up manufacturing. It can provide quantity and quality at speed and this gives it real advantages over many other countries. It is not going to lose that any time soon," he said.
3 comments:
hey, what are you complaining about, here? everything we see in america are made in china anyway!
China are going to be the world most polluted nations in the world!
China need to behave or need to wal;k behind India or even Vietname! LOL!!!!!
Post a Comment