Monday, August 16, 2010

ASEAN unity ‘key to handling’ US-China rivalry in the region

Monday, August 16, 2010
Abdul Khalik
The Jakarta Post
Singapore

Apparent acrimony between the US and China emerged last month when US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stated at the ASEAN Regional Forum in Hanoi that the US was willing to mediate in territorial and maritime disputes in the South China Sea. Many Southeast Asian countries see Beijing increasingly views the contested maritime area as a Chinese lake.

Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi responded bluntly to Clinton’s remarks, saying they amounted to “an attack on China”, before reminding Southeast Asian countries that China is a big country, implying that individually they were small.
Competition between the US and China in the Southeast Asian region has been more apparent recently as the major powers tested each other — from territorial conflicts in the South China Sea and Greater Mekong areas, to lending a hand to ASEAN members to develop nuclear plans.

ASEAN officials have warned that the rivalry between the two powers could divide members of the ASEAN bloc, potentially hampering their efforts to work together as allegiances are torn in two directions.

In areas that could draw ASEAN members into open conflict, discussion with good intentions must be prioritized between members, officials said recently.

“There is no future of military solutions in each of the conflicts,” Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong told visiting ASEAN journalist in press conference last week.

The key is ASEAN’s unity. If we are not united then there is a danger of us being balkanized. We should not invite them into our own internal affairs, because it will divide us,” Singaporean Foreign Minister George Yeoh said earlier.

Yeoh cited the example of the interplay between China and India in Myanmar.

“If Myanmar was not a member of ASEAN then India and China would intervene in self-defense. It would tear Myanmar apart,” he said.

However, Yeoh urged ASEAN countries to be open and more friendly toward all major powers, quoting President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono’s submission, “A thousands friends, zero enemies”.

They have their rivalry but we should be friendly, neutral and open with them,” he said.

Apparent acrimony between the US and China emerged last month when US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stated at the ASEAN Regional Forum in Hanoi that the US was willing to mediate in territorial and maritime disputes in the South China Sea. Many Southeast Asian countries see Beijing increasingly views the contested maritime area as a Chinese lake.

Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi responded bluntly to Clinton’s remarks, saying they amounted to “an attack on China”, before reminding Southeast Asian countries that China is a big country, implying that individually they were small.

In response, Cambodia and Vietnam are following countries such as Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines in trying to forge new links with the US to counterbalance China’s rapid rise to power.

After meeting with Yudhoyono last month, US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates announced that the US would re-engage with Kopassus, Indonesian Army’s special forces unit.

In a move that will further increase regional tensions, the US is also conducting negotiations with Vietnam over a deal to allow the purchase of nuclear fuel, as well as American nuclear technology and reactors. The issue became controversial as the deal would allow Vietnam to enrich its own uranium to produce fuel for its power reactors, subject to monitoring by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Zhai Dequan, the deputy secretary of the China Arms Control & Disarmament Association, said the US negotiation with Vietnam was a “double standard” in comparison to the UAE agreement. He said China was worried about the potential for Vietnam to have nuclear enrichment capabilities.

The US government had also agreed to help manage and develop the Mekong river, which Washington had lost interest in soon after its defeat in the US war in Vietnam, another sign that the Obama administration is engaged in an aggressive strategy to counter Chinese influence throughout the Asian region.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

The Europe unity and ASEAN unity is different.Each of these Asian countries( the big , strong ones want to swallow the poor,the weak and the small ones.The Vietnam wants to take over Cambodia,Lao or....ect...Does China want to take over near by her country too? May be!

Anonymous said...

To reach the ASEAN unity is a very difficult task for Americans, especially for nations which have a democratic and liberal policy. How can you compromise or mix the communist, the socialist and the democratic in ASEAN nations. Also how can the Americans reach the Chinese mind who allowed the socialist Vietnam to gain back control of French-Indochina (Cambodia, Vietnam and Laos). Again, in the past 40 years, Americans have left a bitter lesson for Cambodians when they handed over the Lon Nol Regime to the Pol Pot Khmer Rouge Regime, who was a Chinese puppet in 1970. As a matter of fact, the Hun Sen Government should seek compensation from the Government of America for the damage and loss of 2 million lives from the Pol Pot Regime because Americans have agreed to leave the Indochinese in 1968, but still cheated the Lon Nol Regime to continue the unwinable the war against the communist. So Americans should remember this.

In terms of investments to promote the policy, the Chinese Government is more attractive to ASEAN countries more than Americans. There is too much red tape in the American policy, which doesn't apply to some of the ASEAN nations.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Yeoh, don't forget that superpowers are very clever. Sure you cant take advantages from them! They will use your soil for their interest.Fucking the Americans, Fucking the Chinese, Fucking the Russians, Fucking the Japanese, Fucking the Thai, Fucking the Yuon. These all nations are just the new naxis! They are trying to create a new version of colonization.

Anonymous said...

Khmers' concerns should be about if either China or the US would wholesale khmers' future to the viets' interests and ambition.

Anonymous said...

Every politicians know that there is no future with USA, I go, I shoot and I come back.
China is different, do what ever you want, if you are my friend, you are safe.
If you want to be PM all your life, be friend with China.

Anonymous said...

Yes,you got the right point 10:50AM.Khmer, Hun Sen,is communist like China too.China supported Pol Pot, now Khmer Rouge Hun Sen. That's what Hun Sen said,"he will be Khmer prime minister all the rest of his life".And I never have had seen or heard that communist country has a king;I just see only Khmer Rouge Hun Sen having a king,could you believe that.That is unbelievable in my life time.

Anonymous said...

get used to it! china is unstopable in moving into the world's second largest economy now, just after america, really! keep up with the current events, ok! don't be so biased with china and cambodia, ok!

Anonymous said...

Yes,I can see and hear pretty well about China being the world second largest economy,but China is communist country,not a free world one. China will swallow,Vietnam,Cambodia,Lao,Thai,Burma economies.Khmer should not be short sighted country.China helped Pol Pot to kill two million Khmer people.I still remembered Khmer Rouge killed my parents under China control three years and eight months.The current even,China is still china;she waits and waits,when the time comes...China never changes her mind.