Saturday, October 09, 2010

The Origins of the Khmer Republic…look back, how Sihanouk screwed up Cambodia

Thursday, October 7, 2010
By Kok Sap
Originally posted at http://khamerlogue.wordpress.com/

"Cambodia is me"
Khamerlogue finds it informative and educational to relearn and to share with readers of what and who caused Cambodia internal break up and repeated invasions then occupation from Viet of all stripes. This extract was part of the 50 page monograph written by the very official of both Sihanouk Socialistic and newly founded Republic regimes. Until present it's disturbing to listen and hear Sihanouk justifying himself, all the times, that the Republic brought war from Hanoi on home. It's Sihanouk had expelled and displaced hundred of thousand refugees from Cambodia. It's he who dared to declare "Cambodia is me." It's Sihanouk who committed treason to the highest degree in the eyes of Cambodian people. The conscionable ones would not buy Sihanouk readjusted arguments according to wind of victors.

28 November 1978 by Lt. General Sak Sutsakhan

The political leadership of the Cambodia of 1970 clearly had one foot firmly planted in the Communist camp. The policy of "double dealing" practices by Prince Sihanouk favored the Vietnamese and Khmer Communists with disastrous results for Cambodia, a fact not lost on Sihanouk who did not fail to vehemently denounce before the entire world and on many occasions the continuous infiltrations and subversion of the Communists and the peril for Cambodia which they posed.

The divorce of Cambodia from the United States of America (USA) and its subsequent marriage with the People's Republic of China (PRC) constituted before the world and within Southeast Asia a new level of Communist penetration into the Indochinese peninsula. It changed significantly the face of the war in South Viet and provoked in Cambodia's neighbors a sense of the danger of Communist expansion. Within Cambodia this marriage signified the victory of Communist factions, who began to appear little by little from their hiding, and the defeat of the pro-imperialist factions.

The trickery of the political games played by Sihanouk from 1954 to 1970 earned for him a certain standing on the international scene as "leader of his country"; but in his own country these tactics met with total defeat. What was unpardonable in Khmer religious and intellectual circles was Sihanouk's practice of abruptly changing loyalties or a policy of "consistent inconsistency" (politique de constance dans l'inconstance) an expression used by Lt. General Sisowath Sirik Matak in an open letter to his cousin, Prince Sihanouk, dated August 27, 1973.


This gap between reputations at home and abroad widened with time for the situation within Cambodia gave scarcely any reason for satisfaction. Actually, Viet Communist forces had already occupied large portions of Khmer territory in the east, southeast, and south. The Cambodian population of these regions, weary of bearing the violent persecutions and exactions of the invading forces, were forced to abandon everything and seek refuge farther in the interior, away from the Viet Communists.

A silent rage began to spread through the population as the people came to realize the political trickery of Prince Sihanouk, a trickery which led to an aggravation of the situation. That peace of which Cambodia had prided itself on being the sole beneficiary in Southeast Asia was rapidly fading. In vain, Sihanouk publicly and repeatedly denounced the exactions of the Viet Communists. Finally he announced to the nation that he would depart on January 6, 1970 for France to take the cures dictated by his physical condition, following which he would travel to the Soviet Union and the People's Republic of China to discuss economic and military aid.

In intellectual circles in Cambodia there was general agreement that the two latter visits had no other real purpose than to find some way to resolve the political difficulties caused on the one hand by the Viet Communists and by the activities of the Khmer Communists on the other, activities which were becoming more widespread all the time.Sihanouk's absence from Cambodia provided the pretext for several demonstrations. On the 8th and 9th of March 1970 there were demonstrations in the capitals of the provinces of Svay Rieng and Prey Veng.

Even in Phnom Penh there were frankly violent demonstrations organized by university students against the Embassies of North Vietnam and the PRG and supported among intellectual circles.

Mr. Cheng Heng, acting Chief of State, and General Lon Nol, Chief of Government (Prime Minister), tried in vain to make Prince Sihanouk aware of a situation which was worsening day by day in Cambodia. When the Prince refused to receive the delegation sent to brief him, Lon Nol and Cheng Heng turned to the National Assembly and the Council of the Kingdom.

The two legislative bodies assembled to consider the problem of Sihanouk's conduct and absence. They were the same two bodies which had ten years earlier, in 1960, designated the Prince as Chief of State.

On March 18, 1970, after a long and historic debate, the two bodies by unanimous vote withdrew their confidence in Prince Sihanouk and removed him from office.

The members accused him, among other things, of having authorized North Viet and South Viet Cong troops to illegally occupy Khmer territory and establish bases (sanctuaries) during the latter half of the 1960's, an occupation in flagrant violation of Khmer neutrality as provided by the Geneva Accords of 1954.

The occupation was characterized as well, as an attack on the independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity of the country.

Following action by the legislative bodies, the Prince Chief of State was tried by the High Court of Justice and condemned to death in absentia for high treason.

Two important events which followed the removal of Sihanouk deserve noting at this point. The first was the meeting on March 16, 1970 between representatives of the Cambodian Government ministry of Foreign Affairs and the General Staff of the Armed Forces) and representatives of the Embassies of North Viet and the Provisional Representative Government (of Viet Cong), a meeting which had as its purpose the securing of Communist agreement to evacuate their forces from Cambodia in accordance with the demand contained in the Cambodian government's official note of March 12, 1970.

Unfortunately, the two hour meeting at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs produced no results.

The second event was the initiative of the PRC after having broken diplomatic relations with Cambodia on May 5, 1970. Chinese Communist emissaries sent from Peking for the express purpose declared to General Lon Nol, by then head of the government, that the "matter between Sihanouk and the Khmer government was nothing more than an internal problem" and that Peking could overlook personalities' involved so long as the Cambodian side accepted the following three conditions:
  1. Permit China to continue to use Khmer territory to resupply the NVA/VC with weapons, munitions, and material so as to continue the war against South Vietnam.
  2. Authorize the NVA/VC to establish their bases in Cambodia as before.
  3. Continue to support North Viet and the Viet Cong with propaganda. This demarche by China met with total rejection on the part of the Cambodian government.
In a note dated March 25, 1970 the Khmer invited the North Viet to discuss for a second time the problem of the evacuation their forces. The meeting was set for the 27th of March. But on the 25th of March the Republic of Poland advised the Khmer officially of the departure from Phnom Penh of the Embassies of North Viet and the Viet Cong PRG, to take place on 27 March when the two groups would travel by International Control Commission aircraft to Hanoi.

Immediately after the armed aggression by North Viet Armies/Viet Cong forces, which was launched against Cambodia from their sanctuaries along the South Viet border, the Khmer Republic government made countless appeals to the United Nations (UN) Security Council for an end to that aggression.

Instead of taking action on the Cambodian request, this international organ (the UN Security Council) merely replied that in view of Cambodia's being governed by the 1954 Geneva Accords, the Khmer Republic had better apply to the co-chairmen of the 1954 Geneva Conference (Soviet Union and Great Britain).

On 31 March 1970, therefore, in a memorandum addressed to the ambassadors of the Soviet Union and Great Britain, the Cambodian government expressed its deep concern about increasingly flagrant and repeated violations of the 1954 Geneva Accords by the armed forces of the Democratic Republic of Viet (DRV) and those of the PRG of South Viet. These forces, the memorandum said, not only refused to withdraw from the Cambodian territory, they were now launching overt attacks against Khmer outposts and defense forces within the Khmer national boundaries. The Cambodian government' then demanded the re-installment of the International Control Commission on an urgent basis.

On 6 April 1970, the United Nations Secretariat announced that Secretary General U Thant had decided "to deal with the authorities who effectively controlled the situation in Cambodia"; in other words, with the Phnom Penh government and not with the former Chief of State. This first and only positive response by the UN constituted, in effect, an answer to the claims made by Prince Sihanouk who, in a message addressed to His Excellency U Thant, represented himself as the only legal holder of Cambodian authority.

In addition to the events described above, the chronology of political activities in Cambodia after March 18 can be established as "follows:

  1. March 26 and 27. Trouble provoked by the Viet Communists in Kompong Cham Province, and particularly in the provincial capital, where two deputies who tried to calm the demonstrators were knifed to death in broad daylight and in the midst of the crowd. The office of, the governor was partially burned.
  2. March 29. The North Viet and Viet Cong Embassies announced the unilateral rupture of diplomatic relations with Cambodia and their refusal to resume' discussions concerning the withdrawal of their forces.
  3. March 29 Launching of North Viet and Viet Cong aggression in several Cambodian provinces.
  4. April 11 Popular manifestation called "The March of National Concord" at the National Sports Complex in Phnom Penh as a sign of support for the government of Lon Nol; the manifestation also demanded the establishment of a Republican regime for the country.
  5. April 14. Lon Nol appealed to the countries of all world blocs to aid him in the fight against Viet Communism.
  6. April 30. American and South Viet troops launched their attacks against NVN and VC sanctuaries located along the frontier in the eastern provinces of Cambodia.
  7. May 5. The PRC broke diplomatic relations with Cambodia.
  8. May 13. Reestablishment of diplomatic relations with Siam, which had been broken in 1961.
  9. May 16 and 17. Indonesia brought ten nations together at a conference in Djakarta aimed at finding a way of restoring peace in Cambodia.
  10. May 19. Restoration of diplomatic relations with South Korea, broken since 1966.
  11. May 27. Restoration of diplomatic relations with the Republic of South Viet, broken since 1963.
  12. June 25. "General Mobilization" of Cambodia in order to deal with the invasion.
  13. June 30. Final date set for ending the cross-border operations of U.S. forces against NVA/VC sanctuaries in Cambodia.
  14. August 28. Mr. Spiro Agnew, Vice President of the U.S., made an official visit to Cambodia.
  15. September 15. Mr. Emory C. Swank, the first U.S. envoy of ambassadorial rank since resumption of diplomatic, relations in 1969, presented his credentials to Mr. Chang Heng, Chief of State. Before that date, the U.S. Mission was presided over by Charge d' Affairs Lloyd M. Rives.
  16. October 9 Proclamation of the Khmer Republic. The above chronology explains in itself the initial reaction of certain nations to the entry of Cambodia into war.

42 comments:

Anonymous said...

You don't talk about my king ok motherfucker!

Anonymous said...

My King Father share the mistakes also we must be fair that he was the one who was in charge!!!

Anonymous said...

King father & Queen Mother are both guilty by let the Viet cong used the land without the whole aggreement from the Khmer people and the top official.

He decided it himself...

he must responsible also.

Anonymous said...

i know, they didn't consult with the khmer people; they tend to make decision own their own. if they consulted with khmer people of cambodia, it could've been different. we all knew it wasn't the case then! even popular leader like sihanouk then can make mistake, too, you know! always consult with the entire nation; don't make the same ignorant mistake again. can't be mr. know-it-all!

Anonymous said...

we can say a mistake of one man caused cambodia dearly, you know!

Anonymous said...

The king is an idiot and so are the
rest of his family. countless khmer
people because of this idiot king
hamona hamoot

Anonymous said...

Not only this idiot is responsible for the death of khmer people, he manage to have a province name after him, with a title of God, Preah Sihanouk. From history, anybody that claim the title of God, does not
last long. For example, most of the earlier Roman's emperors, etc..


hamona hamoot

Khmer in PP said...

King Sihanouk is our Father, we love him dearly. His Majesty was very popular amongst those regions..

He made a big mistake by chasing the American out of South Vietnam...The King didn't know South Vietnam is Khmer land? Or is it Ho Chi minh "Ban jo" His Majesty what to do?

He could have keep American in South Viet and stop Vietcong's fire from entered Cambodia. No more story and we live happily ever after...

King Father thinks he can control vietnam and thinking vietnam will listen to him.

No Way... sure vietnam is now listening very well...

My point is: King Father did not know what is Priority!

We still love our father dont get us wrong!

PP Khmer

Anonymous said...

This short dog King he must responsible for the dead of our people. He is not good King at all he fucking useless of all Khmer King. That short dog deserve to be hang by Khmer people. And ah Kwack is next in lines.

Anonymous said...

Ce type Sihanouk, lui il est foutu et évidemment un criminel pour avoir masacré presque deux millions de Khmers. Il devrait être pendu immédiatement avant qu'il meurt.

Dîtes donc, qu'en pensez-vous?

Jean Fernandez
Bourg-la-reine, Paris

Anonymous said...

C'est la viet....! King Father!

Anonymous said...

To K I Media::

can you post the letter Lt. Sisowath Serimatak wrote to his cousin King sihanouk? We want to read if it in khmer can you all translate so all the young khmers can understand.

Please thank you...

Anonymous said...

Sihanouk's practice of abruptly changing loyalties or a policy of "consistent inconsistency" (politique de constance dans l'inconstance) an expression used by

Lt. General Sisowath Sirik Matak in an open letter to his cousin, Prince Sihanouk, dated August 27, 1973.

We would like to see this particular letter -- if you have a copy please post it we want to read.

once again thanks...

Anonymous said...

Well, thanks to Ah Our Father King Sihanouk to bring me to a very nice life in America. He is a Cambodian killer with his fucking stupid political policy. His policy killed 1.7 million Cambodians from 3/18/1970 to 4/15/1975 as a Khmer Rouge Leader.

Anonymous said...

the 1970 civil war was a set of unintended consequences of Sangkum policies of neutrality, which in Samdech N Sihanouk's own words was like navigating between Charibdis and Scylla, SEATO and the communist bloc. There's obviously a lot of hubris involved when the Head of State refused to listen to his most loyal advisers, while threatening dire consequences on those who let off steam in Phnom Penh in those days against VC/NVN. My way or else. I wonder if in his own quieter times throughout the 80's and 90's he did not felt some genuine regrets on that point. That self centeredness is so common among khmer leaders since world war 2; each one aspired to be the next Jayavarman VII. And what motivates that paranoid and desperate hold to power? the unforgiving nature of khmer civic life, the manoeuvring between competing factions and the ignominous fate of those were on the wrong side of those in power. And i don't know if SRP is above that were they to achive power. will a new breed of khmer politicians exposed to western democratic values arise with a sense of the greater public good? i doubt it. The cat.

Anonymous said...

This short fat king was born to destroy khmer.

Anonymous said...

The French colonizer knew what they were doing when they installed this Sihanuok as king of Cambodia.

Just a play boy king, and a womanizer.

Sihanuok is inept in foreign affairs and failed to understand the sign of the tumultous times(1960-1975).
Now Cambodians are still paying for his shallow politics.

Anonymous said...

Sihanuok viewed himself as the father, and owner of Cambodia and Cambodians.

He is very arrogance, and very inflated with self importance. After all the deceived Cambodians mass bow to him, loyal to him, and considered him god. So he can manipulate them any way he was fit during difficult times.

Anonymous said...

King father is a short man with an ego as high as a 10 story tall building.

No wonder he made such a blunder in world politics.

I'm glad to see his role in politics has deminished in the current era.

Anonymous said...

The king father is one of many Cambodian recent leaders who came out of the French educational system, like Pol Pot, Ieng Sary, etc.

These so-called intellectual Cambodian leaders did nothing except teared down Cambodia.

HAS ANY THING GOOD COME OUT OF FRANCE? is the question I always asked.

Hopefully we see a lesser French influence in education and French ideas in Cambodia as we moved into the 21st century.

Anonymous said...

Sihanouk thought Khmer people and Khmer country belong to him.He could kill them as much as he could.He could give country to Vietnam any time he wanted.Sihanouk was a Khmer People killer; in 1970,he brought Viet soldiers to kill Khmer people.He killed monarchy,and Khmer throne.It was his fault.

Anonymous said...

Khmer need to hang all Sihanoki family. kings didnt do shit for the country Hun Sen need to arrest all his family and hang at the Olmpic stadium. then hang himself onlu suffer himself

Anonymous said...

most of everyone here got it right...

egotistical, self-centered, he believes he was smart and able to outwitted many other world leaders...it is true, but at the expenses of Cambodia the country and a genocide....

didn't he try to say "l'etat c'ect moi?" what a narcisist!

Anonymous said...

Please note:

the war erupted in Cambodia in 1970 was not a civil war. Khmer did not fight against khmer. It was an invasion by the Vietnamese regular army, primarily the 7th and the 9th division. Sihanouk did not magically raise troops to fight on his behalf. As a 13 years old child soldier, I fought against the NVA along highway 7, from Kwet Thom to Prey Totung in Kampong Cham, until 1973, I do not see a single Khmer Rouge on front line except acted as porters for the NVA.

Khmer Republic soldier fought against one of the most modern and well equipped NVA, we fought them with Garand M1 or Enfield Rifle, a few had AK 47.

Anonymous said...

I'm felt sorry, as a teacher, by pushing my students of classe de 4eme, troisieme, seconde, to join Lon Nol's armies to fight Viet Cong, Hanoi's invaders of Cambodia.

A lot of them had died on the front lines.

Anonymous said...

The destruction of Cambodia is 100%commited by traitor named Norodom Sihanouk.

And he is alone to be responsible for 2 millions Khmers deads, and the Vietnamisation of Cambodia.

Anonymous said...

I support you 100%.It was Sihanouk who brought Vietnamese soldiers to laughter Khmer soldiers and Khmer people in 1970.At that time I was in Siemreap,I saw Viet soldiers at the Angkor Watt temple.Being a nine years old kid,I stood by Viet soldier invaders.There were no Khmer rouge fighters at that moment.

Khmer Republic, USA said...

WOW. Heartfelt stories by some of you. All of you are HERO how can we allow this Vietcong to take over our country!

""I'm felt sorry, as a teacher, by pushing my students of classe de 4eme, troisieme, seconde, to join Lon Nol's armies to fight Viet Cong, Hanoi's invaders of Cambodia."" WOW!!!

I just wanted to cry, my heart is filled with tears, this is unbelievable!!

I think those of you were old enough to see and witness those actions should tell us young ones. More details, I was only 5 years old by then, I have no clues what was happening.

I sincerely thanks to those of you very much.

my heart cries with tears...

Anonymous said...

((As a 13 years old child soldier, I fought against the NVA along highway 7, from Kwet Thom to Prey Totung in Kampong Cham, until 1973, I do not see a single Khmer Rouge on front line)) a quote from 10:27 am

___ So, you fought against the Vietcong then?....

TO all of us: Why do you think King Father believe so much in viet Cong that they will not harm his majesty in return?

By now do you all feel suspicious of his policy? What do you think he wants to achieve?

anyone has any idea?

Anonymous said...

I have watched French documentary about Sihanuok.

Sihanuok is too afraid of the Vietcong, so by allowing them safe haven inside Cambodia, the Viet promised they would not invade Cambodia. Having the Vietcong on Cambodia's eastern border angered the US, which drop tons of incendiary bombs.

Comclusion: Sihanuok acted out of fear for the Vietcong by allowing them safe sanctuary. The arrogance king adopted a policy of neutrality, but in fact sided with the VC. Had he allowed the US to deny the VC sanctuary inside Cambodia, things might have turned out different. Of course this is hindsight. Little Sihanuok was just too intimidated by the VC, and personally embraced communism ideology to the ruined of Cambodia.

Khamarak007 said...

Anonymous said...

""I have watched French documentary about Sihanuok."" A Quote from 12:39 pm.

-- it is so confusing. One of his interviews, he claimed that the reason he provided vitcong sanctuary in khmer territory because vietcong had asked 26 countries to support N.Viet to fight against S. Viet?

It is very confusing. Why is he afraid of Vietcong? We dont' have enough military to defend ourselves?

The King didn't know S. Viet is our land?

If you have more informations regarding this issues.. please feel free to email me at

khamarak007@gmail.com

I would like to compile any informations for an essay for Political Science thesis for My Master. Thanks in advance.

Anonymous said...

1:05PM,

This is 12:39pm. The book title is "A History of Cambodia" by David Chandler.

Why is Sihanuok afraid of Vietcong?
Sihanuok knew the Vietcong was a disciplined fighting force and the Khmer Republic soldiers would never stand a chance. When the Khmer soldiers tried to resist them the Vietcong "decimated" the Khmer soldiers, and overran the eastern border. The Ho Chi Min Trail cut through Cambodia's eastern border. American soldiers were not prohibited to go after Vietcong inside Cambodia. You often hear American soldier complained that they fought the war with one hand tied behind their back because of this policy.

I'm not Sihanuok's fan, but I have to give him credit for having good intention to save Cambodia. He figured America would lose the Vietnam War, and America did.

Publicly Sihanuok adopted a neutral stand on the Vietnam War, but privately he sided with the Vietcong. If you read enough, many sources will state this fact.

I found the French sources provide more details. The documentary I mentioned is mainly in French, but also in English, and Khmer. They have excellent video clips. Unfortunately I bought the low quality dvd in Phnom Penh while on vacation. I don't know where you can get in the US.

Anonymous said...

Don't extend your fool all guys. this silly king spent a huge number of Khmer lives for his power. he contacted yuon for assistance and allowed yuon to invade Cambodia taht is why Khmer Republic people rejected this sihanouk king, but he remained his revenge to the Khmer Republic regime and called for a war with the assistance of yuon and Khmer at remote area to be Khmer Rouge. THIS SILLY KING SHOULD BE HUNG.

Anonymous said...

Xam Rainxy is also taking stupid decisions like removing border posts instead of explaining peacefully the issue to the government, UN, and other associations.

THINK ABOUT IT : If Sam Rainsy is in power, it will be the next Sihanouk!

Anonymous said...

sam rainsy is showing anarchy! if he were a leader of cambodia and failed to consult with the gov't, the khmer people, the UN, etc, he sure to take cambodia back to civil war, etc. now, does cambodia need that kind of mentality or leader right now! i mean, we must exhaust all other diplomatic routes before becoming anarchic like sam rainsy. cambodia, please learn from mistake by repeating education, etc; don't let an extremist take over, not good for the country, prosperity, etc!

Anonymous said...

Siri Matak was way more a MAN than Sihanouk...

listen to the Royal Cambodian national anthem and compare it to some Khmer Republic patriotic songs:

"saom puok tevada, raksa mohaksathr yeung..." - self-centered

vs.

"beuh satrouv chhlean pean chhean chaul proumden, kampuchea raob sen proha kahpear oy ban..." - patriotic

Anonymous said...

It suppose "saom puok tevada, raksa NATION yeung " NOT THE MOTHER FUCKER Sihanouk .He's fool king....

Anonymous said...

Blame will not get Cambodia anywhere... but rather learn from our leaders' mistakes; so the same will not be repeated. NO one should vote for any leaders who make the same mistakes!!!! We must learn and move on...

CPP Idiotic Cronnies. PP said...

The lesson today is : How to get HUNXEN arrested for good.

Can you come up with that matter... the longer we keep HS the longer our pain and suffering will be.

We are his cronies is not happpy with HS involvement with Viet-Noid, He sold land to Viet-Noid for his own pocket. HS has more 300,000,000 in foreing bank, he didn't give us croines a pennies now we are fed up with him lying to us, using us for the benefit of is BOSS Hanoid gangs.

We the CPP croneis are protesting, stop HS now. HE is a liar. He is not good for Cambodia leader.

Join us CPP members and poor ass cronies want to get rid of HS for all for once.

Sincerely... CPP bad cronies & Gangsters...

Anonymous said...

Sihanouk represented Cambodians but Hun Sen owns Cambodia and Cambodians.

Anonymous said...

"saom puok nis saom puok nouss..." why don't you have a backbone?

Or, maybe it actually works because tevada Hun, tevada Jin Tao, and tevada Triet are now protecting preah mohaksathr!

Anonymous said...

Sihanouk is an idiot leadership in Cambodia. Why some Cambodian still love him so much. For the sake of Cambodia and Cambodian people you need to get rid of him.