 |
| The inquiry was ordered by International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell |
Britain freezes millions in aid to 16 countries after inquiry discovers they are actually no longer in poverty
27th February 2011
By Daniel Martin
Britain is to stop giving aid to 16 countries after a major review found they were no longer in poverty.
Countries such as Russia, China, Vietnam, Cambodia, Moldova and Serbia will be stripped of millions of pounds a year, following the inquiry ordered by International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell.
Aid to India - which can afford its own space programme - will also be frozen.
But vast amounts of extra money - 30 per cent of the entire aid budget - will be pumped into unstable terrorist hotspots such as Yemen and Somalia, in a bid to help them to crack down on citizens exporting violence.
Critics will ask whether that is a wise plan, seeing there will be no way for Britain to check whether the money being poured in is spent wisely, rather than being embezzled by corrupt officials.
Britain's aid budget is one of the few areas, that is protected from cuts, unlike defence, education and the police which are having to make deep savings.
The total amount being spent on aid will soar from £7billion to £11billion in 2015 - at the same time as front-line public services here at home are being slashed.
In an interview at the weekend, Mr Mitchell admitted that many of his constituents 'go ballistic' about the amount of British cash spent on overseas aid at a time of belt-tightening at home.
His aid review into Britain's aid spending will report later that week. Mr Mitchell said the plan was to 'buy results' rather than 'lob money at problems' - that is setting targets and stopping aid if they are not met.
And he is also likely to order the removal of funding from international organisations which have not delivered. For example, the £12million given to UN cultural body Unesco is likely to be axed.
'From now on we will only give aid where we can follow the money and ensure that the British taxpayer is getting value for money,' he said.
'Most international organisations are doing a decent job but some need to be shown the yellow card; others will frankly get the bullet. It's the mission of my department to focus ruthlessly on results, on delivering 100 pence of development value for every hard-earned pound of taxpayers' money.
'If one of my constituents is watching television and hears these [aid] announcements, particularly now, they go ballistic because they think about how the money could be spent here.
'But if you determine it by results, about how you're going to get 200,000 more children cleaner water, people are up for that.'
Mr Mitchell will also announce the first 'cash-on delivery' aid scheme in the world, with a scheme to get more Ethiopian girls into school.
'We will only release funds once firm evidence of results has been seen,' he said.
The International Development Secretary defended the huge amount spent on international aid at a time of stringency at home.
'The reason why at this time of a dreadful economic inheritance, we made it clear that we won't balance the books at the expense of the poorest people in the world is because it is morally right to do so,' he said.
'It's part of the British DNA to be there for those in desperate straits. But it's also very much in our national interest to tackle these effects of dysfunctionality and poverty, such as piracy, migration, terrorism and disease in Somalia. Tackling the causes of poverty upstream is much less expensive than sending in the troops.'
Other countries which will lose their aid money are Bosnia, Iraq and Kosovo.
Resources will be concentrated on the 27 countries that account for three-quarters of the world's maternal mortality and malaria deaths, such as Ghana and Afghanistan.
By 2014, 30 per cent of UK aid is expected to go to war-torn and unstable countries such as Somalia and Yemen. And the UN children's charity Unicef will also see its UK funding double to £40million.
But the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation, the UN Industrial Development Organisation and Unesco will all lose out.
A source at the Department for International Development said: 'It's been very hard to find out what they spend our money on.'
3 comments:
The money ends up in Hun Sen' s family any way
It is our responsibility to help the poor and needy but not until there are so many children and elderly living in poverty in our own countries. Governments throughout the world should look after their own people first. If the country is well-off and has got any spare money it should be spent at home.
The money go into Hun Sen'clan for expand theit business without pay national tax. For instance, his both studied in UK received Money from UK'education in hoping those move Cambodia into democracy was but that's only dream from UK'Govt. Those turn back to Cambodia to help his father how to oppress the democracy and max. benifit from poor people, they are not differents from Gaddifi' son from Libya. That is the fact.
Do you all want know more ....
Post a Comment