Research indicates most of the country's orphans have a living parent (Photo: Getty) |
Friday, 25 March 2011
By Robert Carmichael in Phnom Penh
The Independent
The Cambodian government has started inspecting more than 250 orphanages after it was revealed that most of the country's 12,000 orphans have at least one living parent. The government said that until the assessment is completed, it had no idea whether the children were being cared for properly.
Aid groups suspect that those running homes for children are enticing more parents to give up their children with promises of food, shelter and, crucially in Cambodia, education. In return, those running orphanages can expect larger donations from charities and Western tourists, who are encouraged to visit homes.
Richard Bridle, the country representative of the UN children's agency Unicef, said research had indicated 28 per cent of children in orphanages had lost both parents, raising the question about why thousands of others with at least one surviving parent were in institutional care. Unicef has also expressed concern at the near doubling of orphanage numbers from 153 to 269 in the last five years. Just 21 are state-run; the rest operate privately, and many of those are faith-based.
"Overseas donors are the main funders of residential care, and many residential-care centres have begun to turn to tourism to attract funders, and in doing so, are putting children at risk," Mr Bridle said.
The rate of growth in the number of Cambodia's orphanages over the past five years matches the increase in the number of tourists visiting the country during the same period. Visitors to Cambodia's three main tourist areas – Phnom Penh, the temple city of Siem Reap and the beach resort town of Sihanoukville – are regularly bombarded with offers to visit private orphanages and donate money.
Guesthouses commonly display posters asking travellers to visit particular orphanages. One poster promoting an orphanage in Phnom Penh says people can help "in many different areas", from teaching English and playing with the children to donating food, toys, educational materials and cash. Another orphanage displayed the appeal: "Children in Cambodia need your help!" Mr Bridle said even those tourists and volunteers who visited with good intentions were sustaining a system that was separating children from their families.
Although Unicef recognises orphanages had a place, institutional care should be a last resort, he said. It was far better for the children – and far cheaper – to have children looked after by a parent or in the community.
Sebastien Marot, the head of Friends International, a charity for street children, said orphanage tourism was simply a cynical marketing ploy that exploited children. "The system is very simple," he said. "You put a few poor-looking, sad-looking children in a centre and you try to attract tourists."
The money that tourists leave typically did not benefit the children, because, "otherwise you're breaking the business", he said. "So the money goes elsewhere and the children are maintained in the situation of poverty, looking poor and so you attract more tourists and make more money."
3 comments:
Alway bad news from this country Cambodia. Parent need to watch theirs kids. They why we have alot of sex predetor walking around sleeping with all this kids. This is not good for the kids without parents!
It's not always the case of orphanages getting children so that they can get funding from donors/tourists etc.
I've once heard of an incident related by an orphanage director. He said that a father came with his 5 children to the orphanage and told the director that he wanted to leave his children at the orphanage. So the director asked if there was some problem because they do not accept children who have a parent alive but the father of the children said that his wife had passed away recently and he would like to remarry again but with 5 children, it is difficult to remarry so he wanted the orphanage to take care of the children to allow him the freedom to remarry. Of course the director turned him away. But you never know if out of desperation the father would just ditch his children somewhere and leave and some orphanage take them in because someone has to care for them.
Having a parent still alive doesn't mean anything if your parent doesn't want to care for you. While I would of course prefer that a family stays together but if the parent is not the caring sort then isn't it better for the kid to be at an orphanage where there is proper care and nurturing.
AH! Kwack you stupid head!
Thing like that they call social problem and what goverment do is to work hard case by case with out interupt the whole system!
You motherfucker take care of social proble just like the fucking communist!
Your PhD from Hanoi is stupid ah Kwack! garbage it youi son of animal!
Post a Comment