LUCIEN DE GUISE
luciendeguise@yahoo.comShare |
Cambodian tie-dyeing offers a sometimes mysterious snapshot of local life (National Museum of Cambodia) |
Sumatra has its colourful rendering of plangi (Islamic Arts Museum, Malaysia) |
The Malay peninsula tends to opt for sombre colours in plangi (Islamic Arts Museum, Malaysia) |
Green reminds the eager audience about plangi Tie-dyeing is cheap and cheerful, and there are many fine examples |
Sunday, April 03, 2011
New Straits Times (Malaysia)
TALK is cheap, as they say, but art talks go one step better thanthat: They are usually free.
This is, of course, unless they are held in countries such as Britain, where demand is so high that museums can get away with a more entrepreneurial approach.
When events are held by enterprises such as Intelligence Squared, the cost of a ticket can go up to well over RM100 when it’s held in London. Prices are more reasonable in Hong Kong, where this popular entity has now set up shop, at just RM100 a ticket. For that, you get big names such as the Swiss auctioneer Simon de Pury and Stephen Bayley, described as the “smartest man in Britain”.
And for the biggest talks and debates, it’s got to be London or New York, where you can see the likes of Arianna Huffington, away from her post. The Intelligence Squared formula has yet to reach Malaysia, which is probably a good thing as it means nobody is going to consider charging here.
An award should go to the National Textile Museum for the most valiant effort in trying to engage the public. A while ago, I wrote about a presentation there which explained the intricacies of tying a sarong. It attracted a good crowd, but perhaps not as large as the most recent occasion. This one featured the art of tie-dyeing under the microscope.
Gillian Green of Sydney University provided an overview of the “plangi” technique that was scholarly without being dry. It was made all the more exciting by including the sort of details that audiences want to know about: how to avoid being conned when buying supposedly old pieces.
As usual with any event that involves textiles, the audience was overwhelmingly female. It’s great to see such a large turnout at any art talk, but why are textile arts so much more exciting to women than they are to men?
I once had the privilege of showing a prominent collector of Southeast Asian textiles around the Islamic Arts Museum Malaysia. This Australian lawyer, with a crocodile-wrestling sort of masculinity, was almost overcome with joy on seeing a group of men crowding round the museum’s songkets. He told me that he had once been to a textile conference where he had been the only male out of a few hundred delegates.
Green was at the National Textile Museum to shed some light on the more neglected traditional fabric arts of the region. Plangi, or pelangi which means rainbow, is, as the name suggests, colourful. It should perhaps have been adopted by Malaysia as its national branding if South Africa hadn’t got there first.
It seems that even if the Tourism Ministry missed out on this opportunity, the National Textile Museum didn’t. One of its galleries is called Pelangi, but it has less to do with the technique than with what the museum calls “Malaysia’s different ethnic groups who are rich with their respective textile treasures”.
Tie-dyeing is a technique familiar to many. Cheap, cheerful and usually available near beaches or hippie communes, it has not aroused the same excitement as more regal weaving such as Malay songket and ikat or Javanese batik.
But being the fabric of less illustrious society doesn’t make it any less dazzling as a canvas for the creative craftsman or more typically craftswoman. It’s something of a folk art, and that should not be an impediment to success in an age where royal products are sometimes considered a bit stiff and fusty, in need of the Kate Middleton touch.
Whether it’s Khmer fabrics with their beguiling but rather obscure narratives, or their Malay cousins with a more geometrical approach, plangi has a spontaneity that cannot be found in more formal textiles. The Cambodian works from the early 20th Century show boats, temples and big splashes of colour that could, according to Green, represent the fireworks that are such a significant part of life there. More mundane aspects of life are also included, including a seemingly minor traffic incident between a car and trishaw.
Green explored some interesting cross-currents of influence between Mainland Southeast Asia and the islands to the south, where motor accidents were less important. The plangi technique appears not to have a long history in the Malay peninsula, at least according to British educationist R.O. Winstedt in a 1925 publication that describes in detail the skill of tie-dye preparation in Terengganu.
“Last and latest of the processes practised in the peninsula is a method introduced apparently at a recent date into Singapore by Boyanese craftsmen and thence copied by the nimble fingers of Terengganu craftsmen.”
Although the skill is waning in Malaysia, plangi cloths are still produced in Cambodia, where alarmingly convincing new versions of old cloths are being churned out. Best of all, Green allowed the audience to rummage among an assortment of these that she had brought along. This is a rare opportunity at any sort of talk, and it was a relief to see visitors doing their hands-on appraisals before getting down to the impressive spread of coffee, cakes and cookies.
The writer is curator of the Islamic Arts Museum Malaysia. You may write to him at
luciendeguise@yahoo.com.
3 comments:
Koh Tral Island must not be forgotten
By Ms. Rattana Keo
Why do Koh Tral Island, known in Vietnam as Phu Quoc, a sea and land area covering proximately over 10,000 km2 [Note: the actual land size of Koh Tral itself is 574 square kilometres (222 sq miles)] have been lost to Vietnam by whose treaty? Why don’t Cambodia government be transparent and explain to Cambodia army at front line and the whole nation about this? Why don't they include this into education system? Why?
Cambodian armies are fighting at front line for 4.6 km2 on the Thai border and what's about over 10,000km2 of Cambodia to Vietnam. Nobody dare to talk about it! Why? Cambodian armies you are decide the fate of your nation, Cambodian army as well as Cambodian people must rethink about this again and again. Is it fair?
Koh Tral Island, the sea and land area of over 10,000 square kilometres have been lost to Vietnam by the 1979 to 1985 treaties. The Cambodian army at front line as well as all Cambodian people must rethink again about these issues. Are Cambodian army fighting to protect the Cambodia Nation or protecting a very small group that own big lands, big properties or only protecting a small group but disguising as protecting the Khmer nation?
The Cambodian army at front lines suffer under rain, wind, bullets, bombs, lack of foods, lack of nutrition and their families have no health care assistance, no securities after they died but a very small group eat well, sleep well, sleep in first class hotel with air conditioning system with message from young girls, have first class medical care from oversea medical treatments, they are billionaires, millionaires who sell out the country to be rich and make the Cambodian people suffer everyday.
Who signed the treaty 1979-1985 that resulted in the loss over 10,000 km2 of Cambodia??? Why they are not being transparent and brave enough to inform all Cambodians and Cambodian army at front line about these issues? Why don't they include Koh Tral (Koh Tral size is bigger than the whole Phom Phen and bigger than Singapore [Note: Singapore's present land size is 704 km2 (271.8 sq mi)]) with heap of great natural resources, in the Cambodian education system?
Look at Hun Sen's families, relatives and friends- they are billionaires, millionaires. Where did they get the money from when we all just got out of war with empty hands [in 1979]? Hun Sen always say in his speeches that Cambodia had just risen up from the ashes of war, just got up from Year Zero with empty hands and how come they are billionaires, millionaires but 90% of innocent Cambodian people are so poor and struggling with their livelihood every day?
Smart Khmer girl Ms. Rattana Keo,
Khmer’s Actuary Financial and economic investigation found that Dr. Hun Sen and his families’ money is not less than US$ 100 billion in all around the world including banks deposited, investments and properties around the world.
All relatives of Dr. Hun Sen ( above 380 families of Dr. Hun Sen together ) is not less than US$ 200 Billion including all their properties and banks deposited and investments all around the world.
Plus the secret money such as drugs dealer, Gold, Silver, diamonds, forest trees cut down, Angkor watt and over 1000 Khmer ancient temples tourist income, oil in the year 2012...During Dr. Hun Sen’s regime, his economic miss calculation and management make Cambodia loss revenue not less that US$ 1 600 Billion to Thailand and mostly Vietnam.
Plus foreign aid Japan alone donates US$ 150 Billion so far. Where is the money? Interesting isn’t it?
Approximately 10 000Km2 to Vietnam (10 000Km2 of sea with full of sea foods protein, oil, minerals include Koh Trol)
65% of Cambodia forest trees have been cut down for private selling only.
Dr. Hun Sen and his families, relatives and friends are stealing from 90% Cambodian people that earn less than $2 per day. They steal 90% Cambodian people health, well being, Khmer dignity, cut down 90% Cambodian people life expectancy, foods...from 90% Cambodian people. Plus pump in more Vietnamese (approximately not less than 5 million Vietnamese in Cambodia) into Cambodia to make 90% of Cambodian people poorer and sufferer.
By Khmer’s Actuary Economic science internal revenue investigation,
I definitely agree with 4:22 PM and 4:31 PM. I think the world is watching the crooks in Cambodia.
Why the crooks are so rich today? Why the people of Cambodia are still living under the poverty, making less than $2 a day?
This is ridiculous that the leaders of Cambodia have robbed a lot of money from the international donors and from selling the natural resources and land and islands of Cambodia, forest, oil and gas, etc
Those crooks are:
1. Hun Sen, His Yuon wife Bun Ranny
2. Hor Nam Bong (Yuon)
3. Sok An (Yuon CPP)
4. Chea Sim
5. Heng Samrin
6. Sok Kong
7. Harnoi Communist leaders(Hun Sen's Masters)
More names of the crooks in Cambodia
Post a Comment