Monday, May 09, 2011

Elections Loom for Tense Thailand

Thailand's Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva speaks to reporters after a news conference at the 18th ASEAN Summit in Jakarta May 8, 2011. (Photo: Reuters)

Monday, May 9, 2011
By SIMON ROUGHNEEN
The Irrawaddy

BANGKOK - Thai Prime Minster Abhisit Vejajjiva is scheduled to announce details of Thailand's parliamentary elections this evening, with a July 3 date as voting day, after Thailand's King Bhumibol Adulyadej endorsed the dissolution of parliament earlier today. The elections do not have to be held until the end of 2011, while an offer was made a year ago by Abhisit to hold a vote in October 2010. Early or late, Thailand's parliamentary elections could offer a way out of the country's five-year old cycle of protests and violence, or they could open a new chapter of division.

Last week, Human Rights Watch (HRW) published a report on Thailand's 2010 protests, which resulted in 91 people being killed, most of them civilians. HRW cited the Thai government and Thai Army for inappropriate and excessive use of force in the report, while dismissing the Redshirt protesters' claims that their demonstration was peaceful and saying that armed “Blackshirt” paramilitaries instigated street fighting on April 10 2010 as the Thai Army sought to remove protesters from the streets around Bangkok's Democracy Monument.


“There are so many people in denial on both sides” said Brad Adams, the Executive Director for HRW Asia, speaking at the report launch in Bangkok on May 3. Urging transparent investigations into all of the killings during the protests, Adams refuted claims “that Thais want to forget and put the past behind them,” saying that “people in Thailand want justice like anyone else.”

It is possible that Abhisit and his Democrat Party want an election win to offset the main criticisms made by opposition politicians in the Peua Thai party, as well as claims made by protest leaders during the March-May 2010 Redshirt demonstration in Bangkok. They say that Abhisit's government came to power after legal sleight-of-hand and behind-the-scenes dealings saw the banning of Redshirt-aligned MPs and the defection of coalition partners, enabling the Democrats to form a coalition government in late 2008.

Redshirt backer and former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra was ousted in a coup in September 2006, and despite some attempts by opposition parliamentarians and Redshirts to put clear water between themselves and Thaksin, his youngest sister Yingluck Shinawatra looks to be the opposition figurehead going into the poll, and messages from Thaksin are appearing on opposition posters and advertisements.

The pre-election period has been overshadowed by concerns about freedom of speech, with 13 Redshirt-aligned radio stations closed down recently, apparently for broadcasting a speech that allegedly insulted the Thai monarchy, a criminal offense under the country's legal system. The Thai Army has taken on a more assertive public stance in recent weeks, warning politicians not to discuss the country's monarchy during the election campaign, just prior to getting embroiled in a second round of deadly border fighting this year with the Cambodian Army.

Less-discussed perhaps, is Thailand's seven year old insurgency in the country's “Deep South,” in the three mainly Muslim and ethnic Malay-populated provinces bordering Malaysia. Tony Davis, an analyst for security consultancy Janes, said that for most Thais the southern conflict “remains a sideshow,” despite 4,600 deaths since 2004 and the continued deployment of around 100,000 soldiers and other security personnel in the tiny region.

The anti-Thaksin, self-styled royalist Yellowshirt protesters returned to the streets of Bangkok earlier in 2011, albeit in much-reduced numbers from their late 2008 heyday, when they occupied Bangkok's Government House and later the country's main airports, prior to Abhisit becoming prime minister. Those 2008 protests were initially undertaken on the pretext that the then government was soft on territorial sovereignty after UNESCO deemed Preah Vihear—one of the temples at the center of the recent Thailand-Cambodia border fighting—to be a world heritage site.

While seen as pro-Abhisit, at least until recently, the Yellowshirts, who seek a five year appointed government and the cancellation of elections, criticized the current government's handling of the Cambodia border issue, but have not been concerned about the southern violence, despite the insurgents' sourcing of cross-border logistical and financial support from inside Malaysia.

The Yellowshirts seem unlikely to have any direct electoral impact, however, in what could be a tight contest. Puea Thai’s internal polls tell it that it could win more than 260 seats, meaning it could form a government without needing support from other parties. However, other surveys show a tighter contest, but with Puea Thai still likely to emerge as the biggest party, but short of a majority. One poll shows that one-third of voters remain undecided, however. The Democrats have not won an election since 1992, and on each of the previous four times Thailand has gone to the polls, parties headed by or linked to Thaksin have won, sometimes decisively.

Abhisit says that he hopes the election will contribute to political stability in Thailand, and boost the country's appeal as an investment destination and rising middle-income economy. Thailand's economy grew by 8 percent in 2010, despite political instability causing a downturn the country's important tourism sector, which makes up around 6 percent of GDP.

Before dissolving parliament, Abhisit secured approval for around 100 billion baht in public spending—drawing criticism from Puea Thai, which labeled the outlay as vote-buying, though Thaksin promised higher social spending if Peua Thai wins, pledging a 40 percent minimum wage increase, while Abhisit promised a 25 percent jump.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

The guy has Khmer Surin at the back left as his body guard.

Anonymous said...

ahbullshit is a slave of bumibol! apparently, ahbullshit can make up his own mind to be professional about his work, instead, he tends to follow bumibol's every dictating words, etc! talk about ahbullshit is indentured servant to bumibol, really!

Anonymous said...

maybe, khmer surin are being brainwashed by siem thugs! wawke up, khmer surin, you are khmer, not siem, ok!

Anonymous said...

Koh Tral Island must not be forgotten

By Ms. Rattana Keo

Why do Koh Tral Island, known in Vietnam as Phu Quoc, a sea and land area covering proximately over 30,000 km2 [Note: the actual land size of Koh Tral itself is 574 square kilometres (222 sq miles)] have been lost to Vietnam by whose treaty? Why don’t Cambodia government be transparent and explain to Cambodia army at front line and the whole nation about this? Why don't they include this into education system? Why?

Cambodian armies are fighting at front line for 4.6 km2 on the Thai border and what's about over 30,000km2 of Cambodia to Vietnam. Nobody dare to talk about it! Why? Cambodian armies you are decide the fate of your nation, Cambodian army as well as Cambodian people must rethink about this again and again. Is it fair?

Koh Tral Island, the sea and land area of over 30,000 square kilometres have been lost to Vietnam by the 1979 to 1985 treaties. The Cambodian army at front line as well as all Cambodian people must rethink again about these issues. Are Cambodian army fighting to protect the Cambodia Nation or protecting a very small group that own big lands, big properties or only protecting a small group but disguising as protecting the Khmer nation?

The Cambodian army at front lines suffer under rain, wind, bullets, bombs, lack of foods, lack of nutrition and their families have no health care assistance, no securities after they died but a very small group eat well, sleep well, sleep in first class hotel with air conditioning system with message from young girls, have first class medical care from oversea medical treatments, they are billionaires, millionaires who sell out the country to be rich and make the Cambodian people suffer every day.

Who signed the treaty 1979-1985 that resulted in the loss over 30,000 km2 of Cambodia??? Why they are not being transparent and brave enough to inform all Cambodians and Cambodian army at front line about these issues? Why don't they include Koh Tral (Koh Tral size is bigger than the whole Phom Phen and bigger than Singapore [Note: Singapore's present land size is 704 km2 (271.8 sq mi)]) with heap of great natural resources, in the Cambodian education system?

Look at Hun Sen's families, relatives and friends- they are billionaires, millionaires. Where did they get the money from when we all just got out of war with empty hands [in 1979]? Hun Sen always say in his speeches that Cambodia had just risen up from the ashes of war, just got up from Year Zero with empty hands and how come they are billionaires, millionaires but 90% of innocent Cambodian people are so poor and struggling with their livelihood every day?

Koh Tral was a Cambodian island, and technically and legally, remained a Cambodian island until today.

Smart Khmer girl Ms. Rattana Keo,

Anonymous said...

The new policy of Hun Sen regime today is to kill all Ex Khmer Rouge because they are the true Khmer patriot that can be harmful to Hun Sen regime as Vietnam slave.

Hun Sen regime sends all Ex Khmer rouge soldiers to frontline fighting with Thai army without enough weapons and foods. Hun Sen ordered the front line army do not fire back to Thai Army while they bomb Ex Khmer Rouge over 50 000 shells. These actions are representing very clear that Hun Sen is trying to clear or kill all Ex Khmer Rouge army by using Thai hands.

The true and real Khmer patriots are the enemy of Hun Sen regime. Vietnam is scare of Ex Khmer Rouge Soldiers as they have been defeat Vietnam army (Over 100 000 Vietnam soldiers have been killed by EX Khmer Rouge Army in Cambodia. That is lead to Vietnam withdraw out of Cambodia) before 1993.