By Supalak Ganjanakhundee
The Nation
It seems no political parties, other than Suwit Khunkitti's Social Action Party, want to follow Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva's call last week for clear positions on the conflict with Cambodia over the Hindu Khmer temple of Preah Vihear. They don't want to take the political risk of losing the battle.
Abhisit and his Democrat Party have taken a clear - but wrong - stance on the issue from the beginning.
Indeed, the party has been mistaken on the issue since it was in opposition. In 2008, it tagged along with the nationalist People's Alliance for Democracy (PAD) to exploit crude nationalism over Preah Vihear and attack the governments of Samak Sundaravej and Somchai Wongsawat.
After Samak's government supported Cambodia in listing the temple as a World Heritage Site, the Democrats and the PAD accused Samak and his foreign minister Noppadon Pattama of losing Thai territory and the chance to reclaim Preah Vihear.
Abhisit made the accusation based on a misinterpretation of the International Court of Justice (ICJ)'s 1962 ruling on the Preah Vihear case. The court ruled the temple "was situated in territory under the sovereignty of Cambodia ".
Abhisit - as he argued in Parliament during a censure motion against Noppadon in June 2008 - said the ICJ ruled only on the ruined sandstone temple, while the territory on which it stood belonged to Thailand. Thus, for Abhisit, any Cambodian activities in the area were violations of Thai sovereignty.
Abhisit's interpretation contradicted Thailand's own consistent stance since 1962, when a Thai Cabinet decision unilaterally set the boundary at Preah Vihear to comply with the ICJ ruling.
In fact, during the military-backed government under General Surayud Chulanont and later under the elected governments of Samak and Somchai, Thailand used the Cabinet-drawn line in dealing with Cambodia's proposal to list the temple.
Thailand's legal team also used it in making their argument in the recent ICJ trial, after Cambodia asked the court to clarify the 1962 judgement and to instigate provisional measures to have Thai troops withdraw from the disputed area.
Cambodia has agreed, at least for now, to use that line as the Preah Vihear boundary in its proposal for the temple's listing and management. The land that is disputed is not included in the management plan, but that did not stop Abhisit from blocking Phnom Penh's plan to run the temple as a World Heritage Site. The premier accused Cambodia of taking Thai territory as a buffer zone around Preah Vihear and asked the World Heritage Committee to suspend its management plan.
Abhisit will send Suwit, his minister of natural resources and the environment, to derail Cambodia's plans at the World Heritage Committee meeting in Paris next week.
The move cornered Cambodia and offered Phnom Penh no option but to bring the case back to the ICJ for a clarification of the scope and meaning of the 1962 judgement. The court is currently considering Cambodia's request for a ban on Thai military activities at the disputed area.
The decisions of both organisations are likely to be delivered around the same time, perhaps shortly after the Thai election.
Abhisit called for other parties to make their stances clear in order to relieve the political pressure mounting on him. In case Thailand loses the court battle, Abhisit needs someone in the same boat- as well as someone with a different stance to shift the blame to.
3 comments:
Mr Sam Rainsy, Why don't you sue PM Hun Sen as you promise to us Cambodian people and your true supporters?
Are you tried to bargain or negotiate with PM Hun Sen again like 2005 lawsuit at America??? Why?? Why??
We want to see Mr Sam Rainsy act as he said to sue PM Hun Sen in every democracy Countries court of justice around the world.
We want the results as transparency, from your progress in suing PM Hun Sen in every court of justices!!!
We are Cambodian people afraid that you are just using the lawsuit to scare PM Hun Sen than when PM Hun Sen gives you (Mr Sam Rainsy) green light. You again, hang your Lawsuit like 2005.
Mr Sam Rainsy, You must do as you said, otherwise you the same as Mr Kim Soka.
Mr Sam Rainsy, where are your law suit VS Hun SEn in America Court of justice? We want to see and hear the stories transparency because we afraid that you are just try to bargain with Hun Sen like 2005 again.
We Cambodian people as well as your supporters are waiting to see your real action in suing PM Hun Sen (In America Court of justice, all countries’ court of justice in Europe, Japan Court of justice, Australia Court of justice, New Zealand court of justice, Canada court of Justice, UN court of justice, World Human Right court of justice, NATO court of justice…) as you Mr Sam Rainsy said.
Mr Sam Rainsy must do as you said OK. Don’t you dare to bargain with PM Hun Sen like 2005 again?
May be you can’t be Prime Minister of Cambodia because of unfair election as 5-6 million Vietnamese votes for Hun Sen and Hun Sen add up his cheating skill in every election but you can be a great Khmer Hero by suing PM Hun Sen about the facts that he has done to Cambodia and Cambodian people so far.
If you Can’t be Prime Miniter due unfair election all the times but Mr Sam Rainsy, you can gives a great stain to PM Hun Sen and CPP Vietnam slave about their crimes against Cambodian people since 1970 until today.
siem is so full of shit, just ask any khmer person, really! no wonder khmer people hated them so much to want to kill them, ok!
ការច្រណែនរវាងសៀមនិងយួនមកលើកម្ពុជា
រាជាណាចក្រក្លែងក្លាយ។តាមពិតប្រទេសខ្មែរ
ខ្ទើយក្រហម៨០%ភាគរយ ក្រោមការដឹកនាំ
បក្សប្រជាជនដែលជាបក្សកម្មុយនិស្តយួន
ហាណូយ១០០%ភាគរយ។
សៀមបានដឹងយ៉ាងច្បាស់ថា ខ្មែរជារណបយួន
ដូ្ចច្នេះសៀមត្រូវតែបានអ្វីខ្លះពីយួនក្នុងដីខ្មែរឥត
ខ្លឹមសារ បានន័យថា ខ្មែរគ្រាន់ជាខេត្តមួយ
របស់យួននាអនាគតដ៏ឆាប់ខាងមុខនេះ។
សង្គ្រាមនឹងកើតមានឡើងរវាងសៀមនិងយួន
តែមុននឹងយួនស្លាប់ យួនត្រូវប្រើឬបញ្ជូនខ្មែរ
ឲ្យទៅស្លាប់មុន រួចសំឡេះខ្មែរនិងសៀម។
ខ្មែរជាវាលសមរភូមិរវាងសៀមនិងយួន។
Post a Comment