Friday, June 03, 2011

Good darning, Vietnam - Rising costs in China are sending more buyers to South-East Asia

Cheaper than China

Jun 2nd 2011
The Economist
BANGKOK

“FASHION is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months.” Oscar Wilde’s quip now sounds hopelessly out of date. Fashions change far more often than twice a year. And the rag trade is as footloose as its customers are fickle. It goes wherever clothes can be made cheaply and reliably. Until recently, that meant China. But as Chinese wages soar, buyers are looking elsewhere. South-East Asia could be the next big thing.

China still dominates the business. It supplies nearly half of the European Union’s garment imports and 41% of America’s. But more orders are shifting to lower-wage economies such as Cambodia and Vietnam, where garment factories are mushrooming. Vietnam is already the second-largest supplier of clothes to America.

The new tigers are still cubs. They often have to import fabrics from China to stitch into clothes, so their transport costs are high. For buyers in a hurry, it is hard to beat China’s mix of scale, speed and flexibility. Suppliers in South-East Asia “are all clearly behind [China],” says Pablo Isla, the chief executive of Spain’s Inditex, which owns Zara, a retailer of “fast fashion” (the rag trade’s equivalent of fast food).


One way to catch up would be to knit together textile and garment producers in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) to create a regional supply chain. Vietnam does not produce denim, but Indonesia does, and its denim can be exported tariff-free within ASEAN to sew into jeans. This sort of partnership, promoted by USAID, America’s aid agency, is attractive to fashion buyers who prefer an integrated, one-stop service. It is also a step towards the single market that ASEAN is supposed to turn into by 2015.

The idea has been knocking around for a while, but has been given a jolt by China’s rising wages. Since mid-2010 the price of American garment imports has risen by around 10%, says Peter Brown of Kurt Salmon, a consultancy, partly because of high cotton and oil prices but also because of Chinese wage inflation.

Last year Guess, an American fashion retailer, vowed to cut the share of Asian goods it sourced from China from half to one-third, within 18 months. Other global brands are following suit. “Every company is pointed down this path,” says Jeffrey Streader, a former executive at Guess.

ASEAN manufacturers are forming alliances. For example, Phongsak Assakul, who owns a textile mill in Bangkok, ships his pre-dyed fabrics by road to neighbouring Cambodia, where another factory cuts and sews them into summer blouses for Benetton, an Italian brand.

To compete with China, ASEAN needs to make it easier to move goods around. New roads and railways, plus faster customs clearance, all help. But infrastructure bottlenecks can delay shipments. This is a no-no for fast fashion. Winter frocks delivered in the spring are worthless.

China still has plenty of cheap labour in northern and inland cities, far from the overheated coastal boomtowns. But as it grows richer, wages will rise in the hinterland, too. Its factories will continue to churn out clothes, but they will increasingly shun simple items, such as polo shirts.

Even Chinese firms are starting to outsource low-end clothes manufacturing to Vietnam and Cambodia, observes Peter Hevicon, a Hong Kong-based buyer for Debenhams, a British retailer. And when wages rise in South-East Asia, the rag trade will move again.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Koh Tral Island must not be forgotten

By Ms. Rattana Keo

Why do Koh Tral Island, known in Vietnam as Phu Quoc, a sea and land area covering proximately over 30,000 km2 [Note: the actual land size of Koh Tral itself is 574 square kilometres (222 sq miles)] have been lost to Vietnam by whose treaty? Why don’t Cambodia government be transparent and explain to Cambodia army at front line and the whole nation about this? Why don't they include this into education system? Why?

Cambodian armies are fighting at front line for 4.6 km2 on the Thai border and what's about over 30,000km2 of Cambodia to Vietnam. Nobody dare to talk about it! Why? Cambodian armies you are decide the fate of your nation, Cambodian army as well as Cambodian people must rethink about this again and again. Is it fair?

Koh Tral Island, the sea and land area of over 30,000 square kilometres have been lost to Vietnam by the 1979 to 1985 treaties. The Cambodian army at front line as well as all Cambodian people must rethink again about these issues. Are Cambodian army fighting to protect the Cambodia Nation or protecting a very small group that own big lands, big properties or only protecting a small group but disguising as protecting the Khmer nation?

The Cambodian army at front lines suffer under rain, wind, bullets, bombs, lack of foods, lack of nutrition and their families have no health care assistance, no securities after they died but a very small group eat well, sleep well, sleep in first class hotel with air conditioning system with message from young girls, have first class medical care from oversea medical treatments, they are billionaires, millionaires who sell out the country to be rich and make the Cambodian people suffer everyday.

Who signed the treaty 1979-1985 that resulted in the loss over 30,000 km2 of Cambodia??? Why they are not being transparent and brave enough to inform all Cambodians and Cambodian army at front line about these issues? Why don't they include Koh Tral (Koh Tral size is bigger than the whole Phom Phen and bigger than Singapore [Note: Singapore's present land size is 704 km2 (271.8 sq mi)]) with heap of great natural resources, in the Cambodian education system?

Look at Hun Sen's families, relatives and friends- they are billionaires, millionaires. Where did they get the money from when we all just got out of war with empty hands [in 1979]? Hun Sen always say in his speeches that Cambodia had just risen up from the ashes of war, just got up from Year Zero with empty hands and how come they are billionaires, millionaires but 90% of innocent Cambodian people are so poor and struggling with their livelihood every day?

Smart Khmer girl Ms. Rattana Keo,