Saturday, November 12, 2011

Closing Order of Case 002 against Senior KR Leaders Nuon Chea, Khieu Samphan, Ieng Sary, Ieng Thirith

In light of the start of trial hearings beginning on 27 June 2011 of Case 002 against the surviving Khmer Rouge senior leaders Nuon Chea, Khieu Samphan, Ieng Sary and Ieng Thirith, KI Media is posting installations of the public document of the Closing Order of Case 002.  The Closing Order of the Co-Investigating Judges forms thebasic document from which all the parties (Co-Prosecutors, Co-Lead Lawyers for all civil parties, Defense Lawyers) will be making their arguments before the Trial Chamber judges (one Cambodian President, 2 Cambodian Judges, 2 UN judges).  Up until now, the hearings involving these four surviving senior Khmer Rouge leaders have been in the Pre-Trial Chamber over issues of pre-trial detention and jurisdictional issues.  Beginning in June 2011, the Trial Chamber will hear the substantive arguments over the criminal charges (e.g. genocide, crimes against humanity, penal code of 1956).  Available in Khmer and French. Contact the ECCC for a free copy. 

 


CLOSING ORDER
of Co-Investigating Judges You Bunleng and Marcel Lemonde
15 September 2010
S-21

Kraing Ta Chan Security Centre


Location and Establishment
489.                  Kraing Ta Chan was located in Kus Subdistrict, Tram Kok District, Takeo Province.2121 Applying the CPK's system of identifying administrative boundaries, it was located in District 105, Sector 13, Southwest Zone.2122 The former Chairman of Kus Subdistrict (and former Chairman of Kraing Ta Chan), [REDACTED], recalls that Kraing Ta Chan was originally a CPK meeting site. In mid-1973 it was converted by the Sector Committee into a detention office under the control of the District 105 committee.2123 It was operational for the duration of the CPK regime.2124 There is some discrepancy between witnesses as to the exact appearance of the site. However, they generally agree that after the district took control, it evolved into a fenced-in compound containing several wooden buildings used for prisoner incarceration, cadre accommodation, interrogation, and dining.2125
Functioning
Structure and Personnel
490.                  Witnesses and District 105 documents demonstrate that the chain of command implemented by the CPK nationwide operated in Sector 13 even prior to April 1975. The subdistricts reported to the District Committee, which reported to the Sector Committee, which in turn reported to the zone. If the tier above gave an order, ordinarily the tiers below had to obey.2126 If lower tier cadres acted contrary to orders from above or did not seek their consent to a course of action, they were arrested and killed.2127 However, it appears that in special cases a level could be circumvented. For example, if the sector sent a summons directly to the subdistrict, then the subdistrict could respond without having to go through the district.2128 Orders travelled down the ranks, from the centre to the subdistrict, through a variety of means.
491.                  Meetings were the most common method of conveying orders and receiving reports, as paper was scarce.2129 One witness who was based at the 'Southwest Zone Commerce' building in Phnom Penh recalls seeing many senior Southwest Zone leaders including the Zone Secretary, Ta Mok, and the Sector 13 Secretary, Ta Soam, attending meetings with Angkar in Phnom Penh.2130 Once every three to six months, the zone would meet with the sector committee. Following these meetings, the sector would meet with the district and subdistrict to convey the work plan and to give instructions on how the people under their authority should be controlled and educated. The situation both within and outside the country was also discussed.2131 Former District Youth Chairman, [REDACTED], remembers attending such meetings at which the Sector Secretary Ta Saom would read out documents containing instructions from 870 (a code number which [REDACTED] understood to mean the office at the Centre) including Revolutionary Youth and Revolutionary Flag. He says these meetings would take place two to three times a month, not including special circumstances when 870 would issue a circular requiring everyone to meet at the sector office. The sector invited the chairmen of the districts and subdistricts to these meetings, who would in turn disseminate instructions to their units.2132
492.                  Former Secretary of District 105, [REDACTED], recalls being present at a Sector Committee meeting at which Ta Soam reported to Ta Mok on matters relating to Kraing Ta Chan.2133 After the meeting had ended, Ta Mok and Ta Soam discussed the fate of a group of 60 people living in Tram Kok District who had been implicated in confessions. Ta Mok ordered the district secretary to monitor and examine these people.2134 [REDACTED] also recalls attending several Party anniversary meetings presided over by Ta Mok. These meetings were initially held at secret sites, but later moved to the sector headquarters. The meetings were attended by senior members of the zone to discuss politics and the revolution. Ta Mok lectured on how to recognise CIA and KGB agents and their activities. [REDACTED] understood from Ta Mok that these enemies were to be identified and smashed.2135 [REDACTED] also remembers attending a Sector level meeting presided over by Ta Soam. He states that, in relation to politics, Ta Soam told those present to observe if there were hidden enemies burrowing from inside. He ordered them to report such cases to the upper echelon, and said that such observations could only be carried out by the cooperatives.2136
493.                  The chairman of Kraing Ta Chan would usually report and send confessions to the district committee, which would in turn send them to the sector. However, if the matter only concerned the Sector, he would report to the sector committee directly.2137 At the end of every month, the district secretary would send a written report on its activities to the sector.2138 [REDACTED] recalls, and District 105 documents from July and November 1977 show, that the Chairman of Kraing Ta Chan would also make a monthly report to the District. The report would include the total prisoner intake, numbers of prisoner deaths due to illness and executions, total population, economic expenditure, and food production.2139
494. The precise composition of each committee changed over time as individuals were relocated, arrested or passed away. However, it appears that the following individuals were secretaries of District 105 at different times: [REDACTED], [REDACTED], [REDACTED], [REDACTED], and Kit.2140 The secretaries of Sector 13 included Ta Soam and Prak.2141 The Southwest Zone Secretary was Ta Mok.2142
495. Some witnesses, including [REDACTED], describe the witness [REDACTED] as the first Chairman of Kraing Ta Chan. However, [REDACTED] denies ever formally holding this position, and states that he merely assisted at Kraing Ta Chan in his capacity as Chairman of Kus Subdistrict.2143 In any event, by April 1975 [REDACTED] had been relocated, and his deputy, [REDACTED], had become chairman with twelve soldiers working beneath him.2144 [REDACTED] was chairman at least until September 1978.2145 It appears that [REDACTED], and later, [REDACTED] reported directly to [REDACTED], who was a member of the district committee and likely tasked with district security.2146
496. It appears that senior cadres visited Kraing Ta Chan. Though some evidence suggests that Ta Mok inspected the prisoners on several occasions, former District 105 Youth Chairman, [REDACTED], [REDACTED], and [REDACTED] either dispute or do not recall this.2147 However, none of these three witnesses were present at Kraing Ta Chan during the whole of the relevant time. Further, one witness believes he saw Nuon Chea visit Kraing Ta Chan and talk to [REDACTED]. However, [REDACTED] denies this event ever took place.2148 Witnesses state that successive district chairmen including [REDACTED], Kit, and [REDACTED], would regularly visit Kraing Ta Chan.2149

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Decho Hun Sen, Mr Sam Rainsy asked you to sue him at a French court about your murders of the Khmer people. Why don't you dare to do it as you have done at the Cambodian court?

Being a strong man as well as a Prime Minister of one country, you should not be coward to face the real justice at a French court or International court. Unless, you are the real murderer in Cambodia that is the reason why you fear Mr Sam Rainsy at a real and fair justice court.

Decho Hun Sen, you rubbed the Cambodian people's well being, health care, dignity and sell Cambodia out to Vietnam in a cheap price as long as you can stay in power. Isn't that true, Samdach Decho Hun Sen?

How many Cambodian people's lives have you killed in your lifetime so far? Can you be honest to tell the truth?

As one Prime Minister of one country, you job is to bully your own people for just talking about Paris Peace agreement 1991 and about Vietnam's encroachments into Cambodia's territory. Why?

Samdach Decho Hun Sen, Why are you so scared of the truth? Why are you so scared of Mr Sam Rainsy when he asked you to sue him at a French court? You are a strong man as you claimed on the TV screen?

Samdach Decho Hun Sen, you shouldn't be scared of Mr Sam Rainsy because Mr Sam Rainsy has no weapon of mass destruction as you do. You are the murderer; you must be strong to face Mr Sam Rainsy at a French court as Mr Sam Rainsy has invited you to do so.

Samdach Decho billion dollars Hun Sen, Please face Mr Sam Rainsy as Mr Sam Rainsy has invited you through the world media. You used to win on Mr Sam Rainsy many times in a Cambodian court of justice. There is no reason why you should be worred about...if you have never killed anyone in Cambodia. Isn’t it true, Decho Sen?

The Cambodian people hope to see Samdach Decho Hun Sen has the gut as a leader or a man to sue Mr Sam Rainsy at a French court as Mr Sam Rainsy has invited Samdach Decho many times through Radio and world media.

Be a man Decho Sen! One in your life be a man Decho Sen! Be a man to face Mr Sam Rainsy at France court and international court.

We are personal bodyguards of Samdach Decho would like to see Decho Hun Sen be a man with Mr Sam Rainsy at a French Court. Otherwise, Samdach Decho is not worthy to protect because why do we have to die for protecting a traitor, a murderer, a blood sucker. Isn’t it true, Samdach Decho Hun Sen? Do you agree with that?