In light of the HISTORIC (!) start of MOST COMPLEX (sic!) trial hearings beginning on 27 June 2011 and again ANOTHER HISTORIC (!) START of this same MOST COMPLEX (sic!) on 21 Nov. 2011 of Case 002 against the surviving Khmer Rouge senior leaders Nuon Chea, Khieu Samphan, Ieng Sary and Ieng Thirith, KI Media is posting installations of the public document of the Closing Order of Case 002 (or, Indictment). The Closing Order of the Co-Investigating Judges forms the basic document from
which all the parties (co-prosecutors, lead co-lawyers
for all civil parties, defense lawyers) make their
arguments before the Trial Chamber judges (one Cambodian
President, 2 Cambodian Judges, 2 UN judges). Up
until now, the hearings involving these four surviving
senior Khmer Rouge leaders have been in the Pre-Trial
Chamber over issues of pre-trial detention and
jurisdictional issues. Beginning in June November 2011, the Trial Chamber is hearing the substantive (sic!) arguments over the criminal charges (genocide
against Buddhists, genocide against Vietnamese, genocide
against Cham Muslims, crimes against humanity at the 200
prisons, mass crimes in countless killing fields, Eastern Zone
purges, penal code of 1956, etc.) of only the Phase I Movement in April 1975.
Available in Khmer, English and French. Contact the ECCC for a free copy.
CLOSING ORDER (or, INDICTMENT)
of Co-Investigating Judges You Bunleng and Marcel Lemonde
15 September 2010
PART TWO: APPLICABLE LAW
A. GEN0CIDE
1310.
Cambodia acquired sovereign autonomy to accede
to the Genocide Convention upon joining the "French Union" in 1949.5162
The United Nations accepted Cambodia's accession and there is no record of any
legal challenge with respect to this accession. The Genocide Convention
received the twenty ratifications and accessions required for its entry into
force in 1951.5163 Thus, the crime of genocide was part of international
law applicable in Cambodia at the relevant time.5164
1311.
It should be noted that some versions of the
definition of this crime in the relevant ECCC instruments could be interpreted
as creating an open-ended list of constitutive acts of genocide.5165
In order to avoid a breach of the nullum crimen sine
lege principle, the Co- Investigating Judges will take into
consideration Article 9 of the ECCC Agreement and Article 4 of the ECCC Law
which provide that "the Extraordinary Chambers
have jurisdiction to prosecute the suspects who have committed crimes of
genocide, as defined in the 1948 Convention" and apply the
international definition of genocide.5166
1312.
In light of these considerations, genocide is
defined as the specific intent5167 to destroy,5168 in whole
or in part,5169 a national5170, ethnic,5171
racial5172 or religious group,5173 as such,5174
by means of any of the following acts: killing of members of the group;5175
causing serious bodily5176 or mental harm5177 to members
of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life5178
calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;5179
imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group5180
or forcibly transferring children from one group to another group.5181
No comments:
Post a Comment