In light of the HISTORIC (!) start of MOST COMPLEX (sic!) trial hearings beginning on 27 June 2011 and again ANOTHER HISTORIC (!) START of this same MOST COMPLEX (sic!) on 21 Nov. 2011 of Case 002 against the surviving Khmer Rouge senior leaders Nuon Chea, Khieu Samphan, Ieng Sary and Ieng Thirith, KI Media is posting installations of the public document of the Closing Order of Case 002 (or, Indictment). The Closing Order of the Co-Investigating Judges forms the basic document from
which all the parties (co-prosecutors, lead co-lawyers
for all civil parties, defense lawyers) make their
arguments before the Trial Chamber judges (one Cambodian
President, 2 Cambodian Judges, 2 UN judges). Up
until now, the hearings involving these four surviving
senior Khmer Rouge leaders have been in the Pre-Trial
Chamber over issues of pre-trial detention and
jurisdictional issues. Beginning in June November 2011, the Trial Chamber is hearing the substantive (sic!) arguments over the criminal charges (genocide
against Buddhists, genocide against Vietnamese, genocide
against Cham Muslims, crimes against humanity at the 200
prisons, mass crimes in countless killing fields, Eastern Zone
purges, penal code of 1956, etc.) of only the Phase I Movement in April 1975.
Available in Khmer, English and French. Contact the ECCC for a free copy.
CLOSING ORDER (or, INDICTMENT)
of Co-Investigating Judges You Bunleng and Marcel Lemonde
15 September 2010
PART THREE: LEGAL FINDINGS
XIII. CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
A. "CHAPEAU" ELEMENTS
B. UNDERLYING OFFENCES CONSTITUTING CRIMES AGAINST
HUMANITY
Extermination
1382.
As regards the actus reus, the perpetrators'
acts and omissions, either direct or indirect, caused the deaths of a very
large number people, including through the creation of conditions that were
calculated to bring about the destruction of part of the population. Even in
the absence of exact figures as to the number of deaths and the lack of
identification of all the victims' bodies, the evidence on the Case File is
enough to establish the deaths of tens of thousands of people.
1383. While there is no minimum threshold for the
number of victims required to establish extermination, in each of the instances
described above, taking into account the number of deaths, evidenced by
documentary records, eye-witness accounts and the discovery bywitnesses of a large number of bodies in mass
graves, in addition to the relevant evidence set out
infra, the magnitude of the acts is sufficient and they were clearly of
a collective nature.
1384.
As regards execution sites, as already noted in
the legal characterisation of murder above, the very rationale for such sites
was to assist in the mass executions.
1385.
As regards security centres and the Prey Sar worksite, in addition to individual
killings, there is sufficient evidence of executions and deaths, as a result of
torture and other acts of violence, of both a massive and collective character.
This includes documentary records establishing the deaths of more than 12,000
people at S-21 and more than 15,000 at Kraing Ta Chan.
1386.
Regarding the treatment of Vietnamese beginning
in April 1977, and that of the Chams beginning
in 1977, the execution of members of these groups increased progressively until
it reached such a scale as to qualify as extermination. The extermination of
Chams was perpetrated, notably, in the security centres of Trea Village and Wat Au
Trakuon.
1387.
Moreover, as set out in the sections characterizing "Other Inhumane
Acts" and persecution, many people died as a result of the conditions
imposed during phases 1 and 2 of the population
movement and also in security centres;
such conditions included deprival of food, accommodation, medical care and
hygiene. This was also the case at worksites,
with the added factor of hard labour.
1388.
As regards the requisite mens rea for the
crime of extermination, the perpetrators of the acts or omissions which
resulted in deaths at the sites listed above, had the intent to cause the death
of a large number of people, as did the CPK leaders.
1389.
Finally, in light of the deaths as a result of the living conditions imposed
during the population movements and in security centres and
worksites, the direct perpetrators acted with the knowledge that the
living conditions imposed would result in a large number of deaths. Despite
being informed of the number of deaths resulting from those conditions, they
still persisted in imposing them. In light of all these elements, the
Co-Investigating Judges consider that extermination has been established in
this instance.
1390.
These exterminations, committed mostly by CPK cadres, personnel, armed or
security forces, were an integral part of the means used to achieve the common
purpose of eliminating "enemies". These acts were part of the attack
against the civilian population, and this was known to the perpetrators and the Charged Persons. Their commission throughout the
country, as reported by many witnesses and civil parties on situations falling
outside the crime scenes included in the judicial investigation, demonstrates
that they were widespread and clearly indicates that they were decided upon and
coordinated by the CPK leaders within the framework of the common purpose.
1 comment:
This is Hanoi and US behind UN ECCC in Cambodia tried to shup up Nuon Chea and Khiue Samphan from speaking out.
1. Before 1975.
2. Between 1975-1979.
3. After 1979.
Do not blame Hun Sen alone for blocking Cases 003-334 if US behind UN has not been playing double game with Hanoi and Hun Sen.
Why US doing so?
Simple Anwers.
1. To cover up US war crime and crime against Cambodian hunmenity knonw as US B 52 carpet bombing between 1969-1973.
2. US Administration has owned Cambodian people a lot not Cambodian people own US administration or the other way around.
3. The worse is US direct or indirect giving green lithg to Hanoi to swallow Cambodia as they did to Lao and to exterminate Cambodian ethnic fro our homeland.
Post a Comment