The election was rigged for his pleasure |
“It is hard to conceive of how the demands for fair elections, rule of law and end of corruption could be met without a revolution”
Guardian March 2012
Four days before the presidential elections in Russia, REN
TV a pro-Kremlin television channel warned what life would be like without
Vladimir Putin. The doomsday scenario goes like this: crowds rejoice in
Moscow's Sakharov Avenue as the Duma and presidential elections are cancelled;
a provisional government is formed and to the victors go the spoils – Boris
Nemtsov takes over Gazprom, Alexei Navalny's wife the foreign trade bank.
Russia's nuclear arsenal is handed over to the US. Economic crisis soon erupts.
Thousands of companies go bust. The provisional government closes Avtovaz, the
giant motor works in Tolyatti. Riots and ethnic clashes break out in major
cities. Kaliningrad, Tatarstan, Bashkiria and Yakutia secede. The republics of
the North Caucasus set up an Islamic state. Civil war erupts. Georgia retakes
South Ossetia. Navalny flees to the US, but not without a Nobel prize for his
pains. The clip ends: "Russia without Putin? You choose."
This is the latest of many samples of the Kremlin dark arts production
team. It is crude, but is it also ineffective? Not as much as one would like to
believe. Put to one side the demonstrators who turned out in their tens of
thousands in the streets of Moscow and St Petersburg to decry the medievalism
of the political state in which they live. The rest of Russia, the majority of
its population who live in its provincial towns and villages, think and act
differently. For them vlast (power) is a low-hanging cloud about to dump 30cm
of snow on their heads. There is very little they can do about it, except hold
on to their shovels and pray for spring.
They, too, are unhappy too with Putin, after 12 years in
power, but not for the same reasons as the agitated city dwellers. They decry
Putin's economic liberalism, the way his elite uses the state's oil and gas
wealth, not to build Russian industry or agriculture, but to fund an economy
that buys its cars from South Korea and its butter from New Zealand. They want
the system to change, not a change of system. For two reasons: every change at
the top, at any level of government, entails a shift change of bureaucrats
below them. And every time that happens, the form is the same. You can do
nothing with your small business, farm, or property, unless you pay the right
people off. Why exchange the predators you know for those you don't? Second, it
is hard to overestimate the cynicism in the country after two decades of broken
promises. About the last thing Russia wants is another revolution, in which
property becomes theft, and the goodies are redistributed – all over again. And
in one sense, they are right. It is hard to conceive of how the demands of the
demonstrators could be met – fair elections, rule of law, end of corruption –
without another revolution taking place. Putin's elite is so deeply dug in to
the system they have created that they are inseparable from it. And they would
not go without a fight, because they personally have so much to lose. So the
other Russia out there in the dormant wastes of winter, a Russia that is
passive and offline, wants a chastised, humbled Putin to continue as the
guarantor of the stability they crave. They ask a simple question: "If not
Putin, who?"
Putin would win the election on the first round on Sunday
even if the elections were fair. We suspect from recent experience that they
will not be. But if they were fair, his vote in Moscow and probably St
Petersburg would fall well short of the required 50%. So a balance has to be
struck. How many ballot boxes have to be stuffed? United Russia inflated its
results in Moscow by about 11% in the December poll. If Putin has to do that
and more this time, what would be the cost? Does he go for broke and fuel the
political activism more, or does he defuse it by playing fair but risking
humiliation in his capital city? A mass demonstration has been called for
Monday. It is expected to be the largest of all so far. How Putin answers this
question will be an indication of how he intends to answer much larger
questions that await him in his third term.
2 comments:
I wish that you, School Of Vice, had as much much much in-depth insights as fas as our homeland is concerned just like this one on Putin and Russia...Russia is too too far away from our homeland...Est-ce possible?
Why Soviet Unions helped Cuba?
They lived far away from the Island
40 miles of the USA.
How come the Soviet helped Vietnam
war against US in South Vietnam?
The Soviet Unions Ghosts used long
spoons to reach these nations(Cuba
and Vietnam).
Are ah Hun Sen and the rest of his
high and low officials Khmer Rouge
and Khmer Vietminh?
Yes they were/are.
32 years in power,Khmer people knew
who was/is ah Hun Sen.They could
read his actions.
Post a Comment