By Lauren Crothers
The Cambodia Daily
Frustrated staff on the national side of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) on Tuesday demanded an explanation as to why they have not been paid since December, and threatened to stop work at the war crimes tribunal if they are not satisfied with the response.
More than half of the 300 unpaid staff, which includes Cambodian judges and prosecutors, wrote to the court’s Office of Administration and warned that they will stop work if the cash-strapped tribunal fails to pay their overdue monthly wages.
“[We] are facing a serious crisis, because [we] have not received pay since December 2012. [We] don’t know when this difficult situation will be resolved. The non-payment is badly affecting our daily lives and demoralized us to work,” court staff wrote in one of three joint letters, which were quoted on Tuesday by ECCC press officer Neth Pheaktra.
“If any news or any source cannot confirm when [we] will get paid and get paid regularly…[we] will consider finding other possibilities to survive by [our]selves, including temporarily stopping work for ECCC,” the letter adds.
A similar work stoppage was narrowly prevented last year by a last-minute pledge of funds and payment of overdue salaries to the national side of the court.
Mr. Pheaktra said that funding woes had also affected the signing of work contracts for national staff this year.
“All national staff continue to work without contract since 1st January 2013. The Administration Office cannot prolong their contracts because the national side has received no new funding pledges from donor countries for 2013 until now,” the letter says.
In late December, Cambodian staff at the tribunal were warned by Tony Kranh, acting director of the ECCC’s Office of Administration, that they would not be paid salaries after December because the court had no funds to do so.
The staff was also told that their salaries for December would be paid two weeks later than usual. Those salaries have not yet been paid because, according to Mr. Pheaktra, “technical issues” are holding up the release of $300,000 pledged to the court by the European Union.
The hybrid war crimes court is comprised of national and U.N.-appointed international staff, and recent pledges of funds from Japan ($2.5 million), the U.K. ($962,000) and New Zealand ($163,000) were all made to the international side of the tribunal.
The reluctance of international donors to fund the national side of the Khmer Rouge tribunal stems largely from long-standing issues related to corruption, including accusations of jobs-for-kickbacks among staff at the court, and allegations of political interference, said Panhavuth Long, a program officer for the Cambodian Justice Initiative, which monitors the court.
“One of the problems is about political influence and the second is corruption allegations in 2007,” Mr. Long said in reference to the kickback scheme that was exposed in February of that year.
“I think it’s also a test, because the Cambodian government is also supposed to contribute to national side. Does the Cambodian government care? They should invest in the court,” he said.
Another issue giving donors cold feet, he said, are a number of cases across the country’s judicial system that give rise to concerns that the ECCC is not leaving the positive legacy it was hoped it might.
“[U.N. Special Expert on United Nations Assistance for the Khmer Rouge Trials] David Scheffer is advocating with donors that funding will go toward strengthening the rule of law,” he said.
“But more than that, the ECCC needs to ensure donors that it is corruption free and a model for courts in Cambodia.”
The government pays for most operational costs on the court’s national side, but Cambodian staff salaries are dependent on international donor funding. Between October 2011 and February 2012, national staff also went without pay due to a funding shortage. The situation was only remedied following threats to stop work at the court.
Mr. Pheaktra said the salary protest letters were sent by the court’s management section, the Interpreter and Translation unit and the Supreme Court Chamber. More departments are expected to submit similar letters today, he said.
“The national component of the ECCC needs $9.3 million to operate in 2013 as reported by next year’s revised budget,” Mr. Pheaktra said.
“We hope that the ECCC’s key donor countries will endorse the revised budget for 2013 as soon as possible and provide funding to sustain the court’s work and avoid disrupting the current active and smooth hearing process.”
No comments:
Post a Comment