ALMSGIVING
In the passage where the New
Testament says that everyone must work, it gives a reason “in order that he may
have something to give to those in need.”
Charity—giving to the poor—is an essential part of Christian morality:
in the frightening parable of the sheep and the goats it seems to be the point
on which everything turns. Some people
nowadays say that charity ought to be unnecessary and that instead of giving to
the poor we ought to be producing a society in which there were no poor to give
to. They may be quite right in saying we
ought to produce that kind of society.
But if anyone thinks that, as a consequence, you can stop giving in the
meantime, then he has parted company with all Christian morality. I do not believe one can settle how much we
ought to give. I am afraid the only safe
rule is to give more than we can spare.
In other words, if our expenditure on comforts, luxuries, amusements,
etc., is up to the standard common among those with the same income as our own,
we are probably giving away too little.
If our charities do not at all pinch or hamper us, I should say they are
too small. There ought to be things we
should like to do and cannot do because our charitable expenditure excludes
them. I am speaking now of “charities”
in the common way. Particular cases of
distress among your own relatives, friends, neighbors, or employees, which God,
as it were forces upon your notice, may demand much more: even to the crippling
and endangering of your own position.
For many of us the great obstacle to charity lies not in our luxurious
living or desire for more money, but in our fear—fear of insecurity. This must often be recognized as a
temptation. Sometimes our pride also
hinders our charity; we are tempted to spend more than we ought on the showy
forms of generosity (tipping, hospitality) and less than we ought on those who
really need our help.
1 comment:
Theary Seng, not happy from within tries to seek happiness from outside !!!
Post a Comment