Ieng Sary, foreign minister and “Brother No. 3” in Cambodia’s Khmer Rouge regime, died on March 14th, aged 87
The Economist - Apr 6th 2013
'Despite all that, slippery as an eel, he triumphantly survived inside the regime.' |
"Life was good after the amnesty, as indeed it had always been for him before it. His Toyota Land Cruiser, with its darkened windows, was a common sight outside the capital’s best restaurants. Security guards protected his villa in an elegant part of town. He smoked the best cigars."
IT WAS, he said, the greatest revolution the world had
ever seen. It would be written in golden letters on the pages of history: how
the Cambodian people had returned to the countryside to become pure, agrarian
communists, relieved of all private property, free of all ties of family,
religion and culture, devoted only to Angkar (“the organisation”) and the
teachings of Mao and Stalin. When Ieng Sary, then deputy prime minister and
foreign minister for the Khmer Rouge regime, sent out such messages in 1975 to
thousands of Cambodian students and intellectuals living overseas, they
naturally came home—to be condemned as spies, thrown in jail, tortured and killed.
Few survived his propaganda.
There were, Ieng Sary admitted—disarming Western
listeners with his ready, radiant smile, as he savoured a sip of champagne—a
few technical hitches along the revolutionary way. For example, the regime had
to remove everyone from Cambodia’s cities, because there was not enough
transport to bring in food for them. It made more sense to take the people to
the countryside, where the food was. What he did not add was that these “new
people”, once in the fields, became slave labour, forced into punishing manual
work and so underfed that they tried to survive on grass; and that over the
four years of Khmer Rouge rule perhaps 2m Cambodians, or around a quarter of
the population, died from overwork, malnutrition and starvation, as well as
mass killings.
Life under 'Democratic Kampuchea' regime between 1975 and 1979 - image google |
If you faced Ieng Sary with this, he shrugged his
shoulders. What did he know? As the foreign minister, he had to travel all the
time. He was just a secondary figure, not privy to the policies and tactics of
Pol Pot, the regime’s “sole and supreme architect”, as he called him. For
himself, he had killed one man—no more—and done nothing wrong. He was a gentle
person, he insisted, as he sniffed delicately at the bottles of French perfume
he liked to buy on first-class international flights.
What he did not add, though most people knew it, was
that Pol Pot was his chum from the elite Lycée Sisowath in Phnom Penh and his
student buddy at the Sciences Po in Paris, later his brother-in-law when they
married girls who were sisters. Deep down, Ieng Sary thought him a simpleton.
He would bang on his door at dawn in the Latin Quarter, yelling at him to get
to his Marxist studies, long before they both began, in 1963, to stir up
revolts in the Cambodian countryside against the American-backed regime. Once
they had seized power in 1975 Ieng Sary was “Brother No. 3”, implicated with
cosy, family closeness in the torture of thousands in secret prisons and
afterwards in their murder.
As foreign minister his role was hypocritical, yet
simple. He had to present a disarming face to the world, build up visceral
hatred of neighbouring Vietnam and draw in help from China, the regime’s only
friend, in the form of money, weapons and advisers. When the Khmer Rouge
government itself was toppled by a Vietnamese invasion in 1979, he fled to
Thailand; and there found fresh clothes, new sandals and a VIP air ticket to
Beijing, all supplied by the Chinese embassy in Bangkok. His skilful contacts
with China kept the movement going for two more decades.
Sapphires in his hands
You could say he was a proper revolutionary, in drab
jacket, cap and scarf, railing against “economic saboteurs” who wasted food and
“traitors”, undoubtedly CIA or KGB agents, who smoked Western cigarettes or had
non-Cambodian blood. Yet he had been born in loathed Vietnam (his old
Vietnamese name swapped for a Cambodian nom de guerre) to a Chinese mother and
a rich father, and had become the very model of a hated French-speaking
intellectual. Despite all that, slippery as an eel, he triumphantly survived
inside the regime.
He was also increasingly rich. The peasant-poverty
enjoined by the Khmers Rouges, and practised by some, never appealed to him. In
1982 (the movement still pretending to govern Cambodia from bases on the Thai
border) he gave up the job of foreign minister to become minister of economics
and finance, which required China’s largesse of more than $1 billion to flow
through his hands. He made deals, too, with Thai sapphire-mining and logging
companies. The rough frontier town of Pailin became his bailiwick, containing
his large villa and bungalows, each with a tank parked outside, for his
supporters. In 1996, sensing change in the wind, he persuaded thousands of
Khmer Rouge troops to defect from Pol Pot, leave the jungle and claim an
amnesty from the prime minister, Hun Sen, and King Sihanouk—a man to whom he
had always bowed, while feeling nothing but contempt for him.
Life was good after the amnesty, as indeed it had
always been for him before it. His Toyota Land Cruiser, with its darkened
windows, was a common sight outside the capital’s best restaurants. Security
guards protected his villa in an elegant part of town. He smoked the best
cigars.
There was the nettlesome matter of a UN-backed
Cambodia tribunal investigating war crimes, which arrested him in 2007 and put
him on trial four years later. But it had convicted only one person, and moved
so achingly slowly that it was never going to catch him. He waited to frustrate
it with his charming, duplicitous smile. Crimes against humanity? Moi?
8 comments:
Well, at the end, money can not save his soul, is it? As God knows every move you make, might as well do good. In life, 'you can run but you can't hide really, because the truth will always be the truth'.
e.g who killed Chea Vichea, Pisit Pilika, Touch Srey Nich, Srey Moum etc (Hun Sen)...or who killed up to 3 millions innocent khmers, off course the VC and Chinese crooks involved in such war crimes against humanity by using the tichnique of 'killing two birds with one stone', but not without the helped of the supper power nations such as USSR, China and US (B52)which made it possible for its downfall.
As Khmer people did not know how create war related weapons and so, where they come from and so, there is always a blue print to define who the real perpetrators are but no need to worry, as what goes around will come around or 'karma', unless those perpetrators able to mend the relationship between the dead and the living and hopefully, their curse will be lifted.
Today, Cambodia is still being controlled by such crooks, continuing to deceiving and manipulate like always and if anyone says anything about them, gone, dead or jailed. Cambodia is not independent and they need international community's help out of such a 'bloody regime'.
Today, Cambodia is still being controlled by such crooks, continuing to deceive and manipulate like always and if anyone dares to say anything about them, gone, dead or jailed. Cambodia is not independent and they need international community to help out of such a 'bloody regime' and of missery way of life, really*.
Same bunch of shitheads are still running that country...
To Khmer Yeurng , Khmer Of Stockton and Former Khmer Rouge Soldiers ,
Please come back to defend your Great leaps and Revolutions of your Pure Khmer Rouge Regime of the Genocide.
Happy Khmer New Year
A Survivor of of our Owen Khmer Killing Fields in 1975-1979
Who gave you the fucking rights to tortured your own people? Fuck you.
I have no sympathy for this criminal person Ieng Sary. He was the one who lured khmer oversea to come back home to torture and to kill them. As long as he involved with the communist Hanoi and China , he was a traitor of a khmer nation.
Before Pol Pot was put under house arrest by Ta Mok, 1996 Pol Pot called Ieng Sary is a national traitor.
Respectfully, a few questions to my fellow khmers who, like most of our ancestors, are buddhists: if in the past 20 years Ieng Sary had only done good and redeemed himself with good deeds, earning spiritual merits - will he go to buddhist paradise? Why? why should those innocent victims accept to live with him in paradise just because he gave a few dollars from his millions to some pagodas?
Post a Comment