P’Dho, We Can
The Women of the Cambodian Spring
by Mu Sochua | The Daily Beast
During
the country’s most recent election, opposition parliamentarian Mu
Sochua saw her brave countrywomen standing up to corruption and
demanding change.
After
intense campaigning throughout Cambodia that took more than 12
months—from the mountains of Mondulkiri to the former stronghold of the
Khmer Rouge in Samlot—the 2013 general election produced the result we’d
all been aiming for: P’Dho, Chneas. Change, We Can.
Against all odds, change was delivered to the people when over 6
million voters—more than half of whom were women under 30—went to the
polls July 28, and the united opposition, the Cambodia National Rescue
Party (CNRP), won the trust of the people. We had no luxury cars. We had
no access to state media. The international community did not give us
the slightest chance, but we maintained the same strong determination
that Cambodia needed a new beginning.
Results are being contested, as the ruling party claims they won
majority of the votes. The U.N. has been called upon to observe the
investigation of electoral irregularities filed by the CNRP on behalf of
1.2 million voters who could not vote due to fraudulent voter lists.
For the past two years I uprooted from my comfortable life in the
capital city of Phnom Penh to establish my new base in Battambang in the
northwest. Our teams used traditional methods of campaigning, going
from door to door to deliver the message for p’dho that centered
around social and economic justice. Land grabs, fair wages for factory
workers, access to free health care, and education were the issues for
our campaign. The ruling party did not have a platform. The prime
minister who ruled Cambodia for 34 years asked people to pity and love
him and therefore vote for him. His sons, with their graduate degrees
from West Point, appealed for No Change.
These young women of the Cambodia Spring use social media to express their thoughts, to debate and to further defy the culture of silence.
I led our teams to small and remote villages. I
looked for the unsung stories. I learned the songs of the villagers. I
kept the issues visible at a local level. The aim was to empower the
women at the grassroots. We dropped the seeds for democracy. We built
partnership with women's groups, and we made it very clear that each
Cambodian woman and man held their destiny in their own hands with their
private vote. We gave the microphone to any woman who wanted to speak
truth. And thousands of stories were told on the opposition radio
program, Moving Forward With Women for Women.
During the 30 days that all parties were officially allowed to
campaign, I targeted small markets where every single woman in each
village gathered to sell her homegrown products and the catch of the
day.
It was important to arrive at the right moment, which was the peak
time and as early as possible. Our team was limited to five with a
loudspeaker mounted on a motorcycle, and in remote areas, the
loudspeaker was on a bicycle. The speech could not be longer than 10
minutes and right to the point. I always chose the smallest stall and
had a "conversation" with the woman who tended it. I directly asked for
the profit she made a day and how she could survive with it. Heads
turned, and it was the magic moment when it felt like the entire busy
market came to a stop to listen to our "conversation." I knew I
connected with the hundreds of female voters—voters like Reun, a
middle-aged woman who divorced her husband so she could run as a
candidate on the opposition list. A few months back, she heard me
address land issues in her commune and became convinced that she needed
to enter politics in order to bring justice to other female farmers like
herself.
Rarely voters would signal to us that they would vote for the
opposition because they knew of the presence of the secret police and
the market owner, who usually are on the side of the ruling party.
Sometimes our team was challenged by the supporters of the ruling party,
and I had to control our members from responding.
What amazed me the most were the young women in the city who defied cultural norms and values enshrined in the Chbab Srey,
or the Women's Code, that teach them to be obedient, to not speak in
public, and to return home before dust. These young women of the
Cambodia Spring use social media to express their thoughts, to debate
and to further defy the culture of silence. In youth concerts, at
rallies across the country, they took to the stage and expressed
themselves in music and in songs of hope, of courage, and of their love
for their nation. These same young women engaged in a widespread
social-media exchange in which they recorded and reported incidents of
irregularities and challenged older male candidates on issues related to
gender justice.
"They call me Ms. Facebook, and I am proud of it, because I think
time has come for Cambodian women to hold their own destiny," says LG,
my 24-year-old self-appointed assistant and leader of the youth
campaign.
The young women's defiance of culture and traditions amazed me and
brought tears to my eyes, as I could vividly see their determination to
shape the future of Cambodia. Throughout the campaign, Sipha, a
20-year-old woman, was assigned by the youth committee to be my
bodyguard. She took the task and performed it with honor by riding
behind my truck in the middle of the hot sun or in the rain. She was
given a second task on Election Day to represent the opposition at her
polling station. When the opposition No. 7 was announced as winner at
her polling station, she broke down, and we embraced, sensing that we
were, at long last, in the midst of a Cambodian Spring.
The July 28 election gives good reason to believe that our country is
ready to leave behind this period of rule by strongman. Across the
nation, women's groups are organized and politically active and are
calling out for a true embrace of democracy.
I am thankful to the women of the Cambodian Spring for my reelection
and for changing the quality of politics in Cambodia. Seven other women
in my party got their seats in Parliament. The opposition party has
never been stronger in modern Cambodian history. The Cambodian Spring
came after years of rough winter, and as Cambodian women, we cherish the
rebirth of our nation as we know we can p'dho.
Mu Sochua
is a Cambodian M.P., a human-rights advocate, an activist, and one of
Cambodia’s leading female opposition figures within the recently formed
Cambodia National Rescue Party.
4 comments:
បើឈ្នះ កុំកំសាកដូច ១៩៩៣ ។
រៀបចំរដ្ផាភិបាលមានសមត្តភាព ។
ត្រួតពិនិត្យកូនចៅឲ្យដើរតាមផ្លូវត្រង់ ។
ធ្វើអ្វីត្រូវតាមច្បាប់ ។
ស្ថាបនាប្រជាធិបតេយ្យខ្មែរ ដោយយកគតិធម៍ សេរីភាព យុតិធម៍ សច្ចធម៍ ទៀងត្រង់ សមភាព ភាតរភាព អព្យាក្រឹតភាព ជាគោល ។
បើសិនជាចាញ់សូមកុំដេក ។
ឈប់ប្រើភាសាបំបះបំបោរ ។
រៀបចំប្រមែប្រមូល ចងក្រង កូនចៅ រៀនសូត្រ ឲ្យចេះដឹង តទៅទៀត។
ណែនាំប្រជាពលរដ្ផយល់ច្បាស់អំពី ប្រជាធិបតេយ្យខ្មែរ ដោយយក គតិធម៍ សេរីភាព យុតិធម៍ សច្ចធម៍ ទៀងត្រង់ សមភាព ភាតរភាព អព្យាក្រឹតភាព ជាគោល។
នុះ ទើបប្រជាជាតិខ្មែរជាអ្នកឈ្នះ ៕
និយាយមិនបាន
សន្ទុសនៃការទាមទារកយុត្តិធ៌ម ត្រូវតែចេញជារូបរៀង ឲ្យបានច្បាស់លាស់ ដោយមិនអាចបង្អង់បានទៀតទេ!
មិនត្រូវអូសបន្លាយពេលវេលា ឲ្យម្ចាស់ឆ្នោតអស់សង្ឃឹមបានឡើយ!
វិប្បត្តិនៃការរៀបចំការបោះឆ្នោត ត្រូវតែមានតំណោះស្រាយដោយ យុត្តិធ៌ម!
ខ្មែរ ត្រូវតែរួបរួមគ្នា ហើយ ប្រកាន់ជំហរ របស់ខ្លួនឲ្យបាន! មិនត្រូវរេម្ដងទៅនេះម្ដងទៅនោះបានជាដាច់ខាត! មើលចុះ បរទេសកំពុងតែមើលមកឃើញ សម្បត្តិដ៏ស្ដុកស្ដំរបស់យើង បើយើងបែកបាក់គ្នា នុះយើងមិនអាចការពារវាបានទេ! តែក៏ត្រូវជ្រើសរើសរួបរួមជាមួយក្រុមដែលអាចផ្ដល់ផលប្រយោជន៍អោយខ្មែរដែរទើបបាន!
គ្មានអ្នកណាគេជួយយើងបាន បើយើងមិនច្បាស់លាស់ខ្លួនឯង! មិនត្រូវចាញ់ល្បិចកល់ញស់ញង់ សូមពិចារណាឲ្យបានល្អិតល្អន់ ត្រូវតែតស៊ូរ ហើយអត់ធ្មត់ បើពុំដូច្នោះទេ កូនខ្មែរមិនអាចមានអនាគតល្អបានទេ!
Mr. Sam Rainsy, and Ms. Mu Sochur, please visit the Koh Kong land grabbing victims, how are doing?
Koh Tral Island must not be forgotten
By “any patriot Khmers”
Why do Koh Tral Island, known in Vietnam as Phu Quoc, a sea and land area covering proximately over 30,000 km2 [Note: the actual land size of Koh Tral itself is 574 square kilometres (222 sq miles)] have been lost to Vietnam by whose treaty? Why don’t Cambodia government be transparent and explain to Cambodia army at front line and the whole nation about this? Why don't they include this into education system? Why?
Cambodian armies are fighting at front line for 4.6 km2 on the Thai border and what's about over 30,000km2 of Cambodia to Vietnam. Nobody dare to talk about it! Why? Cambodian armies you are decide the fate of your nation, Cambodian army as well as Cambodian people must rethink about this again and again. Is it fair?
Koh Tral Island, the sea and land area of over 30,000 square kilometres have been lost to Vietnam by the 1979 to 1985 treaties. The Cambodian army at front line as well as all Cambodian people must rethink again about these issues. Are Cambodian army fighting to protect the Cambodia Nation or protecting a very small group that own big lands, big properties or only protecting a small group but disguising as protecting the Khmer nation?
The Cambodian army at front lines suffer under rain, wind, bullets, bombs, lack of foods, lack of nutrition and their families have no health care assistance, no securities after they died but a very small group eat well, sleep well, sleep in first class hotel with air conditioning system with message from young girls, have first class medical care from oversea medical treatments, they are billionaires, millionaires who sell out the country to be rich and make the Cambodian people suffer everyday.
Who signed the treaty 1979-1985 that resulted in the loss over 30,000 km2 of Cambodia??? Why they are not being transparent and brave enough to inform all Cambodians and Cambodian army at front line about these issues? Why don't they include Koh Tral (Koh Tral size is bigger than the whole Phom Phen and bigger than Singapore [Note: Singapore's present land size is 704 km2 (271.8 sq mi)]) with heap of great natural resources, in the Cambodian education system?
Look at Hun Sen's families, relatives and friends- they are billionaires, millionaires. Where did they get the money from when we all just got out of war with empty hands [in 1979]? Hun Sen always say in his speeches that Cambodia had just risen up from the ashes of war, just got up from Year Zero with empty hands and how come they are billionaires, millionaires but 90% of innocent Cambodian people are so poor and struggling with their livelihood every day?
Post a Comment