The Diplomat
September 30, 2013
By Colin Meyn
Defying an opposition boycott, Hun Sen appears to be pushing
ahead. But options for both sides are limited.
After being sworn into office last week, Hun Sen became the
leader of a one-party Cambodian state for the second time in his life. The
first time it happened was in 1985, when Hanoi promoted him to prime minister
of what was then the socialist People’s Republic of Kampuchea, beginning the
rule of one of the world’s longest-serving leaders. It happened again in a
carefully orchestrated ceremony in Phnom Penh on September 23, presided over by
King Norodom Sihamoni, the nominal head of democratic Cambodia.
It wasn’t supposed to be this way. Less than two months ago,
the Western world was applauding Cambodia’s July 28 parliamentary elections as
a turning point for democracy in the country. The opposition Cambodia National
Rescue Party (CNRP) won a shocking 55 out of 123 seats in the National
Assembly, despite a litany of failures in the electoral process that skewed the
vote heavily in favor of Hun Sen’s Cambodian People’s Party (CPP).
E.U. High Commissioner Katherine Ashton could hardly contain
her enthusiasm in a letter to opposition leader Sam Rainsy in the days
following the ballot. “The preliminary results of the parliamentary elections
in Cambodia show remarkable gains by your party and I would like to
congratulate you on this achievement,” she wrote.
The opposition had doubled its representation in parliament,
the biggest blow to the CPP in 20 years. However, that wasn’t good enough for
the CNRP or its nearly 3 million supporters. Emboldened by their success at the
polls, Rainsy and his deputy, Kem Sokha, claimed that if not for manipulation
of voter lists and outright electoral fraud, they would have won the election
outright. Calls for an investigation
into the ballot became the opposition rallying cry.
On September 15, the day before Rainsy and Sokha sat down
for top-level talks with Hun Sen to breach the political impasse, the CNRP
began three days of mass demonstrations in the capital. More than 20,000 people
turned out each day to cheer on CNRP leaders as they took their fight to the
negotiating table. Nothing came of the talks.
The CNRP was willing to accept outright control of the
National Assembly in exchange for validating a CPP-led government, a condition
that Hun Sen told reporters days later was unacceptable as it would have
thwarted the government and made it impossible for the CPP to pass a budget
without the CNRP’s approval. So the prime minister, who was defeated in 1993
elections by the royalist Funcinpec party but never ceded control of the
government, pushed ahead with forming a new government without an opposition
party.
With the blessing of the monarch, 68 CPP lawmakers took
their oaths on September 23 and unanimously voted in Hun Sen as the head of the
new government. After 20 years of democracy, and billions of dollars spent by
the U.N. to get Cambodia back on its feet after more than a decade of civil war
following the brutal Khmer Rouge regime, Cambodia has returned to being a
one-party state.
In many ways, things are now back to normal. In the weeks
following the election, Hun Sen was eerily silent. People were left to
speculate on what was going on within his party as heavily armed troops and
armored personnel carriers inexplicably rolled into Phnom Penh. The day after
his new government was made official, the prime minister was acting like
himself again. He delivered an epic six-hour speech that was broadcast over the
radio and on nine CPP-friendly television stations. Barbed-wire barricades that
had blocked many central streets in the capital, which the government said were
necessary for security purposes as the new government was sworn in, were taken
down. As it has for the past 15 years, the opposition party could only shout
about the injustice of it all.
But Hun Sen knows this is not the old opposition. His
marathon speech laid out a broad program of reforms, many of which echoed the
populist campaign platform that proved so successful for the CNRP during
campaign season, including higher wages across the board and more transparency
and accountability in government. If Hun Sen doesn’t implement significant
reforms over the next five years, he faces two options: be crushed at the polls
in 2018 and give up power peacefully or call off democracy altogether and
become “the next Burma,” relying on Chinese largesse as he suppresses domestic
discontent.
The opposition, meanwhile, thinks it has little to gain by
joining a National Assembly controlled by the CPP. It’s most hardline
supporters won’t accept anything less than an overthrow of the current regime,
while even the most moderate CNRP supporters can agree that giving legitimacy
to Hun Sen without being guaranteed a check to his power would be a waste of
the party’s newfound popularity.
After almost 20 years fighting against the CPP, Rainsy told
The Diplomat that he has learned that serving as a parliamentary opposition to
Hun Sen, without mechanisms in place to ensure deep reforms and a balance of
power, is pointless. “If we were in a country with an actual democracy, we
would consider playing the role of the opposition. But the opposition in
Cambodia…is denied any right, any power, any status, so it is totally
ineffective. We need other forms of engagement to have checks and balance with
the ruling party to ensure change. Cambodia’s political landscape has changed
and the balance of power has changed. We have to define a totally new
strategy,” he said.
What exactly that strategy will be is difficult to say, even
for CNRP leaders. Responding to reporters at a press conference following the
CPP’s formation of its new government, Rainsy said that the CNRP would launch a
worldwide campaign to make Cambodia a pariah state, and raised the idea of
conducting nationwide labor strikes to cripple the economy, which is dominated
by CPP officials and their friends. The opposition has also promised more mass
protests in Phnom Penh and throughout the provinces. But whether or not the
opposition could rally enough support to push the Hun Sen to make the sort of
concessions that the CNRP are pushing for is yet to be seen.
Rainsy says the opposition is happy to wait out the CPP as
it struggles to achieve legitimacy after staging what he calls a
“constitutional coup.” “We have the confidence that legitimacy is on our side.
Given the level of popular support that we enjoy, there is a crisis of identity
in the ruling party. We are not going to give legitimacy to a party like the
CPP who has suffered precisely by losing legitimacy,” he said.
The Cambodian people will ultimately judge the wisdom of the
CNRP’s refusal to take their seats during this post-election dispute, but
foreign donors seem willing to maintain business as usual in Cambodia, even as
the CNRP says the CPP must change its ways. Without sweeping international
sanctions or a popular revolt, political analysts said there is no reason to
believe that Hun Sen will be pressured to commit to make any immediate
concessions to the CNRP that might jeopardize his grip on power in years to
come.
Even if major Western donors were to cut aide, the CPP could
still fall back on China, which in recent years has ramped up its cooperation
with the CPP, committing to bloated investment projects and giving the
government millions in no-strings-attached loans.
“Western governments would certainly prefer a negotiated
deal [between the CPP and CNRP] rather than a lengthy CNRP boycott that forces
them to choose whether to cut aid or not.
If the CPP is seen to be negotiating in good faith and offering
meaningful concessions and pledges, there is little likelihood that donors will
suspend aid or cooperation,” said John Ciorciari, a Southeast Asia expert at
the University of Michigan’s Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy. “If the
situation worsens and Western donors do curtail aid, the CPP has other sources
of revenue and international support to help it survive for an extended period
if it is rebuffed by the West,” he wrote in an email.
Carlyle Thayer, an emeritus professor of Southeast Asian
studies at the Australian Defence Forces Academy, said that by staying out of
parliament altogether, the CNRP would struggle to claim credit for any reforms
that are made in the next five years, adding that an extended campaign of mass
demonstrations risked pushing the ruling party to use their sizeable security
forces to protect its power.
“The CPP can definitely remain in power over the next five
years with or without the CNRP. If the CNRP abnegates its role as an opposition
party it will leave the CPP unopposed. This will be a terrible disappointment
to the CNRP’s support base,” Thayer wrote in an email. “The real concern should
be over whether or not an embattled CPP regime will revert to its default
position of authoritarian rule. If the opposition mounts a strong challenge in
terms of mass demonstrations…then Hun Sen is liable to use repressive means
justified on dubious legal grounds.”
With little hope of isolating the CPP government, the CNRP
can either attempt to conduct prolonged and widespread acts of civil
disobedience or find a way to explain to its supporters why its formidable
contingent of parliamentarians will take their seats in the National Assembly
despite having won few up-front concessions from the CPP.
“I’m not sure what the CNRP’s current strategy is, but given
that the world is seemingly willing to proceed as though the current
unconstitutional government is actually legal, this limits their options,” said
Simon Springer, a Cambodia expert and professor of geography and Southeast
Asian studies at the University of Victoria in British Columbia. “They can
either hope for mass upheaval among the populace that brings the current
government down, or they can try to make nice and get down to business within
the National Assembly by making life difficult for CPP lawmakers. The former is
a hugely risky approach, while the later requires them to swallow their pride.”
Colin Meyn is a reporter at The Cambodia Daily newspaper.
5 comments:
They will get a special gift from the western countries soon:
1) UN membership to be imposed
2) economic sanction, it means 70-80% of exported products to USA & EU market must be banned
3) marrote economy will be affected
Please enjoy it.
United States and European Union believed the election was held in Cambodia on July 28, 2013 is not free and fair, over one million names had been removed from the voter lists and about 200,000 names duplication votes
United States and European Union requested Cambodia government to create the Independent election investigations to satisfy Cambodian people.
Only two countries had sent letter to Hun Sen government to congratulating him which is Vietnam and China. The rest of the world they not recognize this election including United Nations.
To all Cambodian people keep fighting for your vote; don’t let this golden opportunity pass by. Stand up together joint with CNRP protest until your succeed.
How more longer will we let the CPP regime does whatever they like.
Who the hell is Hun Sen. Take care this guy and save million lives is the right ways to do.
The CNRP, be strong since you have the People Power in your side. Let's crush the CPP until they disappear and move Cambodia forward together. Do this once and for all.
Is it not you wish for? A One party state. School of Vice, we are Watching you closely.
Which side are you on? You have played games so well. A Yuon who pretends to be Khmer???
Before election, I predicted that CNRP will get 35 seats. Mr. Sam Rainsy himself said he expected 40. So 55 seats was considered as a success. The turning point is the time of decision to push for the win. This considered as premature policy. Vietnam planed 500 years to take over Cambodia។ខ្មែរគិតព្រួលៗ លោតតាមគេចាក់ គ្មាន ប្រាកដនិយម ជោរទឹកប្រហុក ចូលក្លេហ៊ុនសែន។
Post a Comment